I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her
I have been waiting for this day. There is so much drama online where different groups complain no one wants to fuck them, it was only a matter of time before someone filed a lawsuit.
He hasn't filed suit yet, and no attorney will take this case. Grindr is immune under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. He's just angry and stupid.
t. Attorney
Edit: read article and the author brings up the CDA, but it's more than a big hurdle. Craigslist, Facebook, eBay have all faced similar lawsuits and prevailed under section 230. There is zero chance this goes anywhere, or you'd see someone suing Reddit for allowing racist subreddits to exist.
Even if this guy were to succeed in legislating language, you can’t legislate behavior of the people who don’t find you attractive. Dude’s issue is racism, and that’s not Grindr’s fault.
Also I don’t know if I’d call that dude an incel. More like just butthurt for all the wrong reasons.
I'd say that tendencies toward racism and race-based sexual preferences come from the same place - humans tend to favor in-groups and dislike outsiders.
But if you think about it, people's perception of beauty is based upon the society and culture in which they grew up in. So everyone is it isnt blatant racism, isn't there a discussion to be had on subconscious racial bias?
Who cares? You aren't entitled to shit in dating. People either wanna fuck you or they don't. If people don't wanna fuck you because you're a pajeet or a hapa or whatever your rights aren't being violated any more than some ugly-ass incel's rights are being violated when nobody wants to sit on his deformed trailer-trash-looking face.
This new faux-progressive habit of whinging like sexual attraction is up for debate as if it's a political stance is 100/10 retarded.
Depends on whether the race is based on a 'type' or a stereotype. Like some people prefer a hair color or body type, some people prefer a certain class (similar or up or down for whatever reason). I think there can be complex arguments about how and why people gravitate towards the people they like. Could be they're attracted to an unequal power dynamic, like a rich person dating someone who makes a lot less so they have more control, or maybe they had a relationship with a friend or someone as a child that ends up flipping their switch as an adult, either with looks or personality. In my personal experience, a preference is just something you lean towards, but not necessarily restricted to. I tend to like goofy smart dudes, but I've also dated ex-football players. I like dark hair, but I've dated a blonde or two in my day. I have found when it comes to the type of people, they culture matters more than race. I feel uncomfortable around macho pushy guys, the kind curious types that don't chase works for me.
Being racist though means that anyone of a certain race is off the table, without considering who they are. Some folks may equate that to culture, but that doesn't mean everyone who is of a certain race is from that culture, and that's not fair to pre-judge or not give the time of day to someone who may be awesome.
So... basically, preference means you have a type, but may be open to people who don't fit that type depending on who they are. Racism is when you refuse to be open based on race. That said, I don't think it's terrible that people leave a 'wont date X' on their profile. It's easier to identify people who are racist when they self identify. Besides, why would anyone want to date someone who wouldn't want to date them for whatever reason is beyond me.
Exactly. If tomorrow, Grindr banned statements of racial preference from their users' profile, nothing would change except a few Asian dudes would end up wasting more time pursuing mayo bussy that isn't in to that oriental shit.
No, what will happen is the community will come together to find a new way of saying "No blacks, whites or asians." Something stupid like I hate rice or chicken or mayo.
Also I'm pretty sure it's still legal to choose who you want to have sex with
Oh well yeah, but this dude is trying to argue that by allowing users to use discriminating language and not censoring them, Grindr is therefore responsible. 230 explicitly creates immunity against any cause of action that would hold the interactive computer service (ICS) liable for info originating from a third party (the user).
They COULD reach liability if Grindr itself provided options to discriminate. See Roommates.com where the website was not immune because it asked discriminatory questions of users in a dropdown menu, published the discriminatory statements in user profiles, and sorted the results based on discriminatory statements in violation of the Fair Housing Act. But Roommates was liable because they created the discriminatory options and furthered the illegal activity.
Websites have been found immune even when the site selected defamatory content to go on his website and commented on it, because he did not materially change what the third party wrote (Tucker Max), immune even when asking for defamatory statements (Jones v. Dirty World), and immune even if created for the purpose of defamation (Giordano).
This dude is shit out of luck, but maybe he'll find an attorney to take his money just to tell him he has no options.
nothing is more satisfying than the dual experience of submitting your bussy to privileged daddy cock, and stealing daddy cock from disgusting decrepit mayo women
Hookup apps have a brief golden age where most of the users are using the app for its intended purposes. All of them inevitably become filled with idiots that take offense when they encounter anyone who dares to still use the app for casual sex.
So let's say he suceeds and makes it bannable say "no rice or spice" on your dating profile. Then what? Do they think the dude who said that is gonna give him a chance? Let's think things through to it's logical conclusion, what does it actually achieve?
