Are you genuinely mentally challenged? Please use whatever little brain cells you have left after your glue huffing addiction to think a little bit before posting something as stupid as this again. Thanks and have a nice evening. src
It's not that they're political oppenents, it's that they're Russian trolls, or complete morons spreading Russian propaganda. It's a hate subreddit. /r/fatpeoplehate died, /r/coontown is dead, they slammed down on /r/spacedicks the classiest subreddit of all. They ban users and subreddits for far less, but T_D can break all of the rules and still be allowed.
/u/spez ban my political oppenents. its okay because theyre rushuns i think. lol. anyway remember CHARLOTTESVILLE where /u/ivankatrumpismywaifu literally MURDERED that fat socialist? i do. Band the dotard now ok thanks.
No but in all seriousness, I'd dance around like a raped ape for T_D to stick around as long as they never ban another subreddit or a user for anything other than spam every again.
I miss calling people a whispering faggot when they forgot to write in all caps in /r/spacedicks and in /r/gats. I split my sides open laughing and died because of some of the posts in /r/fatpeoplehate and /r/coontown.
No more censorship damnit! Voat doesn't censor but the site fuckin sucks.
You should probably get a life and a sense of humor if you "split my sides open laughing and died", and actually have a sense of longing over not calling people faggots anymore.
America and western Europe is a better place because of Russian influence, this is no different than any other cultural exchange, it's just that some of us get a little money for it.
I've been saving up for a PS4 Pro so that I can play Bloodborne with less frame drops. It would've been pretty shitty if all the effort I've put in running interference for the Kremlin were for naught because of soyboys like you.
Idk this whole "everyone who disagrees with me is a Russian bot" reminds me of "deep state astroturfing mind control"
Like it's the left version of the conspiracy theory that only exists because people are too stupid and fragile to handle the fact that their opinions can be disagreed with.
Amazing its like all you seem to know about T_D was gathered from cherry picked screen shots of posts and comments that usually were later removed for breaking the rules.
Dear Christ. Wait till Againsthatesubreddits and Chapocunthouse hear. The sheer amount of autistic reeeing will be enough to rival /r/the_daddy and the 100 subreddits specifically designed to #resist
In before Multiple gilded posts calling for boycotts and petitions that won't do shit.
I love /r/announcements threads. They could be about how we cured world hunger and the top comment will still be someone butthurt over how TD isn't banned yet.
/r/politics was a full Russian inside job. You can tell after the primary where people started claiming they liked Hillary Clinton against all reason and facts. At least Trump had his supporters of steak and bad television but /r/politics should be banned
I'm really hoping it's because multiple ad companies have expressed concern over certain subs. And I say this because if these subs happen to get banned, the melt down will be amazing.
Are you genuinely mentally challenged? Please use whatever little brain cells you have left after your glue huffing addiction to think a little bit before posting something as stupid as this again. Thanks and have a nice evening.
there's like an entire sub of all the shitty things that T_D's gotten away with, not to mention that so many other subs have gotten banned for way less worse things. like even ignoring all the completly false conspirary shit they create, T_D has literally doxxed people and broken tons of Reddit's rules multiple times but somehow they're still here
there's like an entire sub of all the shitty things that T_D's gotten away with
Last time I checked AHS, they voted some blatantly fake post to the top. It was revealed that OP actually posted the hateful post himself, and then screenshotted it to AHS. Despite that revelation, the mods refused to remove it. That subreddit is untrustworthy garbage.
There is literally blood on your hands. You need to deal with the brainwashing going on or resign. Personally I think you should resign because your ineptitude as any sort of leader at Reddit has directly caused the deaths of at least one confirmed person and potentially the deaths of dozens of others because of your refusal to take a look at this as a moral prerogative.
Where's the lie? But honestly, some people are mad-retarded. They will find ways to view the things they wanna see, interact with people like them. If you believe these kinds os people will stop when you ban one or two subreddit... Nothing personnel
Protip, if you really wanna fuck with people, ALT + 0173 is a soft hyphen that isn't rendered by pretty much anything, and makes for a clever way to work around "no blank comments" on various forums around the internet.
It won't show in the "source" button if someone looked at your comment.
We take the integrity of Reddit extremely seriously
Aren't you the guy who edited other people's comments as a prank?
ads from Russia are blocked entirely
We were always at war with the Ruskies!
content from accounts we suspect are of Russian origin or content linking directly to known propaganda domains, we are doing our best to identify and remove it
WTF, I love censorship now! Keep up the good work, you true-blue patriot! We will crush the enemy and hear the laments of their women!
We have found and removed a few hundred accounts
Indians, dogs and Russians not allowed. Diversity, but in moderation, right?
sadly, from everything we can tell, these users are mostly American, and appear to be unwittingly promoting Russian propaganda
A fifth column, you say? Let's get started on those concentration camps.
I believe the biggest risk we face as Americans is our own ability to discern reality from nonsense, and this is a burden we all bear.
That's all right, pardner, we will fight it with censorship, like we did in the previous Red Scares.
what we’re going through right now will actually reinvigorate Americans to be more vigilant, hold ourselves to higher standards of discourse, and fight back against propaganda, whether foreign or not
Whatever keeps you busy while the military-industrial complex starts exciting new wars all over the planet.
54% of liberals believe it's either "probably true" or "definitely true" that "Russia tampered with vote tallies in order to get Donald Trump elected President."
You wait long enough, and the Birthers switch sides.
LOL they actually think the election was hacked? Who knew the Dems would take the Russian propaganda ball and run even further with it. Americans are provided evidence that Russia used the election make them hate each other and their response to this revelation is to not only to pour gasoline on the mutual hatred but start believing Russia possesses supernatural cyber warfare capability. Putin's dick must be permanently rock hard, this is better than any piece of domestic propaganda Russia can get their own people to swallow and he didn't even have to pay for it.
I'm pretty sure I saw an unearthed Fark thread once that had a remarkably /r/politics-esque discourse going on about the Bush administration. I wonder if any of them ended up being one of those redditors who gave in to Bush apologia just so they could illustrate how bad le Drumpf is.
