It looks like a study that is being taken out of context, to make a points about Gender politics.
From what I can see, it only tests physiological responses, and I don't think it's even close to saying "straight people don't exist" just that people who identify as straight can get physiologically aroused to gay stimuli.
I see this happen so often that if anyone makes a conclusion that is not specifically made word for word in their source study, I automatically assume it's horse shit.
It's like 99% of the time, especially in political contexts, people just skim a marginally relevant study until they see something that could maybe possibly be misconstrued as agreeing with the argument they're trying to make, and then use that to prove they're right entirely. Who cares if it wasn't the point of nor the conclusion made from the study, right?
Yeah, the other end with people who demand a source in order to believe anything at all you say are part of this problem too.
God forbid my statement is a fucking theory, right? Just fuck me up the asshole for not conducting an international double blind study published in a journal with 3,000 impact factor before saying Trump's hair is fake.
The best part though is those same people use the lack of a source as some kind of proof in itself that the person is wrong, which is the most backward ass psuedo-intellectual interpretation of how research works that it's incredible. How do these people figure out anything without being explicitly told it by a tenured Harvard professor?
Just fuck me up the asshole for not conducting an international double blind study published in a journal with 3,000 impact factor before saying Trump's hair is fake.
I think it's about the sensuality of it, you know what I mean? I'm pretty sure if a guy was gently rubbing his dick between your buttchecks, you'd get an erection.
The study didn't even look that far, it just looked at eye dilation.
"We show straight men a picture of a woman masturbating and they respond just like a straight guy, but then you also show them a guy masturbating and their eyes dilate a little bit. So we're actually able to show physiologically that all guys are not either gay, straight, or bi."
Very Definitive.
Read More: The Straight Men Who Have Sex with Trans Women
Matt didn't know it was possible for a girl to have a dick before the model pictured in his Hustler-esque mag drew seven inches. She had slipped in unannounced between the magazine's other, more typical spreads. His stroke quickened, sticking with sweat in his Brooklyn bedroom while a worrying thought knocked in his skull: Did it mean he was gay?....
On Reddit, arguably the most revealing cultural sampler of our times,
Well, you know what people do in dark room so yeah, it's probably an induced paraphilia, like that guy who ended up being aroused by shoes because he used to hide under the bed to jerk it off.
The way you talk is almost as horrible to my ears as your smell is to my nose. Your dad was correct for leaving your family. Your dog is tiny and unimposing. Your remaining parent does notlike you very much.
I believe all of the above because you're a fag. Get bullied son.
"It's basically a study that assesses sexual orientation by looking at the eyes and whether they dilate or not. You can't control your eye dilation. Essentially, that's what the whole project attempts to get at, another way of assessing sexuality without relying on self report.
Your pupils will dilate anytime you see anything interesting or shocking. Like a car crash. I guess I'm a car crash sexual.
Another way of course is genital arousal, but that gets a little invasive.
Actual science is too inconvenient so we're just gonna half ass it.
Crash is a 1996 British–Canadian psychological thriller film written and directed by David Cronenberg based on J. G. Ballard's 1973 novel of the same name. It tells the story of a group of people who take sexual pleasure from car crashes, a notable form of paraphilia. The film stars James Spader, Deborah Kara Unger, Elias Koteas, Holly Hunter, and Rosanna Arquette.
The film generated considerable controversy upon its release and opened to mixed and highly divergent reactions from critics.
Devices for measuring sexual arousal have existed for decades, and they have been used for the research of sexuality. The problem isn't that they are inconvenient, but that they result in a politically-undesirable answer.
So, everybody's at least bi?!? I guess the we dn't need LGBT community, PRIDE, etc..because minority is now a majority and one can't oppress a majority.
Because most straight guys are actually gay or bi you fucking faggot. You just deny it because hetero-patriarchal norms on behaviour tell you to. Don't worry, just think about your thick shaft sliding into some thick bussy and tug one out.
90 comments
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-12-06
Wtf I’m a ghost now?
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-12-06
👻💦
¯\_(ツ) _/¯
1 GunOfSod 2017-12-06
Ed, can you post a clever picture thingy for me as well? BTW I like cats.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-12-06
🔫😼🍆🍑💦
Gun of sod. Gun/you like cats so a cat/sod ---> sodomy so eggplant (dick) + peach (ass) + cummies
1 rewind45 2017-12-06
Bro your shit is super low effort. Post bussy instead
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-12-06
https://i.imgur.com/XGTsjOw.jpg
1 shallowm 2017-12-06
It's like literature class all over again.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-12-06
Hahaha :D
1 Stuntman119 2017-12-06
u r necrosexual
1 JasonJewnova 2017-12-06
No ones buying it turd smuggler
1 Wild_Child19 2017-12-06
It looks like a study that is being taken out of context, to make a points about Gender politics.