Odd, in my experience on Grindr, it’s usually the basketball Americans that list “no Asians” in their profiles. Also, please let this get to the Supreme Court.
It ain't even getting to a regular court lmao. Notice how he's announcing it to media all over the place and he doesn't even have a lawyer. Cuz ain't nobody gonna take this case.
this is obviously just a publicity stunt for his asianentertainment.tv website, there is no way he believes that he'll get any money or whatever from grindr
96 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-07-15
I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 GadolBoobies 2018-07-15
SENTIENT
1 BussyShillBot 2018-07-15
Ｅａｔ ｓｈｉｔ
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 dramasexual 2018-07-15
He's trying fam. Those bigots won't let him.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-07-15
Thisssss!!
1 SuperiorExcess 2018-07-15
And den they eat da poo poo
1 Sumido 2018-07-15
Laik ice cream!!!
1 ItsSilverFoxYouIdiot 2018-07-15
I have been waiting for this day. There is so much drama online where different groups complain no one wants to fuck them, it was only a matter of time before someone filed a lawsuit.
1 AlreadyPorchNaked 2018-07-15
He hasn't filed suit yet, and no attorney will take this case. Grindr is immune under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. He's just angry and stupid.
t. Attorney
Edit: read article and the author brings up the CDA, but it's more than a big hurdle. Craigslist, Facebook, eBay have all faced similar lawsuits and prevailed under section 230. There is zero chance this goes anywhere, or you'd see someone suing Reddit for allowing racist subreddits to exist.
1 Cocheeeze 2018-07-15
I’m sure people have tried to sue Reddit countless times.
1 BeforeTheRobots 2018-07-15
Also I'm pretty sure it's still legal to choose who you want to have sex with
1 Fey_fox 2018-07-15
Even if this guy were to succeed in legislating language, you can’t legislate behavior of the people who don’t find you attractive. Dude’s issue is racism, and that’s not Grindr’s fault.
Also I don’t know if I’d call that dude an incel. More like just butthurt for all the wrong reasons.
1 BeforeTheRobots 2018-07-15
Serious question, is it really racism to have a sexual preference that factors in race?
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-07-15
Is it really homophobia to have a sexual preference that factor in sex ?
1 xXsnip_ur_ballsXx 2018-07-15
I'd say that tendencies toward racism and race-based sexual preferences come from the same place - humans tend to favor in-groups and dislike outsiders.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-07-15
That's your way of coming out as a sister fucker, white devil ?
1 dramasexual 2018-07-15
No, that's retarded.
Races look different, people are often sexually attracted to people based on looks.
fucking rape-ass """progressives""" tryna force people to fuck them smdh
1 Kinderqueer 2018-07-15
Some of us need a little tweak to the law in order to fulfill our identities, ok?
1 Hydrium 2018-07-15
Some people are so fucking ugly or have personalities so shitty that the only way they could get laid is if it were court ordered.
1 andrehsu 2018-07-15
But if you think about it, people's perception of beauty is based upon the society and culture in which they grew up in. So everyone is it isnt blatant racism, isn't there a discussion to be had on subconscious racial bias?
1 dramasexual 2018-07-15
Who cares? You aren't entitled to shit in dating. People either wanna fuck you or they don't. If people don't wanna fuck you because you're a pajeet or a hapa or whatever your rights aren't being violated any more than some ugly-ass incel's rights are being violated when nobody wants to sit on his deformed trailer-trash-looking face.
This new faux-progressive habit of whinging like sexual attraction is up for debate as if it's a political stance is 100/10 retarded.
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
I don't think it's racist to point out that there are 2 types of gingers:
Drop-dead gorgeous or "who let the steer out of the pen"
1 kippot 2018-07-15
You should give out some more r/malefashionadvice
Not here, in that sub, where you give male fashion advice
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Uh huh
1 kippot 2018-07-15
I like your takes on male fashion, pls advice more
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Uh huh
1 kippot 2018-07-15
That wasn't a fashion advice?
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
That wasn't a false MDE accusation?
1 kippot 2018-07-15
post MDE streetwear fit
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Sorry I dress like an adult.
1 kippot 2018-07-15
post it
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
You wish, creeper
1 kippot 2018-07-15
so i can give you male fashion advice
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
You dress like an incel 😉
1 kippot 2018-07-15
thats why i need more male fashion advice from you dammit
1 Fey_fox 2018-07-15
Depends on whether the race is based on a 'type' or a stereotype. Like some people prefer a hair color or body type, some people prefer a certain class (similar or up or down for whatever reason). I think there can be complex arguments about how and why people gravitate towards the people they like. Could be they're attracted to an unequal power dynamic, like a rich person dating someone who makes a lot less so they have more control, or maybe they had a relationship with a friend or someone as a child that ends up flipping their switch as an adult, either with looks or personality. In my personal experience, a preference is just something you lean towards, but not necessarily restricted to. I tend to like goofy smart dudes, but I've also dated ex-football players. I like dark hair, but I've dated a blonde or two in my day. I have found when it comes to the type of people, they culture matters more than race. I feel uncomfortable around macho pushy guys, the kind curious types that don't chase works for me.
