You're not even trying to be witty or anything, you're just circlejerking. How does it feel literally karma whoring, like, actually just being a human who cares enough to type multiple comments for no purpose except to draw a nearby majority's attention to the fact that you agree with them?
Since Labour is leading pretty much every poll now, after overperforming polls by 10 points in average last time, I guess Corbyn just has to wait for a new election to implement socialism.
It'll be great. Corbyn will simultaneously negotiate an economically devastating brexit for the UK while engaging in direct attacks on the financial sector which will be the last liferaft keeping Britain afloat.
We may actually live to see British refugees trying to flood into the EU and being stoped, turned away, and prosecuted after the EU finally adopts the anti-refugee policies the British right have been clamoring for.
The Conservative party has completely collapsed and in the midst of destroying the nation through the worst possible implementation of Brexit imaginable, and they are going back and forth neck and neck in the polls.
Corbyn is doing a fucking terrible dog shit job. Labour should be consistently double digits ahead with this shit show going on
I realize venezuela actually nationalized things, but isn't giving workers equity not at all the same thing? In theory when you give employees stock in the company you're doing that anyway.
I can see why such a law would be a problem, but its not like handing over the company to the government. I think even the germans have a requirement for one of the board members of any company to be an employee representative.
was trying to address two issues. The 10% bit is great for drama bc businesses don’t like that sort of thing. Personally I dislike it because yippee, you gave a faceless mob 10% control. Versus stocks (often non voting) and a named employee.
Elsewhere in the article, the guy wants to nationalize a shitton of goodies, hence the second paragraph. Nationalizing tennnds not to work as intended. Although there are things I think should be managed by the government, government proves time and again they can’t.
Could be worse, given its only 10%. Would depend on how that 10% makes its collective will known. Its probably less annoying than dealing with a closed-shop union workplace, and definitely less annoying than ever hiring a lawyer to work at your company ever.
They exist in all economies unless you over-regulate. But like I said in a free market they won’t last long as a result of stimulating competition. Producers would naturally compete
But like I said in a free market they won’t last long as a result of stimulating competition. Producers would naturally compete
Again, due to economies of scale a free market naturally converges on a monopoly. If your cost of production is fixed costs + costs per unit, then a producer that sells 2000 units can afford to sell them at a lower price than a producer that sells 1000 units, which leads to a death spiral for the second producer.
How stimulated your personal competition with, say, eBay is right now, and how much does it help you with competing against them?
The 10% bit is great for drama bc businesses don’t like that sort of thing. Personally I dislike it because yippee, you gave a faceless mob 10% control.
Works councils in Germany have quite a good reputation, compared to their equivalent next door in France, despite both having similar laws regarding works council's. There is a great deal of evidence that works councils in Germany have had a positive economic effect, the evidence is more mixed in France.
The actual labor laws passed by the government are only half the story, how businesses & employees respond is also important. There is probably a cultural element here around attitudes towards work.
If it's newly issued stock, it's equivalent to a 10% levy on existing capital. If the companies are supposed to buy the stock from private holders on the open market, that's going to FUBAR market prices.
I don't know if you will believe me but Venezuela and the USSR are not the only left wing economic models in the history of the world. This is normal in most European countries, the French state owns like 15% of loads of the car companies and lower Saxony has 20% of voting rights in Volkswagen, this is true of lots of other companies.
Because they invested in these companies back in the day. This is going to be they taking the stock and being like 'lol bye'
I'm pretty sure you don't know what you're talking about here, those shares were kept by the local state to keep control after it was privatised lol, they even named a law after it. Also as if the British state didn't invest in any of the big companies in the UK, it only does free R&D, and various other stuff for them and organises bail outs when they go tits up.
It was enacted on 28 July 1960, when Volkswagenwerk GmbH was privatized.
Learn to fucking you illiterate dolt, you absolute fucking waste of human genetics. Fucking britbongs ought to have been gassed by Nazi daddy. You fucking moron.
