/r/politics is low-hanging fruit tbh, but couldn't help myself. With commie mommy releasing her green manifesto so recently, the DDF now has actual ammunition to fling against her, and the shitshow is beautiful.
Bonus: With the post being so new, there's potential for even more slapfights. Keep your eyes peeled, because commie mommy is the best thing to have happened to dramacoin since Trump. Drama is always best when both sides are retarded.
oh bless your heart. hol up while i drop this knowledge
I have never seen a more over the top and unsubtle example of political astroturfing than what happened to /r/politics.
Unfortunately for rational and balanced discourse, /r/politics has been taken over by a Super PAC and is now complete and total pro-Hillary propaganda to an absurd degree
, a user did an analysis of the first 15 pages of /r/politics (375 posts) and found 87% of them were anti-Trump and ZERO were pro-Trump or anti-Hillary.
This shows the most downvoted posts on Reddit. /r/politics dominates, and downvotes everything that goes against the pro-Hillary/anti-Trump narrative. Everything. It is the most downvoted new section by a country mile. It's absolutely shock full of new accounts doing this and there is no way that this is organic, especially when the Hillary Clinton sub is a ghost town. Anyone saying anything positive about 3rd party candidates is quickly shut down.
For the unaware that sub has become a part of the Correct the Record Super PAC that aims to control the narrative in specific social media channels in order to convince people to vote Hillary. In fact they're very open about targeting Reddit:
more than tripling of its digital operation to engage in online messaging both for Secretary Clinton and to push back against attackers on social media platforms like Reddit
At this point it's not even remotely subtle, they replaced their entire modding team within the last year, including adding /r/EnoughTrumpSpam mods. Take a look at the post history of the mods of /r/politics like Qu1nlan to realize just how openly biased they are, they post anti-Trump garbage on /r/EnoughTrumpSpam.
The mods actively censor and delete pro-Trump posts, and they ban you if you mention Correct the Record. In fact they will straight up delete a thread with nearly 8k upvotes and 7k comments simply because the people in it are calling them out on their censorship.
This isn't even anything rare, go to /r/undelete and you will find hundreds of censored /r/politics threads in the last month alone or the long stream of people complaining in /r/subredditcancer about their comments and submissions being deleted
CTR is very well funded and organized, last quarter they spend $6 million in just 3 months. We don't know yet what they spent this quarter but once it's announced expect it to run into tens of millions. Their strategy on Reddit seems to have been to first use /r/EnoughTrumpSpam, a subreddit which suddenly saw virtually all of its subscribers join in two days,
incidently at exactly the same time that CTR announced their increase in funding! Then after Bernie endorsed Hillary, they saw an opportunity to apply their forum sliding tactics to /r/politics and dominate the discourse there.
They now even have HillaryClinton.com links as their #1 thread and shower it thousands of upvotes, while links from other candidates sites are instantly removed. But then again they also don't even allow Wikileaks and delete anything that goes against the narrative. Which at this point they don't need to do anymore as anything that goes against the pro-Hillary or anti-Trump narrative is instantly brigaded by the flurry of new accounts that camp on /r/new.
Their expenses are actually public record, you can see thousands of disbursements:
Why do the admins allow the biggest political subreddit that is meant to be a place of discussion and intellectual diversity to devolve into a propaganda piece for one candidate? Well even Alexis Ohanian, the executive chairman of Reddit denounced Trump openly in a letter.
The sad thing about all of this is that it's killing the sub. It had less pageviews and active users in October than the Trump subreddit. This is a horrible state of affairs for political discussion on Reddit when we need open conversation more than ever.
On a related note, would you like to know more about how estrogenic chemicals in the water supply are turning frogs gay?
I mean it's not like they can't just rebrand, and create or buy new accounts to shill with. Seriously fam, did you not prepare for the cyberpunk future where mercenary PR firms are going to reinvent themselves like Blackwater every time they appear in the public eye.