64% of them do. Not even the most irresponsible of WaPo op/eds has alleged this. This is of course 16 months after the election in which every single Russian story has been front page news for a week with nothing even approaching allegations of this nature, and after intelligence agencies said that it didn't occur. You expect rural uneducated conservatives to latch onto retarded conspiracies, but this is beyond the pale.
These people are living in an alternative reality where the Trump presidency isn't legitimate because some Russians made FACEBOOK MEMES. Please ignore that you have ENTIRE MEDIA COMPANIES SHILLING FOR HILLARY it's the facebook memes we need to be worried about.
None of you people give a damn about "election integrity" or you would advocate for voter ID and better record keeping. You just want to pretend the Trump presidency isn't legitimate because some Russians made memes.
If by "interference" you mean FACEBOOK MEMES then you're just pathetic. If you think Russian shitposting means the election is illegitimate then you're a moron.
Spending millions on propaganda campaign to get stooge in office to the point that stooge refuses to enforce congressional sanctions
Millions is a drop in the bucket. I would love to see any kind of proof that they really mattered. You're just buttmad that your candidate was so fucking terrible that Trump could win. You are a useful idiot lacking any meaningful form of agency.
Your point is correct and I have been repeatedly proven wrong
Your "point" is that Russians took over our facebook memes. Never once did I deny that some Russians were probably paid to make facebook memes. WHY DOES THIS MATTER. You ignore any form of real corruption or meddling that matters because you are a twat who thinks John Oliver is an actual political informant and that this is anything more than a vain attempt to detract from Trump. Part of me wishes trump actually is a Russian plant because all of you would fall over dead from a serotonin overdose.
because most americans in the present day get their opinions from social media
there’s been lots of studies supporting this
also they already did it with the Ukranian elections in ‘14(?) among others, and probably wouldn’t continue to spend millions on it if it didn’t yield them some advantage
Oh yeah I'm sure these people were all going to be good Hillary supporters until they were corrupted by Facebook memes. Why can't you just accept that most of America hates you and voted for Trump because he was the best candidate.
INB4 "muh popular vote" even though Trump would have campained differently if it was a fight for the popular vote.
Oh yeah I'm sure these people were all going to be good Hillary supporters until they were corrupted by Facebook memes
I think it’s more like, maybe like two percent of potential voters were dissuaded from voting by the propped-up online culture around it. And some reluctant-Hillaries are said to have flipped at the last minute.
most of America hates you and voted for trump
lmao
"muh popular vote"
well, i mean...
...a popular vote for our only shared representative is just common sense. It seemed like a glaring issue the first time it went wrong, and now it’s been twice in 20 years. And hell, even if you adjusted the electoral college so it was as proportional as the House, echoing the original model (2 votes were added to each), they would have turned out differently.
even though Trump would have campained differently if it was a fight for the popular vote
I think it’s more like, maybe 5% of potential voters were dissuaded from voting by the propped-up online culture around it. And some reluctant-Hillaries are said to have flipped at the last minute.
You have no reason to believe this. Most people who consume this content do so because they already believe in it. Even if this is true what do you do about it? Firewall an entire nation off the internet?
...a popular vote for our only shared representative is just common sense
If someone sets up a race where the winner is whomever takes the most steps and you try taking the most steps while your opponent bolts for the finish line you still win. It doesn't matter if you say the race should be first to the finish line because both parties would have acted differently if that was the objectives and you can't predict the outcome. Had the contest been for popular vote Trump would have campained in different locations.
Could you stand to be a little less pathetic and just admit this Russian thing is a sham and that you lost an election because your canidate is a terrible person.
Polling brah. The difference from expected turnout, the trends expressed in tracking polls, etc.
Most people who consume this content do so because they already believe in it.
That's not how most of Facebook works.
Even if this is true what do you do about it?
well, prohibiting american companies from taking money from foreign governments for domestic political ads would probably be a good start
If someone sets up a race where the winner is whomever takes the most steps
Then it's a stupid race, that should be the central point lol.
It doesn't matter if you say the race should be first to the finish line because both parties would have acted differently if that was the objectives
as would have voters. but not differently enough to suddenly appeal to any of the other 65% of Americans.
Had the contest been for popular vote Trump would have campained [sic] in different locations.
where he'd have less than 40% support locally, right? his strategy has always depended on dividing voters and maintaining a slim plurality, he'd have to completely shed his current image to appeal to a majority.
Polling brah. The difference from expected turnout, the trends expressed in tracking polls, etc.
Because the vote didn't turn out how the polls expected doesn't mean that Russian memes won the election. There are numerous reason the polls were wrong to blame it all on Russian memes is pathetic.
well, prohibiting american companies from taking money from foreign governments for domestic political ads would probably be a good start
Not a bad idea but while we're at it lets ban foreign government from making donations to candidates and parties as well.
Then it's a stupid race, that should be the central point lol.
It's like you're incapable of understanding anything you don't want to. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THE RACE IS STUPID. The race is what both candidates agreed upon and competed in. Had the race been different you would have different campaigning strategies and different outcomes.
where he'd have less than 40% support locally, right? his strategy has always depended on dividing voters and maintaining a slim plurality, he'd have to completely shed his current image to appeal to a majority.
His support is low in those areas but they have an abysmal turnout. The majority of the country didn't vote so he just has to aim for the large white populations who have low turnout and motivate them.
Regardless the electoral college is what was what was competed for and Trump won it.
Because the vote didn't turn out how the polls expected doesn't mean that Russian memes won the election.
You're right, it doesn't. But that coupled with the cause of the discrepensies is a reason to believe it.
There are numerous reason the polls were wrong
if you're not talking state-level here, i'd like to hear em.
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THE RACE IS STUPID.
Uh... shouldn't it matter if the method that you're using to pick your leader has multiple glaring issues? I'm having a hard time understanding your priorities here.
