I'm not even sure what your point is. Yeah I'd rather sleep with a dakimakura of my waifu Renge-chan than with some random 3D slut but that doesn't mean I'm desperate, it's the opposite, it implies that I have standards.
Next week on r/futurism:
"Google is currently in talks with Reddit to buy the source code of "snapshillbot" the first artificial intelligence to pass the turing test."
b) more than 30 "partners in sex" before your 21 st birthday? WEW LAD
Eh. That shit wouldn't bother me one bit, personally. One of my better relationships involved a relatively high number girl (20-something partners at 19), and I'm happy I never let that irrelevant fact bother me.
In my experience sanity and principles have nothing whatsoever to do with someone's count - things have worked out every which way for me in the past. At least when someone has been around the block they have seen what's out there. That tends to work in my favor.
And anyway, not like I'm a stranger to casual sex between bouts of monogamy. That shit is good for the soul.
depends on what you want from the relationship. for something fun and casual, a high-count girl is fine. if youre looking at settling down, you have a much higher chance of being divorced in <10 years if shes got a high count
Aside from the fact that it's hard to look at this stuff in a meaningful sense while isolating all the cultural cultural shit, our lives are not ruled by statistics in a direct fashion. We're all individuals.
Besides, I've seen plenty of low/single-partner marriages get fucked to know that it's not any sort of panacea. Shit, sometimes the lack of experience is literally the cause.
Your best bet is to find a good woman of sound moral character who gets you and loves you, makes your dick hard, and who you want to spend your life around. Everything else is just a detail, and a few years together will settle most questions as a matter of course.
our lives are not ruled by statistics in a direct fashion. We're all individuals.
you can try to fight the odds, but if youre trying to turn a ho into a housewife, theyre overwhelmingly against you. but who knows? maybe your relationship is super special and will break the mold?
Why aren't you citing Teachman himself rather than some weird projection of his research mapped onto a completely different data set?
Look, if you're shooting for a virgin bride in 2018, go for it. That's is its own brand of hell, and you're welcome to it. It's true, you're much less likely to get divorced - but you're far more likely to be a couple of crazed weirdos trapped in a private hell of religious insanity.
I personally, am not afraid of divorce - that just means things aren't working out.
Ironically... I appear to be in the process of settling down with someone who has an extremely low partner count. And in my view, that is a weakness, not a strength. From my own "we lost our virginity to each other" experience, I've seen what that looks like after seven years from the inside. Shit is poisonous.
But like I said, the numbers are the least important aspect of all of this, so I'm bucking up.
I appear to be in the process of settling down with someone who has an extremely low partner count. And in my view, that is a weakness, not a strength.
Unless you go for people with 1 or less pre marital partners the chances are mostly flat. And even then I would question if number of partners is a good heuristic to judge that rather than other variables (people that suck at compromise may have more partners but people with more partners may not suck at compromise).
Either way, an incel won't ever betray you, he/she is 100% virgin.
If you pay attention they are not as incompatible as it seems, as chances beyond 2 partners are not that different
2 partners is 44%, 5 partners is 30%, 21+ partners is 20%
theres definitely a linear trend beyond two partners. you can certainly choose to fight those odds if you wish, banking on your girl being the magical unicorn to whom they dont apply, the divorce industry depends on people like that to put bread on their tables
theres definitely a linear trend beyond two partners. you can certainly choose to fight those odds if you wish, banking on your girl being the magical unicorn to whom they dont apply
That's hardly a linear pattern. Roughly 1/5 for the worst scenario is not an unicorn at all, and I'd advise you to judge people by character rather than being one dimensional (it's likely you'll end with people with few partners either way, it's more just though). If you care more about the number of partners than the quality of them you are very likely to fail either way.
Also, a society that cares more about numbers of partners than anything else will end with liars, not happy people.