All those rotting burgers in your fat gut really makes you tetchy darling, maybe you should try some healthy American lettuce instead.
I'm pretty sure their first car was designed by Porsche and the Porsche company built the factory with dodgy money from a quasi nazi/private owned but profit making company so I guess your point was sort of vaguely true if you twist it and squint your eyes enough.
But I'm still right because what I said actually happened, the state kept controling shares and this is true of loads of other European companies, Renault was literally expropriated then the state kept shares in it once it was re-privitised. Your whole rugged burger idea is dumb, every state invests in companies 'back in the day' we just don't take any control for that in the UK because our Tories want to suck burger dick.
Um ok? Its kind of racist to say that theres something wrong with a country when in reality there is nothing wrong. Also I dont speak that language so I cant go there, plus Im scared of poor countrys.
Labour is literally lead by a guy who thinks NATO was founded to promote a cold war with the Soviet Union and that the Warsaw Pact was a mutual defense strategy.
It should surprise nobody that they have tankies within their own ranks.
Labour is literally lead by a guy who thinks NATO was founded to promote a cold war with the Soviet Union and that the Warsaw Pact was a mutual defense strategy.
That's pretty much the case tho. It's a pro russia take but not wrong.
And they would be fucking retarded for saying so. France left on their own. Show me where all these NATO citizens desperately tried to escape to the safety and liberty they had in Warsaw and all the secret police to keep them in lockdown.
Genius, did you skip over France leaving and not getting invaded? What happened to Hungary when Communists wanted even just a different form of Communism?
USSR rewarded Warsaw Pact countries by installing oppressive as fuck governments against their will and straight up robbing the countries blind to build up their own country.
USA instead threw money at the countries until they transformed from piles of rubble into the richest places on the planet overnight.
This both sides nonsense to call NATO and Warsaw the same situation is a joke. The only threat to either Warsaw or NATO was the USSR. You can see this clear as day when countries today actively try to still join NATO as a way to prevent getting invaded and looking like Ukraine while Warsaw doesn't even exist.
Ukraine still had them in their country. The countries were rebuilt so they could prevent the spread of Communism to rest of Europe and not have USSR steamroll their way to the Atlantic.
They CREATED the market by rebuilding the continent. Only an arrogant frog could think France was doing America a favor by taking American money to rebuild.
Yes it certainly did. Now you want to tell me America did nothing to help allies in Western Europe? Mutual benefit isn't some gotcha against America. You would have to be retarded as a world leader to actively take part in something that would harm your own country. Of course America creating strong allies helps everyone.
It would be peak arrogance to think war torn country taking money is doing a favor towards the country giving money.
What is next, is Israel doing a favor by accepting aid from America? Same exact logic.
See, the US give money to israel. Israel in exchange buy american. It's a way for the US to pay their military complex, but it fudge the numbers so it doesn't look too obvious.
The amount given is a rounding error for military spending. It isn't a favor BY Israel. It is a favor TOWARDS Israel. You are delusional in your thinking that people that take money from others are doing favors. Do you thank panhandlers after they take your money too?
And? What is your point? Do you think it is a secret that Israel spends the aid on military? If a random Reddit user knows this it isn't a state secret. You are not clever.
Israel is not doing any favors by accepting free defense support from America.
And? What is your point? Do you think it is a secret that Israel spends the aid on military? If a random Reddit user knows this it isn't a state secret. You are not clever.
Israel is not doing any favors by accepting free defense support from America.
Do you even attempt to answer what other people say or you just decide to strawman them all the time ?
Why would anyone ever want to live in England? Like seriously.
If you're English you can just move to Ireland or Australia depending on which weather you prefer and live in much nicer, less overpopulated places without crazy communists, islamists and witches trying to take your shit. So why would you stay??
Lmao. Why would an English person go to the trouble of moving to Ireland, when they can just go to the London zoo and live among the howler monkeys? It would be cheaper, easier, and cleaner. Plus, the howling of the monkeys would be less annyoing that the Irish whining about British colonialism.