The race is what both candidates agreed upon and competed in. Had the race been different you would have different campaigning strategies and different outcomes.
ok, you've said this like three times, but still haven't given me a reason to care lol. i'm not saying he technically lost the election or something, i'm saying it's a shitty system, and there's no conceivable way he could have won in a less shitty system- even against a candidate as shitty as Hilldawg, who can at least communicate and knows how to waffle.
he just has to aim for the large white populations who have low turnout and motivate them.
if he could literally double their turnout without energizing the opposition, sure. might need some online help for that, though.
Uh... shouldn't it matter if the method that you're using to pick your leader has multiple glaring issues? I'm having a hard time understanding your priorities here.
Because you fail to understand the argument. I'm not arguing for other against the electoral college. I'm stating you can't claim his presidency is illegetimate by saying Hillary would have won popular vote because both canidates would have campained differently and the results would have been different.
Regardless though, there were extremely visible attempts to influence the election on their part. Which is the part that's actually illegal.
By Facebook troll groups. Sure you can ban paid aids but what do you do about posts? This medeling is insignificant and there is no real proof that it mattered in any significant way. Even if it did convince enough people to turn the election are they guilty of the crime of saying things you disagree with?
At the end of the day this nothing more than you being buttmad about election results over a year after inauguration.
I'm stating you can't claim his presidency is illegetimate by saying Hillary would have won the popular vote
I'm saying it's "illegetimate" because he's literally never had the support of the american people, who he's supposed to represent. I'm not arguing there's some technicality that should nullify his presidency.
This medeling is insignificant and there is no real proof that it mattered in any significant way.
This is not only redundant, it's irrelevant to anything I said.
No but you're making the dumb argument that the election result would have been the same if the contest was for popular vote which you can't make.
If we want to argue about the "legitimacy" of an election then I would argue that there are districts in California with more votes than people that did far more damage than any Russian trolls. Not to mention that anyone receiving govenrment assistance should not have the right to vote on the basis that the integrity of their vote has been compromised.
you're making the dumb argument that the election result would have been the same
Nope. Just said Trump would still get fewer votes. Which is pretty obvious lol, if his public conduct before the primaries or after the election is any indication.
then I would argue that there are districts in California with more votes than people
Nope. Just said Trump would still get fewer votes. Which is pretty obvious lol,
you have little reason to infer this outside of the results of the last election which you can't use as a basis for the popular vote. Are you such a fucking ape that even the most basic of reading comprehension is impossible for you.
So wait... does that imply any citizen that receives a benefit from their government shouldn't be able to vote? What do you think the government's there for, exactly?
If you were to hand somebody money and say vote for me you would be jailed. If you offer them gibsmedats from other people it's perfectly OK. People who are net tax payers should have the right to vote while dindus without a penny in their name who live welfare check to welfare check shouldn't.
The idea that it's for the benefit of those governed is like... literally the founding principle of the country.
The founders of our countries thought only white property owning men of good character should be able to vote. Also the foundation of our country is based off rights and principles not some silly notion of "benefit" at the expense of others.
you have little reason to infer this outside of the results of the last election which you can't use as a basis for the popular vote.
Lol, you serious? There’s been consistent national polling since the primaries, his peak was when he was quiet the week leading into inauguration if I’m not mistaken. Just so happens the “likely voters” category corresponded to the actual popular vote.
The founders of our countries thought only white property owning men of good character should be able to vote.
there was some disagreement about that actually, but not about the thing I said.
If you were to hand somebody money and say vote for me you would be jailed.
Surely you understand there’s a difference between offering your money as an actual bribe, and doing the job you were elected to do (which involves allocating public funds) they way you promised?
also you know candidates don’t personally oversee and attach their name to every payout right
Also the foundation of our country is based off rights and principles not some silly notion of "benefit" at the expense of others.
holy shit this is fucking stupid, i’m sorry but wow. You know having civil rights and protections for them is a benefit of the government, right?
Lol, you serious? There’s been consistent national polling since the primaries, his peak was when he was quiet the week leading into inauguration if I’m not mistaken. Just so happens the “likely voters” category corresponded to the actual popular vote.
Because all of these polls were right before the election they must be on point now.
Surely you understand there’s a difference between offering your money as an actual bribe, and doing the job you were elected to do (which involves allocating public funds) they way you promised?
Depends on what you mean by allocating public funds. Politicians should build put money into things like infrastructure, defense, ect but when somebody is being handed a LITERAL check from the government I don't think they should have the right to vote. If the rest of society decides to keep voting these people money then great, but they don't get to vote themselves money.
holy shit this is fucking stupid, i’m sorry but wow. You know having civil rights and protections for them is a benefit of the government, right?
This is in reference to what the goals of the founding fathers was. They wanted to base their law on rights and principal rather than whatever a politician considered to be "best for the people" at a given time.
I'm not even saying I agree with them on this, the government should be for the benefit of the people,
"rights" and "principles" are social constructs and don't exist in nature.
A more recent one is “suffrage.”
And that was a mistake. Ideally the only people with a right to vote should be families with children and service members.
Because all of these polls were right before the election they must be on point now.
The national ones? Yeah, they were lol.
That's what I just said.
But when somebody is being handed a LITERAL check from the government I don't think they should have the right to vote.
But voting is a civil right. As is the right to life (though it's not in the BoR), which is supposedly protected by said check.
And again, world of difference between getting a check from a single candidate and getting a check from a government program. But even candidates can pay people- I mean, they have to, they don't run their campaigns themselves- it just can't be an actual bribe.
Clearly the founding fathers disagreed with this and for good reason. They had an even more harsh stance on who gets to vote than I do.
And again, world of difference between getting a check from a single candidate and getting a check from a government program
Yea at least the check comes out of the pocket of the politician rather than the society. I guess promising people the money of others if you vote for you is perfectly OK then and not at all corrupt.
lol gtfo you damn commie
If anything commies think women should have the exclusive right to vote.
Well, Adams didn't. The whole details of voting weren't exactly a unanimous thing, it's why they left it out of the constitution.