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you lie and call an obviously linear trend 'hardly a linear pattern'
judge people by character rather than being one dimensional
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you tell people to ignore one of the most crucial variables in their marriage success
Also, a society that cares more about numbers of partners than anything else will end with liars
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you tell people to not worry about the truth, the truth is knowable, people will just lie, etc
why are you so committed to seeing sluts married off, contra all evidence?
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you lie and call an obviously linear trend 'hardly a linear pattern'
I would have agreed with you if you said something about decreasing expected returns or something, but you said linear, so you are wrong on this one.
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you tell people to ignore one of the most crucial variables in their marriage success
I think it's one of those cases of "correlation doesn't imply causation", that's the reason I said it's better to look at other factors before passing judgement. It's less likely, but it's not really that impossible. A bad partner may not stick with people, but that doesn't necessarily mean that someone that didn't stick with people would be a bad partner.
Also, try to define crucial. There are way more important things explaining marriage failure, most research out there care about personal compability (education, income difference, beliefs and so on) this days.
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you tell people to not worry about the truth, the truth is knowable, people will just lie, etc
That's you just being a moron. It's not hard to tell that if your first variable of choice is that, people will try to game it, it's not like you have a way to know for sure (there are ways, but those were inaccurate and often intrusive). Historically that's what was done, people just lied often about their past and intentions.
why are you so committed to seeing sluts married off, contra all evidence?
It seems it triggers people like you a lot, so it's fun. I don't really care that much.
thats a whole lotta typing to just say "im a worthless slut desperate for a man". or, more likely the case "my girls a slut and im trying to ignore all the data that says this was a bad idea"
I think it's a compatibility issue. If you're a pig who'll fuck anything with a hole, you'll get along much better with Sticky Vicky than a virgin will.
It's a lifestyle thing. The number by itself doesn't actually matter, but if you take two people with entirely different backgrounds it's gonna take something really special to make that work.
I really have a hard time believing that 2 people could have a similar lifestyle and by age 20 one of them has fucked 0-1 people and the other has fucked over 30.
Ofc, not disagreeing there. Plus if they're around that age anything serious is probably going to explode anyway. This incompatibility is just extra dynamite.
Higher than hers in absolute terms - but then again I was quite a bit older, and not a fucking NEET. We had a lovely few years before splitting up on good terms after some real life shit happened that made us start moving in different directions. No infidelity or intimacy problems, etc.
There are just so many variables to this shit, and literally every other one is more important. But a lot of dudes have crippling insecurity about measuring up to the past, and tend to hyperfocus on the numbers.
I found out that this sub mostly makes fun of Le Donaldo.
From a foreigners point of view - he's probably one of the shitiest presidents you had in a long time, but good for drama....sorry 'bout your damn luck though, baby Jesus weeps for America.
I found out that this sub mostly makes fun of Le Donaldo.
Insert "Let me tell you this..." copypasta
This sub is for just shitting on everyone and everything, it's kind of fun in an edgy 14 year old kinda way, which I can appreciate from time to time, but don't get too sucked in. It will destroy your bussy.
There are definitely tankies in SRD, but they're usually downvoted from what I've seen. You talking about that CTH post with the AskReddit dude who killed a kid during his "service"? That was a pretty blatant troll, but I guess good enough to fool two subreddits lol.
Oh yeah, the CTH sub seems to be shit, and I'm not likely to ever listen to the Podcast partly because of that, but every time it gets linked to SRD, it and its followers usually get dunked on pretty hard. Though those threads are pretty boring because the arguments are always the same, I subscribe to SRD for the food drama mostly. Some of the T_D/conspiracy drama is good, but only in smaller doses.
You got banned??? I can see the post getting deleted for surplus or (questionably) biased title, but that's a dumb ban unless you've had history with the mods.
r/drama? It doesn't really work, but everyone gets their willies wound up every time a linked OP responds to their u/ pinging. It's fun to watch most of the time
r/SubredditDrama has stricter rules about posting and leans pretty leftward in the userbase (myself included).
