I'm not even sure what your point is. Yeah I'd rather sleep with a dakimakura of my waifu Renge-chan than with some random 3D slut but that doesn't mean I'm desperate, it's the opposite, it implies that I have standards.
Nigga there are direct political messages written right into a dream for electric sheep. I think you mean could people stop using movies to give their shitty current year analysis of it.
They live in a hyper capitalistic society where corporations have essentially taken control of the government and created their own underclass using robots. Do you even know what dystopian means? Political Philosophy?
Yes, like everyone else I took Sophomore English in high school bud. There is very little anti-capatlist rhetoric if at all in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep I had to read it in college. The book focuses almost exclusively on existential philosophy and what makes us human.
Not to say that it is completely devoid of any political commentary at all. The man had a crazy interesting life, what with losing half his sanity to syphilis and catching his daughters life threatening medical emergency because he heard voices telling him she was in danger.
lol, where on earth did you get the idea dystopian narratives are apolitical? its one of the most explicitly political genres there is out there. blade runner is more metaphysical than most, but it's absolutely still preoccupied with formations of state and corporate power. this article is mind-numbingly retarded because all its author can do is tally "diversity" stats, but congrats on finding the even dumber take.
The whole film is about the ethics of robot slaves and whether or not we can dismantle something that is seemingly as intelligent as people, it’s pretty much 100% politics
I haven't seen it but does Ryan Gossling manage more than a single facial expression in this movie or is it still the "my face never changes expression because my characters so stoic not because I can't act" shtick still.
It's like when authors dismiss the books they wrote as trash when it attracts a certain kind of audience or they start to get criticised for the content. Chuck Paluniuk can dismiss Fight Club all he wants, but there's no denying he had the incel mentality until he got famous.
The hell, i remember a black guy who chases him in the movie. The one who puts down the paper unicorn at the end. When Harrison Ford and the chick are escaping on the elevator. He had a mustache.
The white devil's testosterone is too low these days from decades of emasculation, so proud womyn have to turn to the brute savagery of BBC to get off.
The only reason women's situation would revert to it's pre-industrial state is if there were some kind of major societal collapse. Industrialization has rendered the agricultural family model obsolete in modern society because a vast majority of work is mechanized to the extent that physical strength is far less relevant than it was prior to industrialization.
Only thing 'bad' is you using that particular term(bad) to describe this quandry. As far as I'm concerned, It's just inconvenient that I have to rummage through all the vivid ones to get a truly lucid one.
You know LUCID dreams are rare, right? You can't just decide to sleep one day and order yourself to have a lucid dream. VIVID dreams are common af. Almost all my dreams are vivid, have favorite characters that I remember, sometimes that lingering feeling of lost love persists, but controlling when these characters appear and creating custom environment in dream is another matter altogether.
No, it is not the same. Yes, controlling makes it different. It's not 'bad' because reading any PM'd dream is 1000% better than salty posts on /r/drama, just mildly exasperating that people aren't grasping this difference between lucid and vivid.
i wasnt trying to use that term to describe it, i was merely asking if you perceived it as bad. i heard there could be some kind of lucid dream training, is that to have lucid dreams or just be aware of when your in one?
Haven't tried. If you got nothing else to do this weekend, please go ahead and be guinea pig for lucid experiment and report back with results on reddit's premier scientific sub, /r/Drama.
Listen Morty, I hate to break it to you, but what people calls "love" is just a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed. It hits hard, Morty, then it slowly fades, leaving you stranded in a failing marriage.
The only reason women's situation would revert to it's pre-industrial state is if there were some kind of major societal collapse to an unrecoverable economic state.
Well he was a math prodigy who got into Harvard at 16.
I disagree with a lot of his conclusions and arguments in Industrial Society and Its Future, namely his criticism of leftist politics in regards to the issues of industrial capitalism, but the first time I read I couldn't help but think "huh, this crazy dude is making a lot of good points"
I mean, it's not like the negative effects of industrialization and widespread technological adoption haven't already been recognized and continue to be studied. Old Teddie went off the wall when he started advocating for a return to a hunter-gatherer society (anarcho-primitivism lol) and when he, you know, bombed multiple universities.