Yes but the original law was property owning white men of good character should be the only ones able to vote and this came from most of them agreeing to the sentiment. I'm not saying they all agreed but when people say voting is a "right" and that the founding fathers were egalitarians they're flat out wrong.
You mean, the money that came from people who elected you to manage it?
Implying that the people receiving gibs are the ones paying for them. As I said earlier if people vote for welfare but aren't recipients then fine, but letting gibs seekers vote is silly.
The biggest corporations are already more powerful than shitholes (Google could erase Botswana from the internet tomorrow but nobody would notice or object). In the developed western countries they control the flow of information much more effectively than government agencies, and they are spending more and more money on influencing the government through lobbying.
oh you meant less power than multinationals? I thought you meant less power than they used to have, with the implication that corporations receive the ceded power
Yeah, multinational corporations have increased power, both soft power and direct (financial/political) power. This is often but not always at the expense of sovereign governments.
In reality those large corporations and most governments are dominated by a wealthy, international elite. The elite as a whole may choose not to act through a government (at least in the US that pesky 1A gets in the way of government action) but through corporations that get around limitations on state power.
Who needs the government to throw somebody in jail if you can just make sure he gets fired and can never work again?
Here's the NYT proposing using corporate power to make the second amendment meaningless, for instance:
The Trump Presidency is illegitimate for plenty of other, much better reasons. The fact that Russian memes were so popular is only important because it validates this.
It's not that ridiculous, electronic voting is notoriously insecure. At least the way it's done in the US. I think the Russian state, if they wanted to, could change the result of US elections. Or any state with sophisticated enough crackers/hackers.
Yea I'm aware there are multiple ways to vote and paper ballots are one of them, but it's not 100%. Look at how close the 2000 and 2016 elections were.
The targets included voter registration systems but not vote-tallying software. Officials said there were some attempts to compromise networks, but most were unsuccessful.
Only Illinois reported that hackers had succeeded in breaching its voter systems.
Other states said their cybersecurity measures turned back efforts to get to crucial information.
“There are constant attempts by bad actors to hack our systems,” Iowa’s secretary of state, Paul Pate, a Republican, said in a statement. “But we continue to deflect those attempts.”
No doubt they tried monkeying around, but not even the most irresponsible newspaper editor or op/ed writer is suggesting the Reds changed the vote tallies.
It’s somewhat ironic, but I actually believe what we’re going through right now will actually reinvigorate Americans to be more vigilant, hold ourselves to higher standards of discourse, and fight back against propaganda, whether foreign or not.
You know it's good drama when sorting by top gives Reddit's trademarked mass-produced stupidity, but sorting by controversial provides actual nuanced discussion
179 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-03-05
Are you genuinely mentally challenged? Please use whatever little brain cells you have left after your glue huffing addiction to think a little bit before posting something as stupid as this again. Thanks and have a nice evening. src
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Rith2 2018-03-05
Beat my by a minute, shit.
Enjoy the shitstorm everyone cuz I know there's gonna be some butthurt in this one
1 Couldnt_think_of_a 2018-03-05
I'd rather he made Trump an admin or mod of /r/politics, the fallout from that would be truly apocalyptic.
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
Why not just automatically make Trump a mod of all political subreddits? I mean everyone is so obsessed with him anyways :)
1 Couldnt_think_of_a 2018-03-05
Also he'd probably just shitpost all day and do no president work, everyone wins.
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
Please my dick can only be so erect
1 RainbowSama 2018-03-05
/u/spez Ban my political oppenents >:E
1 Hotrod_Greaser 2018-03-05
It's not that they're political oppenents, it's that they're Russian trolls, or complete morons spreading Russian propaganda. It's a hate subreddit. /r/fatpeoplehate died, /r/coontown is dead, they slammed down on /r/spacedicks the classiest subreddit of all. They ban users and subreddits for far less, but T_D can break all of the rules and still be allowed.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-03-05
Lol
1 RainbowSama 2018-03-05
/u/spez ban my political oppenents. its okay because theyre rushuns i think. lol. anyway remember CHARLOTTESVILLE where /u/ivankatrumpismywaifu literally MURDERED that fat socialist? i do. Band the dotard now ok thanks.
1 incineratechicken 2018-03-05
This but unironically tbqfh
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-03-05
My sides, is this pasta???
1 Hotrod_Greaser 2018-03-05
No but in all seriousness, I'd dance around like a raped ape for T_D to stick around as long as they never ban another subreddit or a user for anything other than spam every again.
I miss calling people a whispering faggot when they forgot to write in all caps in /r/spacedicks and in /r/gats. I split my sides open laughing and died because of some of the posts in /r/fatpeoplehate and /r/coontown.
No more censorship damnit! Voat doesn't censor but the site fuckin sucks.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-03-05
Oh bb it's pasta now.
1 Hotrod_Greaser 2018-03-05
Yay I made pasta
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-03-05
poor baby
1 VnillaGorilla 2018-03-05
You should probably get a life and a sense of humor if you "split my sides open laughing and died", and actually have a sense of longing over not calling people faggots anymore.
1 LemonScore 2018-03-05
America and western Europe is a better place because of Russian influence, this is no different than any other cultural exchange, it's just that some of us get a little money for it.
I've been saving up for a PS4 Pro so that I can play Bloodborne with less frame drops. It would've been pretty shitty if all the effort I've put in running interference for the Kremlin were for naught because of soyboys like you.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-05
Top tier pasta, this fresh?
1 Plexipus 2018-03-05
Made to order in this very thread.
1 yourdeadwife 2018-03-05
Idk this whole "everyone who disagrees with me is a Russian bot" reminds me of "deep state astroturfing mind control"
Like it's the left version of the conspiracy theory that only exists because people are too stupid and fragile to handle the fact that their opinions can be disagreed with.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-03-05
Surething Ivan.
1 yourdeadwife 2018-03-05
I only drink as much vodka as a Russian.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-03-05
That might be beca&use you are a russkie, Ivan.
