This is a nice post and all, but I'm guessing that the only reason anyone is even arguing about this because these people believe 3D is superior to 2D.
Imagine hating someone so much you get excited when you hear about attorney client privilege being violated. Whatever "evidence" you think they found will never hold up in a court of law because of the constitution. Even if the wiretap was based on something illegal, it better be damn good because otherwise this case will be untriable. And if whatever evidence they had to get the wire tap was that good, Trump would be in a paddy wagon right now Best case scenario for DEMs this goes to the FEC and Trump is fined 50000 for it. Haven't you guys noticed yet, literally multiple times a week stories drop about Trump indicating an approaching arrest or impeachment and the lefty subs go nut (f5 o clock and the like) and every single time it disappears a week later or turns back against them.
I honestly cannot figure out how anyone at all would even have a reaction to a story like this anymore. How are you not yet de-sensitized by the constant churning out of scandal after scandal that never ends the way you want? How many headlines with a variation of "its over this time" have to be wrong before self-awareness sets in?
I didn’t get a chance to read that yet but I just want to say that I appreciate you stopping by. Now Can you ping a few friends so we can get some drama cookin?
I don't have friends here, like I said, give it a few months and return to my comment and you'll see I'm right. Ironically I don't support Trump, but watching this train wreck unfold it's endlessly entertaining to see the left get so excited, and then let down every time a Drumph is finished this time story drops.
If they caught Trump breaking any law it would leak in seconds and be broadcast nation wide, let's not pretend Trumps enemies aren't ready to leak anything negative at the drop of a hat...
That's literally already happened. He's already been caught breaking the law in many different ways, this is just one example.
Seriously though, you can find episodes of L&O and/or L&O:SVU easily online, that will educate you up significantly more than you seem to be. Or, read this:
He's already been caught breaking the law in many different ways, this is just one example.
Tells me he's broken laws, without any proof while the man is currently President and free. Tells me to watch a television show to educate myself. the absolute state of armchair legal redditors.
Haha, do you like, think that breaking a law means you automatically go to jail, or are kicked out of office or something? Serious question.
Look, if L&O isn't your cup of tea, maybe start with Night Court, a real gem that's overlooked by many today. It's not exactly Emmy-caliber material but I'm sure that watching a few seasons would leave you better educated about how laws work than you seem to be here, kid
Every time anything possibly related to Trump breaking the law has occurred it's leaked immediately, now all of the sudden they have enough evidence to over-turn attorney client privilege but crickets from all those sources close to the investigation? Sure is weird.
See, this right here is proof enough that you've made a serious mistake in neglecting to watch that classic, CSI: Miami. As is clearly detailed in Season 2, Episode 11, there exists no 'attorney-client' privilege when the attorney is assisting in the commission of a crime.
Given that every single entity inolved in the investigation of Trump and Cohen has far, far better taste in procedural drama than you do, what makes you think that they know less about the law than you do? Serious question.
I wouldn’t over analyze this, the libs/ anti trumpers are going to use every dirty tactic at their disposal. It’s frustrating but I’m letting it fire me up. I’m campaigning for the trump agenda in the fall, never thought I’d campaign for political stuff. Just gonna go door to door and fear monger ‘purple’ Households about gun rights etc potentially being taken by libs.
I know. Half the reason I’m doing it is for the pizzashill types. I can’t wait, I’m going to go door to door and tell people (((they))) are going to take your guns, literally. That one dem. Congressmen Swalwell literally called for a buy back today. I book marked that article, and am going to print it out so I can hand it out in the fall as an example. Most people are retarded and motivated by the shit we ridicule ime 🇺🇸
Honestly I think they wanted to expose the wiretap because they know it turned up nothing impeachable or actually illegal. The optics of wire tapping a presidents lawyer without something very illegal already known are terrible and will sink careers. I think they're gearing up to fire Rosenstein and end the special counsel by order of the President based on the lack of investigative direction, and lack of any crimes or evidence related to the initial purpose of the investigation: Russian collusion. Not to mention the over-reach and indictments all unrelated to the investigation scope covering only process crimes.
Actually I've read dozens of articles about manafort and Flynn and as far as I can tell the charges are related to lying to officials and have nothing to do with colluding with a foreign government to win an election so I'll ask you again unless we're talking crimes related to people lying to officials could you please point me in the direction of any Russian collusion that has led to indictments I'll wait.
Actually Mueller was tasked with investigating Russian interference in the election, and he's already brought charges relating to that against multiple Russian companies and individuals.
