I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
I can't fucking stop laughing , holy shit. Holy fucking. Shit. I cannot believe someone would do this.
This is crafted to illicit emotional response within the black community, while triggering a rational response within the non-black communities. There are so many levels to this; if it wasn't so goddamn funny people might actually fall for it.
Tfw when you say you're not racist, but everytime you open your mouth you somehow manage to disprove it, and yet are totally ignorant of that fact and believe that your words were shakespeare
The actual response this ad triggers in people is called cringe my friend
You are causing us to cringe
Black people experience that emotion of cringe but also as well the feeling of being condescended too
You cringed, the rest of us are laughing. What's the argument against this ad going to be, aside from "ew, cringe?" Every reaction that isn't laughter is going to be something else worthy of laughter. It's like comedy that multiplies exponentially. A mind virus of "ha-ha."
You know how I know this ad is genius? You can't formulate a response to it. The best you got is "cringe." This is barely a half-step above the Wil Wheaton style "icky and gross" complaints idiots trot out when they don't have enough vocabulary to explain why they don't like something.
Do you really not know why people aren't responding to this moronic ad seriously? Do you have fucking autism?
I'll explain things clearly, just for you:
1.) It's clearly a moronic ad to anyone with any awareness of democratic policies, the history of the democratic party, and democratic party members.
2.) Because we're on reddit, particularly a sub like /r/Drama where the average person is more politically engaged than the average person, people assume that the reasons as to why this ad is fucking stupid don't need to be explicitly stated, and instead responses like 'cringe' are appropriate.
I think you must be projecting with your allegations of stupidity because:
1.) You were dumb enough to think that someone commenting 'cringe' indicated that they were incapable of articulating themselves as to why this ad is fucking dumb.
2.) You are apparently dumb enough to not be able to think of any reasons as to why this ad is fucking dumb on your own, and actually think it's a good ad.
Ah, a LOLCOW. In other words (words of people who aren't cancer to society), someone who embodies all of the characteristics that repulsive, cancerous right-wingers do not, but deep down wish they could.
To be fair to the hopeless and worthless, any amount of serious-posting is too much and "a lot of words" is therefore understating the the severity of the problem.
It's okay though, if you get your way with your global warming denial and inaction you will only have to live 10 or 20 more years being hated by everyone who knows you intimately.
This is straight up pathetic bantz. You should be ashamed.
1.) It's clearly a moronic ad to anyone with any awareness of democratic policies, the history of the democratic party, and democratic party members.
How so? You wrote a lot of words trying to prove that you have an actual argument instead of "cringe", this was the closest you came to making it, and still did not.
What I suspect you meant by that was something along the lines of "democrats are not racists and the purpose of that listen and believe stuff is definitely not to oppress black men, so the ad is hilariously wrong to imply that".
But that's only one way to look at it, with an exclusive focus on intentions and an expectation that as long as it would be the good guys wielding this new social norm nothing could possibly go wrong for black men. A distinctly leftist and pretty stupid way of looking at things.
Listen and believe never meant "they have to prove their innocence in court" or "lynch people", and listen and believe is not exactly super popular among the left anyway.
"This is a stupid straw man, Democrats don't want to take away due process" ought to do it.
The Kavanaugh hearings and college sexual misconduct hearings would seem to indicate otherwise, but I guess "Democrats don't want to take away due process" is as worthy an argument as "Democrats don't want to take your guns."
Does it not occur to some of you that maybe it's not good for democrats to find themselves in the position where they have to say things like "we don't want to take your due process/guns," and even worse for them when their words aren't believable because of their actions?
"Your first reaction to this stupidity wasn't a well cited rebuttal, so that makes this thing brilliant."
No one expects an eloquent, fact-based rebuttal, but I don't think it's asking too much not to sound like an entitled teenage girl talking about the fat, pimply boy in their math class.
What part of the Kavanaugh hearings violated due process? He wasn’t on trial for anything, he was never legally declared guilty of anything.
Does it not occur to some of you that maybe it's not good for democrats to find themselves in the position where they have to say things like "we don't want to take your due process/guns,"
Oh no we have to squash bullshit rumors about us, well golly clearly if there’s really bad accusations about us then we must be doing something bad. /s
And this argument seems really insincere when you have the president saying “take the guns ignore due process”
Nah just pointing out how you’re concern trolling is really transparent
Yet you've taken the bait two or three times now. Let's hope you never find yourself in a predator/prey situation.
how exactly was Kavanaugh’s due process violated?
