a lot of them begun to resent black men and started only uplifting black women instead, they get in fights when black guys accuse them of being too mean/not feminine enough/ghetto and thats why they like white girls or something
Yeah /r/blackladies, totally your real life, because everyone knows black women are the ones being shot by the police.
Sure, a shitlord such as myself might be inclined to point out 97% of police shooting victims are male, and males from literally every other racial group, including white, are more likely to be shot by the police than black women, but who cares about facts.
well i thought that part was more about the paranoia that the mother has since even the daughter wasn't worried. if a shooting happened in your community then you might not be thinking rationally about it.
They should ban it everywhere. It's a stupid meme for stupid people. Even if a couple republicans played on the fears of white racists for votes 40 years ago it doesn't make a lot of sense to smear people in the present for it. It's like arguing that modern democrats are racist because the KKK was the militant arm of the party in the early-to-mid 20th Century.
I hope you realize that you can't really say "to this fucking day" when the quote you're tossing out is from 30 years ago and describing what was alleged to have happened 40 years ago. Get back to me when you figure out how time works.
The whole "muh southern strategy" shtick is an easily disprovable urban legend. People like you base it on a single quote. Other people make the same mistake you're making by accepting the argument that the Southern Strategy was inherently racist and confusing the Southern Strategy with the Southern Realignment. The Southern Strategy was the plan used by Nixon and some other republicans to win elections during the late 1960s. The Southern Realignment describes the political shift among southerners that saw New Deal, Blue Dog democrats slowly change party and become republicans, in a lot of cases because of the changing southern economy.
You and any else that buys into and/or spreads this silliness are trying to attribute a complex, multi-issue, decades-long, sociopolitical electoral shift to a single issue in a much briefer span of time. You ignore how most major democrat southern politicians remained democrats for several years, if not decades, after the end of the civil rights era, most until their eventual death. You ignore the bulk of southern democrats and make the case that there was some kind of flip-flop based solely on Strom Thurmond changing parties. You ignore not only those democrats who remained loyal to their party even after Civil Rights legislation passed over their objection, but also Thurmond's history within the democrat party, most notably his primary challenge against FDR during the height of FDR's popularity, and worse the party's continued support of men like Robert C. Byrd who filibustered the civil rights act but remained a member of the party in good standing until his death in 2010.
I'd like to recommend these two articles by Sean Trende on the subject:
Even worse, you're ascribing characteristics to people in the present based on people in the past that they have a very tenuous connection with if they have any connection at all. The vast majority of people who were of voting age in 1964 are either dead or senile. The generations of southerners that came after them grew up in desegregated schools and developed different values.
The 'flip-flopped ideologies'/Southern Strategy story is really just a cheap way of calling republicans racists whenever it's a convenient way to shut down conversation. It's cheap, it's silly, and any reasonable person would dismiss it out-of-hand.
The perception that the Republican Party had served as the "vehicle of white supremacy in the South", particularly during the Goldwater campaign and the presidential elections of 1968 and 1972, made it difficult for the Republican Party to win the support of black voters in the South in later years.[4] In 2005, Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman formally apologized to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), a national civil rights organization, for exploiting racial polarization to win elections and ignoring the black vote.[13][14]
Even more hilarious is you ignore the fact they're literally engaged in racial voter suppression today.
Most strikingly, the judges point to a "smoking gun" in North Carolina's justification for the law, proving discriminatory intent. The state argued in court that "counties with Sunday voting in 2014 were disproportionately black" and "disproportionately Democratic," and said it did away with Sunday voting as a result.
"Thus, in what comes as close to a smoking gun as we are likely to see in modern times, the State’s very justification for a challenged statute hinges explicitly on race — specifically its concern that African Americans, who had overwhelmingly voted for Democrats, had too much access to the franchise," the judges write in their decision.
It's really hilarious when someone continues to insist on "to this fucking day" when even the links they scrounge up are over a decade old. An apology from over a decade ago that, once again, reference the exact same 40 year old bullshit. Congratulations, you're not only capable of understanding time, you're also repetitive and boring. NC wrote a dumb law because some localities were giving one party an advantage over the other party. Instead of stopping those localities from voting on Sundays they should have made all the other localities do Sunday voting. Every state gerrymanders based on race...to give blacks more representation. The argument in the TX case is that they weren't skewing it to the advantage of blacks hard enough.