Yes 4 years ago reddit was the 20th best site now its number 4 or 5 but the ones above us are like... google, facebook, youtube and twitter in that order iirc. So basically this is normieville.
people are in there arguing that "unwilling to work" isnt in the bill verbatim, so that means it doesnt exist. Except that the FAQ that SHE POSTED explains that it infact it does. The levels of COPE in there are off the charts.
I can honestly hardly believe it. All either party has to do at this point to come out on top is not act literally retarded, but neither can pull it off.
Lol like DDF ever gave a shit about policy. Both of them are meme politicians who are completly out of their element and talk out their ass. She is the perfect yin to daddy's yang
I am all alone (poor me) in the White House waiting for the Democrats to come back and make a deal on desperately needed Border Security. At some point the Democrats not wanting to make a deal will cost our Country more money than the Border Wall we are all talking about. Crazy!
Neither do I but you gotta know a bit about your drama magnets.
People like her because she's hot by politician standards and she ticks a bunch of oppression boxes so they get to be good people for praising her. She sort of mimics first-election Obama's "hip young rebel underdog" image. I think her position is relatively hard left?
People dislike her for a buncha reasons but right now it's because she accidentally published her high school "how to save the world" project as a policy proposal.
no she wouldn't, you burgers need to stop with this 'all US progressives would be center in Europe' meme because that's not true, she is a kook and her proposals would be recognized as such in here
You're retarded. I've seen Americanoids unironically call the EU/Merkel/Sweden/Norway/UK "socialist" and/or "communist".
The most left-leaning shit they have is Bernard and Ocasio, which are at best demsucc. For so many burgers the faintest sign of a social security net automatically registers as USSR.
If they would've been extreme left, like anarchists, anarcho-commies or left-libertarians, they would've been championing the destruction of the state and by extension the eradication of the political and capitalist class.
I mean, for fuck's sake, from many points of view Merkel, FUCKING MERKEL of the centre-right Christian Democratic Union, is more leftist than AOC.
take your daily dose of soy and chill the fuck down
Merkel is from many points of view more leftist than AOC
HOW, show me one point of view that suggests that
what she is proposing is not just somewhat larger marginal tax rate for wealthy or merely expanding current welfare system, she is basically proposing replacing existing industrial infrastructure and using the central bank to just print money for it, along with banning nuclear and having universal welfare system for people who don't work, ensuring quality living
there is not one european country whose leadership is proposing this, left or right
just because republicans don't waste an opportunity to call dems communists doesn't mean AOC and her proposals are way beyond being social dwmocrat
Just a year ago, Merkel was claiming that all nuclear power plants in Germany should be closed within 6 years. Merkel also wanted workers of all big companies to get half of all the seats, the owners getting the other half. Social welfare for poor citizens for unlimited time. Government to pay for houses, health insurance and for a 5+ family 1.5k euro for their expenses. No upper limit to the number of refugees from Syria. Green energy subsidized by the gov. Germany to be carbon neutral by 2050. Free Uni. Health insurance for everyone, poors get it free.
The woman who has successfully welcomed hundreds of thousands of refugees and has implemented the kind of social security net that American commies barely dream of and you come here claiming that AOC is more leftward just because she riled up some retards with a list of high-aiming objectives in the hopes of at least achieving half of that.
Yeah right, bitch. If anyone like Merkel would surface in American politics, she'd be straight-up branded either the devil or the female version of Stalin.
Her plan is literally "ban all airplanes and calls" and "rebuild literally every single building in the country in 10 years to be environmentally friendly."
New US congresswomen and DSA succ who is either literally Stalin or the person who is single handedly going to stop climate change. In reality she's just a moderately stupid social democrat.
She wants to shrink the government, by making it larger.
"Let's replace unemployment offices, with employment offices"
"Let's bring all the troops home"
"Let's get rid of all environmentally unfriendly modes of transportation and fuel"
This would put millions out of work immediately.
