I just want that in about two or three weeks, when RBG should be fit again to sit on the bench, that it won't be RBG who shows up. It should be Hillary with with dyed hair, RBG's glasses on her nose while pretending to have a humpback like RBG.
Nah, she’s “resting” just like Clinton did after that time she passed out leaving s campaign event. They’re taking a little longer than expected to build the RBGbot that will replace her soon, so she’s “resting” until that’s done
It's weird that we've come to a place where a piece of the fate of the nation will be determined by how long a dusty old dinosaur can cheat death, and how obsessed everyone is with her health. It's like how in the Middle Ages all the peasants gathered around the castle to get updates on how close a sickly prince was to death. Sad!
oh it's going to make a tremendous difference, arguably bigger than a simple 5-4 which it had for a long-time, because now we are getting post abortion BS to things that actually matter, things that can alter how the federal goverment works and what it can pass (or rather how it doesn't).
Remember that Roberts is a sorta an originalist, but he respects the precedent and he doesn't want the court to againts the democratic will of the people especially while voting 5-4, hence why he didn't declare ACA's individual mandate unconstitutional back in 2012. With 6-3 majority much of the legislation would be simply fucked.
I think it's a reasonable compromise tbh. The electorate is retarded, being on the bench for life means they're truly independent - and the permanence gives everyone a lot of motivation to vet the candidates thoroughly.
They're supposed to follow the law and the constitution, not the whims of either the electorate or politicians. We have other, elected branches that are beholden to the people. And we have one that doesn't need to give a fuck. Checks and balances.
We have other, elected branches that are beholden to the people.
And the fact that it's not those branches that decide important stuff is a joke. Gay marriage and corruption should have been voted on by the chambers, not 9 fucktards that were never elected.
It's a check on democracy, yeah. Because the electorate is retarded.
It's not a check on democracy when they make more massive change than democracy do. At best you could say that democracy is a check on the supreme court.
He's far from a perfect choice, but that's how it goes sometimes. We had an ex-KKK judge at some point too.
Doesn't this prove my point about how they are not well vetted ?
They don't make more massive changes, than democracy do, and they can't write new laws. The democratic check on judicial review is the process of a constitutional amendment.
The KKK judge worked out fine. The vetting worked out fine, there was a scandal during his nomination. In the end, they decided to let him on the bench, and he didn't fuck it up.
They don't make more massive changes, than democracy do, and they can't write new laws.
Functionnaly the gay marriage thing and the corruption thing (where entreprises can pay politician "campaign") were new laws.
The KKK judge worked out fine. The vetting worked out fine, there was a scandal during his nomination. In the end, they decided to let him on the bench, and he didn't fuck it up.
You were saying they were well vetted and thus it was okay. The fact that an ex KKK member got into it disproves your point.
fate of the nation? literally anything they decide on wont affect you unless you are a weird extremist. unless you plan on getting tons of abortions. and honey, trust me, you should take what you can get.
She has cancer spreading throughout her body and they can't even find the source tumor, they only removed the secondary tumors they've been able to find.
RBI’s survived pancreas cancer which If know anything about cancer is the deadliest kind. She’s being kept alive by Kabbalah magic and the fore skins of gentiles.
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
RBG WILL BE FINE
The rights reaction to news of RBG's health is like those doctors who tried to measure the weight of the human soul, just grabbing a dying person and eagerly awaiting the end of their life staring at the scale.
There's a huge difference between not having metastatic cancer, and them just not being able to find it. You don't get lobes like that if you don't have metastic cancer, and that doesn't just go away because you remove the masses in the lungs.
She is too old for chemo, and radiation has to be targeted. There is no further treatment in that instance, which explains why they aren't conducting any further treatments.
I know that this sub has taken a long leap off the slippery slope that is Democratic politics in the last year, but this is just completely ignorant of how cancer works.
62 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-01-11
You're not shit next to me. My genes are just light years superior to yours and I don't even need to look at you.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Think_Once 2019-01-11
I just want that in about two or three weeks, when RBG should be fit again to sit on the bench, that it won't be RBG who shows up. It should be Hillary with with dyed hair, RBG's glasses on her nose while pretending to have a humpback like RBG.
I wonder how people would react.
1 jorio 2019-01-11
By calling the police?
1 ZA44 2019-01-11
Lock her up?