1 yourdeadwife 2018-03-05
Thankfully not, I couldn't live a life under a government that banned bussy.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-03-05
You break the law Ivan? To the gulag.
1 fok_yo_karma 2018-03-05
enough bussy there.
1 telandrias 2018-03-05
Report him to the council of American activities. Commie spies
1 0Gwynbleidd7 2018-03-05
Russia Russia Russia. Do you fags ever get bored with that tired old shit?
1 Hotrod_Greaser 2018-03-05
New account. Only defends Trump and T_D.
1 0Gwynbleidd7 2018-03-05
Actually bothers looking up account age, as if anyone gives a fuck.
I’m from Ohio you raging faggot.
1 Going_up_the_Country 2018-03-05
Ohio, AKA the Russia of the Midwest.
1 fight_for_our_future 2018-03-05
Нахуй пошел.
Thanks for the tip.
1 morerokk 2018-03-05
Nice personal attack. Do you have anything to say or not?
I echo his sentiment. Now what?
1 Mexagon 2018-03-05
Keep going...
1 freet0 2018-03-05
literally couldn't keep a consistent argument for 2 sentences
1 wolfsktaag 2018-03-05
RUSHINS RRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2018-03-05
>Wahh ban people I deem morons
1 lightfire409 2018-03-05
Amazing its like all you seem to know about T_D was gathered from cherry picked screen shots of posts and comments that usually were later removed for breaking the rules.
1 El_Jefe_Yaqui 2018-03-05
/u/spez won't ban /r/the_daddy
Dear Christ. Wait till Againsthatesubreddits and Chapocunthouse hear. The sheer amount of autistic reeeing will be enough to rival /r/the_daddy and the 100 subreddits specifically designed to #resist
In before Multiple gilded posts calling for boycotts and petitions that won't do shit.
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
Why is le TD not banned yet? They are doing the exact same things as us but are right leaning >:(((((((
1 DistortedLines 2018-03-05
TD is a godsend, the amount of drama they generate in every /r/announcements thread is enough to keep this sub going for weeks.
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
I love /r/announcements threads. They could be about how we cured world hunger and the top comment will still be someone butthurt over how TD isn't banned yet.
TD+/r/announcements is the true OTP
1 DistortedLines 2018-03-05
Exactly, you can literally predict the top response with 90% accuracy everytime.
1 better_bot 2018-03-05
CBTS has a better lolcow density, though T_D wins in raw numbers.
1 telandrias 2018-03-05
/r/politics was a full Russian inside job. You can tell after the primary where people started claiming they liked Hillary Clinton against all reason and facts. At least Trump had his supporters of steak and bad television but /r/politics should be banned
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-03-05
ADMINS ARE LITERALLY NAZIS
1 fuckyourcontext 2018-03-05
This but unironically
1 KalebCS 2018-03-05
Lmao theres people actually calling /u/spez an alt-righter. This shit writes itself
1 froibo 2018-03-05
Why would they make a statement about this. I'm not really complaining. I am going to enjoy the fallout.
1 IAmAN00bie 2018-03-05
Admins secretly have a fetish for drama
1 SithisTheDreadFather 2018-03-05
"Popcorn tastes good." - /u/kn0thing
1 IAmAN00bie 2018-03-05
Oh shit I forgot they actually said that lmao. Guess it's not a secret.
1 SithisTheDreadFather 2018-03-05
That was almost 3 years ago...
1 AntiLuke 2018-03-05
That was only three years ago?
1 ItsSugar 2018-03-05
POP that kernel Daddy 😍
1 better_bot 2018-03-05
I mean, it's not like people are gonna go to voat.
1 zwiebelhans 2018-03-05
Well they wanted to give users the chance to go on yelling about banning more subreddits.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-03-05
I'm really hoping it's because multiple ad companies have expressed concern over certain subs. And I say this because if these subs happen to get banned, the melt down will be amazing.
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
/r/spez is secretly as much of an autistic faggot as us here on /r/drama and feeds of it just like us
1 TaylorSwiftOfRdrama 2018-03-05
That's a whole lot of words to say "we ain't done jack shit"
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
Just the way it I like it
1 Hotrod_Greaser 2018-03-05
They ban users and subreddits for far less. This is absolute bullshit.
1 RainbowSama 2018-03-05
Are you genuinely mentally challenged? Please use whatever little brain cells you have left after your glue huffing addiction to think a little bit before posting something as stupid as this again. Thanks and have a nice evening.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-03-05
Stop being a pedo, pedo
1 lincoln1222 2018-03-05
apparently Spez thinks these are voices worth being heard
1 morerokk 2018-03-05
Less than what? What has T_D itself done, exactly? You think an entire sub should be banned because a bunch of Russians posted on it at some point?
1 lincoln1222 2018-03-05
there's like an entire sub of all the shitty things that T_D's gotten away with, not to mention that so many other subs have gotten banned for way less worse things. like even ignoring all the completly false conspirary shit they create, T_D has literally doxxed people and broken tons of Reddit's rules multiple times but somehow they're still here
1 morerokk 2018-03-05
Last time I checked AHS, they voted some blatantly fake post to the top. It was revealed that OP actually posted the hateful post himself, and then screenshotted it to AHS. Despite that revelation, the mods refused to remove it. That subreddit is untrustworthy garbage.
1 gas_all_shoplifters 2018-03-05
That's a spicy meatball.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2018-03-05
LITERALLY BLOOD!! PEOPLE HAVE DIED FOR THIS! HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH! ....wait...
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-03-05
HIS NAME WAS SETH ROGEN YOU LEFTOIDS
1 GadolBoobies 2018-03-05
Who?
1 zion48 2018-03-05
halp
1 morerokk 2018-03-05
He deleted his posts.
1 gas_all_shoplifters 2018-03-05
Wrong username, it was actually /u/vikinick.
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
Oh hey, it's /r/drama. Sweet. It's about time you assholes commented about me.
1 gas_all_shoplifters 2018-03-05
Micro aggression like that are NOT welcome here.
1 RollTide09 2018-03-05
Were you actually being serious in that post?