Like, where are all these troops going to work if she wants the government to be a "last resort" employer? You can't force private businesses to hire the people you want, because unlike the government, they don't give veterans preference for these jobs.
So, this would effectively create massive unemployment, but we would still have the money to rebuild every building in America by 2030 because a British thinktank said we could.
She's a young Dem who promises she will give everyone a unicorn and have everyone in America living in a house with a white picket fence for not working while saving the world from climate change. That answers both your questions.
She's the left wing version of trump. A person stupid enough to make your average 90 IQ redditor finally feel represented in a government usually filled with at least somewhat capable or realistic thinkers.
Train from New York to London? Oh just take the train from New York to San Francisco 4 days, then train to Vladivostok another 2 days, then train to Moscow only 6 days, then Moscow to London just two more days.
How does a train get from San Francisco to Vladivostok in just two days? That looks crazy far. So I guess there's trains that go over the Bering Straight btw? And how do you know so much about train schedules?
Just let them live their pathetic life and die a miserable person. Meanwhile the rest of civilized society will be pushing forward with progressive environmental policies, universal basic income, and subsidized education programs. You ever watch superhero movies? They save the planet, help the needy, and make sure children are empowered learners. That make progressives superheros.
In those same movies, you know who wants inequality, an inhabitable polluted planet, and an enfeebled populace? The Republican Villains.
OK but how does anyone come to the conclusion that these movies depict liberals as the good guys? Tony Stark is basically Ron Paul with an engineering background. Captain America is a boomer veteran. Thor is a monarchist. Black Panther is a racist monarchist. The only major character with a recognizably liberal worldview is Thanos, with his concern over resource depletion caused by overpopulation.
Well yeah their country is tiny they aren't going to let in millions. The point of the movie was that T'Challa learned that being a hermit kingdom when you have the capability of helping improve the world is bad.
Tony Stark didn't even put a parachute in the flying armor he gave to a black guy. Tell me that's not a racial issue. It's not like he didn't think about parachutes, either; Spiderman (white) got a parachute, and he can't even fly.
Even worse lol, Boomers were the Millenials of their triad, the GI generation were the ones tutting at their drugged out children whining about having to do a tour in Vietnam while they fondly remembered blowing Japs out of the sky.
In comics Captain America is an anti-Nixonian/anti-warhawk vet in the comics. (A lot of comic writers in that era loved to self-insert.) He was very much anti-segregation and is generally anti-war unless its against enemies that can't be fought any other way (like the Third Reich was.)
Oh absolutely. I had someone try to argue with me about how deep marvel movies were and how amazing the anti-war message in the newest star wars movie is, all because I dared to imply that being the most popular movie doesn't make you right.
What's incredibly puzzling to me is that they are sucking AOC right now, while hailing Bezos, the richest guy in the world, the owner of that company that has squashed multiple attempts at unionizing, because he has an anti-Trump hot take right now.
RIGHT. I HAD TO MUTE HER VOICE AND READ THE SUBTITLES.
Her voice... was.... JUST.... ehhhh I don't have a problem with what she's saying (basically it's old hat meh whatever) but like the pitch tone and frequency of her voice hit me in a place i'd never been hit before
Unfortunately, majority of the posts in controversial are just talking about her lack of sound economic policy, which is boring and already extensively discussed the in other thread, so let's change the channel to the main circlejerk.
It's amazing that depending on how you sort that thread, it's either full of daddy supporters mocking her GND even though I bet they didn't read it (it's terrible, but they have 0 points except "lmao AOC is stupid), or it's full of people with their tongues deep in her asshole who think she's the second coming of Christ Prophet Muhammad.
8k comments are a lot but I doubt there are many that are not completely retarded.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Oh you formulated an opinion based on your own personal experiences and situation? ANECDOTE! ANECDOTE! YOU ARE COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIED IN HOLDING THOSE BELIEFS! Who cares if basketball americans have broken into your house in the last 5 years! You don't need a gun! ANECDOTE!