I don't bring up the southern strategy to call them racist,
Uh, yeah, you do. That's literally the only value the phrase has in 2015 unless you're in a poli-sci class discussing Nixon.
No, it's value is pointing out the republican party very clearly pandered to southern racists and they drove the party into a demographics crisis.
And yeah, calling it a dumb law when they literally argued that too many black people were voting is pretty rich dude, even more rich because I left out the rest:
In particular, the court found that North Carolina lawmakers requested data on racial differences in voting behaviors in the state. "This data showed that African Americans disproportionately lacked the most common kind of photo ID, those issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)," the judges wrote.
So the legislators made it so that the only acceptable forms of voter identification were the ones disproportionately used by white people. "With race data in hand, the legislature amended the bill to exclude many of the alternative photo IDs used by African Americans," the judges wrote. "The bill retained only the kinds of IDs that white North Carolinians were more likely to possess."
The data also showed that black voters were more likely to make use of early voting — particularly the first seven days out of North Carolina's 17-day voting period. So lawmakers eliminated these seven days of voting. "After receipt of this racial data, the General Assembly amended the bill to eliminate the first week of early voting, shortening the total early voting period from seventeen to ten days," the court found.
They literally requested racial voter data and amended the law to very clearly suppress black voters.
Well, if you want to give the republicans of 40 years ago credit for the party's current "demographic crisis," I'm sure they wouldn't mind taking credit for the party controlling congress, the presidency, the supreme court, the bulk of governor's offices, and the overwhelming majority of state legislative seats. I only hope that if I ever fuck up and create a crisis it's one just like that.
Yeah well, here's the thing, all of that control? Outside of the senate/governorships? Extreme gerrymandering. Republicans have a geographical advantage, but demographics will overtake it at some point.
The voters the GOP pandered to in order to win under Obama are not the type of voters that are reliable, they're perfectly willing to punish whichever political party they view as in control.
In the same way Bush Triggered a blue wave, Trump is going to do the exact same thing. The senate/house is decided by turnout, and while the democrats might not be able to take the senate, everything else is up for grabs, and if the blue wave comes in 2018, and it carries to local elections as well, then it'll be those same republicans gerrymandered out, and I for one won't give two shits because they didn't give two shits about suppressing voters.
Everything is cyclical. No one is saying the republicans are going to start a 1000 year empire. Bush triggered a blue wave because people were tired of war and republicans governing like democrats by spending excessively and creating new entitlements. Trump's going to have a similar effect if republicans in congress go crazy with the purse strings again. The "unreliable" voters who elected Trump are generally pleased with the progress that's been made on immigration issues but they're not happy about the Obamacare repeal fiasco.
You are very seriously underestimating how relevant presidential approval ratings are in midterm elections.
It's literally why Republicans were able to gerrymander and win a bunch of seats.
Trump is currently at around 36%, to put that into perspective, Obama dipped from like 44%, when polls showed the country preferred a Democratic Congress by about 4%, he dipped to 40% and the country then preferred a Republican congress by a few percentage points.
Midterm elections tend to be a referendum on the president, and Trump is historically unpopular.
You are very seriously underestimating how relevant presidential approval ratings are in midterm elections.
If Presidential Popularity determined midterm elections President Obama wouldn't have seen congressional losses during the two he experienced.
Midterm elections tend to be a referendum on the president, and Trump is historically unpopular.
Yes, according to the exact same people who said he was historically unpopular and could never win the election. The media fawned over President Obama and he couldn't maintain 50% popularity. Trump has been hammered like a nail every day since he won the election and still does 36%. Any republican that loses their seat next year won't lose it because of Trump. They'll lose it because they failed to keep their campaign promises.
If Presidential Popularity determined midterm elections President Obama wouldn't have seen congressional losses during the two he experienced.
What in the ever loving hell are you talking about, lol?
That's EXACTLY why he experienced losses. Do you even know anything about those midterms?
Yes, according to the exact same people who said he was historically unpopular and could never win the election.
Well now you're just making random shit up, Clinton was also historically unpopular.
The media fawned over President Obama and he couldn't maintain 50% popularity.
Uh what? Obama was a lot more popular than Trump is, the reality is the country is so polarized you'll likely never see high average approval ratings again.
