I get why they wanted to do the showing like that, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. The outrage against it is pathetic though, do people really believe the Alamo Drafthouse wants to prevent men from seeing the film? This showing doesn't negatively impact anyone.
> lawyer says this might not be legal and action might be pursued
"We at the Alamo Draft House respect people of all genders and in no way intended to exclude anyone. We welcome people of all walks of life to see Wonder Woman and realize it is a film for all audiences"
That's the standard process for any business really. Before legal threat, it's "get fucked", but after legal threat, it's a lengthy, carefully worded essay on how they "didn't mean it".
Businesses usually don't publicly tell the people to go fuck themselves beforehad like Alamo did, however. I like Alamo, but their Twitter team needs to be fired.
Same shit, a bunch of idiots realized that stirring the pot so much when you're a multi billion dollar company is a terrible idea, I just find it funny
So if they did a men-only screening of Thor Ragnarok, or something like that, would you be shrieking in outrage like the rest of the dipshits or would you still say you don't get the outrage?
I don't even live in the state, but if I did I still wouldn't care. It's just trying to bring a specific audience together, but unless this one day and time was the only time I could see the movie, it wouldn't affect me at all.
Nobody gives a shit about the showing. People do give a shit about the way they promoted it and a shitshow that would happen in someone tried to do all-male showing of a movie.
I guess this feels like the kind of non-issue that bogs down actual equality progress. With real problems like false rape accusations and disadvantages in custody cases, is this stuff even worth thinking about?
Well yeah because (a) how the fuck is some random dude going to stop false rape claims, and (b) raking the smarmy low level proponents of this retarded cultural phenomenon over the coals seems a useful and fun way to erode the sense of indignant righteousness that leads to the more serious stuff.
Yeah I thought this actually sounded like a fun idea. And it would've been 10-20 years ago. That just isn't the world we live in anymore. Nothing can happen anymore without somebody getting outraged over it.
They fucked up dude, the were super smug about it but they were playing with fire. Civil rights laws are serious business, which is why every big company has an HR department.
Ladies night have actually gotten in trouble before with the law because of civil rights issues, i think its stupid that people have issue with it but it has happened.
Yeah, according to wikipedia they're banned in several states. I never really cared about that either, it's the best time to go out drinking for guys as well.
Is it at all of them or nah? If it's at the one in southpark meadows, I literally live like five minutes away. How the hell have I not heard about this before.
I guess we should look forward to a strict 'no girls allowed' policy on opening screenings of films that depict young men as medical professionals, you know, to empower boys to enter a field that they are rapidly being under represented in.
You're forgetting one part: it wasn't just a showing for women only. They didn't allow any male employees to work. Read the announcement, they gloat about women only everything, from the cashier to the projectionist. That's totes illegal af fam.
I don't see the appeal. Any event that was only male sounds lame as fuck and I wouldn't want to attend, why were women excited about takijg part in a fish fest?
do people really believe the Alamo Drafthouse wants to prevent men from seeing the film?
Since they said that they did, yes, I believe them.
It's amazing how feminists always pass these laws, and start screaming their heads off whenever a non-feminist uses them. If you don't want rules, don't argue for them. But you damned sure don't have a right to argue for these laws, and then declare yourselves immune to them after they get passed.
If fucking 'people' can't live with a goddamned rule, then don't fucking pass it.
In this case, I believe Austin prohibits public exhibitions (like movie screenings) from discriminating based on sex. That said, I'm not entirely clear if anyone was actually denied entry.
That said, I'm not entirely clear if anyone was actually denied entry.
Because their ad campaign had already told men not to attend.
The court system isn't some half-retarded king from an old fairytale. Being 'clever' isn't going to work. The legal system has dealt with that kind of 'Sure, I broke the law--but you can't prove it!!!!' nonsense before.
Of course it varies by state. When people ask about constitutional law without mentioning a state it's presumed the question refers to federal law and not the statutory quirks of New Hampshire.