I went to London once, DIS-CUST-ING! Foggy ass shithole swarming with people queuing to get anywhere, living in closet sized apartments that consume 75% of their income that they make at miserable jobs they ride to in shitty tincan trains that Londoners have the SHEER AUDACITY to brag about as 'the best in the world'. The food is awful, the people are rude, taxi prices are absurd and the crime rate is high due to shiftless loser chavs that listen to copycat wannabe American rap. If I lived in London I'd neck myself.
Labour ran on a fairly left-leaning succdem manifesto. McDonnell has shifted their policy hard left and said he wants to implement communism. He has already spoken of plans to collectivise land like the USSR did. If he had done that last election there would have been a Tory majority.
The media ran all the commies stories before and Labour still defeated tory majority. Face it, british people want go radical and Labour's policies are popular even with conservative voters
I was wondering wether brexit would be enough to sink britain. Seems that I no longer need to wonder.
My smugness will be trough the chart with that. 1) I will get to be smugs at brits after their economy go down the shitter 2) I will get to be smug at french commies once their economy goes down the shitter and 3) I will get to be smug to IRL britbongs fan I know.
There's honestly a part of me that feels it would be hillarious if Britan transitioned to a full-blown Socialist state, but still kept the Royalty intact (albiet with less power). I mean, they already turned into a liberal democracy while still having a crown, I just kinda think it would be funny if they went as far as Socialism without ending the monarchy.
135 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-11-23
You're not even trying to be witty or anything, you're just circlejerking. How does it feel literally karma whoring, like, actually just being a human who cares enough to type multiple comments for no purpose except to draw a nearby majority's attention to the fact that you agree with them?
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 CherryKirsche 2018-11-23
Why do you enjoy hurting me?
1 antiwarus 2018-11-23
Jesus it's over for labourcels
1 allendrio 2018-11-23
i think most labour supporters are used daring feats of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
Corbyn's increased voting share for Labour by the biggest margin since 1945.
1 2odastream 2018-11-23
0 x 2 is still 0
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
Since Labour is leading pretty much every poll now, after overperforming polls by 10 points in average last time, I guess Corbyn just has to wait for a new election to implement socialism.
1 FieldMarshalHaig 2018-11-23
If it fails then will it be real socialism this time?
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-11-23
It'll be great. Corbyn will simultaneously negotiate an economically devastating brexit for the UK while engaging in direct attacks on the financial sector which will be the last liferaft keeping Britain afloat.
We may actually live to see British refugees trying to flood into the EU and being stoped, turned away, and prosecuted after the EU finally adopts the anti-refugee policies the British right have been clamoring for.
I can't wait!
1 w1ntrmute 2018-11-23
Va te faire foutre, on est complet.
1 doyourworkyoufailure 2018-11-23
The Conservative party has completely collapsed and in the midst of destroying the nation through the worst possible implementation of Brexit imaginable, and they are going back and forth neck and neck in the polls.
Corbyn is doing a fucking terrible dog shit job. Labour should be consistently double digits ahead with this shit show going on
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
Labout might be ahead by double digits if you consider how labour overperformed the polls by 10 points average last time
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-11-23
This is great for dramacoin.
The nice minister should help in with Venezuela and see how nationalizing all the things went.
1 PracticalOnions 2018-11-23
Tfw when the party that wants to run the country doesn’t even understand basic economics or why nationalizing businesses is a dumpster fire
1 Velxon 2018-11-23
Its OVER for economically-literatecels
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
Germany requires 50%.
1 JoeFalchetto 2018-11-23
Germany require (slightly less than) 50% of the supervisory board, not 50% of ownership.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-11-23
I realize venezuela actually nationalized things, but isn't giving workers equity not at all the same thing? In theory when you give employees stock in the company you're doing that anyway.
I can see why such a law would be a problem, but its not like handing over the company to the government. I think even the germans have a requirement for one of the board members of any company to be an employee representative.