Trump has been hammered like a nail every day since he won the election and still does 36%.
This is absurd, are you living in some alternate reality where Obama wasn't hammered by the right-wing hate machine for years?
Any republican that loses their seat next year won't lose it because of Trump. They'll lose it because they failed to keep their campaign promises.
That's just not how midterms work.
The president's party always loses seats, and Trump, being historically unpopular, will likely make this a lot worse.
Here's a pretty good article on democratic losses:
The Republican candidates this year tied their opponents to Obama and to his policies, and the tactic worked. Public disapproval of Obama’s presidency, which has remained high, rubbed off on Democratic candidates. In a Pew poll taken in mid-October, 32 percent of voters said that they considered their vote for Congress as a vote against Barack Obama; 20 percent thought of it as a vote for Obama. These figures are usually understated—people don’t like to say their vote for one individual is based on their feelings about another. The significance of the 12-point margin and of a third of the electorate saying that their vote was directed against the president becomes clear when one compares 2014 with 2010. In that year, 28 percent said they were voting against Obama and 26 percent for. In 1994, another big Republican midterm victory, only 21 percent of the electorate said they were voting against Clinton. The only midterm election where the vote was similarly directed against the president was 2006, when Americans cast a vote against George W. Bush. Like that election, this one was a referendum on the president.
Could Obama and the Democrats have avoided the voters’ wrath? I think there was an opportunity to do so in the fall of 2013 when many Americans blamed the Republicans for the shutdown of the government. In a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll from October 7-9, 2013, Obama’s approval rate was 47 percent and his disapproval rate 48 percent, and registered voters said by 47 to 39 percent that they would prefer that Democrats control the next Congress. By the next poll on December 13, Obama’s approval was at 43 percent and his disapproval at 54 percent and voters now preferred a Republican congress by 44 to 42 percent. A Washington Post poll registered the same trends. The bottom fell out of Obama’s approval and of Democrat prospects for November 2014 sometime in mid-October 2013. What happened during October was the administration’s failed rollout of the Affordable Care Act. That was Obama’s Katrina, and it turned out to be the Democrats’ as well. Of course, the administration subsequently repaired the program, but the political damage was lasting. It occurred at just that time when the issues of the coming election were being defined. Obama’s and the Democrats’ popularity never recovered.
Obama didn’t help matters in the year to come. While he has brought his substantial political skills to bear on his presidential campaigns, he has remained detached from the midterm elections in 2010 and 2014, insisting last month that his policies would speak for themselves. But by withdrawing from the struggle—and not attempting to frame the 2010 or 2014 elections—Obama allowed voters to blame him and the Democrats for whatever continues to ail America. And the Republicans did a good job in this election of turning the voters’ attention on Obama and away from their own lack of a program for the country.
Wow, I used to think you were shareblue, but now I realize you're just an idiot drunk on the kool aid, shareblue would never allow black crime statistics.
The combination of black and woman is becoming too much to handle for them. A recent history of slavery, combined with the tendency to continuously pat themselves on the back, makes for a devastating cocktail of complete unawareness and total insanity.
Wowowowow, look at that, police kill white people more often then asians! Dare I say it? Are police anti-white? But seriously I appreciate how much effort you put into that diagram.
I mean, you can count the number of such shootings in each case, and compare to population statistics.
Or do you require everyone to spoon-feed you? Looking at your post history, it appears you do. Holy shit do you spend a lot of time demanding "source?" for things that are blatantly obvious to anyone with more than one functioning neuron.
Here we see the typical cowardly reaction from the caucazoid sub species. The white man instinctually recognizes his inferiority yet cannot admit it, not even to himself. He knows his entire world is a lie- a world built on the stolen labor and culture of people's of color. When confronted with the reality of his position as a stunted evolutionary dead end, he sublimates the realization of his flawed demi-humanity into blind rage and hatred. He knows that the time of the great Healing is coming and that soon the world will be wiped clean of filth such as him. What you see here is the reaction of a terrified feral animal.
/u/rhombus2 Seems to be a pretty apt description of feminism tbh.
Therefore, her calculated, even cruel actions are always justified. Invincibility. The narcissistic variety of sociopath believes he is indomitable.