SJWs say this because it's very clear as a constitutional matter--you have to have a VERY good reason to discriminate on matters sex, and sex as a protected class does cover all institutions that can't cross that barrier.
So they pretend that this is a state issue (it isn't, or civil rights acts wouldn't exist) or that it hasn't been adjudicated, or that somehow running an ad campaign but not physically turning anyway will protect them.
SJWs live in a feels before reals lifestyle. They aren't going to stop now.
Honestly fuck the people and their faux outrage at this screening, they think they're 'giving it back' to the sjw crowd but they're just keeping the perpetual outrage machine alive with this shit
The only way to end stupid policies is to enforce them on the people who support them. End affirmative action by forcing gender equality in sewage work and crab fishing.
people dont realise its about making them live up to their own standards so they can see how bad they are, and not, for instance, an actual desire to see women coal workers
Yeah, they've really put themselves on the spot with that one. The only non-women who are gonna see it will be edgelord trolls now. Identity politics will always come back to bite you in the ass.
According to one memo, police in 2015 were told to be vigilant of young men sexually assaulting women in the crowd, as the previous year such offences had been committed, mostly by migrants, including Afghans.
That's the fun part about all of this. It's not just any men sexually assaulting women at these events. 90%+ of the perpetrators are Muslim migrants.
The We are Sthlm sexual assaults allegedly took place in 2014 and 2015 at We Are Sthlm, a youth festival in the Swedish capital Stockholm. Police recorded complaints from women, but did not make them public. Dagens Nyheter, the first mainstream source to cover the story, faced allegations on social media that they had been part of a cover-up to hide the story, which the newspaper's editor denied.
Uh. Wrong. Didn't the courts get the mathematical definition of privilege? It's not discrimination if you exclude men. Only if you exclude women. Get๐yo๐shit๐to๐get๐her, fucking misogynists pissbabies.
Hillary wasn't the SJW candidate, that was the Bernito Bandito, they all ended up voting for her but ahe didn't pander any more than she really had to for those votes. She would have been a bad president* because she's a corrupt morally bankrupt person, not because she was a mindless SJW.
*please note that her being a bad potential president does not imply she was the worse of the two choices in the end.
Shit like this is why most people don't take the Men's Rights movement with any kind of sincerity. They come off like a bunch of spoiled children anytime they are excluded. Bruh, you excluded women from pretty much everything for centuries, I'm sure you'll get over not being able to see Wonder Woman at one specific screening.
You're right, excluding men from one single screening of Wonder Woman is equal to years of women not being able to own property, vote, and other basic things. Alamo Drafthouse totally deserves to be sued.
years of women not being able to own property, vote, and other basic things.
Which the modern men's right movement totally traveled back in time and did, like I said.
After all, if they hadn't traveled back in time and done those things, then you'd be blaming them for a bunch of shit that they're not in any way guilty of, due to those things not having been true for about a hundred years now.
But as we know, the mrm totally is a bunch of devious time-traveling supervillains, so keep using the situation of a bunch of dead women from the 1920s to justify yourself acting like a twat today.
It's fucking misogyny but I'm also drunk and I'm gonna shill for pinnacle vodka for a second fam. It's delicious. I'd spend my settlement money on socksoff.com and pinnacle whipped
151 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-08-10
No wonder you have an army of pretentious neckbeard losers following you around
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
I get why they wanted to do the showing like that, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. The outrage against it is pathetic though, do people really believe the Alamo Drafthouse wants to prevent men from seeing the film? This showing doesn't negatively impact anyone.
1 MasterLawlz 2017-08-10
> ban men from a showing
> people get upset on twitter
"lol whiny men fuck them all"
> lawyer says this might not be legal and action might be pursued
"We at the Alamo Draft House respect people of all genders and in no way intended to exclude anyone. We welcome people of all walks of life to see Wonder Woman and realize it is a film for all audiences"
1 AnalogDogg 2017-08-10
That's the standard process for any business really. Before legal threat, it's "get fucked", but after legal threat, it's a lengthy, carefully worded essay on how they "didn't mean it".