If you need someone to explain that you I'm not sure what to tell you other than I hope you never have anyone make a flimsy accusation against you about something they allege happened forty years ago. Fortunately, the vast majority of Americans realize that concepts like "due process" and "innocent until proven guilty" aren't just legal constructs, but common principles. You can make any kind of semantic argument you want, but anyone who wasn't a full-blown partisan going all-in with the democrats could see that how Kavanaugh was being treated wasn't fair or honest. That's probably why people are less likely to "listen and believe" today than they were a year ago.
If you need someone to explain that you I'm not sure what to tell you
"It's not my job to educate you shitlord." Fucking cop out. His due process was not violated at all and you know it.
Fortunately, the vast majority of Americans realize that concepts like "due process" and "innocent until proven guilty" aren't just legal constructs, but common principles.
Due process is a legal term, and he wasn't even charged with anything, ever. All you want to do is whine that "wah some people on the internet said he was guilty before the investigation was finished" which has nothing to do with due process.
You can make any kind of semantic argument you want, but anyone who wasn't a full-blown partisan going all-in with the democrats could see that how Kavanaugh was being treated wasn't fair or honest
Oh no he had to suffer the indignity of having to wait a week for a deliberately crippled investigation to finish and go through ANOTHER hearing. The horror, the horror!1!1 /s What exactly would you have done differently?
Thanks, I think that pretty much sums up my original point. You don't care about due process/innocent until proven guilty when it's convenient. "This is different because" isn't a convincing argument, and neither is "democrats don't want to take your due process/speech rights/gun" when their words and actions make it obvious they do.
You don't care about due process/innocent until proven guilty when it's convenient.
What the fuck are you talking about? I never said we should just assume he's guilty and I don't know how you think SCOTUS nominees works but a Senator can vote against putting someone on the bench even if the nominee has never committed a crime or even been accused of one. They can just vote no and they don't even need to give a reason why.
Kavanaugh has not been punished in any way for the alleged sex crimes or even charged so I don't know how the fuck you think he hasn't been afforded due process. Do you think due process means that you never get investigated? Or do you think it means that civilians aren't allowed to form their own opinion on whether they're guilty or not? I'm guessing it's either the the latter or you're just repeating some right wing talking points without understanding what they mean.
Even if he is retarded he sent the CNN morons into such a spin that they were dragging out mid-20th Century racial slurs. He used the power of his retardation to bring out the retard in people who should know better. That's practically a super-power.
When Republicans make an ad targeting black people, they are really making an ad targeting white conservatives.
This is why diversity does indeed have some merits people, this is what happens when your staff is 100% white (hire purely based on merit™ ofc), but you blast ahead at full speed anyway because racism isn't real after all and you know full and well how black people actually feel and do not have any sort of distorted or lacking perspective at all and it's racist to say otherwise.
Democrats: You can't hold us responsible for what members of our party did 60-150 years ago!
Also Democrats: Republicans are responsible for what members of our party did 60-150 years ago.
If it's retarded to hold present-day democrats accountable for the actions the party took several decades ago, and it is, then it's even more retarded to hold republicans accountable for what democrats did several decades ago.
The leftist is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a snowflake, pussy, cuck, soyboy, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him an NPC and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
If there's anything that could convince me to go either neo-monarchist or one-party rule, it'd definitely have to be political ads. They possess no redeeming quality and are a blight on the species.
It's stupidly patronizing. But where's the issue you have with the content?
I'd say "black dudes have the most to worry about from false accusations, and Dems are the party of 'listen and believe the mayo gussy' right now" is a logically rock hard argument.
Because the only reason the republicans care about black men being locked up is because now white men are being treated the way black men have for decades?
This is like when that video of a sorority girl getting chokeslamed by a cop (hilariously I might add) got posted and a bunch of white people on facebook were shocked that this could happen
Does that make the content of the ad not make sense? Like if Hitler told me to love my fellow man I'd be like "wow, you're a fucking hypocrite" but I would still agree with the statement.
Understandable. The statement's right, tho. That's what I wanted to know about all the literally shaking folx on Twitter, like do they really not agree with the argument or is it more who's saying it that makes it retarded offensive/unbelievable in their eyes? Makes sense if it's the latter like you said.
Trump saying we should ignore due process when it comes to deportations and guns, and their continuing support of Guantanamo which is a lot of due process violations. I remember a lot of conservatives saying "forget their rights to a trial, they're terrorists".
Remember the ACLU? The "American Civil Liberties Union"? Literally the main group that focuses on trying to make sure that accused criminals get due process and try to free the wrongfully convicted?
Yeah, there's one party that supports the ACLU and one party that consistently and regularly shits on their efforts. And the party of shitters is rhymes with Publican. It's so pervasive that it's common knowledge that one of the biggest group of democratic campaign contributors is criminal defense lawyers, while one of largest sources of support for the Republican Party are prosecutors.