This dumb bitch is unironically the best thing to happen for drama. She has and will continue to do and say the absolute stupidest shit imaginable for as long as she is in office. She is the far left's answer to Trump and it's glorious.
You want to see horseshoe theory in action? Well here it is. She's exactly like Trump just from a far left perspective. No subtlety just push an impossible agenda as much as possible every time she opens her mouth with no regard for how the real world works. People deep in the kool-aid on the far left will eat that shit up just like people deep on the far right eat up Trump's rhetoric.
This is now American politics. Do and say the dumbest shit you can because no one has been listening to moderates for years.
You can’t just say “it’s clearly going to destroy the economy”, that’s just as unnuanced and intellectually lazy as otherwise.
Rebuild. EVERY. Building.
Jesus if that didn't scream to you this is beyond implausible, nothing will for this fentanyl American. I want things to change and even im not this fucking retarded to believe that this is a plan that wasn't made during a weekend of binging everclear and huffing spraypaint.
These idiots still believe Youtube algorithm is rigged. This is what the recommendations look like in an incognito window without logging in. My personal recommendations are full of tech videos and music.
Just because you're a faggot who constantly watches divisive political videos doesn't mean algorithm is rigged, it means right wingers are better at the clickbait youtube grift.
Since Bush it's a war between left and right to whom can elect the biggest moron and I can't get enough of it. Feed me with drama Ameritards. Make her Prezprez.
192 comments
1 kesselarc 2019-02-08
/r/politics is low-hanging fruit tbh, but couldn't help myself. With commie mommy releasing her green manifesto so recently, the DDF now has actual ammunition to fling against her, and the shitshow is beautiful.
Bonus: With the post being so new, there's potential for even more slapfights. Keep your eyes peeled, because commie mommy is the best thing to have happened to dramacoin since Trump. Drama is always best when both sides are retarded.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-02-08
Basically you're saying that Commie Mami brings the drammy
1 tHeSiD 2019-02-08
4 hours ago, 36k total score.. wtf how/!??
1 UhmOkSweaty 2019-02-08
Unironically a Shareblue sub fam
1 nice_thoughts 2019-02-08
sorry sweaty, shareblue was for centrists only
1 UhmOkSweaty 2019-02-08
oh bless your heart. hol up while i drop this knowledge
I have never seen a more over the top and unsubtle example of political astroturfing than what happened to /r/politics.
Unfortunately for rational and balanced discourse, /r/politics has been taken over by a Super PAC and is now complete and total pro-Hillary propaganda to an absurd degree , a user did an analysis of the first 15 pages of /r/politics (375 posts) and found 87% of them were anti-Trump and ZERO were pro-Trump or anti-Hillary.
Take a look at the following on any day:
http://www.notreddit.top/
This shows the most downvoted posts on Reddit. /r/politics dominates, and downvotes everything that goes against the pro-Hillary/anti-Trump narrative. Everything. It is the most downvoted new section by a country mile. It's absolutely shock full of new accounts doing this and there is no way that this is organic, especially when the Hillary Clinton sub is a ghost town. Anyone saying anything positive about 3rd party candidates is quickly shut down.
For the unaware that sub has become a part of the Correct the Record Super PAC that aims to control the narrative in specific social media channels in order to convince people to vote Hillary. In fact they're very open about targeting Reddit:
http://correctrecord.org/barrier-breakers-2016-a-project-of-correct-the-record/
At this point it's not even remotely subtle, they replaced their entire modding team within the last year, including adding /r/EnoughTrumpSpam mods. Take a look at the post history of the mods of /r/politics like Qu1nlan to realize just how openly biased they are, they post anti-Trump garbage on /r/EnoughTrumpSpam.
The mods actively censor and delete pro-Trump posts, and they ban you if you mention Correct the Record. In fact they will straight up delete a thread with nearly 8k upvotes and 7k comments simply because the people in it are calling them out on their censorship.