1 die_rattin 2017-08-10
Businesses usually don't publicly tell the people to go fuck themselves beforehad like Alamo did, however. I like Alamo, but their Twitter team needs to be fired.
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
That's literally what happens any time a lawyer gets involved, ever. How naive are you?
1 JasonJewnova 2017-08-10
Lawyers are worse than gypsies
1 MasterLawlz 2017-08-10
Idk I just think it's funny seeing them cave like a bunch of pussies
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
1 MasterLawlz 2017-08-10
Same shit, a bunch of idiots realized that stirring the pot so much when you're a multi billion dollar company is a terrible idea, I just find it funny
1 JohnnyLargeCock 2017-08-10
Are they a multi-billion dollar company? Is there more than one or a few of these places? I've never been.
1 MasterLawlz 2017-08-10
I may have overshot it but Google says there's 29 of them and idk how much money each generates
Point is it's a big company
1 JohnnyLargeCock 2017-08-10
Ahh, that's a lot. I thought there were like 3 or 4. Thanks!
1 fierwall5 2017-08-10
Dude austin has like 6 or 8.
1 JohnnyLargeCock 2017-08-10
Is Austin really big? That's a lot of a single chain of theaters for one city. I always assumed it wasn't that big of a city. Never been there.
1 fierwall5 2017-08-10
It's in the top 20 for sure if not top 12 big cities in the US also I think the brand started here so there is naturally a large presence
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
29 movie theaters? Oh come on, that is tiny.
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
Literally a company I've never heard of before.
Lol.
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
It's one of the bigger theater chains in Texas, but I don't think they're anywhere else
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2017-08-10
there you go again, with your "logic" and "facts" saints preserve us
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
Watching /u/MasterLawlz touch himself because he doesn't understand basic realities is sad to me :(
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-08-10
You're literally more autistic than him tbh
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
I'm not at all.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-08-10
Literally what your comment chain with him amounts to
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
TIL pointing out /u/MasterLawlz doesn't know what he's talking about is odd to you. ๐ค ๐ค ๐ค
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-08-10
You're actually so autistic that you think you pointed out something that lawlz and every one else reading didnt understand. ๐
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
Lol you think I care if anyone else understood.
1 DeepDickedHillybilly 2017-08-10
Mate. A novelty account is scoring points on you. This is bad.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-08-10
K then:
Keep yourself safe sheepshagger
1 ComedicSans 2017-08-10
TIL mocking /u/MasterLawlz is srs bznz.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-08-10
Lol k
1 SuperShake66652 2017-08-10
So if they did a men-only screening of Thor Ragnarok, or something like that, would you be shrieking in outrage like the rest of the dipshits or would you still say you don't get the outrage?
1 AltRightRulesReddit 2017-08-10
You already know the answer to that.
1 hyledog 2017-08-10
Biting commentary from Reddit user "AltRightRulesReddit"
1 die_rattin 2017-08-10
Nice flag
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
No he doesn't lol, and neither do you. I couldn't care less about gender specific screenings.
1 Helmet_Icicle 2017-08-10
The point of a question to which you already know the answer is still indirectly pursuing the eradication of ignorance.
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2017-08-10
Who cares
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
I don't even live in the state, but if I did I still wouldn't care. It's just trying to bring a specific audience together, but unless this one day and time was the only time I could see the movie, it wouldn't affect me at all.
1 mehforeverybody 2017-08-10
Nobody gives a shit about the showing. People do give a shit about the way they promoted it and a shitshow that would happen in someone tried to do all-male showing of a movie.
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
I guess this feels like the kind of non-issue that bogs down actual equality progress. With real problems like false rape accusations and disadvantages in custody cases, is this stuff even worth thinking about?
1 Helmet_Icicle 2017-08-10
What do you know, politicizing social issues isn't a good marketing advertisement.