Or hell, we could look at Donald Trump himself. The same asshole crying about Due Process is the motherfucker who, for no apparent reason, took out a full page in the New York Timea demanding the death penalty for 5 black kids who were wrongfully accused. Also the same asshole who told a gathering of police officers, with journalists present, basically to throw suspects around and not mind if they get hurt during an arrest.
Republicans have been fucking over black guys based on spurious accusarions from white women since fucking forever. That they suddenly give a shit because of a mayo Supreme Court nominee doesn't erase decades of still ongoing attempts by the Republican Party to hold back or even erode civil liberties when it comes to "dangerous inner city youths"
We just went through about a year (more?) of hashtag women hashtag metooing metoo'd dudes straight out of their livelihoods, THEN the kavanaugh nomination, and this is really your take? It's the rightoids?
You've either been under a rock, or you're really partisan. Here are some FBI crime statisticspolls that show demonrats care less about false mayoccusations than rapeublicans.
The part you are missing is that #metoo is a really, really small blip on the map of criminal justice. And in all likelihood, just like Kavanaugh, most of those dudes will be fine.
You know what IS a much bigger blip? Shit like Brian Banks getting railroaded by a false accusation. Or, I dunno, Emmett Till gettting strung up. The dudes who lynched Emmet Till weren't exactly leftist. And the people who worked hard to get Brian Banks freed were not Republicans. Everytime you hear some news story about cops harrassing a black guy because he fits a vague and unhelpful description from some white lady (which turned out to be a lie anyway) there's always a raft of asshole Republican voters chiming in about how we coddle criminals too much.
Would love to see how your take changes after being plastered across the internet as a rapist in front of millions of people, including your loved ones, friends, coworkers, and employers.
I'd take all that and still ending up a Supreme Court Justice over getting hung in the street by a racist mob. Or going to jail for a decade because some "law and order" Republican prosecutor wanted another win so he can become the midget Attorney General for an equally racist slumlord form New York.
If you listen to a lot of Republicans dickstroking themselves over a return to the "good old days", it does rather feel like they'd much rather that lynchings came back in vogue.
And besides, you just glossed right over the second half of that paragraph. I'm guessing the reference went over your head. So let me be clear. I'm talking about Jeff Sessions. Who is a real person. And who has a reputation for selective prosecution and distate for civil rights advocacy which not all that uncommon among many prosecutors. A defender of the rights of the accused, he is not.
They might be both dumb, but they are dumb in different ways.
Republicns trying to act like they suddenly give a shit about the rights of the accused is like Democrats trying to act like they suddenly care about protecting the 2nd amendment. Only the incredibly gullible would buy that act with decades of history to counteract it.
The people who actually think rape trials should not have innocent until proven guilty are a small minority of Democrats and none of them are running for office AFAIK.
Yeah now I remember. A small minority of Democrats said "shut the fuck up and listen to Ford, you rapist oppressors." Just a few people, really!
Actually wanting assumption of guilt in legal trials is not a view that's likely to make it far from anyone, I agree that there aren't many people seriously pushing for that.
But do you not agree that assuming guilt in the court of public opinion, job interview style things like the nomination, etc. is the approach a majority of leftoids are bringing to the table? That can be just as damaging as legally determining rape cases the same way.
Not that being a creepy mayo rapist rightoid is great either.
Congratulations. You've now realized Democrats (at least a nontrivial percentage of them) are advocating for policies which fuck blacks over. Slow clap.
176 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-18
I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2018-10-18
I know that ain't Roshanda's voice cause she ain't for the Republicans
1 WitYoAshyAss 2018-10-18
guuuuuuurl
1 Krombopulos-Snake 2018-10-18
I can't fucking stop laughing , holy shit. Holy fucking. Shit. I cannot believe someone would do this.
This is crafted to illicit emotional response within the black community, while triggering a rational response within the non-black communities. There are so many levels to this; if it wasn't so goddamn funny people might actually fall for it.
1 Dildokin 2018-10-18
It really is a masterpiece
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-10-18
Beautiful!
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
In the same way that the Office episode "Scott's Tots" was beautiful? Yes.
1 wwyzzerdd 2018-10-18
https://youtu.be/vhsYPVEinBE?t=18
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
cringe
1 r_zunabius 2018-10-18
cringe
1 RedGT2033 2018-10-18
Leafy get out
1 Pol_Pots_Crockpot 2018-10-18
He’ll ride this ad to victory
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
How fucking stupid can Republicans be to think this was a good ad
Like are you mentally retarded
Did your mother ever go below a BAC of 0.30 while carrying you
1 Pol_Pots_Crockpot 2018-10-18
We’re dealing with the people of Arkansas here, lower your expectations
1 better_bot 2018-10-18
It's really depressing how cartoonish rural America really is.
