This is a nice post and all, but I'm guessing that the only reason anyone is even arguing about this because these people believe 3D is superior to 2D.
the best part is that it was made by pixelated boat, who is genuinely one of the most well-know ironic satirist guys on twitter. if you fell for that, you have to be one of the most limpbrain mouthbreathers EVER
I'll never understand why people feel the urge to make shit up about DaddyTM when you can just listen to him for 10 seconds to find something to rage at.
EDIT: 15 seconds. gotta buffer for his non-sentences.
/u/ilikehillaryclinton i'm normally not going to help Chapo-friends, but take my advice: The guy you're "debating" with is an unhinged and powertripping lunatic who once beat up his gf because she wore purple-green colored socks. This creature doesn't know things like 'humor' or 'sarcasm'. Steer clear.
I haven't read the book, but as far as I can it basically says that Daddy is a thin-skinned narcissist that everyone glad hands despite privately thinking he is a complete dumbass. So I'm not sure what the book tells us that we didn't know already know or what the point of the book is or whether its accuracy even matters.
No he didn't. He said some of the quoted statements in the book contradict each other, so obviously it should be noted that not all statements reflect reality.
It is in the introduction of the book. How is it walking back when it was published in the book?
18 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-01-05
This is a nice post and all, but I'm guessing that the only reason anyone is even arguing about this because these people believe 3D is superior to 2D.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 boyoyoyoyong 2018-01-05
Some of it is crazy like trump watches 17 hours of gorillas fighting
1 NardDogAndy 2018-01-05
I thought that was an excerpt someone made as a meme. Is that really in the book?
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-01-05
Nah, just the usual drama poster falls for satire: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/01/05/trump-gorilla-channel-parody-326374
1 GeauxHouston22 2018-01-05
the best part is that it was made by pixelated boat, who is genuinely one of the most well-know ironic satirist guys on twitter. if you fell for that, you have to be one of the most limpbrain mouthbreathers EVER
1 Prysorra 2018-01-05
I'll never understand why people feel the urge to make shit up about DaddyTM when you can just listen to him for 10 seconds to find something to rage at.
EDIT: 15 seconds. gotta buffer for his non-sentences.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2018-01-05
Is that a euphemism for Mike Thernovith mathurbathing?
1 WarSanchez 2018-01-05
/u/gorillamindset are you selling animal boner pills to Trump?
Does that explain his fascination with your favorite species?
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2018-01-05
That article is not reporting anything new.
It's just deliberately misinterpreting the disclaimer in the book itself.
1 pizzashill 2018-01-05
Yeah, this is the route they're taking now to try to spin out of it.
1 Ultrashitpost 2018-01-05
/u/ilikehillaryclinton i'm normally not going to help Chapo-friends, but take my advice: The guy you're "debating" with is an unhinged and powertripping lunatic who once beat up his gf because she wore purple-green colored socks. This creature doesn't know things like 'humor' or 'sarcasm'. Steer clear.
1 ilikehillaryclinton 2018-01-05
Are you talking about N-R?
Also does this have anything to do with this drama thread I'm confused
1 [deleted] 2018-01-05
[deleted]
1 jorio 2018-01-05
I haven't read the book, but as far as I can it basically says that Daddy is a thin-skinned narcissist that everyone glad hands despite privately thinking he is a complete dumbass. So I'm not sure what the book tells us that we didn't know already know or what the point of the book is or whether its accuracy even matters.
1 grobobobo 2018-01-05
Wonder if they are denying it because they don't want to deal with potential consequences.
1 TruthPains 2018-01-05
He has audio tapes apparently.
1 froibo 2018-01-05
No he didn't. He said some of the quoted statements in the book contradict each other, so obviously it should be noted that not all statements reflect reality.
It is in the introduction of the book. How is it walking back when it was published in the book?
1 starship_litterbox 2018-01-05
I can tell you how
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-05
That’s some serious agendaposting faggotry OP.
Shit, he taped a lot of this shit. Just because he can’t tell you if it’s true, doesn’t mean it wasn’t said.
1 TruthPains 2018-01-05
He basically said, the people he interviewed could be distorting facts or lying, because liars lie yo.
1 buttermyself 2018-01-05
Lol, imagine being dumb enough to post this unironically.