1 VatiasMellerman 2017-08-10
Well yeah because (a) how the fuck is some random dude going to stop false rape claims, and (b) raking the smarmy low level proponents of this retarded cultural phenomenon over the coals seems a useful and fun way to erode the sense of indignant righteousness that leads to the more serious stuff.
1 cleverseneca 2017-08-10
Baby steps fam, baby steps.
1 U2_is_gay 2017-08-10
Yeah I thought this actually sounded like a fun idea. And it would've been 10-20 years ago. That just isn't the world we live in anymore. Nothing can happen anymore without somebody getting outraged over it.
1 WyrmSaint 2017-08-10
So how long have you been against gender equality?
1 aspergillus-niger 2017-08-10
I've always been against it.
1 U2_is_gay 2017-08-10
My point exactly
1 ay_what_up 2017-08-10
not gender equality, just men. Men are scum
1 grafton29 2017-08-10
They fucked up dude, the were super smug about it but they were playing with fire. Civil rights laws are serious business, which is why every big company has an HR department.
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
This just sounds like a ladies' night at a bar but even less serious
1 grafton29 2017-08-10
Ladies night have actually gotten in trouble before with the law because of civil rights issues, i think its stupid that people have issue with it but it has happened.
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
Yeah, according to wikipedia they're banned in several states. I never really cared about that either, it's the best time to go out drinking for guys as well.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
Wrong. Best nights to go drinking are when there are turtle races at Woodrow's in Austin TX
1 reddog2442 2017-08-10
Holy shit they have turtle races? I need to go there.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
Every thursday. It's a damn shame I'm not down there right now
1 reddog2442 2017-08-10
Fuck, wish I had access to a car right now. Soon I will see these turtle races, dammit.
1 reddog2442 2017-08-10
Is it at all of them or nah? If it's at the one in southpark meadows, I literally live like five minutes away. How the hell have I not heard about this before.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
I'm not 100% sure
1 reddog2442 2017-08-10
Alright, I'll have to check. Thanks for letting me know about this, sounds great.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
Last time I went you just drew a card and if your turtle won you got a free pint. It's a great time
1 reddog2442 2017-08-10
Hell yeah free beer
1 captainpriapism 2017-08-10
for real i dont give a shit about ladies night or ladies gyms but i support fucking with them because have some consistency
1 meatpuppet79 2017-08-10
I guess we should look forward to a strict 'no girls allowed' policy on opening screenings of films that depict young men as medical professionals, you know, to empower boys to enter a field that they are rapidly being under represented in.
1 westphall 2017-08-10
You're forgetting one part: it wasn't just a showing for women only. They didn't allow any male employees to work. Read the announcement, they gloat about women only everything, from the cashier to the projectionist. That's totes illegal af fam.
1 OniTan 2017-08-10
Easiest place to rob ever.
1 aqouta 2017-08-10
I don't see the appeal. Any event that was only male sounds lame as fuck and I wouldn't want to attend, why were women excited about takijg part in a fish fest?
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-10
Trannies negatively impact everyone. Islam negatively impacts everyone.
1 ThatDamnedImp 2017-08-10
Since they said that they did, yes, I believe them.
It's amazing how feminists always pass these laws, and start screaming their heads off whenever a non-feminist uses them. If you don't want rules, don't argue for them. But you damned sure don't have a right to argue for these laws, and then declare yourselves immune to them after they get passed.
If fucking 'people' can't live with a goddamned rule, then don't fucking pass it.
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
What kind of "fucking people" do you think I am? I'm not even a feminist, I just think this situation is overblown
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
can't say I didn't see this coming. isn't gender a protected class? whoever vetted this should be fired. some COO needs to get the boot.
however, I enjoy their atmosphere and will be back at the Drafthouse to watch the new Star Wars movie when it comes out. I hope you all will join me!