Sorry for the seriouspost (pls to be downvote) but - where does 'classically liberal' fall on the axis of praxis these days? When I was just a tiddler I thought it would be on the left, but it seems that 'social justice' has bounced things around a bit. Anyway, my point is that, by being a hive of villainy, /r/drama is unironically more classically liberal than many subreddits who see their entire world through supposedly 'liberal' eyes. Thank you and sorry.
I think I get it. So what you're saying is that classical liberalism is the SRD of political ideologies, while libertarianism is the /r/drama of political ideologies. Cool.
Yes I think you're right. It becomes right-wing because it's bundled in with ideas of economic freedom - which generally means a small state, low tax, 'the market will fix our problems' mentality - essentially the dominant US conception of libertarianism. I was more talking about the social ideas of classic liberalism (and libertarianism) which I think are a pretty cool guy and ought to be de-coupled from the economic part so that I can be South Park Neutral at work and not end up in a special class.
They're jealous of us. By posting here you're officially consorting with the enemy and must be purged.
If it makes you feel any better you can username-ping the SRD mods here to make fun of them and their physical appearance. Could've been anyone, but soyboy /u/TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK/ is usually a safe bet.
Lmao you are hilariously terrified of stds. The 19 year old virgin will get that retarded pseudo-romantic shit fucked out of him sooner or later, but you better get that germaphobe shit under control.
no not me, the original poster of the question in r/relationships might be.
i was just saying the facts. condoms don't protect against oral sex transmission (unless you use condoms for oral), which includes syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia....
hpv is also not exactly best prevented via condom.
I'm not sure why so many people here don't know this. It's like they're virgins who never been to an std clinic
Everyone knows that shit, that's not the point. Everyone has their own risk tolerances, but at one end of the spectrum you're living in bubble of your own fears.
Toss that dental dam. Learn to ride a motorcycle. Have sex with a beautiful stranger after wrapping it up. There were like, three thousand cases of syphilis in women last year, roll the dice and trust that you're not running into one. It's a pretty good lottery.
110 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-01-07
I'm not even sure what your point is. Yeah I'd rather sleep with a dakimakura of my waifu Renge-chan than with some random 3D slut but that doesn't mean I'm desperate, it's the opposite, it implies that I have standards.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 OniTan 2018-01-07
Well, yeah. That's what /u/Emptythebin was saying.
1 Rigulel 2018-01-07
Next week on r/futurism: "Google is currently in talks with Reddit to buy the source code of "snapshillbot" the first artificial intelligence to pass the turing test."
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
a) I know you want karma, so you will get it.
b) more than 30 "partners in sex" before your 21 birthday? WEW LAD
c) TIL - not wanting sex with a woman = misoginy and sexism. Witch also means that gay men are the ultimate sexists.
d) Nyet means no.
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Eh. That shit wouldn't bother me one bit, personally. One of my better relationships involved a relatively high number girl (20-something partners at 19), and I'm happy I never let that irrelevant fact bother me.
In my experience sanity and principles have nothing whatsoever to do with someone's count - things have worked out every which way for me in the past. At least when someone has been around the block they have seen what's out there. That tends to work in my favor.
And anyway, not like I'm a stranger to casual sex between bouts of monogamy. That shit is good for the soul.
1 wolfsktaag 2018-01-07
depends on what you want from the relationship. for something fun and casual, a high-count girl is fine. if youre looking at settling down, you have a much higher chance of being divorced in <10 years if shes got a high count
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
It's actually fairly non-linear. And weirdly enough, a recent trend.
https://ifstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/wolfinger-sex-partners-divorce-figure-1-1.png
Aside from the fact that it's hard to look at this stuff in a meaningful sense while isolating all the cultural cultural shit, our lives are not ruled by statistics in a direct fashion. We're all individuals.
Besides, I've seen plenty of low/single-partner marriages get fucked to know that it's not any sort of panacea. Shit, sometimes the lack of experience is literally the cause.
