You see it with a lot of online communities and circlejerks; the only "bad" science/economics/philosophy is that which does not support their worldview.
You can find a """study""" in support of anything you want. They're sometimes just glorified articles on the internet. There are even pro pedo studies (where's that copypasta pedo nowadays?).
And women game journalists are the only ones they take 'ethical' issues with. Thenonly male joirnalists they half-heartedly attack are those with connections to their female targets.
LOL. No they don't. There aren't even any female game journos. They took issue with the MALE who was writing good reviews for a game dev he was fucking with.
I dont know if youre just trolling and in character, bur mt god you are one patheticly low t manlet. Id feel sorry for your father but there is no chance he isnt just as pathetic as you
In the world of psthetic gamergators, literally no ome can think theyre pathetic without simultaneously being a sjw supporter of ehomever their target of the week is.
Usually if a man is getting bussy, they throw a tantrum just at the sheer mention, doesn't even need to have good reviews as payment, or be a journalist.
Anybody who gives a shit about video games is a loser, no matter male or female, maker or player, young or old. No matter what "side" of the so-called culture one is on.
Educational video games for very young children are ok, otherwise everyone involved is a pathetic human being.
Only the ones that are universally acknowledged to be stupid and boring as fuck. There's nothing redeemable about that guy whatsoever and I don't want to see their pings.
Gametegoobers are the biggest threat to women in the modern day. Look at the countless doxxings, death threats and abuse innocent female game devs like Brianna Wu have experienced for the crime of being female.
Oh right, I forgot that SJWs think women suck and dont believe that women can survive in the field of journalism with integrity, the very thing goobergaglootles advocate...so by your woman-hating logic, GG is indeed a threat to women
We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.
We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.
We'll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.
Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.
Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?
These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.
Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You're not special, you're not original, you're not the first; this is just another boss fight.
My complaint about Gamergate is more they thought saying "We're not sexists, it's about ethics" was going to matter. Feminazis are always going to win that debate.
They should have run with it, made it clear that numales, MTT and women shouldn't be allowed to play vidya.
I love to munch on fast food in front of Dirty Dancing and all of a sudden MRA's care about harmful gender roles in movies? Please can I like be allowed to not be feminist for a sec omg. Stop concern trolling me!
The researchers say the findings support an “evolutionary argument” that low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy.
Its like someone read my mind and then went on to prove my thoughts with research.
Lmao /u/chehelem if you believe that shit then you have to agree that women shouldn't work and are only supposed to raise children
I literally had like 3 paragraphs typed but then I realized that's too much autism and serious posting for here so I'll just say this.
Shitty research(small test size, didn't account for age of players) with a huge fucking extrapolation at the end. People will still circlejerk over it.
Fragile X syndrome
About a third of people have features of autism such as problems with social interactions and delayed speech.
I'm sorry to hear about your genetic disorders. In a just world you would have been institutionalized so you'd been kept safe and wouldn't bother decent folk.
we examine how individual performance and social standing affect female-directed male behaviour using an online first-person shooter video game, Halo 3
They used Halo 3, which was released in 2007, for a study done in 2015. Who the fuck would even still be playing it apart from omega-level losers?
i didn't read the article because it sounds boring as fuck
so time magazine revealed that the world's third most obvious losers were actually losers, and this is funny because twoX thinks losers don't real now? how long have i been out?
Some study showed that over about 100 Halo 3 games (only about 1000 people were online at peak times when the study was done) the people that get a low score and are killed by women are mean to the women. This therefore means that people who are mean to women are losers (as in losing at Halo 3, not that the headline mentions that). It is then used to justify weird red pill logic about alpha males and twomanychromosomes likes that now apparently
So, is duexchromies ok with men of higher status attacking women online? It just seems like they are beating up losers. I bet it's like when /r/incels proved that women will sleep with nazis and pedos if they are cute.
110 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-08-09
You're not shit next to me. My genes are just light years superior to yours and I don't even need to look at you.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 aonome 2017-08-09
1 Marowacked 2017-08-09
Wow.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-08-09
I'm confused last week they posted that video from Adam ruins everything that there is no such thing as alpha males have they changed their minds
1 aonome 2017-08-09
Yeah but this is different because it's negative about a group that they don't like
1 IFuckedZoeQuinn 2017-08-09
As long at it's negative towards men they'll believe it, regardless of whether or not it contradicts their other views.