1 squarefaces 2017-08-10
I know two people who won't be joining us for the next installment of Lucas's masterwork - your wife, and her boyfriend.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
I hope we can find her a new boyfriend in time because I cannot stand that woman after 3 beers
1 potatoesarenotcool 2017-08-10
That's the only way I can stand her
1 menvaren 2017-08-10
After you've had three beers or she's had three beers?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
Both
1 easementbyforce 2017-08-10
Sex is a protected class in housing and employment. Men as a protected class is a more murky topic outside of those areas of law.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
themoreyouknow.gif
1 princessCuck 2017-08-10
That depends heavily on the state. Just look at the Unruh Act in California.
1 imaginarycreatures 2017-08-10
In this case, I believe Austin prohibits public exhibitions (like movie screenings) from discriminating based on sex. That said, I'm not entirely clear if anyone was actually denied entry.
1 ThatDamnedImp 2017-08-10
Because their ad campaign had already told men not to attend.
The court system isn't some half-retarded king from an old fairytale. Being 'clever' isn't going to work. The legal system has dealt with that kind of 'Sure, I broke the law--but you can't prove it!!!!' nonsense before.
1 Unicorn_Abattoir 2017-08-10
Yeah but you need to demonstrate a tort in order to have standing to sue. You can't claim theoretical harm.
1 houinator 2017-08-10
Its worth noting that the Austin ordinance also prohibits advertising discrimination, so they are fucked regardless.
1 easementbyforce 2017-08-10
Of course it varies by state. When people ask about constitutional law without mentioning a state it's presumed the question refers to federal law and not the statutory quirks of New Hampshire.
1 ThatDamnedImp 2017-08-10
SJWs say this because it's very clear as a constitutional matter--you have to have a VERY good reason to discriminate on matters sex, and sex as a protected class does cover all institutions that can't cross that barrier.
So they pretend that this is a state issue (it isn't, or civil rights acts wouldn't exist) or that it hasn't been adjudicated, or that somehow running an ad campaign but not physically turning anyway will protect them.
SJWs live in a feels before reals lifestyle. They aren't going to stop now.
1 grafton29 2017-08-10
SW sucks and actual cucks are even worse, keep your meme theater to yourself.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
Remember the Alamo bud!
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-10
socksoff.com
1 ThatDamnedImp 2017-08-10
They thought publicly shaming people would magically make the legal system disappear.
1 UTAutism 2017-08-10
The Alamo died for this shit smh.
1 bleak_new_world 2017-08-10
Was this really what Davey Crockett died for?
1 DarkResurgence 2017-08-10
Nah. He said traps weren't gay. Santa Anna fucked his shit up.
1 SperglockHolmes 2017-08-10
Wtf I love Santa Anna now.
1 hetoldmeontv 2017-08-10
Honestly fuck the people and their faux outrage at this screening, they think they're 'giving it back' to the sjw crowd but they're just keeping the perpetual outrage machine alive with this shit
1 WyrmSaint 2017-08-10
The only way to end stupid policies is to enforce them on the people who support them. End affirmative action by forcing gender equality in sewage work and crab fishing.
1 WarSanchez 2017-08-10
We already do all the house keeping in the stadiums, now you want us to get killed by 7 foot monsters for entertainment?
1 sethstorm 2017-08-10
That's American football.
1 WarSanchez 2017-08-10
I prefer a perpetual concussion and CTE than getting postered and teabagged.
If another man put his nuts by my face, I'd have to kill him. It's a rule of machismo as old as women having to heat up the tortillas.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
And she better not fucking use the microwave and dry them out like last time or I'll have to drink a bottle of brandy and cry/beat the kids
God I miss welito
1 WyrmSaint 2017-08-10
The NFL should make the offensive lineman position woman only next year. That would be some entertaining shit.