1 TehAlpacalypse 2018-10-18
Look man it's not their fault they really, really like meth
1 VidiotGamer 2018-10-18
Dude, are you physically incapable of not being triggered and having a liberal sperg-out at least once a day?
1 somnolentSlumber 2018-10-18
No, he's a leftist.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
I don't think republicans paid for it. Listen to it again. It's paid for by "Blacks for the President's Agenda" or some bullshit like that.
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-18
These people.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-18
Black's for the President's Agenda
1 Prysorra2 2018-10-18
<Screams in 140 characters>
1 fingerpaintswithpoop 2018-10-18
They doubled the character limit. It’s 280 now.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
It's a Republican running in Arkansas, he'd have to screw up really badly to lose there.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
Tfw when you say you're not racist, but everytime you open your mouth you somehow manage to disprove it, and yet are totally ignorant of that fact and believe that your words were shakespeare
The actual response this ad triggers in people is called cringe my friend
You are causing us to cringe
Black people experience that emotion of cringe but also as well the feeling of being condescended too
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
You cringed, the rest of us are laughing. What's the argument against this ad going to be, aside from "ew, cringe?" Every reaction that isn't laughter is going to be something else worthy of laughter. It's like comedy that multiplies exponentially. A mind virus of "ha-ha."
You know how I know this ad is genius? You can't formulate a response to it. The best you got is "cringe." This is barely a half-step above the Wil Wheaton style "icky and gross" complaints idiots trot out when they don't have enough vocabulary to explain why they don't like something.
1 rock5555555 2018-10-18
Do you really not know why people aren't responding to this moronic ad seriously? Do you have fucking autism?
I'll explain things clearly, just for you:
1.) It's clearly a moronic ad to anyone with any awareness of democratic policies, the history of the democratic party, and democratic party members.
2.) Because we're on reddit, particularly a sub like /r/Drama where the average person is more politically engaged than the average person, people assume that the reasons as to why this ad is fucking stupid don't need to be explicitly stated, and instead responses like 'cringe' are appropriate.
I think you must be projecting with your allegations of stupidity because:
1.) You were dumb enough to think that someone commenting 'cringe' indicated that they were incapable of articulating themselves as to why this ad is fucking dumb.
2.) You are apparently dumb enough to not be able to think of any reasons as to why this ad is fucking dumb on your own, and actually think it's a good ad.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
That's a lot of words just to say "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!"
1 rock5555555 2018-10-18
Moron.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Someone call the milkman, we got us a LOLCOW.
1 rock5555555 2018-10-18
Ah, a LOLCOW. In other words (words of people who aren't cancer to society), someone who embodies all of the characteristics that repulsive, cancerous right-wingers do not, but deep down wish they could.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
That's a lot of words just to say "Moo."
1 rock5555555 2018-10-18
It's only a lot of words to someone as hopeless and worthless like yourself.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
To be fair to the hopeless and worthless, any amount of serious-posting is too much and "a lot of words" is therefore understating the the severity of the problem.
1 Neon_needles 2018-10-18
This is straight up pathetic bantz. You should be ashamed.
1 biggest_decision 2018-10-18
Users like you are why we don't even need pinging anymore.
1 100_Percent_not_homo 2018-10-18
lmao zzzz
1 EarnestNoMeta 2018-10-18
post on your main, chapotard
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
try that again, but with an actual point
1 zergling_Lester 2018-10-18
How so? You wrote a lot of words trying to prove that you have an actual argument instead of "cringe", this was the closest you came to making it, and still did not.
What I suspect you meant by that was something along the lines of "democrats are not racists and the purpose of that listen and believe stuff is definitely not to oppress black men, so the ad is hilariously wrong to imply that".
But that's only one way to look at it, with an exclusive focus on intentions and an expectation that as long as it would be the good guys wielding this new social norm nothing could possibly go wrong for black men. A distinctly leftist and pretty stupid way of looking at things.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
Listen and believe never meant "they have to prove their innocence in court" or "lynch people", and listen and believe is not exactly super popular among the left anyway.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
"This is a stupid straw man, Democrats don't want to take away due process" ought to do it.
"You didn't immediately respond to this stupidity with a well cited rebuttal that makes it brilliant."
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
The Kavanaugh hearings and college sexual misconduct hearings would seem to indicate otherwise, but I guess "Democrats don't want to take away due process" is as worthy an argument as "Democrats don't want to take your guns."
