The only point you'll ever have is that you represent the sad, fedora-wearing, bloated face of capitalism in the 21st century.
Unfairly made famous and rich through copied ideas and appealing to kids. And yet is driven by some bizarre need for attention to spout insane, teenage edge lord style views. You are clearly not all that up on politics (or anything, maybe you can code?) yet your wealth has given you an oversized platform of confused 12 to 16 year olds to yell "sjwjjwjwj" at over and over again.
Honestly, I don't give a shit if you've been driven mad by fame or some bullshit. When I see amazing creative people dying depressed in poverty every day and you get to sit on twitter and make half assed 'now yur the nazi' comments, it's fucking sickening.
It's interesting because it was Japan that really fucked over the Bengali's by occupying Burma, which cut off Bengal's supply of rice.
Funnily enough it was also Churchill who asked Australia to ship wheat to Bengal, as it would only take a month, whereas it would've taken 4 months for it to come from Canada (who had offered to send wheat - good guy Canada).
Moreover, much of the Indian government and local officials were also corrupt and hoarders, and was Hindu-dominated, Bengal being Muslim-dominated, the Indian government wanted to embarrass the Muslim-dominated Bengali government by not actually helping them properly. On a more regional level, several areas of India had placed an export ban on their own food produce, preventing them from trading with each other, combined with the inability to import rice from Burma, Bengal, and smaller neighboring regions starved. And much of the food aid that did come disappeared into the black market.
It's also worth noting the Minister of War Transport (Frederick Leathers) stated that there was statistically a surplus of grains in India, pointing the finger at Leather's ineptitude.
And you know what's also still interesting about all this? Churchill wrote to FDR to help India in its food shortage, and FDR refused.
It's interesting because it was Japan that really fucked over the Bengali's by occupying Burma, which cut off Bengal's supply of rice.
The Fall of Burma 1941–1943 (Chapter 2) - ISBN 978-1-4738-6360-6
(Prices rises, export ban and hoarding) - Famine Inquiry Commission (May 1945) - Page 11, 25-30 (on page 29 you can see the imports drop to 25% of just several months before at the time of the Fall of Rangoon (Jap invasion).
Funnily enough it was also Churchill who asked Australia to ship wheat to Bengal, as it would only take a month, whereas it would've taken 4 months for it to come from Canada (who had offered to send wheat - good guy Canada).
(Annoyingly I can't seem to find the bit about Australia online)
Moreover, much of the Indian government and local officials were also corrupt and hoarders, and was Hindu-dominated, Bengal being Muslim-dominated, the Indian government wanted to embarrass the Muslim-dominated Bengali government by not actually helping them properly.
It's also worth noting the Minister of War Transport (Frederick Leathers) stated that there was statistically a surplus of grains in India, pointing the finger at Leather's ineptitude.
but the famine is in large part due to British policies in general than purely the actions of Churchill
Such as which?
The Australian aid he was talking about for example was redirected for war efforts and wasn't really utilized for famine.
From what I've read the Australian aid was offered but both the British and Australians didn't have the required ships as many were requisitioned for the war effort, and those that were used to transport grains were often sunk by Japanese forces. Which is why Churchill asked FDR to essentially borrow some ships for the grain transportation, but FDR denied this request due to his Joint Chiefs of Staff stating that they were required for the war effort and could not be spared (allegedly).
I wonder if this guy really is well read about history as he pretends to be.
I am by no means pretend to be some sort of actual historian, nor do I study history as my major, but I read what I'm interested in and I'm more interested in the facts than narratives. Although narratives can serve as an entertaining form of reading (see: The Forgotten Voices of the Great Way by Max Arthur), but I digress.
The elimination of the "white" race is inevitable. In fact, race is, for the most part, a nonsense construct, but the "white" race even moreso. It is clear that there is no explicit, accurate definition for being "white", the phantasm of "race purity" is far from reality and is grounded in nothing but the fantasies of people who think that those that they do not consider "white" are "taking muh womenz" (read: insecurity, as well as misogyny).
In present-day society, the identity of Western countries and their inhabitants are not pegged down by race, but by nationality—additionally, you can now see people mixing their origins with their current nationality, an example being so called "hyphenated Americans". These people range from someone holding some aspects of their culture dear to them, to someone who calls themselves so because "my [insert near ancestor] was from [insert foreign country]". Contrary to the European failure at integrating immigrants, the United States has done well with the integration of immigrants, and miscegenation of races will thus be unavoidable, and the delusion of "white purity" will become extinct.