This isn't even anything rare, go to /r/undelete and you will find hundreds of censored /r/politics threads in the last month alone or the long stream of people complaining in /r/subredditcancer about their comments and submissions being deleted
CTR is very well funded and organized, last quarter they spend $6 million in just 3 months. We don't know yet what they spent this quarter but once it's announced expect it to run into tens of millions. Their strategy on Reddit seems to have been to first use /r/EnoughTrumpSpam, a subreddit which suddenly saw virtually all of its subscribers join in two days,
incidently at exactly the same time that CTR announced their increase in funding! Then after Bernie endorsed Hillary, they saw an opportunity to apply their forum sliding tactics to /r/politics and dominate the discourse there.
They now even have HillaryClinton.com links as their #1 thread and shower it thousands of upvotes, while links from other candidates sites are instantly removed. But then again they also don't even allow Wikileaks and delete anything that goes against the narrative. Which at this point they don't need to do anymore as anything that goes against the pro-Hillary or anti-Trump narrative is instantly brigaded by the flurry of new accounts that camp on /r/new.
Their expenses are actually public record, you can see thousands of disbursements:
https://beta.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?two_year_transaction_period=2016&disbursement_purpose_categories=other&committee_id=C00578997&min_date=01%2F01%2F2015&max_date=10%2F05%2F2016
The shills they hire are all part of public record and can be looked up by anyone:
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/318/201607159020655318/201607159020655318.pdf#navpanes=
Why do the admins allow the biggest political subreddit that is meant to be a place of discussion and intellectual diversity to devolve into a propaganda piece for one candidate? Well even Alexis Ohanian, the executive chairman of Reddit denounced Trump openly in a letter.
The sad thing about all of this is that it's killing the sub. It had less pageviews and active users in October than the Trump subreddit. This is a horrible state of affairs for political discussion on Reddit when we need open conversation more than ever.
On a related note, would you like to know more about how estrogenic chemicals in the water supply are turning frogs gay?
1 LongPostBot 2019-02-08
That degree finally paying off
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 LightUmbra 2019-02-08
HAHAHAHAHA YOU WROTE THIS SHIT
1 UhmOkSweaty 2019-02-08
1 LightUmbra 2019-02-08
HAHAHAHAHA YOU WROTE THE FIRST LINE
1 UhmOkSweaty 2019-02-08
and the last one :^)
1 LightUmbra 2019-02-08
Yeah I didn't read it.
1 UhmOkSweaty 2019-02-08
who would tbh
1 regeya 2019-02-08
I ain't reading all that vomit
1 wwaalleess 2019-02-08
I'm not going to read but I assume you just owned some libtards 😎😎😎
1 UhmOkSweaty 2019-02-08
with FACTS and LOGIC 💯 💯 💯
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-08
They banned shareblue lol
1 cutman 2019-02-08
I mean it's not like they can't just rebrand, and create or buy new accounts to shill with. Seriously fam, did you not prepare for the cyberpunk future where mercenary PR firms are going to reinvent themselves like Blackwater every time they appear in the public eye.
1 StopEditingTitles 2019-02-08
Reddit just keeps getting larger as the normans pour in from deadbook
1 MyAliasWasTaken 2019-02-08
Even the boomers are starting to learn about it.
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-02-08
When was the Great Norman Invasion, specifically? I think it started in like ‘14.
1 StopEditingTitles 2019-02-08
Yes 4 years ago reddit was the 20th best site now its number 4 or 5 but the ones above us are like... google, facebook, youtube and twitter in that order iirc. So basically this is normieville.
1 tathrowaway666 2019-02-08
Wtf Twitter?! Don’t they have a relatively tiny amount of active users compared to pretty much all other major social media?
1 Corporal-Hicks 2019-02-08
people are in there arguing that "unwilling to work" isnt in the bill verbatim, so that means it doesnt exist. Except that the FAQ that SHE POSTED explains that it infact it does. The levels of COPE in there are off the charts.