Does it not occur to some of you that maybe it's not good for democrats to find themselves in the position where they have to say things like "we don't want to take your due process/guns," and even worse for them when their words aren't believable because of their actions?
No one expects an eloquent, fact-based rebuttal, but I don't think it's asking too much not to sound like an entitled teenage girl talking about the fat, pimply boy in their math class.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
What part of the Kavanaugh hearings violated due process? He wasn’t on trial for anything, he was never legally declared guilty of anything.
Oh no we have to squash bullshit rumors about us, well golly clearly if there’s really bad accusations about us then we must be doing something bad. /s
And this argument seems really insincere when you have the president saying “take the guns ignore due process”
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
So your point is that Orange Man, who is bad, said something and you want to agree with it? Bold strategy, Cotton.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
Nah just pointing out how you’re concern trolling is really transparent when the other party has explicitly endorsed what you claim the Dems endorse.
Now how exactly was Kavanaugh’s due process violated?
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Yet you've taken the bait two or three times now. Let's hope you never find yourself in a predator/prey situation.
If you need someone to explain that you I'm not sure what to tell you other than I hope you never have anyone make a flimsy accusation against you about something they allege happened forty years ago. Fortunately, the vast majority of Americans realize that concepts like "due process" and "innocent until proven guilty" aren't just legal constructs, but common principles. You can make any kind of semantic argument you want, but anyone who wasn't a full-blown partisan going all-in with the democrats could see that how Kavanaugh was being treated wasn't fair or honest. That's probably why people are less likely to "listen and believe" today than they were a year ago.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
"It's not my job to educate you shitlord." Fucking cop out. His due process was not violated at all and you know it.
Due process is a legal term, and he wasn't even charged with anything, ever. All you want to do is whine that "wah some people on the internet said he was guilty before the investigation was finished" which has nothing to do with due process.
Oh no he had to suffer the indignity of having to wait a week for a deliberately crippled investigation to finish and go through ANOTHER hearing. The horror, the horror!1!1 /s What exactly would you have done differently?
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Thanks, I think that pretty much sums up my original point. You don't care about due process/innocent until proven guilty when it's convenient. "This is different because" isn't a convincing argument, and neither is "democrats don't want to take your due process/speech rights/gun" when their words and actions make it obvious they do.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
What the fuck are you talking about? I never said we should just assume he's guilty and I don't know how you think SCOTUS nominees works but a Senator can vote against putting someone on the bench even if the nominee has never committed a crime or even been accused of one. They can just vote no and they don't even need to give a reason why.
Kavanaugh has not been punished in any way for the alleged sex crimes or even charged so I don't know how the fuck you think he hasn't been afforded due process. Do you think due process means that you never get investigated? Or do you think it means that civilians aren't allowed to form their own opinion on whether they're guilty or not? I'm guessing it's either the the latter or you're just repeating some right wing talking points without understanding what they mean.
1 polzavatel 2018-10-18
you got it all out? you ready to go back now?
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-18
Big guys gonna be alright.
1 EarnestNoMeta 2018-10-18
do you need one of those donut pillows to sit on?
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2018-10-18
I genuinely think it is the same woman putting on two different voices in that ad.
1 geeses 2018-10-18
It's like shitposting came to the radio.
1 VALIS666 2018-10-18
Hoooly fuck. 😂 This is Pocahontas level what-were-they-thinking.
1 MG87 2018-10-18
Welcome to Arkansas
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-18
Good crystal huntin
1 confusedblues 2018-10-18
meth?
1 Power_Incarnate 2018-10-18
It's fucking beautiful. Don't let your memes be dreams boys.
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
Just ask kanye what happens when you step out of line for a minute
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-18
You mean absolutely nothing? He's still rich and famous and his latest album Ye sold just fine.
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
Yea but CNN called him illiterate literally telling black children they can't succeed by reading books.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-18
Oh no CNN said mean words about him! Kanye has really had his life ruined for stepping off the plantation.
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
If he was a white women and Fox insulted her instead of CNN, this would be the official narrative.
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
Its about cNN sending a message that you must be hated if youre a successful black man.
1 pisserpatterwater 2018-10-18
Noncentrists in a nutshell.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
Show me one person who said Hillary's life was ruined because Fox insulted her.
1 OysterCookie 2018-10-18
Hilldawg
Woman
shiggydiggy
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Kanye got idiots on CNN to use the word "negro" without a trace of irony. His troll game is stronger than his love for big, round asses.
1 MazzyFo 2018-10-18
Truly the messiah we need
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-10-18
Kanye is a turbo autist of the highest caliber. These lame excuses are hilarious tho.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Even if he is retarded he sent the CNN morons into such a spin that they were dragging out mid-20th Century racial slurs. He used the power of his retardation to bring out the retard in people who should know better. That's practically a super-power.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-10-18
O shit he got cyberbullied 😢
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
Muh CNN promoting illiteracy good!. Good.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2018-10-18
Literally who gives a shit?