The only reason women's situation would revert to it's pre-industrial state is if there were some kind of major societal collapse to an unrecoverable economic state.
Getting xir money's worth out of that gender studies degree, I see. This article lifts my spirits, though, after discovering that a roastie and a basketball american are heading up the new Pacific Rim 😤
oh my god this movie populated mostly by robots and holograms programmed to perform particular roles has characters that seem lacking in agency and free will, clearly the evil bigots have struck again
Decaked, possibly replicant, doesn't show up until the last quarter. Ryan Goosling is also a replicant, not a white male human by a traditional definition.
Lared Leto is a blind white rich guy who is the only "villian"
Meanwhile you have robo waifu as a main plot, a real female police director, and near-sentiant robo killer waifu and two black guys who are human with speaking parts. Oh and one's a slave owner.
Haha I love feminists get pissy about the fact that they'll all be soon replaced by robots. Hmm I wonder why. Bang some radical feminist who's only going to accuse me of rape. Or bang a much hotter sexbot, like Fisto from Fallout New Vegas, have the time of my life, and no rape charges.
Well at least until Fisto becomes self aware and tells the cops. That's why I always secretly install a small (actually it's quite large) explosive device right up it's bussy. Like in that $30 demo for MGSV.
You have just destroyed one model XOJ-37 Nuclear Powered Pan-Sexual Roto-Plooker.
And you're gonna have to pay for it! So give up, you haven't got a chance.
No, it literally means unpleasant and bad state, which is however often portrayed through oppression. It's hardly the only way to do it, tho. For example Black Mirror often features dystopian societies we wouldn't want to live in (like one where's your status is based on others' likes), but it's not oppression.
This bullshit is so annoying.
Not every fucking film needs to cater to every fucking thing.
This is almost as stupid as neckbeards tilting because Bioware included Gay & Transgender Characters in DA:I. Just let people tell the goddamn story they want.
> Hollywood movie's writing and direction uses lazy, reductive, Hollywood shorthand and cardboard cut-out characters for everything but the few themes the movie wants to focus on.
Not only is this obvious, from a practical standpoint it's often desirable. The shorthand of film tropes allow the director can communicate quickly with the audience and focus their attention on the things they set the stage for. Yeah, the idea they have to do that is a bit disenchanting, and a movie that is nothing but tropes is garbage, but not everything can be a magnum opus.
blade runner is probably the least lazy/cookie-cutter hollywood movie of the year (including all the tryhard oscarbait), so it's not even that, this "commentator" is just really bad at thinking
omg. ..... they didn't try and do a Ghostbusters shitshow with the sequel so obviously it's a racist sexist homophobic xenophobic piece of s*** that only evil Nazi white men will watch
170 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-10-09
I'm not even sure what your point is. Yeah I'd rather sleep with a dakimakura of my waifu Renge-chan than with some random 3D slut but that doesn't mean I'm desperate, it's the opposite, it implies that I have standards.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 1171798 2017-10-09
>tfw no JOI gf, which uncoditional loves me
1 aggressiveshitpost 2017-10-09
7.8/10, too much water and too many white people.
1 botchlings 2017-10-09
Jesus Christ, can we now not even enjoy a movie without analyzing it's politics? Especially a Sci-fi movie with no basis in reality?
1 Neon_needles 2017-10-09
Star wars- Ewoks, the unseen people. Thoughts about the Jewish struggle and Endor.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-09
I think you mean the (((Jawas))).
1 clarkeff 2017-10-09
Everyone knows the Jawas are Mexican. Watto is the one true space Jew
1 TehGroff 2017-10-09
To be fair, the people that write "reviews" like this aren't based in reality either.
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2017-10-09
Nigga there are direct political messages written right into a dream for electric sheep. I think you mean could people stop using movies to give their shitty current year analysis of it.