Also, I like how you say "Apart from the multiple Russian-related felonies, what else do you got?"
You asked if Mueller had any indictments out that were related to Russian interference and I pointed out that there was.
Lies I asked this:
could you please point me in the direction of any Russian collusion that has led to indictments I'll wait.
Russian Collusion my friend, nobody gives a shit about interference, if we did Israel would no longer exist as they influence our elections day in and day out with AIPAC.
If you'll remember, this conversation was about if Mueller had produced any indictments within the scope of the special counsel. And Russian interference is included in the scope. That's why I corrected you about it.
Nah dude, you just tried to change my wording and look like an ass now because I proved it. No backtracking bb just take your licks and better luck next time.
People in this sub understand context, you are 100 percent in the wrong here and are now trying to twist words after the fact and adapt the context of the conversation to make yourself seem right, good day sir you've been shown to be wrong.
the optics of wire tapping a president’s lawyer without something very illegal already known are terrible and will sink careers.
We know that the wire tap order was granted in the weeks/months preceding the raid on Michael Cohens offices so they obviously have something pretty fucking incriminating if it cleared the much higher standards applied to search warrants on officers of the court.
Man the goalposts are moving so fast around here, so have the left just given up on Russian collusion? I thought any day now Mueller was going to find that obstruction charge? I guess you guys are now ready to settle for anything, even process crimes? Hilarious, you should all take some time to read up on executive privilege, and attorney client privilege. This was a massive over-step by anyone involved and it will likely end with quite a few firings. I'm sure that will only lead to more outrage over collusion and obstruction of justice, but that fat white cheeto colored ass will still be in the oval office driving you guys mad.
Hilarious, you should all take some time to read up on executive privilege, and attorney client privilege.
Yes, I’m sure the DOJ lawyers and the judge that granted the taps completely forgot about these fundamental principles of law before proceeding with this. They really are easy things to overlook, these most technical of tiny details…
Time will tell, I cannot wait to watch the about face when this back fires horribly and the firings start. I'll be back to this thread in a week or so.
Literally every Drumph ending scandal has gone exactly this way, DEMs rush it out with as many sensational headlines as possible and then speculate about it until it blows back in their faces, or just get ignored eventually. So sure, I think this story will die when they find another "crime" or they'll find another pornstar. This is all political theater, nobody is going to jail or being impeached.
The only ones ignoring it are his sycophants. And that's because daddy is some weird christ-like figure in their eyes that can do no wrong. Remember when T_D started supporting gun control?
>This is all political theater, nobody is going to jail or being impeached.
If it's all political theater then why are there indictments? Why is Trump constantly freaking out? None of this is playing out like the nothingburger you desperately seem to want it to be.
The story was retracted dumbfuck, it was fake news no crime was found to lead to any wiretap. And now you want to jerk off to Mueller's Manafort subpoenas!!!
Enjoy grasping at straws, my god this is delicious.
A correction isn't a retraction, but it doesn't surprise me that a Trump voter doesn't understand the distinction. Just like they uniformly don't understand how polls work.
Don’t act like you weren’t acting under the assumption that there was a wiretap granted as well, but I'm sure for some reason in your head that was different. And none of this changes your asinine comment about privilege; it was still straight asinine.
There was still the high bar to clear just to get the warrant for the raids which we know were actual real news.
I'm just saying that I don't think this will end how everybody is calling for it to end similar to the way it's happened for like I don't know a whole year now but if that makes me angry and you're mine so be it I guess I'll just have to live with a single redditor thinking I'm mad.
I was using voice to text, I'll leave it as is because frankly who the fuck really cares. And I know this is going to blow you're mind, but I'm not a Trump supporter, I just like to correct leftists with a hard on for acting like they understand the political theater playing out.
HAHAHAHAHA THEY RETRACTED THE STORY WASN'T EVEN TRUE!
Holy shit you fucking morons trusting those anonymous sources, I don't even need the reminder bot now. "they must know something big and illegal if he got wiretapped." HAHAHAHAHA HE WASN'T EVEN WIRETAPPED, STILL NO CRIMES FOUND HOLY SHIT!!!
88 comments
1 Strictlybutters 2018-05-03
Inb4 “SMH at the absolute state of drama”
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2018-05-03
SMH at the absolute state of r/drama
1 Strictlybutters 2018-05-03
THIS ^
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
The deep absolute state.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-05-03
The absolute (((deep state)))
1 SnapshillBot 2018-05-03
This is a nice post and all, but I'm guessing that the only reason anyone is even arguing about this because these people believe 3D is superior to 2D.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 pizzashill 2018-05-03
I can't wait to hear how this legal wiretapping of a person under federal investigation was actually an abuse of power from the daddy defense force.