Being racist though means that anyone of a certain race is off the table, without considering who they are. Some folks may equate that to culture, but that doesn't mean everyone who is of a certain race is from that culture, and that's not fair to pre-judge or not give the time of day to someone who may be awesome.
So... basically, preference means you have a type, but may be open to people who don't fit that type depending on who they are. Racism is when you refuse to be open based on race. That said, I don't think it's terrible that people leave a 'wont date X' on their profile. It's easier to identify people who are racist when they self identify. Besides, why would anyone want to date someone who wouldn't want to date them for whatever reason is beyond me.
Just my two cents...
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Nibba that was like $20 not 2 cents
1 Fey_fox 2018-07-15
Sorry, forgot to adjust for inflation
1 Anarcho_Autism 2018-07-15
Exactly. If tomorrow, Grindr banned statements of racial preference from their users' profile, nothing would change except a few Asian dudes would end up wasting more time pursuing mayo bussy that isn't in to that oriental shit.
1 Hydrium 2018-07-15
No, what will happen is the community will come together to find a new way of saying "No blacks, whites or asians." Something stupid like I hate rice or chicken or mayo.
1 serialflamingo 2018-07-15
"Rice" is already used on grindr
1 dramasexual 2018-07-15
a version of this for lesbians when
1 AlreadyPorchNaked 2018-07-15
Oh well yeah, but this dude is trying to argue that by allowing users to use discriminating language and not censoring them, Grindr is therefore responsible. 230 explicitly creates immunity against any cause of action that would hold the interactive computer service (ICS) liable for info originating from a third party (the user).
They COULD reach liability if Grindr itself provided options to discriminate. See Roommates.com where the website was not immune because it asked discriminatory questions of users in a dropdown menu, published the discriminatory statements in user profiles, and sorted the results based on discriminatory statements in violation of the Fair Housing Act. But Roommates was liable because they created the discriminatory options and furthered the illegal activity.
Websites have been found immune even when the site selected defamatory content to go on his website and commented on it, because he did not materially change what the third party wrote (Tucker Max), immune even when asking for defamatory statements (Jones v. Dirty World), and immune even if created for the purpose of defamation (Giordano).
This dude is shit out of luck, but maybe he'll find an attorney to take his money just to tell him he has no options.
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Question: Would OKCupid's "dating question" that reads as follows be considered an option to discriminate?
"Would you prefer to date someone of your own race?"
I've never seen anyone except the planetiest of hamplanets answer "yes."
1 BeforeTheRobots 2018-07-15
The Roommates.com example is totally inapplicable because there’s nothing like the FHA for dating, despite the attempts by incels
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-07-15
Hopefully not for long, inshallah
1 EternallyMiffed 2018-07-15
Shouldn't that be:
t. Attorney, t. not YOUR Attorney
1 zenicaone 2018-07-15
1 lawsuit
2 profit
3 ....
4 get that sweet sweet bussy
1 myshl0ng 2018-07-15
their buttholes are sideways lmao
1 MG87 2018-07-15
Shut the fuck up! You Round-Brown Eyed Devil
1 zenicaone 2018-07-15
he street-shitter?
1 Cootieisfolk 2018-07-15
Christ.
1 myshl0ng 2018-07-15
wasn't that offensive comon
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Ah, so that's how ice cream machines at Chinese buffets work.
1 EternallyMiffed 2018-07-15
Jesus
1 htmlcoderexe 2018-07-15
Lol
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
swoon
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-07-15
"Reeeees about lawsuits instead of posting bussy on gay dating site"
Debil
1 armed_renegade 2018-07-15
Omg people have preferences, how dare they, I'm going to sue another company for someone elses valid sexual preferences...
Unfortunately, sex with everyone isn't a right, and therefore, means you aren't protected from "racist" exclusion from that sex.
1 22333444455555666666 2018-07-15
i only fuck wealthy, elderly white men
nothing is more satisfying than the dual experience of submitting your bussy to privileged daddy cock, and stealing daddy cock from disgusting decrepit mayo women
1 Son-Wukonda 2018-07-15
This guy has got it all figured out
1 wayback000 2018-07-15
this but unironically.
1 Cocheeeze 2018-07-15
Wait. So I can either fuck whoever I want, or I can sue them for discrimination?
Give up the cooter, Angela Merkel, otherwise I’m suing you for discrimination against white penis.