Even in Europe, although they may not have succeeded in integrating their immigrants well (leading to the formation of ghettos such as the ones in Tower Hamlets, London), there will always be a few immigrants who manage to escape from the grasps of these ghettos and integrate within larger society. This leads to race-mixing as well, albeit to a lesser extent, but every bit counts, and every bit helps. Why? When two people of color have children, you can usually see distinct features from both parents present in the child. When a person of color and a white person have a child, the most commonly (and usually only) feature passed down from the white parent is lighter skin (cumskin). This is due to the fact that the genes that lead to the expression of so-called "white" phenotypes, are for the most part, recessive. This facilitates the elimination of "white" features in society.
Furthermore, children who have blood from both a person of color and a white person are forsaken by those who fantasize about the white race being preserved, even though they carry recessive genes from their white parent, genes that could eventually be expressed again. This will also contribute to the demise of the so-called "white race".
Eventually, no person who considers themselves "white" will have so-called "pure" genes. Hence, the white race will have been eliminated by the standards set by the race purists themselves, having led themselves to their own demise.
to be fair, churchill is described as a hero by mostly western historians, and rightly so, because he was instrumental in saving western civilization from falling into the dark abyss. while mao zedong, despite his direct role in the death of more than 50 million chinese, is deemed a hero by a billion plus chinese.
83 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-11-22
The only point you'll ever have is that you represent the sad, fedora-wearing, bloated face of capitalism in the 21st century.
Unfairly made famous and rich through copied ideas and appealing to kids. And yet is driven by some bizarre need for attention to spout insane, teenage edge lord style views. You are clearly not all that up on politics (or anything, maybe you can code?) yet your wealth has given you an oversized platform of confused 12 to 16 year olds to yell "sjwjjwjwj" at over and over again.
Honestly, I don't give a shit if you've been driven mad by fame or some bullshit. When I see amazing creative people dying depressed in poverty every day and you get to sit on twitter and make half assed 'now yur the nazi' comments, it's fucking sickening.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
W O K E
1 BellyCrawler 2018-11-22
Stay woke!
1 BeanerShnitzel 2018-11-22
Lurk more
1 SeattleFingers 2018-11-22
Don't put this shit on momruepari.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
cuck
1 SeattleFingers 2018-11-22
What happened to dramatard2
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Why should I know?
1 SeattleFingers 2018-11-22
TALK DAMMIT! WHAT DO YOU KNOW??
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
nigga u mad?
1 ExtraLustyArgonian 2018-11-22
nigga I'm orange. Juicy.
1 SeattleFingers 2018-11-22
Hi
1 MorelloCherries 2018-11-22
It’s u/dratamard2 He’s MIA 😢
1 ReddneckwithaD 2018-11-22
Thats a funny way of saying banned
1 MorelloCherries 2018-11-22
Don’t slander a good username with idle gossip.
1 100_Percent_not_homo 2018-11-22
He's right here --- /u/Ed_ButteredToast
1 MorelloCherries 2018-11-22
Ed is keeping dratamard2 all to himself? Shocking.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-11-22
Lmao
1 100_Percent_not_homo 2018-11-22
In his paki basement with the curry kegs
1 -DeadHead- 2018-11-22
Pushed to suicide by /u/riemann1413... Not his first victim, but the admins don't care.
1 Sarge_Ward 2018-11-22
This comment posted by momruepari
1 Momruepari 2018-11-22
this comment was not made by momruepari
1 friedsoup1 2018-11-22
This is so sad, can we hit sparrows?
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Birbs are fine. You can hit vegetarians, vegans and pit bull owners.
1 MPHJ-7 2018-11-22
Here are some highlights fromn the article:
The government also declared that "birds are public animals of capitalism".
The objection to the sparrows is that, like the rest of China's inhabitants, they are hungry.
And so divisions of soldiers deployed through Peking streets,
By April 1960, Chinese leaders changed their opinion due to the influence of ornithologist Tso-hsin Cheng who pointed out that sparrows ate a large number of insects
1 KittehDragoon 2018-11-22
How can 650 million people be so collectively retarded?
1 Sardinops 2018-11-22
Momruepari watermark thoughtfully ocupying the radical center here; we want the coloreds to starve so that the mayos can die of obesity
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-11-22
This but unironically
1 demotecontrol 2018-11-22
Too slow. What we need is a giant meteor to hit the Earth, giving evolution a chance to try again.