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
“But muh privuluge!!!”
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Imagine hating someone so much you get excited when you hear about attorney client privilege being violated. Whatever "evidence" you think they found will never hold up in a court of law because of the constitution. Even if the wiretap was based on something illegal, it better be damn good because otherwise this case will be untriable. And if whatever evidence they had to get the wire tap was that good, Trump would be in a paddy wagon right now Best case scenario for DEMs this goes to the FEC and Trump is fined 50000 for it. Haven't you guys noticed yet, literally multiple times a week stories drop about Trump indicating an approaching arrest or impeachment and the lefty subs go nut (f5 o clock and the like) and every single time it disappears a week later or turns back against them.
I honestly cannot figure out how anyone at all would even have a reaction to a story like this anymore. How are you not yet de-sensitized by the constant churning out of scandal after scandal that never ends the way you want? How many headlines with a variation of "its over this time" have to be wrong before self-awareness sets in?
1 Strictlybutters 2018-05-03
I didn’t get a chance to read that yet but I just want to say that I appreciate you stopping by. Now Can you ping a few friends so we can get some drama cookin?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
I don't have friends here, like I said, give it a few months and return to my comment and you'll see I'm right. Ironically I don't support Trump, but watching this train wreck unfold it's endlessly entertaining to see the left get so excited, and then let down every time a Drumph is finished this time story drops.
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
I get the feeling that you haven't, unlike me, watched the thousands of hours of Law & Order necessary to know how stupid this statement was
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
If they caught Trump breaking any law it would leak in seconds and be broadcast nation wide, let's not pretend Trumps enemies aren't ready to leak anything negative at the drop of a hat...
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
That's literally already happened. He's already been caught breaking the law in many different ways, this is just one example.
Seriously though, you can find episodes of L&O and/or L&O:SVU easily online, that will educate you up significantly more than you seem to be. Or, read this:
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/05/03/rudy-imagine-stormy-daniels-hadnt-paid-off-affair-revealed-october-2016/
tl;dr: Trump and Giuliani don't know what the fuck they're talking about and keep stepping on their own dicks
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Tells me he's broken laws, without any proof while the man is currently President and free. Tells me to watch a television show to educate myself. the absolute state of armchair legal redditors.
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
Haha, do you like, think that breaking a law means you automatically go to jail, or are kicked out of office or something? Serious question.
Look, if L&O isn't your cup of tea, maybe start with Night Court, a real gem that's overlooked by many today. It's not exactly Emmy-caliber material but I'm sure that watching a few seasons would leave you better educated about how laws work than you seem to be here, kid
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Every time anything possibly related to Trump breaking the law has occurred it's leaked immediately, now all of the sudden they have enough evidence to over-turn attorney client privilege but crickets from all those sources close to the investigation? Sure is weird.
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
See, this right here is proof enough that you've made a serious mistake in neglecting to watch that classic, CSI: Miami. As is clearly detailed in Season 2, Episode 11, there exists no 'attorney-client' privilege when the attorney is assisting in the commission of a crime.
Given that every single entity inolved in the investigation of Trump and Cohen has far, far better taste in procedural drama than you do, what makes you think that they know less about the law than you do? Serious question.
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
You shut your whore mouth!
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
I fucking love the Night Court theme song
1 menvaren 2018-05-03
John Laroquette begs to differ.
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
I noted that error in a post below!
Annoying to me that Harry Anderson never got the recognition he deserved. What a treasure he is
1 menvaren 2018-05-03
He really was, but I'm a little concerned you're using present tense...
1 EffOffReddit 2018-05-03
TOO SOON Judge Harry Anderson just recently died.
1 Cycloptichorn 2018-05-03
No! I didn't know, aargh
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-03
Surely this is the end of Drumpt!
I wouldn’t over analyze this, the libs/ anti trumpers are going to use every dirty tactic at their disposal. It’s frustrating but I’m letting it fire me up. I’m campaigning for the trump agenda in the fall, never thought I’d campaign for political stuff. Just gonna go door to door and fear monger ‘purple’ Households about gun rights etc potentially being taken by libs.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
My god, there are lurkers here biting their pillows reading that comment.