1 Awayfone 2018-07-15
Interesting the articke did leave out anti-white preference
1 the_pankake 2018-07-15
I hope he sues gridr into oblivion Checkmate Bigots!
1 UnexpectedLizard 2018-07-15
What if the writer is transracial and suffers PTSD from seeing xer previous race? Systemic toxic transphobia.
1 King_Drumpf 2018-07-15
He wants to seize the means of reproduction from the bourgeoisie chads.
1 Not_RCMP_ 2018-07-15
Cant he just use a gun or a van like a normal incel?
1 Awayfone 2018-07-15
Hahaha
They keep using that "dating" word
1 wayback000 2018-07-15
who the fuck uses those apps for dating.
I had this exact same conversation with a dirty neckbeard FTM tranny fuck on growlr yesterday at work.
I asked her if she was trans, she said yes, I said "Ok neat, bye." then she goes off like "I guess you don't wanna know me as a person."
Like, bitch, no, I don't, growlr is for finding chubby white genetic males to pound their bussy.
nobody wants fake bussy or real gussy.
1 _Suprememe_ 2018-07-15
Hookup apps have a brief golden age where most of the users are using the app for its intended purposes. All of them inevitably become filled with idiots that take offense when they encounter anyone who dares to still use the app for casual sex.
1 CulturalYogurt 2018-07-15
Aka women
1 wayback000 2018-07-15
in this country we can choose who we have sex with.
you aren't gonna shame me into fucking some dirty brown/black/yellow savage and therefore lowering myself.
I am a gold star gayo with no diseases, and will stay that way.
1 ricardogce 2018-07-15
Abstinence is really working for ya
1 wayback000 2018-07-15
sorry hun, I'm way too cute to be abstinent.
Only disgusting brown people get diseases.
1 ricardogce 2018-07-15
Justine..?
1 wayback000 2018-07-15
I dunno who that is, I'm assuming you're trying to call me a tranny? that sounds like a tranny name, I'm fat and hairy and not trans, like, at all.
try again.
1 TheJacksonFour 2018-07-15
People like young, healthy, attractive people, not old overweight, ugly people and no amount of lawsuits will ever change that.
1 feelsbrained 2018-07-15
He doesn't seem ugly, though he does seem like a douche. I'm guessing the latter is actually why no one wants to fuck him.
1 dramasexual 2018-07-15
I'd say he's pretty ugly tbqh.
1 shallowm 2018-07-15
it's over for ricecels 😞
1 imissyouseattle 2018-07-15
Thank Allah
1 Awayfone 2018-07-15
You have a forehead fetish?
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-07-15
That will be the last prejudice to be erased
1 Feanorfanclub 2018-07-15
So let's say he suceeds and makes it bannable say "no rice or spice" on your dating profile. Then what? Do they think the dude who said that is gonna give him a chance? Let's think things through to it's logical conclusion, what does it actually achieve?
1 fuckrbrasilmods 2018-07-15
Sexual preferences include-- always have, always will-- racial aspects. End of story.
1 Infrah 2018-07-15
I must say, he really is grabbing this one by the balls.
1 Not_for_consumption 2018-07-15
I hope he takes this further. Or hooks up with a co-plaintiff and gets the relief he so desires.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-07-15
He should check out Thailand if he's looking for a gay friendly place
1 ComedicSans 2018-07-15
Suddenly Musk.
1 Zappert 2018-07-15
Odd, in my experience on Grindr, it’s usually the basketball Americans that list “no Asians” in their profiles. Also, please let this get to the Supreme Court.
1 dramasexual 2018-07-15
It ain't even getting to a regular court lmao. Notice how he's announcing it to media all over the place and he doesn't even have a lawyer. Cuz ain't nobody gonna take this case.
1 Kinderqueer 2018-07-15
I agree with this man.
1 Quizlop 2018-07-15
🍦 or 🔥. No 🍫 or 🍚.
1 CommonThroat 2018-07-15
Imagine being a fag zoz
1 Mabans 2018-07-15
How dare be picky about where they put their dick.
1 chumthescrubber 2018-07-15
A woman should sue this guy for the same reason. Bring it full circle.
1 VioletBroregarde 2018-07-15
this is obviously just a publicity stunt for his asianentertainment.tv website, there is no way he believes that he'll get any money or whatever from grindr
1 FreeDory 2018-07-15
I wouldnt want to bang an asian guy either. Go trans or go home.
1 Gtyyler 2018-07-15
What are you, such as huge bigot you won't put your noodle into a Vietnamese man's wangcave?
1 cincilator 2018-07-15
how hard is it to get laid as a gay man, anyway? he pretty much hit a jackpot when it comes to preferences and still disatisfied.