1 Mistermann14 2017-10-09
Not really political messages in Do androids dream od electric sheep mostly philosophical.
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2017-10-09
They live in a hyper capitalistic society where corporations have essentially taken control of the government and created their own underclass using robots. Do you even know what dystopian means? Political Philosophy?
1 Mistermann14 2017-10-09
Yes, like everyone else I took Sophomore English in high school bud. There is very little anti-capatlist rhetoric if at all in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep I had to read it in college. The book focuses almost exclusively on existential philosophy and what makes us human.
1 Mistermann14 2017-10-09
Not to say that it is completely devoid of any political commentary at all. The man had a crazy interesting life, what with losing half his sanity to syphilis and catching his daughters life threatening medical emergency because he heard voices telling him she was in danger.
1 glmox 2017-10-09
lol, where on earth did you get the idea dystopian narratives are apolitical? its one of the most explicitly political genres there is out there. blade runner is more metaphysical than most, but it's absolutely still preoccupied with formations of state and corporate power. this article is mind-numbingly retarded because all its author can do is tally "diversity" stats, but congrats on finding the even dumber take.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-10-09
/r/drama wins again
1 OchoMorales 2017-10-09
So blessed.
1 Mexagon 2017-10-09
Blade runner is character story, you fucktard. Don't shoehorn your faggy r/latestagecapitalism pseudointellectualism into it.
1 glmox 2017-10-09
that isnt mutually exclusive, you fucktard
1 OchoMorales 2017-10-09
This is what I said during Roger and Me.
Can't we enjoy watching a fatso getting roughed up without a bunch of negroes complaining about not having jobs!
1 GopherGus 2017-10-09
everything is racist, everything is sexist and you have to call it all out
1 diversity_is_toxic 2017-10-09
I want to kick that fat Armenian midget in the cunt.
1 Denny_Craine 2017-10-09
That's not exactly new...
1 MasterLawlz 2017-10-09
The whole film is about the ethics of robot slaves and whether or not we can dismantle something that is seemingly as intelligent as people, it’s pretty much 100% politics
1 Successful-Troll 2017-10-09
That ethics.
1 incineratechicken 2017-10-09
Okay, discussing the film’s intersectionality is good and all, if you’re into that shit, but can I fap to neon-soaked noir cityscapes or not?
1 kermit_was_right 2017-10-09
Yes. Movie is gorgeous.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-09
Want spoilers?
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-09
No, there's being a dick like all r/drama users and then there's being a monster. Don't be a monster.
1 carthoris26 2017-10-09
Only when delivered as God intended: in the flair of unrelated threads that have hit /r/all
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
Extensive fappables, yes. You'll be a very joiful joe.
1 neutralvoter 2017-10-09
I haven't seen it but does Ryan Gossling manage more than a single facial expression in this movie or is it still the "my face never changes expression because my characters so stoic not because I can't act" shtick still.
1 jet199 2017-10-09
He's been method acting a robot for years, he's hardly going to change it for this film with actual robots.
1 caliberoverreaching 2017-10-09
He's actually really good in it.
I think he just needs a Not shit director to act well.
1 kermit_was_right 2017-10-09
That fits really well with his role in this one. They cast him well.
1 telandrias 2017-10-09
Considering he's a robot pretending to be a robot, the whole lack of expression fits very well.
1 c3534l 2017-10-09
That's how Harrison Ford played it in the original. The human characters are meant to come off as robotic and the robots to come off as human.
1 smokes_degrass 2017-10-09
but if you ask Ridley Scott, Deckard is a robot.
Except there are no robots dumbass, replicants are bio-engineered humans
you'd know this if you watched real sci-fi like rick and--- ahahhahaha no, no, I can't go through with it
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
Frankly, Ridley Scott's a geriatric Geordie lunatic so who gives a fuck what he thinks?