Also your definition (you know cause it totally looks like a legit definition) as disassociative identity disorder....or did you just go through it changing instances of female to male because the idea women can be sociopaths triggered you?
Topics are hard, hard as maintaining a gender(should be ungendered) term in your totally not made up definition. So hard you lol and shut your little mind down.
You ever read desriptions of narcissistic sociopaths? It's White American culture in a nutshell. I think some of them know it, and it's why they go so hard to dismiss psychology and sociology.
A driven quest for power. If a narcissistic sociopath cares about anything other than himself, it is destructive power and control over people. Behaviors that seek love and admiration. To be sure, this isn't needy love. It's not even emotional love. It's superficial. A narcissistic sociopath sees love and admiration as power tools to manipulate and dominate (Do Sociopaths Even Have Feelings?). No apologies, no guilt, no remorse under any circumstance. A sociopathic narcissist believes that she is a gift to the world who makes it richer and more colorful. Therefore, her calculated, even cruel actions are always justified. Invincibility. The narcissistic variety of sociopath believes he is indomitable. Even punishment and prison can't stop him. They're merely part of the game. Wholly self-serving. The needs and wants of others are insignificant and undeserving of consideration. Act as the producer, director, and only actor of his own show. The narcissistic sociopath casts people in roles that increase his power and sense of importance and when bored, casts them aside.
Imagine being u/Rhombus2 and actually being psychotically paranoid about and bigoted towards white people enough to actually believe this.
84 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-08-05
Did you know that the bathtub was first marketed in north america as a horse trough and dog scalder?
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Can I ask why black women are such activists and so loyal to the cause when black men would drop all of that for a 2/10 obese white girl?
1 SperglockHolmes 2017-08-05
Being so easily replaceable makes people obsessive.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
That is a good observation.
1 AlreadyPorchNaked 2017-08-05
See eurasiantiger and that hapa sub.
1 knottedfate 2017-08-05
a lot of them begun to resent black men and started only uplifting black women instead, they get in fights when black guys accuse them of being too mean/not feminine enough/ghetto and thats why they like white girls or something
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2017-08-05
Because they don't have dat fat white girl bussy 😂😂😂
1 DannyLee90 2017-08-05
DOES ANYONE ON THIS SUB UNDERSTAND WHAT BUSSY IS ANYMORE?
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-05
Bussy
1 giroth 2017-08-05
A butt pussy can belong to any of the genders. What year is this, 1998?
1 snappleteadrink 2017-08-05
Gussy and bussy dude, I don't make the rules I just enforce them.
1 giroth 2017-08-05
We very moved past binary genders, a glorious rainbow of genders.
1 heavenlytoaster 2017-08-05
Bussybow
1 Threadbreaker 2017-08-05
Preferably with red hair
1 EchoScorpion 2017-08-05
They'll just keep dying
1 neutralvoter 2017-08-05
why are people too dumb to instantly see when a large corporation is masturbating history for profit
1 Liturgy_Loon 2017-08-05
You need to be woke*
*unless it involves criticizing capitalism and grotesquely cynical advertising
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
This ad is pretty fucking stupid, but I fail to see how it's racist exactly.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Yeah /r/blackladies, totally your real life, because everyone knows black women are the ones being shot by the police.
Sure, a shitlord such as myself might be inclined to point out 97% of police shooting victims are male, and males from literally every other racial group, including white, are more likely to be shot by the police than black women, but who cares about facts.
1 ManuOKu 2017-08-05
i mean they're still indirectly affected if their brother, husband, or son was shot.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
That wasn't what the ad displayed, it clearly claimed that black girl was in danger of being shot by the police.
1 ManuOKu 2017-08-05
well i thought that part was more about the paranoia that the mother has since even the daughter wasn't worried. if a shooting happened in your community then you might not be thinking rationally about it.
1 LSU_Coonass 2017-08-05
so what you're saying is that they are the primary victims of this war?
1 nomad1c 2017-08-05
women are the primary victims of men being shot
1 ManuOKu 2017-08-05
this is exactly what i was saying
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
ok. so, you are capable of not being retarded. neat.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
PS: you're the retard dude. You're the extremist, you're the idiot. I'm a normal person.
You know those SJWs you attack? You're every bit as retarded as they are.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
I'm just a regular American who happens to be particularly handsome and talented.