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
I do believe that he has blood on hands and has a moral imperative to do something and should resign.
1 RollTide09 2018-03-05
Lol
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
That's your opinion that he shouldn't, but he could have stopped people like /u/seattle4truth from murdering people if he had taken action.
1 RollTide09 2018-03-05
So do we need to bad every other subreddit he posted in as well?
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
No, just the ones that quite obviously led him to believe that all Democrats are pedophiles.
1 ltedt 2018-03-05
Where's the lie? But honestly, some people are mad-retarded. They will find ways to view the things they wanna see, interact with people like them. If you believe these kinds os people will stop when you ban one or two subreddit... Nothing personnel
1 ParticularVillage 2018-03-05
hahahahahahahahahaha
"Why is le TD not banned yet? They are doing the exact same things as us but are right leaning >:((((((("
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
It's actually sorta pathetic that you fall into the "but both sides!" bullshit.
1 ParticularVillage 2018-03-05
hahaha 90% of /r/politics comments are astroturfed
are you 'tarded?
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
Lol
1 ParticularVillage 2018-03-05
two scoops
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
K
1 lightfire409 2018-03-05
We summon you for our daily dose of the TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome).
Thank you for your service.
1 vikinick 2018-03-05
I for one look forward to the inevitable clusterfuck all Trump supporting subs will be when he gets indicted and begins to not in prison.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-03-05
1 fight_for_our_future 2018-03-05
and continue to win
1 OkThatsProblematic 2018-03-05
Plz tell me how you do it? Is it 50 ^ ^ ^ s and a period? Your autisim is heartwarming and example of what we can all achieve if we are nuts enough
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-03-05
"#"
1 Re_LE_Vant_UN 2018-03-05
1 OkThatsProblematic 2018-03-05
Thank you kind strangler
1 TheRootinTootinPutin 2018-03-05
Protip, if you really wanna fuck with people, ALT + 0173 is a soft hyphen that isn't rendered by pretty much anything, and makes for a clever way to work around "no blank comments" on various forums around the internet.
It won't show in the "source" button if someone looked at your comment.
1 Kosmiche 2018-03-05
1 better_bot 2018-03-05
You can always click 'source'.
1 OkThatsProblematic 2018-03-05
Bot, please tell me how
1 PantherChamp 2018-03-05
1 shallowm 2018-03-05
It's a RES feature.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
i type a comment, then delete it
1 ItsSugar 2018-03-05
/u/stefantalpalaru, please end your life.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-03-05
The Red Scare shit is hilarious.
54% of liberals believe it's either "probably true" or "definitely true" that "Russia tampered with vote tallies in order to get Donald Trump elected President."
You wait long enough, and the Birthers switch sides.
1 brdboys 2018-03-05
Do you have any source for that 54% because the only article I found is this one from CNN that says 54% of people believe Russians on social media affected the election.. That’s not really the same thing as tampering with votes.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-03-05
No problem. The actual wording is "Russia tampered with vote tallies in order to get Donald Trump elected President"
Page 69
In relocating that source, I actually found a more recent poll from the same organization. Page 36 shows it even higher at 64%. Jesus Christ.
1 brdboys 2018-03-05
Thanks - I’ll be damned.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-03-05
np bby ;)
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-03-05
LOL they actually think the election was hacked? Who knew the Dems would take the Russian propaganda ball and run even further with it. Americans are provided evidence that Russia used the election make them hate each other and their response to this revelation is to not only to pour gasoline on the mutual hatred but start believing Russia possesses supernatural cyber warfare capability. Putin's dick must be permanently rock hard, this is better than any piece of domestic propaganda Russia can get their own people to swallow and he didn't even have to pay for it.
1 UmmahSultan 2018-03-05
Everyone left of center knew for certain that George W Bush was going to cancel the elections as of 2002. Partisan politics causes retardation.
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-03-05
I'm pretty sure I saw an unearthed Fark thread once that had a remarkably /r/politics-esque discourse going on about the Bush administration. I wonder if any of them ended up being one of those redditors who gave in to Bush apologia just so they could illustrate how bad le Drumpf is.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-03-05
64% of them do. Not even the most irresponsible of WaPo op/eds has alleged this. This is of course 16 months after the election in which every single Russian story has been front page news for a week with nothing even approaching allegations of this nature, and after intelligence agencies said that it didn't occur. You expect rural uneducated conservatives to latch onto retarded conspiracies, but this is beyond the pale.
1 nanonan 2018-03-05
When this is all you hear it's not too hard to understand.
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-05
63 million russians voted in ARE NATION'S ELECTIONS
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-03-05
Everybody knows Russian government officials and Mexican illegal immigrants are the dominant voting blocs in America.
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-05
Exactly as the founding fathers intended.
1 telandrias 2018-03-05
Burn both partjes gary Johnson was the only American running
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
basically, leave it to Demmycrats to drop any ball handed to them
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
These people are living in an alternative reality where the Trump presidency isn't legitimate because some Russians made FACEBOOK MEMES. Please ignore that you have ENTIRE MEDIA COMPANIES SHILLING FOR HILLARY it's the facebook memes we need to be worried about.
Muller should have been fired ages ago.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-05
Ah yes, the difference between a foreign government and corporations is completely arbitrary at this point.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
None of you people give a damn about "election integrity" or you would advocate for voter ID and better record keeping. You just want to pretend the Trump presidency isn't legitimate because some Russians made memes.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-03-05
But voter ID's requires legal citizenship.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Which is why it's important
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-03-05
But then California would flip!