1 shanewater 2017-10-09
It's like when authors dismiss the books they wrote as trash when it attracts a certain kind of audience or they start to get criticised for the content. Chuck Paluniuk can dismiss Fight Club all he wants, but there's no denying he had the incel mentality until he got famous.
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
Fame and wealth cures inceldom instantly unless you work in IT.
1 dionysist 2017-10-09
In the book it’s based on, it’s clear that Deckard is a replicant.
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
Oh and he was me thinking that he just didn't give a fuck.
1 nanonan 2017-10-09
They passed on the perfect actor though.
1 MasterLawlz 2017-10-09
The way it was written, I think he played it about as well as anyone could
I don’t want to spoil it, but the few scenes where his character got emotional, he did well
1 wololololow 2017-10-09
This. Why the fuck did anyone like driver. The faggot had no facial expressions and his character was like something from an emo fanfic
1 glmox 2017-10-09
1 wololololow 2017-10-09
hehe autocorrect eksdee
1 whenweriiide 2017-10-09
Full disclosure: Ryan Gosling's a pretty cool dude
1 rewind45 2017-10-09
This makes no sense, one of the main characters in the original Blade Runner was a black guy.
1 carthoris26 2017-10-09
There is not a single black person in the original wtf are you talking about
1 _trailerbot_tester_ 2017-10-09
Hello, I'm a bot! The movie you linked is called Blade Runner, here are some Trailers
1 rewind45 2017-10-09
The hell, i remember a black guy who chases him in the movie. The one who puts down the paper unicorn at the end. When Harrison Ford and the chick are escaping on the elevator. He had a mustache.
1 carthoris26 2017-10-09
That's Edward James Olmos dude.
1 rewind45 2017-10-09
Im a retard.... im sorry. :(
1 leafidpdx 2017-10-09
Is that the black guy in Battlestar Galactica?
1 carthoris26 2017-10-09
He's hispanic, but yes.
1 parameciidae 2017-10-09
Dear God, don't tell me a woman said something again.
1 Neon_needles 2017-10-09
Wait, blacks = walking fleshlights?
1 EternallyMiffed 2017-10-09
That's how some roasties view them, sure.
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
The white devil's testosterone is too low these days from decades of emasculation, so proud womyn have to turn to the brute savagery of BBC to get off.
1 EternallyMiffed 2017-10-09
I blame the chemicals in the water. Buy moar water filters.
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
Way ahead of you. No flouride/estrogen/govt mind control for this brita boye!
1 uniqueguy263 2017-10-09
Wtf does roastie mean?
1 JoeFalchetto 2017-10-09
How incels call women.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-09
it's an incel term for women who have had sex
1 menvaren 2017-10-09
ewwwwww
1 niggerpenis 2017-10-09
ewwwwww
1 eelsify 2017-10-09
You mean the ruined remnants of what used to be a woman?
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
What's a Stacy then? A woman the incel wants whether or not she's a roastie?
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-09
I don't know! Do I look like a fuckin' incel to you?
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
.... Yes?
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-09
but I'm not
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
That's what an incel trying to keep it on the down-low would say!
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-09
I have sex of my own volition
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
Until now. Post bussy.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-09
my wife says no
1 DayyyTripper 2017-10-09
Stacy is the female Chad, stereotypical popular cheerleader.
Any woman who's been violated by another man is a roastie.
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
So a Stacy can also be a roastie?
1 DayyyTripper 2017-10-09
Stacey is the Queen of roasties
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
Ahhh.
Anyone who uses that terminology unironically should be shot.
1 your_odd_erection 2017-10-09
lets round up all the freaks in r/incels and get er done!
1 SperglockHolmes 2017-10-09
It refers to how women with a lot of labia kind of look like roast beef.
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
I dunno, but I just got a major craving for some Arby's.
1 your_odd_erection 2017-10-09
you an incel?
1 EternallyMiffed 2017-10-09
Nope, I'm a generic shitlord.