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-11-23
was trying to address two issues. The 10% bit is great for drama bc businesses don’t like that sort of thing. Personally I dislike it because yippee, you gave a faceless mob 10% control. Versus stocks (often non voting) and a named employee.
Elsewhere in the article, the guy wants to nationalize a shitton of goodies, hence the second paragraph. Nationalizing tennnds not to work as intended. Although there are things I think should be managed by the government, government proves time and again they can’t.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-11-23
Could be worse, given its only 10%. Would depend on how that 10% makes its collective will known. Its probably less annoying than dealing with a closed-shop union workplace, and definitely less annoying than ever hiring a lawyer to work at your company ever.
1 Ridicatlthrowaway 2018-11-23
People are corrupt shitheads, the free market at least allows you to say fuck you to the corrupt shitheads as long as there are no monopolies.
1 chumthescrubber 2018-11-23
Monopolies don't last long in a free market. If they do it's because they're doing much better than the competition
1 Grinning_Caterpillar 2018-11-23
Instead you get oligopolies.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-23
How so? As far as I understand, monopolies is one of the main problems plaguing free markets, and they form naturally because of economies of scale.
1 chumthescrubber 2018-11-23
They exist in all economies unless you over-regulate. But like I said in a free market they won’t last long as a result of stimulating competition. Producers would naturally compete
1 zergling_Lester 2018-11-23
Again, due to economies of scale a free market naturally converges on a monopoly. If your cost of production is fixed costs + costs per unit, then a producer that sells 2000 units can afford to sell them at a lower price than a producer that sells 1000 units, which leads to a death spiral for the second producer.
How stimulated your personal competition with, say, eBay is right now, and how much does it help you with competing against them?
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
Germany requires 50%
1 biggest_decision 2018-11-23
Works councils in Germany have quite a good reputation, compared to their equivalent next door in France, despite both having similar laws regarding works council's. There is a great deal of evidence that works councils in Germany have had a positive economic effect, the evidence is more mixed in France.
The actual labor laws passed by the government are only half the story, how businesses & employees respond is also important. There is probably a cultural element here around attitudes towards work.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-11-23
Well duh, they're fucking french, of course it won't work.
1 biggest_decision 2018-11-23
Yeah basically.
1 BriefSquirt 2018-11-23
The Franzosen are shit at everything though.
1 IllustriousQuail 2018-11-23
If it's newly issued stock, it's equivalent to a 10% levy on existing capital. If the companies are supposed to buy the stock from private holders on the open market, that's going to FUBAR market prices.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-11-23
ROFL imagine it being 2018 and still believing this reagonomic crap.
1 uniqueguy263 2018-11-23
Imagine being too stupid to do basic math
1 IllustriousQuail 2018-11-23
You're right: Obama changed forever how fractions work. Hashtag woke econ.
1 SuperObviousShill 2018-11-23
Oh and I suppose we still believe in fractions do we? Fractions are splittist and the tools of wreckers.
1 RecallRethuglicans 2018-11-23
Things were great until Venezuela stopped nationalizing things and the bankers then went into economic strikes against the people.
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-11-23
whoa cool it with the anti-semitism big guy
1 Momruepari 2018-11-23
slow down there Chapo
or maybe MDE?
1 MAMStoic 2018-11-23
Worse it's a non resident Indian who lives in California and posts on r/India.
1 Momruepari 2018-11-23
what the fuck
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
The private sector accounts for 70 percent of Venezuelan GDP In Norway it's the opposite.
1 JoeFalchetto 2018-11-23
Yes. When you count private businesses forcefully taken away from their owners and given to coops as „private business“.
1 lurker093287h 2018-11-23
I don't know if you will believe me but Venezuela and the USSR are not the only left wing economic models in the history of the world. This is normal in most European countries, the French state owns like 15% of loads of the car companies and lower Saxony has 20% of voting rights in Volkswagen, this is true of lots of other companies.
1 OriginalRazzmatazz 2018-11-23
Because they invested in these companies back in the day. This is going to be they taking the stock and being like 'lol bye'
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2018-11-23
Imagine that. Stealing 20% equity has the exact opposite effect of investing and buying 20% equity.