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
Oh boy oh boy oh boy
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-18
oh no, how can he possibly recover?
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
People might say some mean things about you
Jeez that never happens to black folk who are liberal
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
Make no mistake.
We have been drawn into the battleground that is taylor swift vs. Kanye. And it is hell
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
When Republicans make an ad targeting black people, they are really making an ad targeting white conservatives.
This is why diversity does indeed have some merits people, this is what happens when your staff is 100% white (hire purely based on merit™ ofc), but you blast ahead at full speed anyway because racism isn't real after all and you know full and well how black people actually feel and do not have any sort of distorted or lacking perspective at all and it's racist to say otherwise.
1 Power_Incarnate 2018-10-18
Thanks, you've convinced me to vote republican
1 NapoleonBonerpart5 2018-10-18
You wouldn't need a diverse staff if you didn't have diversity (points at head)
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
Yup. White conservatives care a lot about justice for black men. Justice for all.
That's why only the political right is in favor of due process.
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-18
this whole playing fast and loose with the term “due process” thing is the worst political meme since pretty much everything the left did in 2015
1 yunghastati 2018-10-18
next they're going to be running ads about how the democrats were the party of slavers
then after that it's just going to be attacks on soyboy caricatures
this must be the fourth dimension donald is now penetrating
1 MazzyFo 2018-10-18
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
aka truth.
who owned the slave ships?
1 TehAlpacalypse 2018-10-18
what is party realignment for 500 alex
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Democrats: You can't hold us responsible for what members of our party did 60-150 years ago!
Also Democrats: Republicans are responsible for what members of our party did 60-150 years ago.
If it's retarded to hold present-day democrats accountable for the actions the party took several decades ago, and it is, then it's even more retarded to hold republicans accountable for what democrats did several decades ago.
1 HP_civ 2018-10-18
Please keep your partisanship to yourself. This is a radical centrist safe space
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
is that what they teach on the plantation?
1 grungebot5000 2018-10-18
i think pirates?
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
arrrr vey!
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Produced, funded, and acted out by black people, no less. Once /r/politics or the Chapotards get wind of it the REEEEEEEEEs are going to be deafening.
1 rock5555555 2018-10-18
Are you really this dumb?
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
Already proving my point...but to answer your question, I'm a /r/Drama regular. You do the math.
1 Tobans 2018-10-18
Yeah. No. Sweaty. I don't do maff
1 trilateral1 2018-10-18
Due process is Nazi ideology, just like freedom of speech.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
"Due process means no one's ever allowed to accuse anyone of anything until it's been proven in court that they're guilty"
1 Lumene 2018-10-18
Due process means I get to sue you for tortious interference and wring money out of you in civil court with a preponderance of evidence standard.
1 telandrias 2018-10-18
So many fall victim to the seductions of white women.
1 Momruepari 2018-10-18
based and redpilled
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
cringe
1 Momruepari 2018-10-18
syringe
1 imissyouseattle 2018-10-18
fringe
1 r_zunabius 2018-10-18
cringe
1 anonymous93 2018-10-18
Taste and coldchilled
1 templesthataum 2018-10-18
I actually don't see what the problem is, considering everything he said is 100% true
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
cringe
1 r_zunabius 2018-10-18
cringe
1 TehAlpacalypse 2018-10-18
yikes
1 MG87 2018-10-18
This but ironically
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
What Democrats want to get rid of due process?
1 TareTiri 2018-10-18
Oh no no no no no. Oh no no Hahhahahhahhahhaha.
1 Imperial_Sardaukar 2018-10-18
Call him by his real name, Colline Française
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-10-18
Atticus Finch will save them
1 carnivoreinyeg 2018-10-18
Fuck it! I'm With HerTM
The point is solid. Due process benefits the most marginalized people.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
cringe
1 Pro_Extent 2018-10-18
Oh dear, this struck a nerve didn't it.
1 jubbergun 2018-10-18
The leftist is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a snowflake, pussy, cuck, soyboy, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him an NPC and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
1 r_zunabius 2018-10-18
cringe
1 EarnestNoMeta 2018-10-18
man you really shit your pants all over this thread.
1 newcomer_ts 2018-10-18
fake
1 Watermark03 2018-10-18
When it comes to black people, Republicans have three speeds: racism, cringe, or both. This is that third speed, the most glorious one of them all.
1 Van-Diemen 2018-10-18
*farts in your face*
LOL!