1 mehforeverybody 2017-08-09
Women can't decide or make up their minds....Damn, mindblown...
1 cheers_grills 2017-08-09
👆👆
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-08-09
It's ok if it serves their interests.
You see it with a lot of online communities and circlejerks; the only "bad" science/economics/philosophy is that which does not support their worldview.
1 kimb00 2017-08-09
For the purposes of this study, does it make a difference between someone's actual status vs their perceived status?
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-09
shhhhhh
1 flipkt 2017-08-09
You can find a """study""" in support of anything you want. They're sometimes just glorified articles on the internet. There are even pro pedo studies (where's that copypasta pedo nowadays?).
1 newcomer_ts 2017-08-09
They needed study for that?
1 aonome 2017-08-09
That's what they keep saying in the thread but they miss the point of the study
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
srsly look at gooblegators
They don't exactly scream "I am a superior male who defends his territory and impregnates many females!"
1 notthegreatestcatch 2017-08-09
Goobergate literally has nothing to do with women. If it was a man getting bussy for good reviews they would have reacted the same.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
I honestly hope you're being ironic
Everyone knows thots are nerd bait like almost nothing else
1 notthegreatestcatch 2017-08-09
And Brianna Wu isn't even a real womyn. Most game journos are male. It has nothing to do with womyn.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
I am a misogynistic neckbeard gamer, I know my own you tard
And most game journos are thirsty numales and there is nothing sweeter than when the mob turns on them, I was hatebating when Nick Robinson got his
But come on, when Jeff Gerstmann got canned people were pissed but there wasn't a social movement created
1 notthegreatestcatch 2017-08-09
I mean, maybe? No man's sky got a lot of backlash tho. Idk. I feel like the backlash against the retarded ""journalists"" was bound to happen.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
Yah, the pimple would have popped at some point, but Eron Gjoni's "She dun me wrong" story was an excellent accelerant for the fecal firestorm
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
And women game journalists are the only ones they take 'ethical' issues with. Thenonly male joirnalists they half-heartedly attack are those with connections to their female targets.
It's indisputable science
1 notthegreatestcatch 2017-08-09
LOL. No they don't. There aren't even any female game journos. They took issue with the MALE who was writing good reviews for a game dev he was fucking with.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
I dont know if youre just trolling and in character, bur mt god you are one patheticly low t manlet. Id feel sorry for your father but there is no chance he isnt just as pathetic as you
1 notthegreatestcatch 2017-08-09
Where the female game journos at
1 Neon_needles 2017-08-09
WHERE IS THE FEM GAME JORNOS /u/Karmaisforsuckers
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
With me havin sex 4 reviews
Fit me irl
1 _narrows 2017-08-09
Jenn Frank
1 TraurigAberWahr 2017-08-09
the journalists that were originally attacked by GG were the five manlets, who had paid zoe quinn for sex.
all five of those manlets were "men" in the wider sense.
brianna wu somehow found a way to make everything herself, but she's not a journalist. she's also male in a wider sense.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
No part of gamergate was attackingthose jounalists. 100% of the effort was on attacking zoe Quinn personally.
1 snappleteadrink 2017-08-09
Lol
1 nmx179 2017-08-09
Holy fuck bruh you give a massive overwhelming shit about all of those people
Like damn son I can smell it from ehre
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
In the world of psthetic gamergators, literally no ome can think theyre pathetic without simultaneously being a sjw supporter of ehomever their target of the week is.
Just another symptom of a weak, weak, boy
1 AltRightRulesReddit 2017-08-09
This is 100% false.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
Its actuallu empirically scientifically tru. Like gravity.
1 AltRightRulesReddit 2017-08-09
I know you think being ironic makes being wrong less embarrassing, but it doesn't.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
No, I think youre the maximum amount of embarrassing
1 TraurigAberWahr 2017-08-09
you seem awfully obsessed with GG.
none of what you said is true :)
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
Everything I said is true. Especially about you.
