Klan members are sure the Vegas shooter was Muslim, since there aren't enough articles from the (((news))) about his identity. Then switch gears to the shooter being a liberal cuck after more details emerge. Whatever the truth, they manage to not lose site of the real victims in Vegas: mayos.

They banned me for that over a year ago. Well, I didn't call them retards, I just told the head mod that while he was insulting someone, he shouldn't wonder why people don't like his sub.

1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-02

I got banned from there for laughing at them in their outrage thread about getting removed from r/all.

1 Etra 2017-10-02

/u/Kaarous:

Attacked a concert again. What's the over/under on Muslims for this one?

[edit: Looks like it was another Berniebro.

—

What accusation? I was openly wondering if it was Muslims, given that ISIS has a pattern of doing shit like this.

But it simply looks as though antifa is copying from a more successful terrorist group.

—

He's confirmed to be yet another Berniebro, liberal. Why doesn't Sanders disavow his murderous followers and terrorist campaign workers?

—

I don't care what bernie thinks

I do. Him, and every other Democrat elected official have been pushing this "resist" horseshit for the better part of a year.

This violence is at their feet, no one else.

> Being unsure of the narrative you’re supposed to push so you spew all of it.

Bonus retardation:

Is Obama a Muslim?

Yes, he is. He outright admitted as much on accident at one point.

1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-02

u/Kaarous is on the same level of retard along with u/mehdbc and u/AntiHasbaraUnit

1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2017-10-02

Im glad I cause such wetness in your pretty pink panties, Nancy.

1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-02

u/YueFei90 what do you think about this white male? Also post your tiny pecker pics kthnxbye 👋

1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2017-10-02

Tiny Pecker Pics? I dont have any of your selfies.

1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-02

Reading comprehension 101, I wasn't talking to you lol. I know you got dat t h i C C d i C C big boy ( ͡° ͜ʖ ) ͡°

1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2017-10-02

who actually wants to comprehend what you spew? you think far too much of yourself

1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-02

who actually wants to comprehend what you spew? you think far too much of yourself

takes time out of his day to reply to me multiple times

Oh honey! 💁💅

1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2017-10-02

lol its not for you, my nigga, other people read this.

1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-02

I just want you to know I love you <3

1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2017-10-02

you remind me of a kid with downs syndrome after his french fries cool down enough to eat.

1 MG87 2017-10-02

Lol at this pussy calling anyone "Nancy"

1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2017-10-02

i call you jew jackass.

1 ProphetRith 2017-10-02

Has he been confirmed Bernie bro or is this some retarded /pol/ disinfo

1 Etra 2017-10-02

No idea tbh. There’s a bunch of speculation at this point but as the shooter is investigated there should be more conclusive information in a few days. Right now it’s just news agencies trying to get viewers.

1 ProphetRith 2017-10-02

🤔 if that's not true how can I use it to jerk about my extremely neutral view

1 wwyzzerdd 2017-10-02

http://heavy.com/news/2017/10/stephen-c-paddock-does-not-have-a-facebook-profile-nevada-las-vegas-shooter-mesquite/

1 brianpv 2017-10-02

The second one.

1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-10-02

It's /pol/ disinfo. They initially identified the wrong guy as the shooter, because they were too blinded by their need to craft an "unhinged liberal" narrative. The whole Antifa/bernie bro shit is holdover from that.

1 ProphetRith 2017-10-02

Why they do this tho 😂

1 Randydandy69 2017-10-02

Mostly projection

1 TheTallyrander 2017-10-02

Not trying to make a serious post on here, but:

1 ) No one ever claimed it was a Muslim; Just that, usually when race info is refused, it is to hide and protect a (ostensibly non-white) racial group;

2 ) The man's affiliations and his choice of target implies he is a self-hating White.

1 DPSnacks 2017-10-02

"not trying to make a serious post but here's one serious post coming right up

The left's sudden lack of hastiness to rush to judgement shows they fear the narrative is out of their control

your hours-long post history spreading unconfirmed stories about the gunman shows you fear the narrative is out of your control.

1 TheTallyrander 2017-10-02

Nah, I just don't want people to point fingers at every scenario but the most obvious one--the fact that so many lefties downvoted me is just proof that they don't want to lose control of their narrative (and you were following me all over that thread too)

1 Nerdlinger 2017-10-02

I just don't want people to point fingers at every scenario but the most obvious one

My speculation is best speculation!