1 EarnestNoMeta 2018-10-18
cringe
1 CuckTatumCNN 2018-10-18
I'm convinced.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2018-10-18
Did anyone else think that in this picture the lady was covered in maggots?
Because either I need glasses or that is the ugliest fucking dress I have ever seen.
1 BlindedbyOnanism 2018-10-18
I laughed, I cried, I realized once again that my decision to quit voting was not entirety unjustified.
1 better_bot 2018-10-18
If there's anything that could convince me to go either neo-monarchist or one-party rule, it'd definitely have to be political ads. They possess no redeeming quality and are a blight on the species.
1 MG87 2018-10-18
Imagine being retarded enough to air this
1 Alicesnakebae 2018-10-18
Called being American
1 Anarcho_Autism 2018-10-18
Couldn't make it through more than 8 seconds. No joke. Way too fucking painful.
Republicans do not - and will never - deserve the black vote.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
It's stupidly patronizing. But where's the issue you have with the content?
I'd say "black dudes have the most to worry about from false accusations, and Dems are the party of 'listen and believe the mayo gussy' right now" is a logically rock hard argument.
1 TehAlpacalypse 2018-10-18
Because the only reason the republicans care about black men being locked up is because now white men are being treated the way black men have for decades?
This is like when that video of a sorority girl getting chokeslamed by a cop (hilariously I might add) got posted and a bunch of white people on facebook were shocked that this could happen
hilarious
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Does that make the content of the ad not make sense? Like if Hitler told me to love my fellow man I'd be like "wow, you're a fucking hypocrite" but I would still agree with the statement.
1 TehAlpacalypse 2018-10-18
I'd say it's more like Hitler saying to Jews, "Make sure yall love each other!"
His statement might be right but history is such that it's rendered asinine.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Understandable. The statement's right, tho. That's what I wanted to know about all the literally shaking folx on Twitter, like do they really not agree with the argument or is it more who's saying it that makes it retarded offensive/unbelievable in their eyes? Makes sense if it's the latter like you said.
1 TehAlpacalypse 2018-10-18
does anyone honestly hope to understand the opinions of those who get mad on twitter? it's pointless
I just think the ad is hilariously stupid and completely tone deaf
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
It's probably "intentionally retarded" a la Daddy.
Unless you live nearby, would you have heard about this rando's ad if it had been normal and stayed in the lane you expect it to? No.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
The issue is that the Republican party quite notoriously does not give a fuck about due process or presumption of innocence.
So when it suddenly benefits them they try to act like they do? Fuck that noise. We aren't retards.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Which party gives more of a shit about evidence being needed for rape accusations?
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
Well when you narrow it down to rape then yeah the people who think rape cases should not be innocent until proven guilty are all on the left.
But when you broaden it to due process in general it's the left.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Sure, I guess. Are there any particular things you're thinking of? Like "lock her up"?
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
Trump saying we should ignore due process when it comes to deportations and guns, and their continuing support of Guantanamo which is a lot of due process violations. I remember a lot of conservatives saying "forget their rights to a trial, they're terrorists".
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Agree on the last one lot of republitard waterboarding enthusiasts
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
Remember the ACLU? The "American Civil Liberties Union"? Literally the main group that focuses on trying to make sure that accused criminals get due process and try to free the wrongfully convicted?
Yeah, there's one party that supports the ACLU and one party that consistently and regularly shits on their efforts. And the party of shitters is rhymes with Publican. It's so pervasive that it's common knowledge that one of the biggest group of democratic campaign contributors is criminal defense lawyers, while one of largest sources of support for the Republican Party are prosecutors.
Or hell, we could look at Donald Trump himself. The same asshole crying about Due Process is the motherfucker who, for no apparent reason, took out a full page in the New York Timea demanding the death penalty for 5 black kids who were wrongfully accused. Also the same asshole who told a gathering of police officers, with journalists present, basically to throw suspects around and not mind if they get hurt during an arrest.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Daddy is indeed a, as the kids say, retard 😂
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
Except "daddy" is the leader and current voice of the Republican party. So if he's a retard, then so is the party.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
It's just a phase. They'll grow out of it.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
Still the Democrats.
Republicans have been fucking over black guys based on spurious accusarions from white women since fucking forever. That they suddenly give a shit because of a mayo Supreme Court nominee doesn't erase decades of still ongoing attempts by the Republican Party to hold back or even erode civil liberties when it comes to "dangerous inner city youths"
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Try again libtard 👎😂😂😂👎
We just went through about a year (more?) of hashtag women hashtag metooing metoo'd dudes straight out of their livelihoods, THEN the kavanaugh nomination, and this is really your take? It's the rightoids?