1 neupainneugain 2017-10-09
It was in the good old days
1 neupainneugain 2017-10-09
It was in the good old days
1 neupainneugain 2017-10-09
It was in the good old days
1 neupainneugain 2017-10-09
It was in the good old days
1 neupainneugain 2017-10-09
It was in the good old days
1 Imanidiot77777 2017-10-09
>a future where women stay off to the side
Wtf I love the future now
1 wolfsktaag 2017-10-09
i cant believe women seriously think theyre current participation in society is anything other than an anomalous blip in the history of mankind
theyre acting like they think this stuff is permanent and sustainable
1 DuBBle 2017-10-09
One minor armageddon and we'll be back to filling the harem for the biggest, meanest man in town.
1 tyuijvhvhcfcjf 2017-10-09
Hopefully this will be a post traps-are-not-gay world, and my scrawny ass can learn to tuck it and live an easy life drinking water with Immortan Joe
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2017-10-09
The only reason women's situation would revert to it's pre-industrial state is if there were some kind of major societal collapse. Industrialization has rendered the agricultural family model obsolete in modern society because a vast majority of work is mechanized to the extent that physical strength is far less relevant than it was prior to industrialization.
1 JoeFalchetto 2017-10-09
Don’t ever seriouspost to me or my children again.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-10-09
What about your wife's children?
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2017-10-09
What about your dad?
1 PM_ME_UR_LUCID_DREAM 2017-10-09
What about your sister?
1 pm_me_dat_T-girl 2017-10-09
do you actually get lucid dream pms? that sounds fun
1 PM_ME_UR_LUCID_DREAM 2017-10-09
Yes. But most are unaware of difference between LUCID and VIVID dreams, so keep getting latter mostly.
1 pm_me_dat_T-girl 2017-10-09
is that bad? id imagine itd be close to the same in your position, unless them controlling their dreams make it different
1 PM_ME_UR_LUCID_DREAM 2017-10-09
Only thing 'bad' is you using that particular term(bad) to describe this quandry. As far as I'm concerned, It's just inconvenient that I have to rummage through all the vivid ones to get a truly lucid one.
You know LUCID dreams are rare, right? You can't just decide to sleep one day and order yourself to have a lucid dream. VIVID dreams are common af. Almost all my dreams are vivid, have favorite characters that I remember, sometimes that lingering feeling of lost love persists, but controlling when these characters appear and creating custom environment in dream is another matter altogether.
No, it is not the same. Yes, controlling makes it different. It's not 'bad' because reading any PM'd dream is 1000% better than salty posts on /r/drama, just mildly exasperating that people aren't grasping this difference between lucid and vivid.
1 pm_me_dat_T-girl 2017-10-09
i wasnt trying to use that term to describe it, i was merely asking if you perceived it as bad. i heard there could be some kind of lucid dream training, is that to have lucid dreams or just be aware of when your in one?
1 PM_ME_UR_LUCID_DREAM 2017-10-09
Haven't tried. If you got nothing else to do this weekend, please go ahead and be guinea pig for lucid experiment and report back with results on reddit's premier scientific sub, /r/Drama.
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
I prefer my vivid and lucid dreams to be lurid.
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
What about love?
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
What is love?
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
Listen Morty, I hate to break it to you, but what people calls "love" is just a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed. It hits hard, Morty, then it slowly fades, leaving you stranded in a failing marriage.
1 bareballzthebitch 2017-10-09
This happened to me. Twice.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-09
Ah jeeze Rick...
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-09
Baby don't hurt me
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
Don't hurt me...
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-09
No more
1 AlyxLovely 2017-10-09
you mean jewish lies?
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-10-09
You rang?
1 Norci 2017-10-09
Yeah, because casual sexism is fine as long as it's ironic.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2017-10-09
You're about two years too late on that.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2017-10-09
>complaining about ironic casual sexism
At that point it's already over.
1 jewdanksdad 2017-10-09
1 leather-muffin 2017-10-09
That's a lot of words for r/drama r u ok
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2017-10-09
no
1 Denny_Craine 2017-10-09
Implying that's not inevitable
1 glmox 2017-10-09
the unabomber will go down as the smartest man of the 20th century
1 Denny_Craine 2017-10-09
Well he was a math prodigy who got into Harvard at 16.