1 doughboy011 2017-10-02

Imagine lacking the brain power to be introspective like u/TheTallyrander

1 DPSnacks 2017-10-02

you have been using the word "mad" incorrectly for many hours consecutively

which makes sense, considering how incorrectly you use other words

1 TheTallyrander 2017-10-02

you have been using the word "mad" incorrectly for many hours

LMAO THAT'S LITERALLY HOW LONG YOU'VE BEEN MAD

1 DPSnacks 2017-10-02

closer this time - the time scale is accurate but the adjective is wrong

1 doughboy011 2017-10-02

This drama, we farm lolcows like you, retard.

1 serialflamingo 2017-10-02

the fact that so many lefties downvoted me is just proof that they don't want to lose control of their narrative

u were wrong tho

1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-10-02

Where is your evidence that he's an unhinged leftist? The only thing I saw about this was when /pol/ identified the wrong guy as the shooter then they kept trying to spread disinfo when they found out they were wrong.

1 Teresa_May 2017-10-02

Some of my conservative friends have been sharing pictures on Facebook that show "Antifa" taking credit for the attack.

Probably bollocks, but that's what a lot of people are going to take away from this.

1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-10-02

Considering the amount of fake Antifa accounts on Twitter and Facebook, I'm pretty skeptical. ISIS has also claimed responsibility.

I mean, /pol/ was trying to push this narrative on social media https://imgur.com/PHiEp1i

1 Mabans 2017-10-02

Oh Facebook. Got it.

1 xMutex 2017-10-02

Is it not mentally exhausting trying to convince yourself that there is some massive leftist conspiracy and that everyone is out to get you because of that one time you wore a MAGA hat? It seems like a very depressing belief to sustain with very little evidence. Most people just get on with their lives, if they find their way on reddit they upvote what they do like and downvote what they don't, there's not ((puppeteer)) behind it, really.

1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2017-10-02

Not releasing the name is another way of saying it's a Snackbar and LEOs don't want vengeance killings.

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

You're 100% correct in all of your assertions but expect downvotes here.

1) There's certainly been a history of muslim violence at concerts and other public events so I don't think it's out of line to have initially assumed that this attack was somehow connected.

It's also interesting that ISIS has already taken credit for the attack.

2) It's possible but highly unlikely that a right-leaning shooter would target a country concert as most country fans also lean right.

Given the target, if the shooting was political in any way I think it's pretty safe to assume that the shooter leaned left.

3) This is the biggest tell-tale sign for me. We're 12+ hours after the shooting and the media isn't really reporting anything about the shooter.

No interviews with neighbors, no voting history, nothing except comments from his brother that were framed in such a way as to create as much distance between the family and shooter as possible. "We weren't that close" "We talked occasionally"

1 RichEvansSextape 2017-10-02

How big of a chubby do you have right now?

1 parameciidae 2017-10-02

1) Assuming the shooter was Muslim was out of line because you didn't know this to be the case. If we are going to go by past attacks, it was equally likely it was a white dude, since they are ticking time bombs.

2) Please God, let people latch onto this as a talking point because it's fucking hilarious.

3) How many times does shit like this have to happen for you numbnuts to notice a pattern that it takes days for all the information to trickle out. Life isn't a television show, where everything is wrapped up in an hour long episode.

Jesus, just calm your tits.

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

1) There are been far more muslim related attacks recently than anything else. You're forgetting that the Pulse Nightclub shooting was muslim related, as was the San Bernardino shooter. Likewise, there have been several acts of muslim related violence in Europe including two acts of violence at concerts - one bomb and one shooting.

Sorry, but these days when mass violence happens there's a better than average chance that muslims are related in some way.

2) It's not hilarious, it's accurate. You're not going to target people who share your political beliefs. There is a fairly accurate perception that most country music fans are right-leaning. Given that, it's pretty safe to say that the shooter was probably not right-leaning.

3) Sorry, information is coming at a snail's pace compared to other events. It remains to be seen if that's because there's no information available or if it's because the media is taking a less than enthusiastic approach to reporting information about the shooter.

1 froibo 2017-10-02

Yeah but white people are clearly way better at terrorism than brown people so you have to weigh it.

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

I disagree

1 froibo 2017-10-02

How many Muslim shooters have over 100 casualties?

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

How many white shooters have over 100?

1 froibo 2017-10-02

Well, this guy.