1 TraurigAberWahr 2017-08-09
wow, you should tell your mom
1 AltRightRulesReddit 2017-08-09
This is embarrassingly wrong and is easily provable.
http://deepfreeze.it/about.php
1 aspergillus-niger 2017-08-09
lol
1 seshfan 2017-08-09
lol
1 Kraaltastic 2017-08-09
lol
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-08-09
lol
1 LadyVetinari 2017-08-09
lol
1 Notthehalf 2017-08-09
No they wouldn't. They react totally differently.
Usually if a man is getting bussy, they throw a tantrum just at the sheer mention, doesn't even need to have good reviews as payment, or be a journalist.
1 Hemingwavy 2017-08-09
Imagine joining a movement that's based off a fake story. Greyson didn't review Depression Quest. Wowee
1 John_Kvetch 2017-08-09
jesus, did we find a /u/prince_kropotkin alt in the wild? How pathetic are you?
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
Pretty fucking pathetic, though luckily not /r/kia or /r/gamerghazi pathetic.
1 John_Kvetch 2017-08-09
complaining about or even bringing up gamergate automatically makes you as worse as gamerghazelle. kill yourself
1 CrushedBlackPepper 2017-08-09
Anybody who gives a shit about video games is a loser, no matter male or female, maker or player, young or old. No matter what "side" of the so-called culture one is on.
Educational video games for very young children are ok, otherwise everyone involved is a pathetic human being.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-08-09
oh fuck another john ketch account, time to add to the blocklist
1 John_Kvetch 2017-08-09
LUL, the time I made you so salty and embarrassed you blocked me is recorded in /r/drama history bby
1 80BAIT08 2017-08-09
> blocking /r/drama posters
1 menvaren 2017-08-09
Basically Jewdank at that point.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-08-09
Only the ones that are universally acknowledged to be stupid and boring as fuck. There's nothing redeemable about that guy whatsoever and I don't want to see their pings.
1 nmx179 2017-08-09
I wasn't aware self-blocking was a feature now.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-08-09
boring
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-08-09
/ > blocking /r/drama posters
1 TotesMessenger 2017-08-09
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 aonome 2017-08-09
Wew
You're one of the retards that invokes the gibblegobble boogyman that doesn't exist when womyn are brought up
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
Gametegoobers are the biggest threat to women in the modern day. Look at the countless doxxings, death threats and abuse innocent female game devs like Brianna Wu have experienced for the crime of being female.
1 chwed2 2017-08-09
Oh right, I forgot that SJWs think women suck and dont believe that women can survive in the field of journalism with integrity, the very thing goobergaglootles advocate...so by your woman-hating logic, GG is indeed a threat to women
1 a__rory 2017-08-09
They targeted gamers.
Gamers.
We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.
We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.
We'll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.
Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.
Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?
These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.
Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You're not special, you're not original, you're not the first; this is just another boss fight.
1 captainpriapism 2017-08-09
yeah we do you big fag
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
Manlet fag get it right
1 captainpriapism 2017-08-09
oh im sorry
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
Thank you
1 savantfool 2017-08-09
When in lack of arguments get triggerd and yell Gamergaters!
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
My complaint about Gamergate is more they thought saying "We're not sexists, it's about ethics" was going to matter. Feminazis are always going to win that debate.
They should have run with it, made it clear that numales, MTT and women shouldn't be allowed to play vidya.
1 IAintThatGuy 2017-08-09
Whereas TwoX and TrollX posters are totally winning at life.
1 aonome 2017-08-09
yaaaaaaaas slaaaaaay queen
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-09
I love to munch on fast food in front of Dirty Dancing and all of a sudden MRA's care about harmful gender roles in movies? Please can I like be allowed to not be feminist for a sec omg. Stop concern trolling me!
1 notthegreatestcatch 2017-08-09
Unironically /r/trollxchromosomes in a nutshell.
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-09
accurate, but -1 for unironic use of "in a nutshell"
1 mehforeverybody 2017-08-09
https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUfzMDryA94
1 IAintThatGuy 2017-08-09
He knows how to handle bitches. Testimony from Michel’le made me realize I didn't beat women enough, and that's why they never stay.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QerfOOlTA3U
1 Works_of_memercy 2017-08-09
Someone, crosspost it to redpill. It deserves to be in "other discussions".