1 Jackanova3 2017-08-05
I like your confidence, wanna hang out?
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
That depends. Do you have any cocaine.
1 Jackanova3 2017-08-05
No cocaine but I've got mdma and weed?
1 yesiamcorrect 2017-08-05
I do, now get that bussy out.
1 LSU_Coonass 2017-08-05
lol you are not a normal person
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Yeah, I am. I suggest you head back on over to /r/conservative where they ban the term "southern strategy."
It's a hugbox more your speed.
1 jubbergun 2017-08-05
They should ban it everywhere. It's a stupid meme for stupid people. Even if a couple republicans played on the fears of white racists for votes 40 years ago it doesn't make a lot of sense to smear people in the present for it. It's like arguing that modern democrats are racist because the KKK was the militant arm of the party in the early-to-mid 20th Century.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Except, you know, they still do it, to this fucking day you moron.
1 jubbergun 2017-08-05
I hope you realize that you can't really say "to this fucking day" when the quote you're tossing out is from 30 years ago and describing what was alleged to have happened 40 years ago. Get back to me when you figure out how time works.
The whole "muh southern strategy" shtick is an easily disprovable urban legend. People like you base it on a single quote. Other people make the same mistake you're making by accepting the argument that the Southern Strategy was inherently racist and confusing the Southern Strategy with the Southern Realignment. The Southern Strategy was the plan used by Nixon and some other republicans to win elections during the late 1960s. The Southern Realignment describes the political shift among southerners that saw New Deal, Blue Dog democrats slowly change party and become republicans, in a lot of cases because of the changing southern economy.
You and any else that buys into and/or spreads this silliness are trying to attribute a complex, multi-issue, decades-long, sociopolitical electoral shift to a single issue in a much briefer span of time. You ignore how most major democrat southern politicians remained democrats for several years, if not decades, after the end of the civil rights era, most until their eventual death. You ignore the bulk of southern democrats and make the case that there was some kind of flip-flop based solely on Strom Thurmond changing parties. You ignore not only those democrats who remained loyal to their party even after Civil Rights legislation passed over their objection, but also Thurmond's history within the democrat party, most notably his primary challenge against FDR during the height of FDR's popularity, and worse the party's continued support of men like Robert C. Byrd who filibustered the civil rights act but remained a member of the party in good standing until his death in 2010.
I'd like to recommend these two articles by Sean Trende on the subject:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/09/misunderstanding_the_southern_realignment_107084.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/30/southern_whites_shift_to_the_gop_predates_the_60s_118172.html
Even worse, you're ascribing characteristics to people in the present based on people in the past that they have a very tenuous connection with if they have any connection at all. The vast majority of people who were of voting age in 1964 are either dead or senile. The generations of southerners that came after them grew up in desegregated schools and developed different values.
The 'flip-flopped ideologies'/Southern Strategy story is really just a cheap way of calling republicans racists whenever it's a convenient way to shut down conversation. It's cheap, it's silly, and any reasonable person would dismiss it out-of-hand.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
It's really hilarious when morons come along and try to deny something the republican party has literally admitted to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
Even more hilarious is you ignore the fact they're literally engaged in racial voter suppression today.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/29/the-smoking-gun-proving-north-carolina-republicans-tried-to-disenfranchise-black-voters/?utm_term=.201ad9244324
Or the racial gerrymandering:
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas-legislature/2017/04/20/federal-court-rules-texas-house-map-drawn-intentionally-dilute-minority-votes
1 jubbergun 2017-08-05
It's really hilarious when someone continues to insist on "to this fucking day" when even the links they scrounge up are over a decade old. An apology from over a decade ago that, once again, reference the exact same 40 year old bullshit. Congratulations, you're not only capable of understanding time, you're also repetitive and boring. NC wrote a dumb law because some localities were giving one party an advantage over the other party. Instead of stopping those localities from voting on Sundays they should have made all the other localities do Sunday voting. Every state gerrymanders based on race...to give blacks more representation. The argument in the TX case is that they weren't skewing it to the advantage of blacks hard enough.
Uh, yeah, you do. That's literally the only value the phrase has in 2015 unless you're in a poli-sci class discussing Nixon.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
No, it's value is pointing out the republican party very clearly pandered to southern racists and they drove the party into a demographics crisis.