Your best bet is to find a good woman of sound moral character who gets you and loves you, makes your dick hard, and who you want to spend your life around. Everything else is just a detail, and a few years together will settle most questions as a matter of course.
1 wolfsktaag 2018-01-07
wrong
https://i.imgur.com/Iqq7ztm.jpg
you can try to fight the odds, but if youre trying to turn a ho into a housewife, theyre overwhelmingly against you. but who knows? maybe your relationship is super special and will break the mold?
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Why aren't you citing Teachman himself rather than some weird projection of his research mapped onto a completely different data set?
Look, if you're shooting for a virgin bride in 2018, go for it. That's is its own brand of hell, and you're welcome to it. It's true, you're much less likely to get divorced - but you're far more likely to be a couple of crazed weirdos trapped in a private hell of religious insanity.
I personally, am not afraid of divorce - that just means things aren't working out.
Ironically... I appear to be in the process of settling down with someone who has an extremely low partner count. And in my view, that is a weakness, not a strength. From my own "we lost our virginity to each other" experience, I've seen what that looks like after seven years from the inside. Shit is poisonous.
But like I said, the numbers are the least important aspect of all of this, so I'm bucking up.
1 SethRichOrDieTryin 2018-01-07
you could always go for a life of cuckoldry
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
At that point might as well embrace the bussy.
1 SethRichOrDieTryin 2018-01-07
wonder why there are noticeable dropoffs after 4 and 15
1 Neronoah 2018-01-07
Unless you go for people with 1 or less pre marital partners the chances are mostly flat. And even then I would question if number of partners is a good heuristic to judge that rather than other variables (people that suck at compromise may have more partners but people with more partners may not suck at compromise).
Either way, an incel won't ever betray you, he/she is 100% virgin.
1 wolfsktaag 2018-01-07
wrong
https://i.imgur.com/Iqq7ztm.jpg
1 Neronoah 2018-01-07
Well, that's a new graph, I just was familiar with this one.
Still, the rest of the comment applies. I'd rather judge by other variables.
1 wolfsktaag 2018-01-07
2 partners is 44%, 5 partners is 30%, 21+ partners is 20%
theres definitely a linear trend beyond two partners. you can certainly choose to fight those odds if you wish, banking on your girl being the magical unicorn to whom they dont apply, the divorce industry depends on people like that to put bread on their tables
1 Neronoah 2018-01-07
That's hardly a linear pattern. Roughly 1/5 for the worst scenario is not an unicorn at all, and I'd advise you to judge people by character rather than being one dimensional (it's likely you'll end with people with few partners either way, it's more just though). If you care more about the number of partners than the quality of them you are very likely to fail either way.
Also, a society that cares more about numbers of partners than anything else will end with liars, not happy people.
1 wolfsktaag 2018-01-07
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you lie and call an obviously linear trend 'hardly a linear pattern'
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you tell people to ignore one of the most crucial variables in their marriage success
imagine being so committed to seeing sluts married off that you tell people to not worry about the truth, the truth is knowable, people will just lie, etc
why are you so committed to seeing sluts married off, contra all evidence?
1 Neronoah 2018-01-07
I would have agreed with you if you said something about decreasing expected returns or something, but you said linear, so you are wrong on this one.
I think it's one of those cases of "correlation doesn't imply causation", that's the reason I said it's better to look at other factors before passing judgement. It's less likely, but it's not really that impossible. A bad partner may not stick with people, but that doesn't necessarily mean that someone that didn't stick with people would be a bad partner.
Also, try to define crucial. There are way more important things explaining marriage failure, most research out there care about personal compability (education, income difference, beliefs and so on) this days.
That's you just being a moron. It's not hard to tell that if your first variable of choice is that, people will try to game it, it's not like you have a way to know for sure (there are ways, but those were inaccurate and often intrusive). Historically that's what was done, people just lied often about their past and intentions.