1 100_Percent_not_homo 2018-11-22
u ever been so fat your eyelids were fat?
1 BigTiddyAnimeWaifu 2018-11-22
You're a curry, aren't you?
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Nope. I just found this out in /r/FULLTANKIE and put the watermark on it.
1 MPHJ-7 2018-11-22
Somebuddy should make a sub called r/FULLTANKIE to parody r/FULLCOMMUNISM
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Did you sucked down properly?
1 The-Ghola-Hayt 2018-11-22
worse, brazilian
1 FratboyGenius 2018-11-22
Brazilian, huh? Well good luck with that, lol.
1 OriginalRazzmatazz 2018-11-22
This sub is full of brazilians. That's why reddit daddy took away teh pinging
1 100_Percent_not_homo 2018-11-22
How many's a brazillian?
1 Fletch71011 2018-11-22
Call me crazy, but if you kill more than Hitler and Stalin combined, you're probably a pretty bad guy who deserves the hate.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Not really. Chink lives are worthless.
1 The-Ghola-Hayt 2018-11-22
what about moradores da favela tho?
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Favelas must be shelled with mustard gas tbh. A homage to the brave man who fought in WWI.
1 h4rdlyf3 2018-11-22
Pajeet Lives Matter
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
10 pajeets = 1 chink
1 100_Percent_not_homo 2018-11-22
He didn't kill them they just stopped living from not having food
1 69big69daddy69 2018-11-22
mao>stalin>fdr>dogshit>churchill
1 dubbinblue 2018-11-22
It's interesting because it was Japan that really fucked over the Bengali's by occupying Burma, which cut off Bengal's supply of rice.
Funnily enough it was also Churchill who asked Australia to ship wheat to Bengal, as it would only take a month, whereas it would've taken 4 months for it to come from Canada (who had offered to send wheat - good guy Canada).
Moreover, much of the Indian government and local officials were also corrupt and hoarders, and was Hindu-dominated, Bengal being Muslim-dominated, the Indian government wanted to embarrass the Muslim-dominated Bengali government by not actually helping them properly. On a more regional level, several areas of India had placed an export ban on their own food produce, preventing them from trading with each other, combined with the inability to import rice from Burma, Bengal, and smaller neighboring regions starved. And much of the food aid that did come disappeared into the black market.
It's also worth noting the Minister of War Transport (Frederick Leathers) stated that there was statistically a surplus of grains in India, pointing the finger at Leather's ineptitude.
And you know what's also still interesting about all this? Churchill wrote to FDR to help India in its food shortage, and FDR refused.
​
But ye, white man bad.
​
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-22
This is one of the worst post I have EVER seen. Delete it.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
rekt
1 dubbinblue 2018-11-22
fuk
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
u
1 dubbinblue 2018-11-22
:0
1 sevp 2018-11-22
Your comment seems mostly plausible but can you source it?
1 dubbinblue 2018-11-22
Are you okay with literature sources?
(Use bo-k.xyz or LibGen)
1 lua_x_ia 2018-11-22
Yes but please provide one of ISBN/ISSN/DOI
1 dubbinblue 2018-11-22
The Fall of Burma 1941–1943 (Chapter 2) - ISBN 978-1-4738-6360-6
(Prices rises, export ban and hoarding) - Famine Inquiry Commission (May 1945) - Page 11, 25-30 (on page 29 you can see the imports drop to 25% of just several months before at the time of the Fall of Rangoon (Jap invasion).
Churchill thanking but denying Canada's aid due to logistical problems - http://www-archives.chu.cam.ac.uk/perl/node?a=a;reference=CHAR%2020%2F123%2F52
(Annoyingly I can't seem to find the bit about Australia online)
http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/large/cab-65-41.pdf - p75-76
http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/large/cab-65-41.pdf - p166
FDR denying Churchill the ships needed to bring the grains from Australia to India on the advisement by the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff http://www-archives.chu.cam.ac.uk/perl/node?a=a;reference=CHAR%2020%2F165%2F82
----------------------------------------------------
Thought I had used more actual books, apparently not.
​
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-22
Good job bobby, here's a star
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 sevp 2018-11-22
Damn you actually came through. I'll go through these.
1 MemoirsofCrime 2018-11-22
No you won't you cunt, You will continue to believe your bullshit notions and you will drink all night to forget this was ever mentioned.
1 [deleted] 2018-11-22
[removed]
1 MAMStoic 2018-11-22
Considering his non answer to this, you can check out this AskHistorians thread regarding this which lists multiple sources
Churchill was a racist piece of shit but the famine is in large part due to British policies in general than purely the actions of Churchill.
