Drama in r/TheSimpsons over whether the show is good or not.

9  2017-08-31 by tot22

145 comments

I want to get zozzed.

no zoz for you!

zozzle

zzl

zoz

zle

zozzle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

Yes I got zozzed.

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

Hail our new bot overlord.

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

Bad bot

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

Zoz my neg hole.

zoz

zle

zozzle

MRW

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

Good bot ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

zoz

zle

zozzle

/u/FTHappy want to tell us more about why calling someone a retard is a bad thing?

But I bet you like the Big Bang Theory so your opinion is irrelevant. (See how making random assumptions to dismiss your opinion is both stupid and shitty?)

I like how your retreating to personal attacks and insults and how you're contradicting yourself saying my opinion is a relevant because it's different from yours even though you said exact same thing.

How the fuck is it possible to miss the point that badly?

RIGHT? I couldn't fucking believe how thick /u/FTHappy is.

zoz

zle

zozzle

You are one obsessed man

zoz

zle

zozzle

Good bot ❤️❤️❤️

Someone destroys your statement, point-by-point, and then calls you a degenerative retard at the end? Well, they just used an ad hominem attack, and it's on Wikipedia's List of Logical Fallacies, so that must mean they lost! Don't bother to refute any of their actual points; just mock them for adding some flair to their argument.

This sort of thing is rife on this website; something about how everyone here seems to think they're the Deity of Debate and are undefeatable if they throw down "Hey that's a fallacy", even if they don't understand the context it's meant to be used in. It's the ultimate way to betray that someone wants to show-off how smart they are despite being totally clueless. Nobody can actually debate anything, apparently.

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

The Simpsons is the best evidence out there that people will continue to be fans of anything and insist it's still good, even long after the quality level drops. There are people who will enjoy something once, because it used to be good, or just because everyone else likes it, and then they will never re-evaluate their enjoyment of it. It just needs to stay familiar enough, even if just on an aesthetic level, to keep this crowd going.

zoz

zle

zozzle

It's not.

zoz

zle

zozzle

I still enjoy the Simpsons. Miliions of people still like the Simpsons. It may not be as popular as it once was but it's still well loved.

You acting like it's somehow objectively worse is dumb. You might not like it, and that's fine but that's subjective, not objective.

Recent season has been the worst reviewed and least watched in series history. It's just an animated sitcom with weak writing now.

Okay. Am I supposed to say that I don't like it anymore now? You can dislike the show as much as you please but that's not going to change the fact that I and millions of others still enjoy the show.

Do you just not understand the concepts of objective and subjective?