1 RememberTheAyLmao 2019-01-11
and then Deadpool walks in
1 birfing 2019-01-11
I'd shit my pants laughing.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-01-11
Does that old hag still have a soul left to sell?
1 Redactor0 2019-01-11
She's been a lawyer for several decades. I think that should answer your question.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-01-11
So what is she bartering with to Satan? What could she possibly offer the Dark Lord that he doesn't have already?
1 haulingtaters 2019-01-11
I mean the devil would probably be in favor of abortion so he's very worried about a conservative SC.
1 keeeeshawn 2019-01-11
Absolutely false
Aborted babies go to heaven since they didn’t do anything wrong
Satan is 100% against abortion. The more kids that are born, the more people there will be that go to hell.
1 2402a7b7f239666e4079 2019-01-11
I mean their mothers go to hell, so that counts for something, but I suppose you are right.
1 keeeeshawn 2019-01-11
If they were going to get an abortion they were going to hell anyway
1 majopa989 2019-01-11
The people who have the abortion go to hell not the babies
1 keeeeshawn 2019-01-11
They would be going either way
1 alexmikli 2019-01-11
This assumes we're talking about the modern interpretation of Satan. This could totally be Molech, a deity fueled by human sacrifice.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2019-01-11
Nuh uh, Christians believe that everyone is a sinner from birth. Your baby died of SIDS? He's rotting in hell, bucko.
1 keeeeshawn 2019-01-11
As far as I know aborted fetuses aren’t born yet
1 uTorrent 2019-01-11
Technically they would still have original sin
1 TheSubredditPolice 2019-01-11
His son a plea deal for that DUI accident that killed those orphans.
1 MelonScore 2019-01-11
She never had a soul.
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2019-01-11
Bitches gotta rest yo
1 serial_crusher 2019-01-11
Nah, she’s “resting” just like Clinton did after that time she passed out leaving s campaign event. They’re taking a little longer than expected to build the RBGbot that will replace her soon, so she’s “resting” until that’s done
1 TheLordHighExecu 2019-01-11
Ben Garrison, it's an honor to have you
1 NoChickswithDicks 2019-01-11
Explain to me how metastatic cancer just goes away.
1 watermark03salt 2019-01-11
Weekend at Baders
1 snallygaster 2019-01-11
It's weird that we've come to a place where a piece of the fate of the nation will be determined by how long a dusty old dinosaur can cheat death, and how obsessed everyone is with her health. It's like how in the Middle Ages all the peasants gathered around the castle to get updates on how close a sickly prince was to death. Sad!
1 UmmahSultan 2019-01-11
I don't know if it's going to make that much of a difference to have everything decided on a 6-3 conservative majority rather than 5-4.
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-01-11
oh it's going to make a tremendous difference, arguably bigger than a simple 5-4 which it had for a long-time, because now we are getting post abortion BS to things that actually matter, things that can alter how the federal goverment works and what it can pass (or rather how it doesn't).
Remember that Roberts is a sorta an originalist, but he respects the precedent and he doesn't want the court to againts the democratic will of the people especially while voting 5-4, hence why he didn't declare ACA's individual mandate unconstitutional back in 2012. With 6-3 majority much of the legislation would be simply fucked.
1 alpr5tis 2019-01-11
It's not as bad as you make it sound tbh.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
Honestly, this entire supreme court shit is complete nonsense.
Nobody unelected should have the power of passing such massive legal changes as gay marriage or making corruption legal.
1 kermit_was_right 2019-01-11
I think it's a reasonable compromise tbh. The electorate is retarded, being on the bench for life means they're truly independent - and the permanence gives everyone a lot of motivation to vet the candidates thoroughly.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
That's sorta the entire issue right there. They should follow the will of the people, not what they want.
Isn't the last one a literal fash ?
1 kermit_was_right 2019-01-11
No, they're supposed to be independent of the people as well. As I said - the electorate is retarded.
And no, he's not a fash - even if I don't think he was the best choice.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
Well, that was my point. In a democracy they shouldn't be independent of the people.
Didn't he led a fash group or something while at the uni ?
1 kermit_was_right 2019-01-11
They're supposed to follow the law and the constitution, not the whims of either the electorate or politicians. We have other, elected branches that are beholden to the people. And we have one that doesn't need to give a fuck. Checks and balances.