1 lurker093287h 2018-11-23
I'm pretty sure you don't know what you're talking about here, those shares were kept by the local state to keep control after it was privatised lol, they even named a law after it. Also as if the British state didn't invest in any of the big companies in the UK, it only does free R&D, and various other stuff for them and organises bail outs when they go tits up.
1 OriginalRazzmatazz 2018-11-23
It was enacted on 28 July 1960, when Volkswagenwerk GmbH was privatized.
Learn to fucking you illiterate dolt, you absolute fucking waste of human genetics. Fucking britbongs ought to have been gassed by Nazi daddy. You fucking moron.
1 lurker093287h 2018-11-23
Lol that is literally what I said, the company was privatised and the state kept voting shares, you said it was
Making a bit of a prat of yourself here aren't you, having a tantrum because of your lack of reading ability, typical tbh.
1 OriginalRazzmatazz 2018-11-23
How does paying for something and keeping it is comparable to just fucking taking with no compensation, you diseased rotting cunt?
1 lurker093287h 2018-11-23
All those rotting burgers in your fat gut really makes you tetchy darling, maybe you should try some healthy American lettuce instead.
I'm pretty sure their first car was designed by Porsche and the Porsche company built the factory with dodgy money from a quasi nazi/private owned but profit making company so I guess your point was sort of vaguely true if you twist it and squint your eyes enough.
But I'm still right because what I said actually happened, the state kept controling shares and this is true of loads of other European companies, Renault was literally expropriated then the state kept shares in it once it was re-privitised. Your whole rugged burger idea is dumb, every state invests in companies 'back in the day' we just don't take any control for that in the UK because our Tories want to suck burger dick.
1 MrGoodieMob 2018-11-23
DAE VENEZUELA?!?!? 😤😤😤😤
1 the_marx 2018-11-23
wait what's wrong with venezuela?
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-11-23
Nothing! You should go there!
1 the_marx 2018-11-23
Um ok? Its kind of racist to say that theres something wrong with a country when in reality there is nothing wrong. Also I dont speak that language so I cant go there, plus Im scared of poor countrys.
1 DistortedLines 2018-11-23
That's not what tankie means lol
1 Inceltiers 2018-11-23
Guy is a quite literal Tankie
He loves lenin
1 Baconlightning 2018-11-23
Labour is literally lead by a guy who thinks NATO was founded to promote a cold war with the Soviet Union and that the Warsaw Pact was a mutual defense strategy.
It should surprise nobody that they have tankies within their own ranks.
1 dudeWares 2018-11-23
Neither of those takes are technically wrong they're just the most commie way of framing them as possible
1 Frptwenty 2018-11-23
Yo dawg I heard you like tanks so I put tankies in your ranks so you can tank tank tank
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
That's pretty much the case tho. It's a pro russia take but not wrong.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Lol mutual defense pact of puppet countries on lockdown from imperialist USSR.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
The same is said about Nato, buddy.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
And they would be fucking retarded for saying so. France left on their own. Show me where all these NATO citizens desperately tried to escape to the safety and liberty they had in Warsaw and all the secret police to keep them in lockdown.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Since when does the citizens matter for an accord between nations ?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Genius, did you skip over France leaving and not getting invaded? What happened to Hungary when Communists wanted even just a different form of Communism?
USSR rewarded Warsaw Pact countries by installing oppressive as fuck governments against their will and straight up robbing the countries blind to build up their own country.
USA instead threw money at the countries until they transformed from piles of rubble into the richest places on the planet overnight.
This both sides nonsense to call NATO and Warsaw the same situation is a joke. The only threat to either Warsaw or NATO was the USSR. You can see this clear as day when countries today actively try to still join NATO as a way to prevent getting invaded and looking like Ukraine while Warsaw doesn't even exist.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Yes, we had nukes.
What burgers actually believe, lmao.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
So did Ukraine, next excuse?
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Those were not ukrainian nukes.