1 headasplodes 2017-08-09
Lmao /u/chehelem if you believe that shit then you have to agree that women shouldn't work and are only supposed to raise children
1 marsjazztrio 2017-08-09
#1 It's lol that now they're on board with hierarchical structures
#2 Yes, if you run around whining about how women don't want you and whatnot, there's a zero percent chance you're not a loser
So this is beautiful in that we get to mock both subs.
1 aonome 2017-08-09
It's x-posted to TBP and they're trying to justify why it's suddenly different when they like it
Funnily enough agreeing with the study means believing that women are below "dominant" men
1 1989Batman 2017-08-09
Don't forget evolutionary psychology, which is now TwoX's hottest science.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-09
Only /pol/ can save us.
1 mtg_liebestod 2017-08-09
1 CuriousKrow 2017-08-09
I literally had like 3 paragraphs typed but then I realized that's too much autism and serious posting for here so I'll just say this.
Shitty research(small test size, didn't account for age of players) with a huge fucking extrapolation at the end. People will still circlejerk over it.
1 SSacamacaroni 2017-08-09
Well you don't need a PHD or scientific study to understand that x is a loser if all they do is put others down. Who would have guessed.
1 UTAutism 2017-08-09
Embrace your autism.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2017-08-09
Fuck you I did it anyway.
1 aqouta 2017-08-09
Yeah, online halo 3 seems like a real solid cross section of the human population.
1 UTAutism 2017-08-09
While we were all studying the blade, they were studying us!
1 PressFPayRespect 2017-08-09
Dismantling the patriarchy one day at a time.
Press F
1 I_smell_like_bacon 2017-08-09
TwoX confirms that confirmation bias confirms their bias.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
SO sick of all these microaggressions against my Y chromosome.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
You mean your fragilitY-Chromosome
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-08-09
I don't think that's a thing.
I'm sorry to hear about your genetic disorders. In a just world you would have been institutionalized so you'd been kept safe and wouldn't bother decent folk.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
Joke
Your head
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2017-08-09
From the study:
They used Halo 3, which was released in 2007, for a study done in 2015. Who the fuck would even still be playing it apart from omega-level losers?
Not to mention, it's a FUCKING VIDEO GAME.
1 Rowdy_4skin 2017-08-09
Halo 3 was a part of the MCC and was re released with the xbone ~2014.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-08-09
/u/tums_festival confirmed for fake gamer nu-male!!
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2017-08-09
I only play real games with tons of depth and strategy.
Like Pokemon Go.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2017-08-09
So they studied people who bought a $500
gaming system"multimedia experience" and used it to play an 8 year old game...I wouldn't say that's better.1 Rowdy_4skin 2017-08-09
Lmao are you seriously trying to judge people for buying consoles?
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2017-08-09
Oh sorry, my mistake. I meant to say "people who told mommy and daddy to buy them a $500 multimedia experience."
1 Rowdy_4skin 2017-08-09
Oh god, so smug.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-08-09
In which Time takes an article from a journal with a 2.68 impact factor and give it to the masses.
Low impact factor journals aren't necessarily bad though, but that's normally for quantitative science and not shitty pop-psy garbage.
1 makes_people_cringe 2017-08-09
women
At least they're accepting biological arguments for gender behaviors
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-09
i didn't read the article because it sounds boring as fuck
so time magazine revealed that the world's third most obvious losers were actually losers, and this is funny because twoX thinks losers don't real now? how long have i been out?
1 aonome 2017-08-09
Some study showed that over about 100 Halo 3 games (only about 1000 people were online at peak times when the study was done) the people that get a low score and are killed by women are mean to the women. This therefore means that people who are mean to women are losers (as in losing at Halo 3, not that the headline mentions that). It is then used to justify weird red pill logic about alpha males and twomanychromosomes likes that now apparently
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-09
w h a t
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-08-09
Glad to see 2XC is cool with Red Pill 101 shit. That's always nice to see.
1 cycophuk 2017-08-09
So, is duexchromies ok with men of higher status attacking women online? It just seems like they are beating up losers. I bet it's like when /r/incels proved that women will sleep with nazis and pedos if they are cute.