"Alt-right" vs "Skeptics" round two! The New York Times has jumped on board and a hitlist is discovered!
85 2017-12-16 by Oh_hamburgers_
For a crash course in the recent revelations, see this Twitter thread:
https://mobile.twitter.com/BravingRuin/status/942074856664977408
As it stands now Kraut has put together an even larger team than previously recorded and has even attracted the attention of your favorite news source, the New York Times. Reporter Amy Harmon has decided to jump into the ring behind Kraut with what he has now described as "The Task Force". The aim of this task force, as if it wasn't clear by now, is to annihilate the alt-right through, well, I guess just smear videos and doxxing.
Here is a list of the Task Force's targets
And here we have the list of the distinguished members of The Task Force
This is how seriously they take themselves
Drama ensues as some skeptics begin to bail on Kraut, namely Sargon and Vee who made videos publicly denouncing him, Kraut is unhappy about this of course
The unimaginable has happened as well. These skeptics who made their entire careers off bashing sjw's have now decided to send a skeptical envoy into the lair of legbeads and transpeople to form an alliance against the Alt-Right! and SS2
Here we see NYT journalist Amy Harmon venturing into the den of skeptics in order to dredge up some quality reporting I'm sure
So where does this all leave us? Is The Task Force doomed to crumble now that it has been fully exposed? Will the NYT reporter be able to wade through the internet drama and print something coherent? Can Kraut ever achieve his final solution of gassing the French? Time will tell.
82 comments
1 Whitey__McPrivilege 2017-12-16
Haha I was just about to PM you the details of this new case but you were faster. You are fast, believe me, it's true.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-12-16
A rag tag bunch of autists
1 a_normal_human 2017-12-16
>Will the NYT reporter be able to wade through the internet drama and print something coherent?
Trick question, they'll just make shit up that sounds rightish.
1 Chicup 2017-12-16
1 IslamicStatePatriot 2017-12-16
The Failing New York Times is still around?
1 Think_Once 2017-12-16
Stronger than ever. Drama sells.
1 Hemingwavy 2017-12-16
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=nyt+stock&oq=nyt+stock&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j0l3.4258j0j4&client=ms-android-motorola&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#mie=l,/m/07zm4_2,New%20York%20Times%20Co%20Class%20A,NYT,NYSE,New%20York%20Times%20Co,/m/07zm4_2,0
That's gone about as well as the rest of the stuff Trump tried to do. How do you fuck up everything?
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-16
Stock prices don't quite tell the tale, though. It's easy to have a leveraged cash position when you're hiding EPS behind non GAAP procedures. Super easy to do as a media conglomerate, you can collateralize your debt as an investment vehicle in subsidiaries and then push it around to different quarters. If you look at page 139 of their latest SEC filing, you can see this exact trick being played with advertising revenue (which youll notice they've hidden as "accruals-other", a clever trick from the Motron, Inc. days in the late 90s). If I had to estimate, I'd say the NYT stock's fundamentals are overvalued 15-17%, to say nothing of the potential SEC fines and hits the stock would take upon a thorough investigation.
1 riemann1413 2017-12-16
what about the NYT is failing
1 rhiehn 2017-12-16
Nothing but Daddy doesn't like them because they're mean to him.
1 SperglockHolmes 2017-12-16
Kraut killing his Youtube career is so glorious.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-12-16
Who is this guy
1 Ace4929 2017-12-16
He’s a German expatriate who became youtube famous by making videos about how Muslims are evil. As a member of the Skeptictm community he was always against doxxing and the like until an alt-righter called Rageafterstorm made a pretty bad video about race realism that earned her a lot of backlash and she consequently deleted herself off the internet. Kraut REEEEed so hard at her that he ended up doxxing her. This was a controversial move and Kraut got lit up by a lot of his former fans. He basically said all of his critica were just alt right nazis and then he disappeared for a week or so. When he came back he decided to make a series of videos where he would debunk the alt right, except in his videos he doesnt really understand anything about anything, which earns him backlash, which makes him REEEE harder, and now he’s hanging out almost exclusively with the people he bashed endlessly just a year ago
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2017-12-16
Mod him.
1 Luminous_Shade 2017-12-16
He had a career?
1 Minimum_T-Giraff 2017-12-16
Shorthand of being a cancer on the internet.
1 OnionBits 2017-12-16
LiteraLlly who?
1 VintageCake 2017-12-16
this should be interesting but i'm numb from all the stupid shit that's happened so far
1 Maarek 2017-12-16
Haha I don't understand any of this!
1 eelsify 2017-12-16
I envy you.
1 WingOfWar 2017-12-16
Imagine caring about any of this lol
1 Luminous_Shade 2017-12-16
All I got from this is that anti-science skeptics are having a YouTube fight with anti-science alt-righters, and it reminds me of the kids trying play hard it now Kick Ass 2, thinking they're changing the world while the world wholly ignores them and watches them with rapt pity.