It seems it triggers people like you a lot, so it's fun. I don't really care that much.
1 wolfsktaag 2018-01-07
thats a whole lotta typing to just say "im a worthless slut desperate for a man". or, more likely the case "my girls a slut and im trying to ignore all the data that says this was a bad idea"
either way,
lol i bet
1 Neronoah 2018-01-07
Less than you for sure.
1 [deleted] 2018-01-07
[deleted]
1 Going_up_the_Country 2018-01-07
I don't understand the pointers in the 0 category:
They count the husband as one partner? What the hell is their definition of virgin?
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2018-01-07
Are you retarded, i think yes.
1 Trajan_ 2018-01-07
Its if you had sex before marriage.
1 Going_up_the_Country 2018-01-07
Then why is it in the 0 column?
1 Trajan_ 2018-01-07
0 other partners.
Sex with your marriage partner before marriage.
1 Going_up_the_Country 2018-01-07
Ah, it turns out I am retarded.
1 Trajan_ 2018-01-07
No worries, it wasn't very clear.
1 Why_We_Need_Islam 2018-01-07
1 TastesLikeAss 2018-01-07
I have zero doubt this is true but is there actual data that supports this?
1 OniTan 2018-01-07
What was your number at the time?
I think it's a compatibility issue. If you're a pig who'll fuck anything with a hole, you'll get along much better with Sticky Vicky than a virgin will.
1 siskonaut 2018-01-07
It's a lifestyle thing. The number by itself doesn't actually matter, but if you take two people with entirely different backgrounds it's gonna take something really special to make that work.
1 OniTan 2018-01-07
I really have a hard time believing that 2 people could have a similar lifestyle and by age 20 one of them has fucked 0-1 people and the other has fucked over 30.
1 siskonaut 2018-01-07
Ofc, not disagreeing there. Plus if they're around that age anything serious is probably going to explode anyway. This incompatibility is just extra dynamite.
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Higher than hers in absolute terms - but then again I was quite a bit older, and not a fucking NEET. We had a lovely few years before splitting up on good terms after some real life shit happened that made us start moving in different directions. No infidelity or intimacy problems, etc.
There are just so many variables to this shit, and literally every other one is more important. But a lot of dudes have crippling insecurity about measuring up to the past, and tend to hyperfocus on the numbers.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-01-07
post bussy
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
OP actually sent me bussy before posting this
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
That's not bussy ☹ It's never just bussy😭
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
Anything is bussy if you thrust hard enough.
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
Wtf happened to that thread?
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
SRD
NaziMods nuked it shortly after it got linked here. Get r/conspiracy on the case.1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
Oh fuck no, I'm not posting in that hellhole of trumptards.
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
Pick one
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
I found out that this sub mostly makes fun of Le Donaldo.
From a foreigners point of view - he's probably one of the shitiest presidents you had in a long time, but good for drama....sorry 'bout your damn luck though, baby Jesus weeps for America.
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
Insert "Let me tell you this..." copypasta
This sub is for just shitting on everyone and everything, it's kind of fun in an edgy 14 year old kinda way, which I can appreciate from time to time, but don't get too sucked in. It will destroy your bussy.
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
But I like to shit on Americans from both sides😭 also SRD became too tankie-lite in this past weeks.
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
There are definitely tankies in SRD, but they're usually downvoted from what I've seen. You talking about that CTH post with the AskReddit dude who killed a kid during his "service"? That was a pretty blatant troll, but I guess good enough to fool two subreddits lol.
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
Yes..and there was two others...but seriously the podcast is meh...the sub on the other hand - is shit
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChapoTrapHouse/comments/7bqgmz/whats_with_all_the_tankies_recently/
It took me 2 minutes to find this..." We don't support tankies" my ass.