And yeah, calling it a dumb law when they literally argued that too many black people were voting is pretty rich dude, even more rich because I left out the rest:
They literally requested racial voter data and amended the law to very clearly suppress black voters.
1 jubbergun 2017-08-05
Well, if you want to give the republicans of 40 years ago credit for the party's current "demographic crisis," I'm sure they wouldn't mind taking credit for the party controlling congress, the presidency, the supreme court, the bulk of governor's offices, and the overwhelming majority of state legislative seats. I only hope that if I ever fuck up and create a crisis it's one just like that.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Yeah well, here's the thing, all of that control? Outside of the senate/governorships? Extreme gerrymandering. Republicans have a geographical advantage, but demographics will overtake it at some point.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/337872-how-the-gop-came-to-dominate-and-be-dominated-by-rural-voters
The voters the GOP pandered to in order to win under Obama are not the type of voters that are reliable, they're perfectly willing to punish whichever political party they view as in control.
In the same way Bush Triggered a blue wave, Trump is going to do the exact same thing. The senate/house is decided by turnout, and while the democrats might not be able to take the senate, everything else is up for grabs, and if the blue wave comes in 2018, and it carries to local elections as well, then it'll be those same republicans gerrymandered out, and I for one won't give two shits because they didn't give two shits about suppressing voters.
1 jubbergun 2017-08-05
Everything is cyclical. No one is saying the republicans are going to start a 1000 year empire. Bush triggered a blue wave because people were tired of war and republicans governing like democrats by spending excessively and creating new entitlements. Trump's going to have a similar effect if republicans in congress go crazy with the purse strings again. The "unreliable" voters who elected Trump are generally pleased with the progress that's been made on immigration issues but they're not happy about the Obamacare repeal fiasco.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
You are very seriously underestimating how relevant presidential approval ratings are in midterm elections.
It's literally why Republicans were able to gerrymander and win a bunch of seats.
Trump is currently at around 36%, to put that into perspective, Obama dipped from like 44%, when polls showed the country preferred a Democratic Congress by about 4%, he dipped to 40% and the country then preferred a Republican congress by a few percentage points.
Midterm elections tend to be a referendum on the president, and Trump is historically unpopular.
1 jubbergun 2017-08-05
If Presidential Popularity determined midterm elections President Obama wouldn't have seen congressional losses during the two he experienced.
Yes, according to the exact same people who said he was historically unpopular and could never win the election. The media fawned over President Obama and he couldn't maintain 50% popularity. Trump has been hammered like a nail every day since he won the election and still does 36%. Any republican that loses their seat next year won't lose it because of Trump. They'll lose it because they failed to keep their campaign promises.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
What in the ever loving hell are you talking about, lol?
That's EXACTLY why he experienced losses. Do you even know anything about those midterms?
Well now you're just making random shit up, Clinton was also historically unpopular.
Uh what? Obama was a lot more popular than Trump is, the reality is the country is so polarized you'll likely never see high average approval ratings again.
This is absurd, are you living in some alternate reality where Obama wasn't hammered by the right-wing hate machine for years?
That's just not how midterms work.
The president's party always loses seats, and Trump, being historically unpopular, will likely make this a lot worse.
https://newrepublic.com/article/120138/2014-election-results-heres-why-democrats-lost-senate-gop
Here's a pretty good article on democratic losses:
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-05
DAE Don't offend conservatives by calling them racists?
1 Velvet_Llama 2017-08-05
Yeah it started decades ago but they never really gave up on it.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-08-05
Ah I see we've moved on from denial to anger this week.
1 better_bot 2017-08-05
Men also commit more crime than women.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
And black people commit more crime than white people, so what's your point?
1 yesiamcorrect 2017-08-05
Can I buy some pcp please?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-08-05
Wow, I used to think you were shareblue, but now I realize you're just an idiot drunk on the kool aid, shareblue would never allow black crime statistics.
1 ay_what_up 2017-08-05
yeah I can see you're totally not retarded
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-08-05
Forget to switch accounts?
1 heavenlytoaster 2017-08-05
No looks like you remembered.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Well, you've already exposed you're mentally ill multiple times, nobody really cares what you think.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2017-08-05
Pot meet kettle
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
No, it's pretty clearly just you.