1 Dropperneck 2018-05-03
I know. Half the reason I’m doing it is for the pizzashill types. I can’t wait, I’m going to go door to door and tell people (((they))) are going to take your guns, literally. That one dem. Congressmen Swalwell literally called for a buy back today. I book marked that article, and am going to print it out so I can hand it out in the fall as an example. Most people are retarded and motivated by the shit we ridicule ime 🇺🇸
1 parameciidae 2018-05-03
For the drama.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
We now know there was no wiretap, it was fake news, just a pen register, how does it feel to be disappointed again?
1 pizzashill 2018-05-03
Can't be disappointed this week. It was revealed Trump paid a pornstar to hide an affair he had.
This is eating the family values propaganda alive.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
HAHAHAHA
1 kippot 2018-05-03
Why are people even allowed to question the Very Stable Genius God Emperor? !?!?!!?!??
REEEEEEEEEEE
1 Seriouscatt 2018-05-03
Really funny seeing these posts now that it was confirmed this was fake news
Liberals arent very bright, are they?
1 kippot 2018-05-03
triggered much snowflake ?
1 Seriouscatt 2018-05-03
Liberal sheep cant think for themselves
Good meme brainlet
1 kippot 2018-05-03
wahwah theyre so mean to daddy cry more centipedo
1 PM_ME_UR_SUSPICIONS 2018-05-03
It's not illegal to be a witch. Checkmate libtards.
1 LadyVetinari 2018-05-03
They'll take my period blood candles from me over my dead body
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
So this is why (((Lee-on-ee))) admitted Trump paid Stormy on Fox, and why Trump confirmed it on Twitter...
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Honestly I think they wanted to expose the wiretap because they know it turned up nothing impeachable or actually illegal. The optics of wire tapping a presidents lawyer without something very illegal already known are terrible and will sink careers. I think they're gearing up to fire Rosenstein and end the special counsel by order of the President based on the lack of investigative direction, and lack of any crimes or evidence related to the initial purpose of the investigation: Russian collusion. Not to mention the over-reach and indictments all unrelated to the investigation scope covering only process crimes.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
Hasn't Mueller already arrested a bunch of people in connection with Russia? And gotten guilty pleas?
1 ____________13 2018-05-03
Also, Trump won by TKO.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
They were process crimes not Russian interference Flynn and manafort's crimes had nothing to do with Russian collusion as far as I've read.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
Then you haven't read very much.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Actually I've read dozens of articles about manafort and Flynn and as far as I can tell the charges are related to lying to officials and have nothing to do with colluding with a foreign government to win an election so I'll ask you again unless we're talking crimes related to people lying to officials could you please point me in the direction of any Russian collusion that has led to indictments I'll wait.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
Actually Mueller was tasked with investigating Russian interference in the election, and he's already brought charges relating to that against multiple Russian companies and individuals.
Also, I like how you say "Apart from the multiple Russian-related felonies, what else do you got?"
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Lmao, charging Russians unconnected to the campaign relates to Trump how exactly? Oh that's right, it doesn't at all.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
Oof. That's a pretty rough attempt at deflection.
You asked if Mueller had any indictments out that were related to Russian interference and I pointed out that there was.
You are wrong. I am right.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Lies I asked this:
Russian Collusion my friend, nobody gives a shit about interference, if we did Israel would no longer exist as they influence our elections day in and day out with AIPAC.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
If you'll remember, this conversation was about if Mueller had produced any indictments within the scope of the special counsel. And Russian interference is included in the scope. That's why I corrected you about it.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Nah dude, you just tried to change my wording and look like an ass now because I proved it. No backtracking bb just take your licks and better luck next time.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
People in this sub understand context, you are 100 percent in the wrong here and are now trying to twist words after the fact and adapt the context of the conversation to make yourself seem right, good day sir you've been shown to be wrong.
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2018-05-03
Actually I've read dozens of reddit comments about this and both of you are fucking dumb and need to """ironically""" end yourselves.
1 Strictlybutters 2018-05-03
We know that the wire tap order was granted in the weeks/months preceding the raid on Michael Cohens offices so they obviously have something pretty fucking incriminating if it cleared the much higher standards applied to search warrants on officers of the court.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
We now know there was no wiretap, it was fake news, just a pen register, how does it feel to be disappointed again?
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
They "just" had call logs and texts.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Man the goalposts are moving so fast around here, so have the left just given up on Russian collusion? I thought any day now Mueller was going to find that obstruction charge? I guess you guys are now ready to settle for anything, even process crimes? Hilarious, you should all take some time to read up on executive privilege, and attorney client privilege. This was a massive over-step by anyone involved and it will likely end with quite a few firings. I'm sure that will only lead to more outrage over collusion and obstruction of justice, but that fat white cheeto colored ass will still be in the oval office driving you guys mad.