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
The horror. Don't forget that the Dem voterbase barely vote as is so if you add the extra hurdle most won't even bother voting
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
well yeah that’s the actual reason though
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2018-03-05
Plenty of lefty europoor countries have no problem with national voter id laws.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-05
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
If by "interference" you mean FACEBOOK MEMES then you're just pathetic. If you think Russian shitposting means the election is illegitimate then you're a moron.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-05
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Millions is a drop in the bucket. I would love to see any kind of proof that they really mattered. You're just buttmad that your candidate was so fucking terrible that Trump could win. You are a useful idiot lacking any meaningful form of agency.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-05
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Your "point" is that Russians took over our facebook memes. Never once did I deny that some Russians were probably paid to make facebook memes. WHY DOES THIS MATTER. You ignore any form of real corruption or meddling that matters because you are a twat who thinks John Oliver is an actual political informant and that this is anything more than a vain attempt to detract from Trump. Part of me wishes trump actually is a Russian plant because all of you would fall over dead from a serotonin overdose.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
because most americans in the present day get their opinions from social media
there’s been lots of studies supporting this
also they already did it with the Ukranian elections in ‘14(?) among others, and probably wouldn’t continue to spend millions on it if it didn’t yield them some advantage
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Oh yeah I'm sure these people were all going to be good Hillary supporters until they were corrupted by Facebook memes. Why can't you just accept that most of America hates you and voted for Trump because he was the best candidate.
INB4 "muh popular vote" even though Trump would have campained differently if it was a fight for the popular vote.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
I think it’s more like, maybe like two percent of potential voters were dissuaded from voting by the propped-up online culture around it. And some reluctant-Hillaries are said to have flipped at the last minute.
lmao
well, i mean...
...a popular vote for our only shared representative is just common sense. It seemed like a glaring issue the first time it went wrong, and now it’s been twice in 20 years. And hell, even if you adjusted the electoral college so it was as proportional as the House, echoing the original model (2 votes were added to each), they would have turned out differently.
lol
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
You have no reason to believe this. Most people who consume this content do so because they already believe in it. Even if this is true what do you do about it? Firewall an entire nation off the internet?
If someone sets up a race where the winner is whomever takes the most steps and you try taking the most steps while your opponent bolts for the finish line you still win. It doesn't matter if you say the race should be first to the finish line because both parties would have acted differently if that was the objectives and you can't predict the outcome. Had the contest been for popular vote Trump would have campained in different locations.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-05
You can just say you love Putin-Juice
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Could you stand to be a little less pathetic and just admit this Russian thing is a sham and that you lost an election because your canidate is a terrible person.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-03-05
I'm sorry I can accept reality without Daddy telling me what to believe
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
Polling brah. The difference from expected turnout, the trends expressed in tracking polls, etc.
That's not how most of Facebook works.
well, prohibiting american companies from taking money from foreign governments for domestic political ads would probably be a good start
Then it's a stupid race, that should be the central point lol.
as would have voters. but not differently enough to suddenly appeal to any of the other 65% of Americans.
where he'd have less than 40% support locally, right? his strategy has always depended on dividing voters and maintaining a slim plurality, he'd have to completely shed his current image to appeal to a majority.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Because the vote didn't turn out how the polls expected doesn't mean that Russian memes won the election. There are numerous reason the polls were wrong to blame it all on Russian memes is pathetic.
Not a bad idea but while we're at it lets ban foreign government from making donations to candidates and parties as well.
It's like you're incapable of understanding anything you don't want to. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THE RACE IS STUPID. The race is what both candidates agreed upon and competed in. Had the race been different you would have different campaigning strategies and different outcomes.
His support is low in those areas but they have an abysmal turnout. The majority of the country didn't vote so he just has to aim for the large white populations who have low turnout and motivate them.
Regardless the electoral college is what was what was competed for and Trump won it.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
You're right, it doesn't. But that coupled with the cause of the discrepensies is a reason to believe it.
if you're not talking state-level here, i'd like to hear em.
Uh... shouldn't it matter if the method that you're using to pick your leader has multiple glaring issues? I'm having a hard time understanding your priorities here.
ok, you've said this like three times, but still haven't given me a reason to care lol. i'm not saying he technically lost the election or something, i'm saying it's a shitty system, and there's no conceivable way he could have won in a less shitty system- even against a candidate as shitty as Hilldawg, who can at least communicate and knows how to waffle.
if he could literally double their turnout without energizing the opposition, sure. might need some online help for that, though.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Because you fail to understand the argument. I'm not arguing for other against the electoral college. I'm stating you can't claim his presidency is illegetimate by saying Hillary would have won popular vote because both canidates would have campained differently and the results would have been different.
By Facebook troll groups. Sure you can ban paid aids but what do you do about posts? This medeling is insignificant and there is no real proof that it mattered in any significant way. Even if it did convince enough people to turn the election are they guilty of the crime of saying things you disagree with?
At the end of the day this nothing more than you being buttmad about election results over a year after inauguration.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
I'm saying it's "illegetimate" because he's literally never had the support of the american people, who he's supposed to represent. I'm not arguing there's some technicality that should nullify his presidency.
This is not only redundant, it's irrelevant to anything I said.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
No but you're making the dumb argument that the election result would have been the same if the contest was for popular vote which you can't make.
If we want to argue about the "legitimacy" of an election then I would argue that there are districts in California with more votes than people that did far more damage than any Russian trolls. Not to mention that anyone receiving govenrment assistance should not have the right to vote on the basis that the integrity of their vote has been compromised.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
Nope. Just said Trump would still get fewer votes. Which is pretty obvious lol, if his public conduct before the primaries or after the election is any indication.
But you'd be wrong, though.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
you have little reason to infer this outside of the results of the last election which you can't use as a basis for the popular vote. Are you such a fucking ape that even the most basic of reading comprehension is impossible for you.
If you were to hand somebody money and say vote for me you would be jailed. If you offer them gibsmedats from other people it's perfectly OK. People who are net tax payers should have the right to vote while dindus without a penny in their name who live welfare check to welfare check shouldn't.
The founders of our countries thought only white property owning men of good character should be able to vote. Also the foundation of our country is based off rights and principles not some silly notion of "benefit" at the expense of others.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
Lol, you serious? There’s been consistent national polling since the primaries, his peak was when he was quiet the week leading into inauguration if I’m not mistaken. Just so happens the “likely voters” category corresponded to the actual popular vote.
there was some disagreement about that actually, but not about the thing I said.