From what I can see, it only tests physiological responses, and I don't think it's even close to saying "straight people don't exist" just that people who identify as straight can get physiologically aroused to gay stimuli.
1 SDIHTD 2017-12-06
Thank God you're here to undramatically explain everything to us.
1 Wild_Child19 2017-12-06
You're welcome.
I'm glad to help.
1 Chicup 2017-12-06
SRD would be all for traps.
1 hexane360 2017-12-06
Post bussy
1 Pyrepenol 2017-12-06
I see this happen so often that if anyone makes a conclusion that is not specifically made word for word in their source study, I automatically assume it's horse shit.
It's like 99% of the time, especially in political contexts, people just skim a marginally relevant study until they see something that could maybe possibly be misconstrued as agreeing with the argument they're trying to make, and then use that to prove they're right entirely. Who cares if it wasn't the point of nor the conclusion made from the study, right?
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-06
citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? citation needed. source? kills self
1 Pyrepenol 2017-12-06
Yeah, the other end with people who demand a source in order to believe anything at all you say are part of this problem too.
God forbid my statement is a fucking theory, right? Just fuck me up the asshole for not conducting an international double blind study published in a journal with 3,000 impact factor before saying Trump's hair is fake.
The best part though is those same people use the lack of a source as some kind of proof in itself that the person is wrong, which is the most backward ass psuedo-intellectual interpretation of how research works that it's incredible. How do these people figure out anything without being explicitly told it by a tenured Harvard professor?
1 glmox 2017-12-06
i mean, if you insist
but not in a gay way
1 nanonan 2017-12-06
Don't try to tousle it though, you'll become a Nazi.
1 birdboy2000 2017-12-06
That seems pretty gay desu
1 shallowm 2017-12-06
I think it's about the sensuality of it, you know what I mean? I'm pretty sure if a guy was gently rubbing his dick between your buttchecks, you'd get an erection.
The study didn't even look that far, it just looked at eye dilation.
1 shallowm 2017-12-06
I don't think "Straight People Have Responses to Gay Porn" would attract as many clicks.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-12-06
https://archive.is
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2017-12-06
Very Definitive.
Trap Aren't Gay ~Vice
1 iredditonreddit21 2017-12-06
I feel like Mac from always sunny works at Vice. And he banged a trap and is trying to convince everyone hes not gay for doing it.
1 MG87 2017-12-06
"She's getting it removed guys"
1 GunOfSod 2017-12-06
MorbidReality makes my pupils dilate. Am I necrophiliac now Vice?
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2017-12-06
I'm apparently attracted to going from a brightly lit room to a darker room.
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-06
Well, you know what people do in dark room so yeah, it's probably an induced paraphilia, like that guy who ended up being aroused by shoes because he used to hide under the bed to jerk it off.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2017-12-06
There is a lot of bussy in closets.
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-06
Here's my favourite song about dark room bussy https://g.co/kgs/3w4hxQ
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-06
phhwoooar that gets me going
1 baaaaby 2017-12-06
optometrists: doctors... or sex workers? a vice oped
1 cimarafa 2017-12-06
Probably
1 Randydandy69 2017-12-06
Link?
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2017-12-06
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/kb4jw9/the-straight-men-who-have-sex-with-trans-women
1 Randydandy69 2017-12-06
God damn. Vice puts out hard as shit documentaries about the Syrian war and then they come out with this shit.
I don't know how to feel about them
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-12-06
Vice confirmed for clickhole sleeper cell
1 shallowm 2017-12-06
Holy shit, it's real. I wish they'd write an article about /r/drama.
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2017-12-06
We need to become more crypto-hate-ish to get any mention :(
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-12-06
Hundreds of millions of years of evolution to get us to this point vs social psychology who wins
1 lewildcard 2017-12-06
Dude history and knowlege were TKO'd as soon as "microaggressions" became everyday vernacular
1 Throwawayfuckarmatbh 2017-12-06
Guess I am the sole exception, you fags better get ready for some major homophobia coming your way. Nerds.
1 wtfuxlolwut 2017-12-06
Homophobia is my kink baby talk dirty to me.
1 Throwawayfuckarmatbh 2017-12-06
The way you talk is almost as horrible to my ears as your smell is to my nose. Your dad was correct for leaving your family. Your dog is tiny and unimposing. Your remaining parent does notlike you very much.
I believe all of the above because you're a fag. Get bullied son.
1 MG87 2017-12-06
Said the dude that I just jizzed on
1 Throwawayfuckarmatbh 2017-12-06
It is only gay if it's consensual, you rapist.