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
Yes, I’m sure the DOJ lawyers and the judge that granted the taps completely forgot about these fundamental principles of law before proceeding with this. They really are easy things to overlook, these most technical of tiny details…
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Time will tell, I cannot wait to watch the about face when this back fires horribly and the firings start. I'll be back to this thread in a week or so.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
Do you honestly believe that's how this is going to play out?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Literally every Drumph ending scandal has gone exactly this way, DEMs rush it out with as many sensational headlines as possible and then speculate about it until it blows back in their faces, or just get ignored eventually. So sure, I think this story will die when they find another "crime" or they'll find another pornstar. This is all political theater, nobody is going to jail or being impeached.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
>it blows back in their faces
Care to give an example?
>or just get ignored eventually.
The only ones ignoring it are his sycophants. And that's because daddy is some weird christ-like figure in their eyes that can do no wrong. Remember when T_D started supporting gun control?
>This is all political theater, nobody is going to jail or being impeached.
If it's all political theater then why are there indictments? Why is Trump constantly freaking out? None of this is playing out like the nothingburger you desperately seem to want it to be.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
The story was retracted dumbfuck, it was fake news no crime was found to lead to any wiretap. And now you want to jerk off to Mueller's Manafort subpoenas!!!
Enjoy grasping at straws, my god this is delicious.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
A correction isn't a retraction, but it doesn't surprise me that a Trump voter doesn't understand the distinction. Just like they uniformly don't understand how polls work.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
Your laughter can't hide the tears.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
This aged well.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
I wasn't wrong.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
HAHAHAHAHA
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
Getting upset doesn't make you right.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Upset, I'm laughing at you and the rest of the Mommy defense force.
1 parameciidae 2018-05-03
Next time they should ask WeWuzKANG5 for advice.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
We now know there was no wiretap, it was fake news, just a pen register, how does it feel to be disappointed again?
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
Why would you think I’m disappointed?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Oh, well I guess you're okay with parroting fake news, carry on.
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
Don’t act like you weren’t acting under the assumption that there was a wiretap granted as well, but I'm sure for some reason in your head that was different. And none of this changes your asinine comment about privilege; it was still straight asinine.
There was still the high bar to clear just to get the warrant for the raids which we know were actual real news.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Yeah you just keep waiting for that one fake news story to be right!
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
And you keep on ignoring all of the “fake news” stories that were later verified to be true.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
But whatabout! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
Where did I whatabout anything?
Seriously bro, you may want to try reading a bit slower.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
HAHAHAHAHA
1 Nerdlinger 2018-05-03
So you’re finally watching Night Court like /u/Cycloptichorn suggested. Good for you!
1 485558 2018-05-03
How would we know? We aren't your parents.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Ouch, right in the infinity stones!
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-05-03
You seem like the only person here who is genuinely mad.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Do I seem mad? I'm enjoying the banter honestly.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
Well, you're already doing the "Y-you'll see next week!" shit that only mad people do.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
I'm just saying that I don't think this will end how everybody is calling for it to end similar to the way it's happened for like I don't know a whole year now but if that makes me angry and you're mine so be it I guess I'll just have to live with a single redditor thinking I'm mad.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
Reading this made it pretty clear to me why you guys think Trump is a genius.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
I was using voice to text, I'll leave it as is because frankly who the fuck really cares. And I know this is going to blow you're mind, but I'm not a Trump supporter, I just like to correct leftists with a hard on for acting like they understand the political theater playing out.
1 el_throwaway_returns 2018-05-03
"You lie!" Was political theater. This involves way too many people, a lot of them Republicans. And to what end? What possible gain could there be?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Is that serious question? Are you asking why would politicians attack each other? What are you even saying?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
RemindMe! 2 weeks "Attorney client privilege backlash"
1 RemindMeBot 2018-05-03
I will be messaging you on 2018-05-17 19:39:35 UTC to remind you of this link.
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
Good bot
1 WeWuzKANG5 2018-05-03
HAHAHAHAHA THEY RETRACTED THE STORY WASN'T EVEN TRUE!
Holy shit you fucking morons trusting those anonymous sources, I don't even need the reminder bot now. "they must know something big and illegal if he got wiretapped." HAHAHAHAHA HE WASN'T EVEN WIRETAPPED, STILL NO CRIMES FOUND HOLY SHIT!!!
1 DeprestedDevelopment 2018-05-03
Why are you sperging so hard in this thread
1 Plexipus 2018-05-03
Did this thread break your brain or something?