1 yesiamcorrect 2017-08-10
I believe I ordered a torta de lengua, not a comment de complainto. Let's get on that amigo
1 WarSanchez 2017-08-10
Si seรฑor. Right-away-o
1 Washington_vape 2017-08-10
Unironically the best torta, nice to see a man of taste on this forum
1 captainpriapism 2017-08-10
people dont realise its about making them live up to their own standards so they can see how bad they are, and not, for instance, an actual desire to see women coal workers
1 JohnnyLargeCock 2017-08-10
Why don't we have sumo wrestlers do that? It seems like they'd be perfect for it.
1 aqouta 2017-08-10
Line backers are basically sumo wrestlers. In real life sumo wrestlers aren't like the marshmellows you see in your malasian cartoons you weab.
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
I absolutely agree. This is basically a bunch of people who don't live within 300 miles of a Drafthouse getting triggered
1 metric_units 2017-08-10
metric units bot | feedback | source | v0.1.2-hotfix beta
1 AFatBlackMan 2017-08-10
oh fuck off
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-10
Bad human
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-08-10
Bad bot fuck YOU
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-10
No you
1 joris 2017-08-10
Good bot
1 IFuckedZoeQuinn 2017-08-10
Ah yes, ignoring social justice fucktards and caving to their demands has worked out so well so far. Sounds like some cuck talk to me
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-10
For those about to REEEEEEE
WE SALUTE YOU!
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-10
I CANT HEAR YOU
1 Arkham_Retirement 2017-08-10
Then... anyone who just says that can see the movie?
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-10
Yeah, they've really put themselves on the spot with that one. The only non-women who are gonna see it will be edgelord trolls now. Identity politics will always come back to bite you in the ass.
I look forward to attending Sweden's first female only music festival next year. Just put on some make-up, throw on some earrings and claim you're a trans-dyke. It's gonna be a pussy buffet.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-10
I want to see an Oppressed People's of Sweden Concert, including only females + Muslim men.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-08-10
We already have that. It's called We are sthlm.
That's the fun part about all of this. It's not just any men sexually assaulting women at these events. 90%+ of the perpetrators are Muslim migrants.
1 WikiTextBot 2017-08-10
We Are Sthlm sexual assaults
The We are Sthlm sexual assaults allegedly took place in 2014 and 2015 at We Are Sthlm, a youth festival in the Swedish capital Stockholm. Police recorded complaints from women, but did not make them public. Dagens Nyheter, the first mainstream source to cover the story, faced allegations on social media that they had been part of a cover-up to hide the story, which the newspaper's editor denied.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.24
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-10
OPSeC - don't let the crime statistics be seen!
1 Senator_Chickpea 2017-08-10
r/FestivalorHPLovecraftstory
1 DeathBahamutXXX 2017-08-10
ยฟPor quรฉ no los dos?
1 TheJum 2017-08-10
Oh, I'm sure you wouldn't be the only man attending. There's going to be plenty of guys there.
It's just that they'll be Muslim.
And not there for the music.
1 aqouta 2017-08-10
Holy shit that will be miserable.
1 ThatDamnedImp 2017-08-10
For the same reason murderers rarely outright say, 'Yeah, I killed the 'em, and that bitch had it coming!' outside of Law and Order marathons?
1 DarkResurgence 2017-08-10
Uh. Wrong. Didn't the courts get the mathematical definition of privilege? It's not discrimination if you exclude men. Only if you exclude women. Get๐yo๐shit๐to๐get๐her, fucking misogynists pissbabies.
1 elwombat 2017-08-10
If Hillary had won and nominated a Supreme Court Justice, privilege would probably be enshrined in law in a few years.
1 A7thStone 2017-08-10
Keep up your victim complex. It's amusing.
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-10
ah yes, hillary "colored people time" "superpredator" " 7/11 mahatma gandhi" clinton, the notorious SJW
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-10
colored people time, 7 eleven gandhi, superpredators
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-10
This is a test of the capabilities of the haiku robot.
1 haikubot-1911 2017-08-10
This is a test of
The capabilities of
The haiku robot.