You are aware of why the plan marshall was a thing ? I am seriously asking here.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Ukraine still had them in their country. The countries were rebuilt so they could prevent the spread of Communism to rest of Europe and not have USSR steamroll their way to the Atlantic.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
That was just one reason. What was the other ?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Can you please just get to it instead of cat and mouse?
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
It was to penetrate the european market, and sell american stuff.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Oh so free trade is bad now? Why did Europe accept the money from the evil empire and rebuild with blood money?
Do you think saying there is a benefit to America having a rich Western Europe somehow negates American actions?
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
That uh wasn't my point. My point was that the US wasn't throwing us money. They were paying for access to our markets.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
They CREATED the market by rebuilding the continent. Only an arrogant frog could think France was doing America a favor by taking American money to rebuild.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
L M A O
What burgers actually believe.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Why does West Germany look different from East Germany?
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Communism. It hurt a lot.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Yes it certainly did. Now you want to tell me America did nothing to help allies in Western Europe? Mutual benefit isn't some gotcha against America. You would have to be retarded as a world leader to actively take part in something that would harm your own country. Of course America creating strong allies helps everyone.
It would be peak arrogance to think war torn country taking money is doing a favor towards the country giving money.
What is next, is Israel doing a favor by accepting aid from America? Same exact logic.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Israel /is/ doing a favor to the US. They are very usefull to hide the subventions to the US military complex.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
I don't know what that phrase means to be honest. Hide the subventions?
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
See, the US give money to israel. Israel in exchange buy american. It's a way for the US to pay their military complex, but it fudge the numbers so it doesn't look too obvious.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
The amount given is a rounding error for military spending. It isn't a favor BY Israel. It is a favor TOWARDS Israel. You are delusional in your thinking that people that take money from others are doing favors. Do you thank panhandlers after they take your money too?
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
3 billions is a rounding error lmao.
Money laundering is not a favor lmao.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Yes, 3 billion is a rounding error. Welcome to having a rich country. It isn't money laundering. None of it is a secret or tax evasion.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
lmao.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
.5% of the budget. Do you still want to be stupid? I can't help you that you live in a poor country.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Not all of that is dedicated to the military complex tho.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
And? What is your point? Do you think it is a secret that Israel spends the aid on military? If a random Reddit user knows this it isn't a state secret. You are not clever.
Israel is not doing any favors by accepting free defense support from America.
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
Do you even attempt to answer what other people say or you just decide to strawman them all the time ?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
You called it money laundering. Sending military aid to Israel is not in any way shape or form a state secret.
1 Redactor0 2018-11-23
Sorry honey, but this guy isn't even a pinko, he's an actual red.
1 MPHJ-7 2018-11-23
Why are you booing him? He's right!
1 Tytos_Lannister 2018-11-23
you are right
tankies are way cooler than Jeremy fuckin' Corbyn and that's saying something
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2018-11-23
I miss the Liberal Party sometimes.
1 Cholestorol-kun 2018-11-23
F for cleggo
1 doyourworkyoufailure 2018-11-23
1 snowkarl 2018-11-23
Why would anyone ever want to live in England? Like seriously.
If you're English you can just move to Ireland or Australia depending on which weather you prefer and live in much nicer, less overpopulated places without crazy communists, islamists and witches trying to take your shit. So why would you stay??
1 NormanImmanuel 2018-11-23
Money, probably.
1 xXsnip_ur_ballsXx 2018-11-23
Not sure about Australia, but Ireland isn't too bad where it comes to money.
1 Thisisepicstein 2018-11-23
Too much effort
1 WhiteKyriarchy 2018-11-23
The weather and all the beautiful people.
Also, australian TV is so bad that brits end up moving back home
1 snowkarl 2018-11-23
Don't they have high quality UK productions like Doctor Who and Eastenders down under?
1 wisty 2018-11-23
Doctor Who is pretty much the best show in Australia. And it was, even during the Moffatt era. Let that sink in.