I disagree with a lot of his conclusions and arguments in Industrial Society and Its Future, namely his criticism of leftist politics in regards to the issues of industrial capitalism, but the first time I read I couldn't help but think "huh, this crazy dude is making a lot of good points"
1 glmox 2017-10-09
yeah, i was only being half sarcastic honestly
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2017-10-09
I mean, it's not like the negative effects of industrialization and widespread technological adoption haven't already been recognized and continue to be studied. Old Teddie went off the wall when he started advocating for a return to a hunter-gatherer society (anarcho-primitivism lol) and when he, you know, bombed multiple universities.
1 SirShrimp 2017-10-09
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
Sounds pretty likely to me, brah.
1 Chlodovechus 2017-10-09
Problem is that differences in physical strength are just the tip of the iceberg.
1 Norci 2017-10-09
Please tell us more.
1 Chlodovechus 2017-10-09
Why, so you can wallow in butthurt?
1 Norci 2017-10-09
Mostly so we can see how retarded you actually are. But also buttstuff, I like that.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2017-10-09
I don't doubt that's what you think.
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
ARTIFICIAL WOMB WHEN
1 StevenGorefrost 2017-10-09
No spoilers or anything but there is actually a women who is the main characters boss in the movie.
1 Cake_eater666 2017-10-09
Negros hate dogs because they never used them when evolving. Whites have empathy for animals because they farm them or use them for useful jobs.
1 wokeaspie 2017-10-09
Getting xir money's worth out of that gender studies degree, I see. This article lifts my spirits, though, after discovering that a roastie and a basketball american are heading up the new Pacific Rim 😤
1 HivemindBuster 2017-10-09
Seriously Wired is really shit lately.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-09
More like Tired, amirite
1 JohnnyLargeCock 2017-10-09
Oh, fuck yeah!
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-10-09
They are spending too much time on social justice and too little on technology.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-09
Every faggot in America has decided to be a writer, and that is why shitposting is the only thing worth reading.
1 chanilastname 2017-10-09
me too tbqh fam
1 glmox 2017-10-09
oh my god this movie populated mostly by robots and holograms programmed to perform particular roles has characters that seem lacking in agency and free will, clearly the evil bigots have struck again
1 telandrias 2017-10-09
Just saw the film a day ago.
WRONG
Decaked, possibly replicant, doesn't show up until the last quarter. Ryan Goosling is also a replicant, not a white male human by a traditional definition.
Lared Leto is a blind white rich guy who is the only "villian"
Meanwhile you have robo waifu as a main plot, a real female police director, and near-sentiant robo killer waifu and two black guys who are human with speaking parts. Oh and one's a slave owner.
1 Zombies_hate_ninjas 2017-10-09
Ha not if I and my soon to be completed robot army have anything to say about it.
CleganeBowl2018!!!Mayocide 2018!!!1 32Fismypreferredtemp 2017-10-09
Good luck faggot
1 glmox 2017-10-09
this but unironically
1 Zombies_hate_ninjas 2017-10-09
Haha I love feminists get pissy about the fact that they'll all be soon replaced by robots. Hmm I wonder why. Bang some radical feminist who's only going to accuse me of rape. Or bang a much hotter sexbot, like Fisto from Fallout New Vegas, have the time of my life, and no rape charges.
Well at least until Fisto becomes self aware and tells the cops. That's why I always secretly install a small (actually it's quite large) explosive device right up it's bussy. Like in that $30 demo for MGSV.
1 smokes_degrass 2017-10-09
stop, I can only get so erect
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
Plooking too hard!
1 niggerpenis 2017-10-09
I just came all over my keyboard, thanks a lot.
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
Just remember to text tomorrow.
1 no_frills 2017-10-09
You have just destroyed one model XOJ-37 Nuclear Powered Pan-Sexual Roto-Plooker. And you're gonna have to pay for it! So give up, you haven't got a chance.