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
Oh yeah, the CTH sub seems to be shit, and I'm not likely to ever listen to the Podcast partly because of that, but every time it gets linked to SRD, it and its followers usually get dunked on pretty hard. Though those threads are pretty boring because the arguments are always the same, I subscribe to SRD for the food drama mostly. Some of the T_D/conspiracy drama is good, but only in smaller doses.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
wow. it had 52 comments. i dont' get it. why did i get banned. they said i was a troll, but i think they are just too sensitive.
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
They were jealous that you decided to show your bussy here.
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
You got banned??? I can see the post getting deleted for surplus or (questionably) biased title, but that's a dumb ban unless you've had history with the mods.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
lol it was a 19 year old boy who didnt' want to sleep witha promiscuous girl. i was stating the facts
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
anyways, so how does this subreddit work?
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
r/drama? It doesn't really work, but everyone gets their willies wound up every time a linked OP responds to their u/ pinging. It's fun to watch most of the time
r/SubredditDrama has stricter rules about posting and leans pretty leftward in the userbase (myself included).
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
Basically anything goes, really nobody gets banned here. Biggest rule is just don't be boring.
1 Wordshark 2018-01-07
Don’t lie to the poor boy
1 fucknazimozdzzz 2018-01-07
I’ve been banned from here like 4 times cause mods r faggots
1 Redactor0 2018-01-07
Try to be alcoholic or at least fake it and you'll be fine.
1 Protect_Me 2018-01-07
Post bussy for full membership
1 shallowm 2018-01-07
Really, this is all you need to follow:
Don't break sitewide rules
Don't post NP links
Have fun!
1 froibo 2018-01-07
They have been really ban happy. They are working really hard to keep it the most boring meta sub.
1 a_normal_human 2018-01-07
Is this bussy enough?
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
See OP, the mods nuked your thread because SRD hates fun. You should stay here.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
whoa, all i did was post that. and i debated without being rude wiht a particular user. now i am banned from there. has this happened before?
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-01-07
Yea. They try to ban anyone who comments or posts here.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
im so confused. why would i get banned on here?
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-01-07
You wouldn't get banned on here. We only ban those who break Reddit rules... mostly.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
oh i see. they ban people who post on here. why the fuck do they hate you guys so much?
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Hodor is taking the piss, sardines are shit and all - but you don't get banned for being a bussy afficionado.
1 Redactor0 2018-01-07
The hate us cuz they ain't us. r/drama is what SRD would be if they broke free from their cocoons and let their wings flap in the breeze.
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2018-01-07
r/drama asking SRD to let loose once in a while
1 subpoutine 2018-01-07
Das pretty good. You should submit that to the kkkontest.
1 Assymptotic 2018-01-07
Get that weeb degeneracy off this beautiful board.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
*fap in the breeze
1 I_poop_in_The_Dark 2018-01-07
SRD became pretty leftist in the past, the can't tolerate /r/drama because it's inclusive to many ideologies.
1 DuBBle 2018-01-07
Sorry for the seriouspost (pls to be downvote) but - where does 'classically liberal' fall on the axis of praxis these days? When I was just a tiddler I thought it would be on the left, but it seems that 'social justice' has bounced things around a bit. Anyway, my point is that, by being a hive of villainy, /r/drama is unironically more classically liberal than many subreddits who see their entire world through supposedly 'liberal' eyes. Thank you and sorry.
1 I_poop_in_The_Dark 2018-01-07
To a "progressive" you're one step away from a modern conservative.
1 error404brain 2018-01-07
Nazis. Or worse libertarians.
1 cheers_grills 2018-01-07
A bit to the the right from alt-right.
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
Also seriouspost: I always thought "classical liberalism" was basically libertarianism in a different name. That's clearly a right-wing ideology, no?
1 fucknazimozdzzz 2018-01-07
They’re not quite the same thing.
A classical liberal would say: “you have the right to do whatever you want on your property.”
A libertarian would say: “I have the right to do whatever I want on my property.” While he’s naked and on drugs with a shotgun in his front yard.