You've either been under a rock, or you're really partisan. Here are some
FBI crime statisticspolls that show demonrats care less about false mayoccusations than rapeublicans.1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
The part you are missing is that #metoo is a really, really small blip on the map of criminal justice. And in all likelihood, just like Kavanaugh, most of those dudes will be fine.
You know what IS a much bigger blip? Shit like Brian Banks getting railroaded by a false accusation. Or, I dunno, Emmett Till gettting strung up. The dudes who lynched Emmet Till weren't exactly leftist. And the people who worked hard to get Brian Banks freed were not Republicans. Everytime you hear some news story about cops harrassing a black guy because he fits a vague and unhelpful description from some white lady (which turned out to be a lie anyway) there's always a raft of asshole Republican voters chiming in about how we coddle criminals too much.
Or hell. If you want actual links, check this out: https://psmag.com/news/partisan-politics-could-mean-jail-time-for-innocent-people
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
????????????
Would love to see how your take changes after being plastered across the internet as a rapist in front of millions of people, including your loved ones, friends, coworkers, and employers.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
Honestly?
I'd take all that and still ending up a Supreme Court Justice over getting hung in the street by a racist mob. Or going to jail for a decade because some "law and order" Republican prosecutor wanted another win so he can become the midget Attorney General for an equally racist slumlord form New York.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Because that's happening anywhere
Sorry you think you're still in danger of being literally lynched.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
If you listen to a lot of Republicans dickstroking themselves over a return to the "good old days", it does rather feel like they'd much rather that lynchings came back in vogue.
And besides, you just glossed right over the second half of that paragraph. I'm guessing the reference went over your head. So let me be clear. I'm talking about Jeff Sessions. Who is a real person. And who has a reputation for selective prosecution and distate for civil rights advocacy which not all that uncommon among many prosecutors. A defender of the rights of the accused, he is not.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Sharing your feelings is healthy, but doing so doesn't make it more likely that you gonna done git lynched.
1 Anarcho_Autism 2018-10-18
Lol both parties are retarded. C'mon. Jesus. Centrism hahahahshhahahahshshshtic
When dems have cultural power and abuse it, Republicans become reasonable. When republicans have cultural power, dems become reasonable.
It's all about power and domination you mongs.
1 BigLebowskiBot 2018-10-18
You said it, man.
1 Che_Gueporna 2018-10-18
They might be both dumb, but they are dumb in different ways.
Republicns trying to act like they suddenly give a shit about the rights of the accused is like Democrats trying to act like they suddenly care about protecting the 2nd amendment. Only the incredibly gullible would buy that act with decades of history to counteract it.
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
The people who actually think rape trials should not have innocent until proven guilty are a small minority of Democrats and none of them are running for office AFAIK.
1 BeastTrinity 2018-10-18
Yeah now I remember. A small minority of Democrats said "shut the fuck up and listen to Ford, you rapist oppressors." Just a few people, really!
Actually wanting assumption of guilt in legal trials is not a view that's likely to make it far from anyone, I agree that there aren't many people seriously pushing for that.
But do you not agree that assuming guilt in the court of public opinion, job interview style things like the nomination, etc. is the approach a majority of leftoids are bringing to the table? That can be just as damaging as legally determining rape cases the same way.
Not that being a creepy mayo rapist rightoid is great either.
1 Anarcho_Autism 2018-10-18
Congratulations. You've now realized Democrats (at least a nontrivial percentage of them) are advocating for policies which fuck blacks over. Slow clap.
Let's vote and endorse Republicans then.
1 awayhow 2018-10-18
Would be a good GTA radio ad.
1 CholentPot 2018-10-18
I can just feel the Aunt Jemima's drippin' out of this.
Mamiys gonna make some sho't cake's too!
1 Hemingwavy 2018-10-18
Well then. I don't know why people think Republicans are racist after that.
1 AlveolarPressure 2018-10-18
They also have LL cool j and the rock on there lol
1 torkoal_lover 2018-10-18
You know in the recording studio they were like "Janine, we need you to sound BLACKER. Give us some of that ghetto hood shit, thanks."
1 General_Insomnia 2018-10-18
Where's the Earth shattering K'nigga?
1 avz7 2018-10-18
Does anyone have a transcript?
1 Woodstovia 2018-10-18
Here's the guy who started up this PAC
1 Sniffposter30 2018-10-18
>a marketing team approved this
I came
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2018-10-18
I sleep
Real shit?
1 rockidol 2018-10-18
Do WHAT to a white judge? Stall his nomination by a few weeks? Oh the horror. /s
He's still an unqualified partisan hack who got put on the court. Sexual assault and gang rape allegations didn't stop it from happening