And no, he didn't.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
And the fact that it's not those branches that decide important stuff is a joke. Gay marriage and corruption should have been voted on by the chambers, not 9 fucktards that were never elected.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-supreme-court-justice-nominee-neil-gorsuch-fascism-forever-club-studen-group-found-a7559676.html
1 kermit_was_right 2019-01-11
Like it or not, judicial review is a fundamental part of our system. In general, it's worked well for us.
That's not the last one and seems like satire, but lmao.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
Sure, it might work well but it doesn't mean it isn't anti democratic.
There was a new one ? Oh, yeah, the one that raped some people (maybe?).
Doesn't really help your side lmao.
1 kermit_was_right 2019-01-11
It's a check on democracy, yeah. Because the electorate is retarded.
Nobody accused him of raping anyone, but yeah, he might have been a drunken retard in high school and college. He seems to have snapped out of it.
He's far from a perfect choice, but that's how it goes sometimes.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
It's not a check on democracy when they make more massive change than democracy do. At best you could say that democracy is a check on the supreme court.
Doesn't this prove my point about how they are not well vetted ?
1 kermit_was_right 2019-01-11
They don't make more massive changes, than democracy do, and they can't write new laws. The democratic check on judicial review is the process of a constitutional amendment.
The KKK judge worked out fine. The vetting worked out fine, there was a scandal during his nomination. In the end, they decided to let him on the bench, and he didn't fuck it up.
1 error404brain 2019-01-11
Functionnaly the gay marriage thing and the corruption thing (where entreprises can pay politician "campaign") were new laws.
You were saying they were well vetted and thus it was okay. The fact that an ex KKK member got into it disproves your point.
1 snowkarl 2019-01-11
It's not the fate of the nation in any way whatsoever ffs.
Kavanaugh is a strict constitutionalist who won't stop you from having a sixteenth abortion, so don't worry
1 RandolphCox 2019-01-11
fate of the nation? literally anything they decide on wont affect you unless you are a weird extremist. unless you plan on getting tons of abortions. and honey, trust me, you should take what you can get.
1 agenderphobe 2019-01-11
Does that mean she needs a refill on her adrenalized child blood or something?
1 moush 2019-01-11
Ah yes, back to her regularly scheduled workout routine!
1 Kat_B0T 2019-01-11
But a brand new day for weekendatbernies-cels
1 unrulyfarmhand 2019-01-11
She’s already dead.
1 Dramaste 2019-01-11
Someone should start a conspiracy on how RBG has been replaced by an actor.
1 EarlyRough 2019-01-11
WHY WON'T SHE DIE, I NEED THIS DRAMA, I NEED IT!
Oh God, have I become the lolcow? Just end me.
1 autistitron 2019-01-11
She has cancer spreading throughout her body and they can't even find the source tumor, they only removed the secondary tumors they've been able to find.
​
Be ready for the drama by spring at the latest.
1 spookyguy109 2019-01-11
RBI’s survived pancreas cancer which If know anything about cancer is the deadliest kind. She’s being kept alive by Kabbalah magic and the fore skins of gentiles.
1 moralizing_fags_btfo 2019-01-11
COPE
1 Chicup 2019-01-11
As soon as you're born you start dying.
1 gehalten 2019-01-11
RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE RBG WILL BE FINE
1 Ennui2778 2019-01-11
C O P E
1 calciu 2019-01-11
She’s be dead in 2 months, mark my words.
1 Warbring3r 2019-01-11
She’s fine they just removed two cancer nodes from her lungs with an unknown metastatic origin it’s no big deal lmao
1 watermark03salt 2019-01-11
The rights reaction to news of RBG's health is like those doctors who tried to measure the weight of the human soul, just grabbing a dying person and eagerly awaiting the end of their life staring at the scale.
1 Fred_MutteredBoast 2019-01-11
lol she definitely is
1 NoChickswithDicks 2019-01-11
Good luck with that.
There's a huge difference between not having metastatic cancer, and them just not being able to find it. You don't get lobes like that if you don't have metastic cancer, and that doesn't just go away because you remove the masses in the lungs.
She is too old for chemo, and radiation has to be targeted. There is no further treatment in that instance, which explains why they aren't conducting any further treatments.
I know that this sub has taken a long leap off the slippery slope that is Democratic politics in the last year, but this is just completely ignorant of how cancer works.