- grungebot5000
I'm a bot made by /u/Eight1911. I detect haiku.
1 OldBiffFromTheFuture 2017-08-10
Lmao
1 aqouta 2017-08-10
Hillary wasn't the SJW candidate, that was the Bernito Bandito, they all ended up voting for her but ahe didn't pander any more than she really had to for those votes. She would have been a bad president* because she's a corrupt morally bankrupt person, not because she was a mindless SJW.
*please note that her being a bad potential president does not imply she was the worse of the two choices in the end.
1 otherwiseyep 2017-08-10
If Hillary had one, I might have been treated like a black person! I'm the real victim here!
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-10
I๐see๐you're๐a๐man๐of๐culture๐as๐well
1 AltRightRulesReddit 2017-08-10
The only reason anyone cares is because liberals shit all over the carpet while doing it.
No, we don't care about some all woman whatever. We care about liberals using it to be smug and shit all over other people about it.
1 Allanon_2020 2017-08-10
Discrimination is bad except sometimes it isn't then you get sued then it is again indeed bad to do so.
Thank you for teaching us this lesson Alamo
1 brahbocop 2017-08-10
Shit like this is why most people don't take the Men's Rights movement with any kind of sincerity. They come off like a bunch of spoiled children anytime they are excluded. Bruh, you excluded women from pretty much everything for centuries, I'm sure you'll get over not being able to see Wonder Woman at one specific screening.
1 MasterLawlz 2017-08-10
This is weak bait
1 IFuckedZoeQuinn 2017-08-10
I literally clapped
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-10
๐๐๐๐๐๐
1 nmx179 2017-08-10
The MRM literally travelling back in time to oppress women, lol
1 brahbocop 2017-08-10
You're right, excluding men from one single screening of Wonder Woman is equal to years of women not being able to own property, vote, and other basic things. Alamo Drafthouse totally deserves to be sued.
1 MadMaxMercer 2017-08-10
Im glad you came to your senses.
1 nullcrash 2017-08-10
If you have a population advantage and you've been oppressed since the dawn of time, you're not actually equal. You're quite a bit the lesser.
1 nmx179 2017-08-10
Which the modern men's right movement totally traveled back in time and did, like I said.
After all, if they hadn't traveled back in time and done those things, then you'd be blaming them for a bunch of shit that they're not in any way guilty of, due to those things not having been true for about a hundred years now.
But as we know, the mrm totally is a bunch of devious time-traveling supervillains, so keep using the situation of a bunch of dead women from the 1920s to justify yourself acting like a twat today.
1 ChewyIsThatU 2017-08-10
If you force girls in the Boy Scouts, guess what? You can't have women only screenings.
1 Unicorn_Abattoir 2017-08-10
I've been alive for centuries?
1 oldirtdogg 2017-08-10
I haven't excluded women from anything. Why wasn't I allowed in?
1 HUNTforREDcucktober 2017-08-10
I want to get that almost $9000 in settlement money, but I'm a fucking woman. Thanks for nothing Alamo, you goddamn shithawks
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-10
They are shiggots, and biglords!
1 HUNTforREDcucktober 2017-08-10
It's fucking misogyny but I'm also drunk and I'm gonna shill for pinnacle vodka for a second fam. It's delicious. I'd spend my settlement money on socksoff.com and pinnacle whipped
1 StrategicSarcasm 2017-08-10
Identify as a lawsuitgendered man!
1 razzmataz 2017-08-10
This is easy to circumvent. Just claim you're trans.
1 take_a_dumpling 2017-08-10
I'm in favor of these "x"-only movies and things. I would love to attend a white only movie or perhaps a white only everything.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-10
Mayocide when?
1 OniTan 2017-08-10
Hwhite.
1 AnnArchist 2017-08-10
seems like a reasonable suit. But I like ADH from all accounts... still, they have a strong case.
1 WorldStarCroCop 2017-08-10
Seems like a great way for no one to pay for their drinks.