1 80BAIT08 2017-12-16
Imagine caring about right wing twitter personalities enough to try and form an "alliance" with commies acting as grand ambassador.
1 imnotagayboy 2017-12-16
This is what happens when you sit at home on youtube all day instead of getting a job
"There Is No Future But What We Make Of Of It" - u/imnotagayboy
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2017-12-16
I don't care in a "what happens here will echo through eternity" kind of way, it's more of a "lol this is too retarded to look away" kind of way.
1 WingOfWar 2017-12-16
Oh I agree. I just find it curious how people genuinely get invested in this internet dumpster fires.
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2017-12-16
The internet is serious bussyness
1 Luminous_Shade 2017-12-16
So you care about this trash.
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2017-12-16
Have you forgotten what sub you're on? This place is a kingdom of trash. A majestic dump of nonsensical internet egesta.
1 Luminous_Shade 2017-12-16
Yeah but you aren't supposed to care about it
1 imnotagayboy 2017-12-16
idc about it but i'm still gonna keep coming back to see what happens. idc tho
"There Is No Future But What We Make Of Of It" - u/imnotagayboy
1 Luminous_Shade 2017-12-16
Don't lie, you do.
1 a_normal_human 2017-12-16
The amount of taking themselves too seriously is inspiring.
1 E-rockComment 2017-12-16
/r/drama coverage >> NY Times coverage
1 YHofSuburbia 2017-12-16
Can someone give me a rundown of this situation using as little incel terms as possible?
1 LoudGoatsfoot 2017-12-16
Retarded.
1 InternetLawyerESQ 2017-12-16
Reddit.com
1 Redactor0 2017-12-16
1 ffbtaw 2017-12-16
Few
1 theweldwest 2017-12-16
You're in the wrong sub for that, friendo.
1 subpoutine 2017-12-16
Is that AltHype or the Québécuck?
1 Greatpointbut 2017-12-16
Thats how they do it there. Its even illegal for a woman to take the husband's last name.
1 imnotagayboy 2017-12-16
That's strange, he seems like he got hit with double vaccinations from how autistic he is
"There Is No Future But What We Make Of Of It" - u/imnotagayboy
1 MisterHundred 2017-12-16
So Here's The Rundown
1 YHofSuburbia 2017-12-16
Have you taken your meds today?
1 ExilesReturn 2017-12-16
https://i.imgur.com/16Oh945.jpg
1 Luminous_Shade 2017-12-16
Too real man.
1 dongas420 2017-12-16
Overevolved apes succumbing to their tribalistic monkey instincts, except the shit being flung around is figurative
1 imnotagayboy 2017-12-16
A group of losers LARP that they are in an internet army and will destroy their real world political opposition by pretending to be army men in a chat.
"There Is No Future But What We Make Of Of It" - u/imnotagayboy
1 visitorjk 2017-12-16
AltHype, the guy who has studied genetics in his basement like a fucking autist for years, has a quick rundown on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4xQoF-NyAQ
1 ralpher313 2017-12-16
We should have Dresdened every German city.
1 penorio 2017-12-16
Let me give you the big enchilada
1 80BAIT08 2017-12-16
/u/jfgariepy
1 WatchOwl 2017-12-16
Is this seriously the guy who made Kraut sperg out?
Literally 2 post down he's talking about how he got in trouble with the law for fucking a retarded girl.
A short bus chaser took down half of the skeptic community.
1 jorio 2017-12-16
Wait, what?
1 SwankDogsbody 2017-12-16
Oh man, there's so many words here.
1 Whitey__McPrivilege 2017-12-16
Andy Warski on Twatter: ''Tomorrow when I get home I'm gonna read up on all the stuff @BravingRuin post3d as well as the audio that was leaked. Gonna make a massive video on this entire situation soon. Gonna have @JFGariepy on Warski live on Wednesday.''
1 glmox 2017-12-16
like everyone else involved in this, literally who
1 Whitey__McPrivilege 2017-12-16
The great Ryan Faulk has jumped in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4xQoF-NyAQ
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-16
The fact that anyone cares even the tiniest bit about this is a perfect argument for accelerating global warming and destroying all habitable land on Earth.
1 Zombies_hate_ninjas 2017-12-16
Just to be very clear for anyone not aware, modern genetics answered this question more than a decade ago. We are all the same, I know I was disappointed to find this out as well.
The Race realist cunts do everything they can to avoid discussions on genetic research for this very reason. Nah they go on about IQ tests, crime rates, marriage rates ect. All of it "Social Science" which is not held to same level of scrutiny than hard science.
Anyway all these people are stupid, they're arguing something that was fully settled in scientific community years ago.
1 kermit_was_right 2017-12-16
I'm having a hard time believing that we're all the same, due to all the... well, variation.
But it's hard to buy the IQ shit too - I can't think of an environment where there is a selection pressure for stupidity. Aside, perhaps, modern life in an industrialized society. Especially when we go back to prehistoric times, being stupid literally killed your ass.