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

He's only at 58

1 froibo 2017-10-02

Casualties includes injuries. What kind of internet conservative are you than you don't know basic military lingo?

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

Casualties are deaths.

Injuries are counted separately.

1 brianpv 2017-10-02

Imagine being this stupid.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualty_(person)

1 WikiTextBot 2017-10-02

Casualty (person)

A casualty in military usage is a person in military service, combatant or non-combatant, who becomes unavailable for duty due to several circumstances, including death, injury, illness, capture and desertion.

In civilian usage, a casualty is a person who is killed, wounded, or injured by some event; the term is usually used to describe multiple deaths and injuries due to violent incidents or disasters. Casualties is sometimes misunderstood to mean fatalities, but non-fatal injuries are also casualties.

1 brianpv 2017-10-02

Good bot

1 OldOrder 2017-10-02

Oh god you're actually retarded. I thought you had been playing for the past couple months.

1 tilmoph 2017-10-02

Dude, no. Casualties is injuries plus deaths. Just deaths is fatalities.

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

I stand corrected.

1 WalterMatthau 2017-10-02

Casualties are deaths. Injuries are counted separately.

Every time you post you just prove how fucking stupid you are. Keep at it, 1-Man Daddy Defense Force, you're an incredible ambassador for your cause.

1 [deleted] 2017-10-02

[deleted]

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

Look, you can define the word however you like... however it fits your narrative but the fact remains that every major news report is listing 50 casualties and 400 or so injuries.

1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-10-02

Link to every major news report?

1 [deleted] 2017-10-02

[deleted]

1 parameciidae 2017-10-02

Eh, I'm not going to get into a serious post back and forth with you. Nothing you said changes any of the points I was making.

1 botchlings 2017-10-02

Eh, I'm not going to get into a serious post back and forth with you.

Right, because you know you're wrong.

1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-10-02

That and all his points are still valid.

Not an argument, bro

1 SpotNL 2017-10-02

It's not hilarious, it's accurate. You're not going to target people who share your political beliefs. There is a fairly accurate perception that most country music fans are right-leaning. Given that, it's pretty safe to say that the shooter was probably not right-leaning.

Or maybe he just really hated country music. It's pretty shite.

1 celocanth13 2017-10-02

It's possible but highly unlikely that a right-leaning shooter would target a country concert as most country fans also lean right.

Why are the retards putting so much emphasis on it being country music? It's a predictable gathering of people, its an easy target for any old nut.

1 froibo 2017-10-02

Because everyone thinks there is some sense to be made from all of this and it better be their political opponents, instead of this dude just being completely off his rocker.

1 parameciidae 2017-10-02

It's just a talking point that's been decided upon to muddy the waters and get people to think this guy belongs to the left. We're probably going to see this repeated all over reddit the next couple of days.

1 Mabans 2017-10-02

Because that is the only thing they are certain about.

1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-02

Not trying to make a serious post on here, but:

serious posts

This nigga!

1 444455555666666 2017-10-02

came here to say this

1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-02

I came

1 _narrows 2017-10-02

It’s a shame you’re not a gambler

1 Etra 2017-10-02

1) Wrong.

2) No u.

3) Wrong.

Source: /u/botchlings agrees with you therefore you’re wrong.

1 SupaDupaFlyAccount 2017-10-02

1) Mass shooters are mostly white in the states.

2) stop sniffing gasoline.

3)again stop sniffing gasoline.

1 bleepis 2017-10-02

self-hating White

whites should hate themselves tho

1 Unfunny_Twat 2017-10-02

Who is 'the left'? In fact who is 'the right'? I only ever see this retarded shit on the Internet. Every single real person I have ever met has opinions that span the whole political spectrum, yet for some reason there exists these extremist bogeyman on both sides on Reddit.

I'm tired of reading complaints about the left and right because they just sound like the same old tired points being reiterated against non existent entities.

1 Mabans 2017-10-02

I had a co-worker who had all these conspiracies about what happened even though he knew nothing about it. After talking to co-workers he shut down. Not in a rude way but people kept challenging his ideas and showing how empty they were. 2 hours after I see a post on Facebook of him starting the same conversation but now his internet friends were along with the ride all agreeing that this shoot couldn't have possible have happened the way it does. People create their own plato's cave to recluse to and continue forth with their nonsense.

1 True_Jack_Falstaff 2017-10-02