Surely you understand there’s a difference between offering your money as an actual bribe, and doing the job you were elected to do (which involves allocating public funds) they way you promised?
also you know candidates don’t personally oversee and attach their name to every payout right
holy shit this is fucking stupid, i’m sorry but wow. You know having civil rights and protections for them is a benefit of the government, right?
And one of those rights is “life” ya mong
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Because all of these polls were right before the election they must be on point now.
Depends on what you mean by allocating public funds. Politicians should build put money into things like infrastructure, defense, ect but when somebody is being handed a LITERAL check from the government I don't think they should have the right to vote. If the rest of society decides to keep voting these people money then great, but they don't get to vote themselves money.
This is in reference to what the goals of the founding fathers was. They wanted to base their law on rights and principal rather than whatever a politician considered to be "best for the people" at a given time.
I'm not even saying I agree with them on this, the government should be for the benefit of the people, "rights" and "principles" are social constructs and don't exist in nature.
And that was a mistake. Ideally the only people with a right to vote should be families with children and service members.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
The national ones? Yeah, they were lol.
That's what I just said.
But voting is a civil right. As is the right to life (though it's not in the BoR), which is supposedly protected by said check.
And again, world of difference between getting a check from a single candidate and getting a check from a government program. But even candidates can pay people- I mean, they have to, they don't run their campaigns themselves- it just can't be an actual bribe.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Clearly the founding fathers disagreed with this and for good reason. They had an even more harsh stance on who gets to vote than I do.
Yea at least the check comes out of the pocket of the politician rather than the society. I guess promising people the money of others if you vote for you is perfectly OK then and not at all corrupt.
If anything commies think women should have the exclusive right to vote.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
Well, Adams didn't. The whole details of voting weren't exactly a unanimous thing, it's why they left it out of the constitution.
You mean, the money they elected you to manage? Yeah, that's literally OK. It's literally doing their job.
lolwut
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Yes but the original law was property owning white men of good character should be the only ones able to vote and this came from most of them agreeing to the sentiment. I'm not saying they all agreed but when people say voting is a "right" and that the founding fathers were egalitarians they're flat out wrong.
Implying that the people receiving gibs are the ones paying for them. As I said earlier if people vote for welfare but aren't recipients then fine, but letting gibs seekers vote is silly.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
Well, they do- sales taxes, property taxes. Most of the people voting for them are paying even more for them, though.
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-05
Increasingly the governments have less power, so...
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
i don’t know if that’s necessarily true
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-05
The biggest corporations are already more powerful than shitholes (Google could erase Botswana from the internet tomorrow but nobody would notice or object). In the developed western countries they control the flow of information much more effectively than government agencies, and they are spending more and more money on influencing the government through lobbying.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
oh you meant less power than multinationals? I thought you meant less power than they used to have, with the implication that corporations receive the ceded power
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2018-03-05
Yeah, multinational corporations have increased power, both soft power and direct (financial/political) power. This is often but not always at the expense of sovereign governments.
In reality those large corporations and most governments are dominated by a wealthy, international elite. The elite as a whole may choose not to act through a government (at least in the US that pesky 1A gets in the way of government action) but through corporations that get around limitations on state power.
Who needs the government to throw somebody in jail if you can just make sure he gets fired and can never work again?
Here's the NYT proposing using corporate power to make the second amendment meaningless, for instance:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/19/business/banks-gun-sales.html
You could do that for any civil right you don't like as long as you control the financial industry.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
The Trump Presidency is illegitimate for plenty of other, much better reasons. The fact that Russian memes were so popular is only important because it validates this.
1 Thane97 2018-03-05
Please enlighten me as to why it's illegetimate for reasons besides memes or this endless Russia BS.
1 Sedai01 2018-03-05
It's not that ridiculous, electronic voting is notoriously insecure. At least the way it's done in the US. I think the Russian state, if they wanted to, could change the result of US elections. Or any state with sophisticated enough crackers/hackers.
Though we would probably detect this afterwards.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-03-05
They gonna hack the paper?
1 Sedai01 2018-03-05
That's why I said electronic voting, which is a large percentage of voting in the US.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-03-05
you didn't look at the link did you?
1 Sedai01 2018-03-05
Yea I'm aware there are multiple ways to vote and paper ballots are one of them, but it's not 100%. Look at how close the 2000 and 2016 elections were.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/08/on-election-day-most-voters-use-electronic-or-optical-scan-ballots/
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
12% is a pretty large percentage my man
honestly, we get into that double-digit range, and I’m already like “whoa, we could be using fractions at this point”
1 shallowm 2018-03-05
Apparently they tried, but they weren't successful.
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-03-05
No doubt they tried monkeying around, but not even the most irresponsible newspaper editor or op/ed writer is suggesting the Reds changed the vote tallies.
1 JumpinJackFasc 2018-03-05
You are the guy that sucks off cross-dressers, yeah?
1 Couldnt_think_of_a 2018-03-05
You can't change fiction unless you're the author.
1 fight_for_our_future 2018-03-05
Нас не догонят!
1 potatismannen1 2018-03-05
/u/xXKILLA_D21Xx
> Actually believing this will work
1 OkThatsProblematic 2018-03-05
Is it passè to call all of you guise gigantic faggots? If so, please retract
1 snallygaster 2018-03-05
LOL
1 QuantumFreakonomics 2018-03-05
You know it's good drama when sorting by top gives Reddit's trademarked mass-produced stupidity, but sorting by controversial provides actual nuanced discussion
1 SonyXboxNintendo11 2018-03-05
They love to say to people to go to Voat but will not go to voat themselves.
1 kuro-no-shinigami 2018-03-05
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DAHkGwnV0AEPMPU.jpg
1 3PPisForLosers 2018-03-05
Reddit should just switch over to dick pill, hentai, and cam girl ads.
1 grungebot5000 2018-03-05
sure, sometimes.
literally who gives a shit
and that's a minimum wage issue.
They take out more than what they put in, and are effectively supported by the next generation. They become a net drain once they start collecting.