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-12-06
But you said you want to do it again next Tuesday?
1 Throwawayfuckarmatbh 2017-12-06
How would you know? 🤔
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-12-06
He talked.
1 Throwawayfuckarmatbh 2017-12-06
You would trust a rapist? Waaaaay to victim blame there buddy.
1 OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-12-06
I thought you couldn’t victimize bussy? That’s what Jezabelle told me.
1 rewind45 2017-12-06
That's not gay, that's just protein sharing.
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2017-12-06
Your pupils will dilate anytime you see anything interesting or shocking. Like a car crash. I guess I'm a car crash sexual.
Actual science is too inconvenient so we're just gonna half ass it.
1 kingofthehill5 2017-12-06
You will like this then
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crash_(1996_film)
1 WikiTextBot 2017-12-06
Crash (1996 film)
Crash is a 1996 British–Canadian psychological thriller film written and directed by David Cronenberg based on J. G. Ballard's 1973 novel of the same name. It tells the story of a group of people who take sexual pleasure from car crashes, a notable form of paraphilia. The film stars James Spader, Deborah Kara Unger, Elias Koteas, Holly Hunter, and Rosanna Arquette.
The film generated considerable controversy upon its release and opened to mixed and highly divergent reactions from critics.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
1 ahbslldud 2017-12-06
I ran into that movie on some cable channel when I was like 12 and shit fucked me up.
1 rewind45 2017-12-06
I really to work my way through Cronenberg's filmography. Dude has out out some weird ass shit.
1 glmox 2017-12-06
long live the new flesh
1 a_normal_human 2017-12-06
Elias Koteas is awesome.
1 Mort_DeRire 2017-12-06
Can't believe that won Best Picture
1 Chicup 2017-12-06
Some dude did the genital arousal study.
Results were all women are somewhat bi.
Men were often 100% straight.
1 hexane360 2017-12-06
Proving definitively that traps aren't gay
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-06
The study was entitled: "Duh".
1 MasterLawlz 2017-12-06
I kinda believe this, I’ve heard it’s not uncommon for women to go to female strip clubs, which I find interesting
1 timsboss 2017-12-06
Women also watch huge amounts of lesbian porn, which they'll claim has no bearing on their sexual orientation.
1 UmmahSultan 2017-12-06
Devices for measuring sexual arousal have existed for decades, and they have been used for the research of sexuality. The problem isn't that they are inconvenient, but that they result in a politically-undesirable answer.
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-12-06
Help! I'm fading out of existence!
1 youpostyoudie 2017-12-06
Most likely!
1 rewind45 2017-12-06
Good fucking riddance.
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-12-06
Oh no wait, i'm back.
1 Tzcar 2017-12-06
So your bi and black now... doing anything this weekend?
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-12-06
Jacking off, probably
1 neveryousay3 2017-12-06
So, everybody's at least bi?!? I guess the we dn't need LGBT community, PRIDE, etc..because minority is now a majority and one can't oppress a majority.
Thanks Vice
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-06
Fags are really low on the progressive stack these days anyway. Not much use left in them.
1 Tzcar 2017-12-06
Bitch please, you wish you could interior decorate at my level.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-06
I do, actually. Can you do my house like a Rome/bronze age thing but not kitschy?
1 hexane360 2017-12-06
Damn patriarchy, why do men keep oppressing themselves?
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2017-12-06
This kind of research isn't typically taken seriouslly, as it also shows nearly every to be a pedophile, a necrophiliac and a fucker of midgets.
Basically, you'll get a pupil reaction to any naked human whatsoever.
1 MG87 2017-12-06
Pretty sure Kinsey said the same thing 60 years ago
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-06
Did he say whether traps are gay?
1 Fieryfrogs6969blaze 2017-12-06
*She
1 Chicup 2017-12-06
The author is a tranny.
How unusual.
1 DoubleDickGirl 2017-12-06
ha! get fucked cishets
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-06
Why is there always that one homo who is convinced everyone is a homo
1 serialflamingo 2017-12-06
Most people aren't smart enough to be gay.
1 rewind45 2017-12-06
So woke, yassss queeeen 👏👏👏👏👏👏 #endheteronormativepatriarchy
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-06
theyre trying so fucking hard to make straight guys randomly gay lol
given up all pretense of subtlety apparently
did you guys see the article that said "dudes in bromances often kiss!" that was a good one
1 ThatGaymer 2017-12-06
Because most straight guys are actually gay or bi you fucking faggot. You just deny it because hetero-patriarchal norms on behaviour tell you to. Don't worry, just think about your thick shaft sliding into some thick bussy and tug one out.
1 ThatGaymer 2017-12-06
So that straight guy who rejected me was just lying??? Mother fucker