1 wOLFman4987 2017-08-05
The combination of black and woman is becoming too much to handle for them. A recent history of slavery, combined with the tendency to continuously pat themselves on the back, makes for a devastating cocktail of complete unawareness and total insanity.
1 blastiff 2017-08-05
Hey did you know that statistically you are more likely to get shot by police if you are a white man than a black woman?
Now I just have to wait for the pings to start and cash in on all the outrage.
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
source?
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2017-08-05
Google.
1 nomad1c 2017-08-05
it's like orders of magnitude more likely. white guys are the biggest group getting shot in raw terms
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/
Have fun.
1 nomad1c 2017-08-05
i just worked it out. white men are 6.66x more likely to get shot by police than black women
1 MaybeNotaTurtle 2017-08-05
Wowowowow, look at that, police kill white people more often then asians! Dare I say it? Are police anti-white? But seriously I appreciate how much effort you put into that diagram.
1 Bronafide 2017-08-05
Someone needs to create a men's lives matter pasta. Just post it every time blm is brought up for some juicy drama.
1 Works_of_memercy 2017-08-05
Saved, thanks.
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
I'm not seeing anything on there that says a given white man is more likely to be shot than a given black woman.
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
I mean, you can count the number of such shootings in each case, and compare to population statistics.
Or do you require everyone to spoon-feed you? Looking at your post history, it appears you do. Holy shit do you spend a lot of time demanding "source?" for things that are blatantly obvious to anyone with more than one functioning neuron.
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
yes
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
Well you sure picked appropriate flair then.
1 no_maps_no_plans 2017-08-05
good goy /u/Rhombus2, we care. P&G cares about you, your struggle and all the black goyim.
remember the 6 octillion and pay your holocaust reparations.
1 odintal 2017-08-05
One of the least self aware statements I've ever read on here.
1 nmx179 2017-08-05
Rhombus2's cognitive dissonance is so staggering i think it gave me the bends.
1 Sober_Sloth 2017-08-05
Giving women the right to vote was a mistake
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-05
WHITE FRAGILITY
1 Velvet_Llama 2017-08-05
Here we see the typical cowardly reaction from the caucazoid sub species. The white man instinctually recognizes his inferiority yet cannot admit it, not even to himself. He knows his entire world is a lie- a world built on the stolen labor and culture of people's of color. When confronted with the reality of his position as a stunted evolutionary dead end, he sublimates the realization of his flawed demi-humanity into blind rage and hatred. He knows that the time of the great Healing is coming and that soon the world will be wiped clean of filth such as him. What you see here is the reaction of a terrified feral animal.
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-05
I missed your
shitpostingincontrovertible truthtelling.1 Velvet_Llama 2017-08-05
Even the most woke need to recharge their batteries from time to time.
1 snappleteadrink 2017-08-05
Are u telling me that wasn't storebought penne I just ate
1 Velvet_Llama 2017-08-05
All my anti mayo content is home made.
1 Notthehalf 2017-08-05
/u/rhombus2 Seems to be a pretty apt description of feminism tbh.
Also your definition (you know cause it totally looks like a legit definition) as disassociative identity disorder....or did you just go through it changing instances of female to male because the idea women can be sociopaths triggered you?
1 Rhombus2 2017-08-05
Wow um...that was obviously a definition that was pulled from somewhere. Google exists.
1 Rhombus2 2017-08-05
Lol@bringing up feminism. Topics are hard I guess.
1 Notthehalf 2017-08-05
How dare I make a comparison that you don't like.
Topics are hard, hard as maintaining a gender(should be ungendered) term in your totally not made up definition. So hard you lol and shut your little mind down.
1 pointmanzero 2017-08-05
I just think it's funny how corporations are now using social activism to sell people shit.
PC culture will be uncool really soon now.
1 nmx179 2017-08-05
Imagine being u/Rhombus2 and actually being psychotically paranoid about and bigoted towards white people enough to actually believe this.
1 Rhombus2 2017-08-05
If you don't know the difference between White people and White culture, good luck I guess.
1 OnePercentOfMonster 2017-08-05
Fuck, thank you. I hate black culture, but blacks can occasionally be kind of okay.
1 heavenlytoaster 2017-08-05
Like Thugs
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2017-08-05
/u/rhombus2