1 snowkarl 2018-11-23
I would honestly rather watch Reef Doctors than Dr Who
1 Herbert-West 2018-11-23
Lmao. Why would an English person go to the trouble of moving to Ireland, when they can just go to the London zoo and live among the howler monkeys? It would be cheaper, easier, and cleaner. Plus, the howling of the monkeys would be less annyoing that the Irish whining about British colonialism.
1 snowkarl 2018-11-23
I know London's pretty bad these days but come on it's not that bad.
1 vjaY619 2018-11-23
It's worse. London is an expensive as fuck shithole. I wouldn't live there even if you paid me to.
1 Justinat0r 2018-11-23
I went to London once, DIS-CUST-ING! Foggy ass shithole swarming with people queuing to get anywhere, living in closet sized apartments that consume 75% of their income that they make at miserable jobs they ride to in shitty tincan trains that Londoners have the SHEER AUDACITY to brag about as 'the best in the world'. The food is awful, the people are rude, taxi prices are absurd and the crime rate is high due to shiftless loser chavs that listen to copycat wannabe American rap. If I lived in London I'd neck myself.
1 Kingtoke1 2018-11-23
Wow. Pot calling the kettle black much?
1 911roofer 2018-11-23
But then he would have Muslims for his neighbors, and the poor monkeys would all be raped to death once the Pakistanis have worn out the petting zoo.
1 VidiotGamer 2018-11-23
This guy knows whats up.
1 l1ll111lllll11111111 2018-11-23
Why live in England and shoot yourself from the misery when you can move to America and have someone do it for you?
1 Sarge_Ward 2018-11-23
Australia is the America of the commonwealth. Screw that lmao
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
Australia could never be that relevant.
1 BriefSquirt 2018-11-23
australia has spiders tho
1 SonyXboxNintendo13 2018-11-23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOkJaJjfzbE
1 Momruepari 2018-11-23
WAKE ME UP INSIDE
1 yunghastati 2018-11-23
can't even pick the chad leftists ideology and strive for an Anarcho-Syndicalist union of communes with strong overtones of lavender and thyme
1 aonome 2018-11-23
I love McDonnell because he makes sure Labour can't get elected
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
That's what they said last time. Tories were supposed to get 400 seats, but ended up losing their majority
1 Whaddaulookinat 2018-11-23
The DUP are same stable partners though!
1 aonome 2018-11-23
Labour ran on a fairly left-leaning succdem manifesto. McDonnell has shifted their policy hard left and said he wants to implement communism. He has already spoken of plans to collectivise land like the USSR did. If he had done that last election there would have been a Tory majority.
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
The media ran all the commies stories before and Labour still defeated tory majority. Face it, british people want go radical and Labour's policies are popular even with conservative voters
1 aonome 2018-11-23
They didn't actually have commie shit in their manifesto. Now they do.
You clearly don't live here
1 xbettel 2018-11-23
There's nothing new in the manifesto lol
1 aonome 2018-11-23
You're right, I meant to say McDonnell's plans will mean that the manifesto will have commie shit in it next election unless he is simply lying
1 error404brain 2018-11-23
I was wondering wether brexit would be enough to sink britain. Seems that I no longer need to wonder.
My smugness will be trough the chart with that. 1) I will get to be smugs at brits after their economy go down the shitter 2) I will get to be smug at french commies once their economy goes down the shitter and 3) I will get to be smug to IRL britbongs fan I know.
1 Environmental_Table 2018-11-23
kill all communists
1 MPHJ-7 2018-11-23
There's honestly a part of me that feels it would be hillarious if Britan transitioned to a full-blown Socialist state, but still kept the Royalty intact (albiet with less power). I mean, they already turned into a liberal democracy while still having a crown, I just kinda think it would be funny if they went as far as Socialism without ending the monarchy.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-11-23
u/aonome how did someone beat you to creating this post?
1 RollBread 2018-11-23
1 kingofthehill5 2018-11-23
I for one support this.
1 Wild_Hunt 2018-11-23
Prepare to be Allende’d