1 nanonan 2017-12-16
For anyone not aware, genetics has done no such thing but a bunch of multicultural lefties decided that seeing everyone has genetic variation that the obvious genetic differences between races are meaningless because that conclusion fits their agenda.
1 kermit_was_right 2017-12-16
Ok, can someone explain this with a bit less faggotry?
1 nanonan 2017-12-16
Just google haplotype. You're welcome.
1 visitorjk 2017-12-16
Fst or fsr distance between human populations would be more informative tbqh.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:9_Cluster_Tree.png
1 visitorjk 2017-12-16
Intelligence has a cost. Everything in evolution is a cost-benefit trade-off. So your "no environment selects for stupidity" is like saying no environment selects for "not being resistant to malaria". I. e. ridiculously uninformed.
1 Fnhatic 2017-12-16
Isn't the 'race realist' the label that others apply when someone says something they don't want talked about? I've never seen someone call themselves that but I've seen people accuse others, especially when someone starts talking about murder rates. It's a huge deflection from where I sit.
1 Zombies_hate_ninjas 2017-12-16
The alt-right by their very natures are a bunch of dishonest liars. All they do is deny, deflect, and try and derail any convince.
I'm tired of seeing Richard Spencer interviews where the reporter fails to ask
"So your intended final goal is a ethno-state within the United States. How do you plan to achieve this without forced deportation or actual genocide?"
The alt-right can't answer that question. Because they know that no matter where in America they go there'll be undesirables. People don't leave their homes because people want them to, or shit gets tough, or the government tells them to. No people stay put.
1 Fnhatic 2017-12-16
Did you respond to the wrong comment?
1 Zombies_hate_ninjas 2017-12-16
. . Probably.
1 seshfan 2017-12-16
"race realist" is what white nationalists self-identify as, because as it turns out they REEEEE incredibly hard when you call them what they are (white nationalists)
1 mr_almeida 2017-12-16
I just don't see how that can possibly be true. Like socially, we classify people into different races based on physical characteristics and those physical characteristics are caused by genes. "Race realists" or whatever want to go a step farther and say the genes causing those clearly observable physical differences also cause mental or behavioral differences.
My instincts tell me that's bs but from a scientific method standpoint I don't see how what you're calling "hard science" could possibly answer that question. Like what data are they using, etc.? If it's looking at behaviors/outcomes etc. they by definition have to be using social science methods and so on.
1 Zombies_hate_ninjas 2017-12-16
The building blocks (on a genetic scale) necessary to make a person have different skin tone, or slightly different physiology are inherent in all of us.
So yeah there are differences between people, clearly. Some people are black, some are Chinese(well Han), some have developed interesting traits. Like the aboriginals of Australia being way more adapted to desert life than pasty white folks.
The term generally used now is called "demes". Memes are characteristics that are passed from Generation to Generation, while demes are interesting and sometimes unique characteristics that have developed for a small.group of people. Usually geography plays a big part. If Europeans moved to Africa, eventually they too would have marked skin. It would take several dozen generations though.
Google "demes" it's a very interesting theory. The main point is yes people have differences between them, but on a genetic scale all the required building blocks to make said changes exist in all of us.
1 mr_almeida 2017-12-16
I googled "demes" and that doesn't seem relevant at all. But anyway, I don't really see how the precise mechanism matters for the bigger point: There are sets of heritable things "demes" that make me look a certain way. There are sets of heritable things "other demes" that make my brain a certain way. Having the first set is correlated with having the second set. Science "ruling out" race realism would require being able to map these underlying demes into intelligence or behavior, which I seriously doubt is possible with our current understanding of biology and neurology and social science (which is implicated by "behavior.") To be clear, my money is on "race realism" being total bs but I don't find it credible that the current science is very clear on this.
1 MG87 2017-12-16
Literally who?
1 Tarrock 2017-12-16
Don't think anything will come of it. They're call the Failing New York Times for a reason.
1 youcanteatbullets 2017-12-16
That reason being Daddy doesn't like them. Like most media outlets they're doing fine, ever since Daddy turned politics into a reality show people care a lot more.
1 imnotagayboy 2017-12-16
meatball
1 visitorjk 2017-12-16
AltHype, the guy who has studied genetics in his basement like a fucking autist for years, has a quick rundown on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4xQoF-NyAQ
1 SnackBier 2017-12-16
I watched part of a video by that guy with the french accent (linked in part 1). That guy is so fucking savage. Holy shit!
Also: RIP to kraut and REE
1 visitorjk 2017-12-16
In a heated stream Zeph, "investigator" on krauts discord and confirmed doxxer, gets called a cuck and confirms his gf is living with her ex-husband and their relationship is emotional and not sexual.
https://youtu.be/yTqMQyebjrs?t=14892
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2017-12-16
Hahah fuck man, even his fellow Task Force members are roasting his ass for that one. Jesus.
1 visitorjk 2017-12-16
Kraut puts out "An appology" (aka blaming cuck Zeph). Zeph anticipated this and promised a stream with leaks incriminating kraut.