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
But I... I... I can't pay! I gave all my money to some groovy shitposter guy two memes ago!
1 no_frills 2017-10-09
Come on out, son. Between the two of us... we'll find a way to work it out.
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
BTW - for all you chillunz out there who have no clue what we're talking about, here ya go.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2017-10-09
Please assume the position
1 ComedicSans 2017-10-09
ASSUME THE POSITION.
1 GopherGus 2017-10-09
Author is just jelly Ryan Gosling has a hot VR waifu in the movie.
I was in the middle of writing up a multi paragraph response but I realized wtf i was doing
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
It's literally a good movie. Shame it bombed.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-09
Thanks for not serious posting famalam
1 Denny_Craine 2017-10-09
No fucking shit that's literally what dystopia means
1 32Fismypreferredtemp 2017-10-09
What's with all these cowboys in western movies?
1 shanewater 2017-10-09
This type of retard probably sees Metropolis at face value.
1 Norci 2017-10-09
No, it literally means unpleasant and bad state, which is however often portrayed through oppression. It's hardly the only way to do it, tho. For example Black Mirror often features dystopian societies we wouldn't want to live in (like one where's your status is based on others' likes), but it's not oppression.
1 Illyana_Rasputin 2017-10-09
Next up: "Mad Max: Fury Road" and its toxic masculinity issues.
1 ppporto 2017-10-09
I unironically want humanity to die.
1 32Fismypreferredtemp 2017-10-09
Omnicide when?
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-10-09
Since when is Eddie Olmos a "person of color"?
1 thetinguy 2017-10-09
I want you to guess what you think the author looks like before clicking this link: https://i.imgur.com/soond1h.png
1 BigBabyDave 2017-10-09
Jesus christ, read that cunts twitter feed, she makes me not want to be even the moderate amount of leftist I am
1 SRSLovesGawker 2017-10-09
Not just white men, but Dave Bautista levels of badass white men.
1 lonestarphysics 2017-10-09
Agenda post. Every time some SJW says something, it doesn't mean it's drama. You have to show actual drama too
1 heyanuntakenusername 2017-10-09
Why must politics be injected into everything. Dear God please end me
1 trecht 2017-10-09
You have to be really brave to come out as a woman in this day and age tbqphwu
1 NotGay88 2017-10-09
Wired has gone to complete shit the last few years.
1 artboiz 2017-10-09
This bullshit is so annoying. Not every fucking film needs to cater to every fucking thing.
This is almost as stupid as neckbeards tilting because Bioware included Gay & Transgender Characters in DA:I. Just let people tell the goddamn story they want.
1 midairfistfight 2017-10-09
> Hollywood movie's writing and direction uses lazy, reductive, Hollywood shorthand and cardboard cut-out characters for everything but the few themes the movie wants to focus on.
Not only is this obvious, from a practical standpoint it's often desirable. The shorthand of film tropes allow the director can communicate quickly with the audience and focus their attention on the things they set the stage for. Yeah, the idea they have to do that is a bit disenchanting, and a movie that is nothing but tropes is garbage, but not everything can be a magnum opus.
1 glmox 2017-10-09
blade runner is probably the least lazy/cookie-cutter hollywood movie of the year (including all the tryhard oscarbait), so it's not even that, this "commentator" is just really bad at thinking
1 diversity_is_toxic 2017-10-09
Make your own movies you fucking retards.
1 Successful-Troll 2017-10-09
She's half Mayo so she doesn't count. Hahaha
1 Successful-Troll 2017-10-09
omg. ..... they didn't try and do a Ghostbusters shitshow with the sequel so obviously it's a racist sexist homophobic xenophobic piece of s*** that only evil Nazi white men will watch
1 Mariokartfever 2017-10-09
more like heaven ay fellas
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-10-09
I literally could not care less about her blather. BTW, she could have made her points in three paragraphs and I might have read all of it.