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
I think I get it. So what you're saying is that classical liberalism is the SRD of political ideologies, while libertarianism is the /r/drama of political ideologies. Cool.
1 fucknazimozdzzz 2018-01-07
If your intent was to write a comment that makes zero sense even to a stage 4 brain cancer patient then congrats you’ve succeeded.
1 DuBBle 2018-01-07
Yes I think you're right. It becomes right-wing because it's bundled in with ideas of economic freedom - which generally means a small state, low tax, 'the market will fix our problems' mentality - essentially the dominant US conception of libertarianism. I was more talking about the social ideas of classic liberalism (and libertarianism) which I think are a pretty cool guy and ought to be de-coupled from the economic part so that I can be South Park Neutral at work and not end up in a special class.
1 aqouta 2018-01-07
We're radical centrist by nature so as close to true center(correctness) the better. I just baked up this new image to describe it as accurately as possible.
1 DuBBle 2018-01-07
That's really helpful - thanks. If it's somehow possible to 'play' an image, I would like this to happen at my funeral.
1 MasterLawlz 2018-01-07
We routinely fuck their girlfriends but don’t let them watch
1 Goroman86 2018-01-07
Hol up. Reddit has rules?
1 DuBBle 2018-01-07
Post personal information about yourself and a screenshot of your desktop.
1 neveryousay3 2018-01-07
I like big butts and I cannot lie..
There, posted.
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
Spoil star wars movies. Seriously.
1 aqouta 2018-01-07
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
They're jealous of us. By posting here you're officially consorting with the enemy and must be purged.
If it makes you feel any better you can username-ping the SRD mods here to make fun of them and their physical appearance. Could've been anyone, but soyboy /u/TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK/ is usually a safe bet.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
that was him
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
Ha, knew it. /u/TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK takes his moderating "job" very seriously. Also he brags about how being a reddit mod gets him laid, no joke.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
oh dear sweet jesus. how much do you believe that?
and most importantly. was it consensual?
1 stankeepickle 2018-01-07
Ooh I never picked up on that. He did say it got him laid, but never explicitly said it consensual.
1 Ennui2778 2018-01-07
Male feminists.
Every. Time.
1 subpoutine 2018-01-07
Is it true that /u/TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK is the Harvey Weinstein of reddit?
1 [deleted] 2018-01-07
[deleted]
1 LightUmbra 2018-01-07
He raped me once.
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-01-07
The chances that that was consensual are zero.
1 OniTan 2018-01-07
/u/snallygaster explain yourself!
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Lmao you are hilariously terrified of stds. The 19 year old virgin will get that retarded pseudo-romantic shit fucked out of him sooner or later, but you better get that germaphobe shit under control.
1 taxitaxixo 2018-01-07
no not me, the original poster of the question in r/relationships might be.
i was just saying the facts. condoms don't protect against oral sex transmission (unless you use condoms for oral), which includes syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia....
hpv is also not exactly best prevented via condom.
I'm not sure why so many people here don't know this. It's like they're virgins who never been to an std clinic
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Everyone knows that shit, that's not the point. Everyone has their own risk tolerances, but at one end of the spectrum you're living in bubble of your own fears.
Toss that dental dam. Learn to ride a motorcycle. Have sex with a beautiful stranger after wrapping it up. There were like, three thousand cases of syphilis in women last year, roll the dice and trust that you're not running into one. It's a pretty good lottery.
1 Protect_Me 2018-01-07
1 kermit_was_right 2018-01-07
Stop fucking bussy and stay out of Africa - problem mostly solved. And you don't get aids from being blown you fucking mong.
1 Protect_Me 2018-01-07
That's gonna be a no-can-do from me, champ.
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2018-01-07
Oh look: subredditdrama deletes actual drama...
Say it ain't so.
1 OniTan 2018-01-07
I will not go.
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2018-01-07
Bismilla no...