So ya white man was indeed bad but it wasn't just one in particular.
1 sevp 2018-11-22
He actually cited a bunch of books later. Thanks for the thread tho
1 dubbinblue 2018-11-22
Such as which?
From what I've read the Australian aid was offered but both the British and Australians didn't have the required ships as many were requisitioned for the war effort, and those that were used to transport grains were often sunk by Japanese forces. Which is why Churchill asked FDR to essentially borrow some ships for the grain transportation, but FDR denied this request due to his Joint Chiefs of Staff stating that they were required for the war effort and could not be spared (allegedly).
I am by no means pretend to be some sort of actual historian, nor do I study history as my major, but I read what I'm interested in and I'm more interested in the facts than narratives. Although narratives can serve as an entertaining form of reading (see: The Forgotten Voices of the Great Way by Max Arthur), but I digress.
1 MAMStoic 2018-11-22
You can read my link which addresses all your points.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
The elimination of the "white" race is inevitable. In fact, race is, for the most part, a nonsense construct, but the "white" race even moreso. It is clear that there is no explicit, accurate definition for being "white", the phantasm of "race purity" is far from reality and is grounded in nothing but the fantasies of people who think that those that they do not consider "white" are "taking muh womenz" (read: insecurity, as well as misogyny).
In present-day society, the identity of Western countries and their inhabitants are not pegged down by race, but by nationality—additionally, you can now see people mixing their origins with their current nationality, an example being so called "hyphenated Americans". These people range from someone holding some aspects of their culture dear to them, to someone who calls themselves so because "my [insert near ancestor] was from [insert foreign country]". Contrary to the European failure at integrating immigrants, the United States has done well with the integration of immigrants, and miscegenation of races will thus be unavoidable, and the delusion of "white purity" will become extinct.
Even in Europe, although they may not have succeeded in integrating their immigrants well (leading to the formation of ghettos such as the ones in Tower Hamlets, London), there will always be a few immigrants who manage to escape from the grasps of these ghettos and integrate within larger society. This leads to race-mixing as well, albeit to a lesser extent, but every bit counts, and every bit helps. Why? When two people of color have children, you can usually see distinct features from both parents present in the child. When a person of color and a white person have a child, the most commonly (and usually only) feature passed down from the white parent is lighter skin (cumskin). This is due to the fact that the genes that lead to the expression of so-called "white" phenotypes, are for the most part, recessive. This facilitates the elimination of "white" features in society.
Furthermore, children who have blood from both a person of color and a white person are forsaken by those who fantasize about the white race being preserved, even though they carry recessive genes from their white parent, genes that could eventually be expressed again. This will also contribute to the demise of the so-called "white race".
Eventually, no person who considers themselves "white" will have so-called "pure" genes. Hence, the white race will have been eliminated by the standards set by the race purists themselves, having led themselves to their own demise.
1 LongPostBot 2018-11-22
😴😴😴
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 DinosSuck 2018-11-22
Not ready to make a judgment until I know each of their stances on gamergate.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Both would have castrated gamers and it's good.
1 DinosSuck 2018-11-22
Well then I'm going to give a dangerously brave opinion and say that I agree with both of them, right down the center.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
I like your username.
1 Momruepari 2018-11-22
based and centrist watermark
1 Khazuki_SMB 2018-11-22
Because it's not like these people ever did anything else, right?
1 chimpanzee13 2018-11-22
alexander the "great" vs. genghis khan, labeled a barbarian.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
RICECELS GTFO
1 chimpanzee13 2018-11-22
to be fair, churchill is described as a hero by mostly western historians, and rightly so, because he was instrumental in saving western civilization from falling into the dark abyss. while mao zedong, despite his direct role in the death of more than 50 million chinese, is deemed a hero by a billion plus chinese.
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2018-11-22
Hitler was an animal loving vegan too.
1 TheOtherGuy9603 2018-11-22
It's almost as if people are complex beings that shouldn't be arbitrarily classified into good or evil
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Agreed. Cucks and soyboys are better.
1 Gil-Gandel 2018-11-22
Looking at momruepari, if there was a famine in the land it would be easy to tell who was to blame.
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
Cuck.
1 Gil-Gandel 2018-11-22
-a-doodle-doo
1 automatic_cluck 2018-11-22
💸
1 2odastream 2018-11-22
I thought Mao was idolised?