1 MtheDowner 2019-02-08
You can always tell when a Redditor is on the ropes because they start getting really concerned about semantics and technicalities.
1 Phantom_Engineer 2019-02-08
I can honestly hardly believe it. All either party has to do at this point to come out on top is not act literally retarded, but neither can pull it off.
Coffeeman 2020!
1 tyuijvhvhcfcjf 2019-02-08
At this point, I'm hoping that an NFL mascot or a food logo is allowed to run.
1 Imgur_Lurker 2019-02-08
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/08/04/west-brom-unveil-boiler-man-greatest-ever-mascot/
1 Phantom_Engineer 2019-02-08
He's got my vote. Let's get a write-in campaign going.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-02-08
Lol like DDF ever gave a shit about policy. Both of them are meme politicians who are completly out of their element and talk out their ass. She is the perfect yin to daddy's yang
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-08
It's almost artistic. A brown millennial woman with retarded leftie policies to take on Daddy on twatter.
1 SnapshillBot 2019-02-08
I am all alone (poor me) in the White House waiting for the Democrats to come back and make a deal on desperately needed Border Security. At some point the Democrats not wanting to make a deal will cost our Country more money than the Border Wall we are all talking about. Crazy!
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 princess_y_fronts 2019-02-08
Is AOC the gamergate candidate that games journalists and famous UN speakers have warned us about ?
1 notcyberpope 2019-02-08
Cant wait for her to run for president, lose the dem nomination and start a new party with an alligator for a mascot.
1 employee10038080 2019-02-08
croc
1 heavenlytoaster 2019-02-08
Made of poo.
A croc of shit if you will.
1 Diddu_Sumfin 2019-02-08
booooooo
1 AlexSoul 2019-02-08
🌊
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-02-08
I think she's more the GamerGhazi candidate than the GamerGate candidate. She's too old for GGers nowadays.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-08
I dont live in America, who is this person, and why do people like or dislike her?
1 MtheDowner 2019-02-08
Neither do I but you gotta know a bit about your drama magnets.
People like her because she's hot by politician standards and she ticks a bunch of oppression boxes so they get to be good people for praising her. She sort of mimics first-election Obama's "hip young rebel underdog" image. I think her position is relatively hard left?
People dislike her for a buncha reasons but right now it's because she accidentally published her high school "how to save the world" project as a policy proposal.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-08
American hard left or an actual hard leftist?
1 rabiiiii 2019-02-08
American hard left. She'd probably be considered mildly left of center by European standards.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-08
Free market with taxes that fund a social safety net?
Fuckin commies.
1 SlowFatHusky 2019-02-08
She's an admitted socialist, but she doesn't know or care where the money comes from.
1 ceproastaimata 2019-02-08
She's a succdem at best.
1 SlowFatHusky 2019-02-08
You act like there's a difference here. She's be bought and paid for in a few years.
1 ceproastaimata 2019-02-08
But hey, at least I get some pretty juicy drama meanwhile.
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-02-08
no she wouldn't, you burgers need to stop with this 'all US progressives would be center in Europe' meme because that's not true, she is a kook and her proposals would be recognized as such in here
1 ceproastaimata 2019-02-08
You're retarded. I've seen Americanoids unironically call the EU/Merkel/Sweden/Norway/UK "socialist" and/or "communist".
The most left-leaning shit they have is Bernard and Ocasio, which are at best demsucc. For so many burgers the faintest sign of a social security net automatically registers as USSR.
If they would've been extreme left, like anarchists, anarcho-commies or left-libertarians, they would've been championing the destruction of the state and by extension the eradication of the political and capitalist class.
I mean, for fuck's sake, from many points of view Merkel, FUCKING MERKEL of the centre-right Christian Democratic Union, is more leftist than AOC.
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-02-08
take your daily dose of soy and chill the fuck down
HOW, show me one point of view that suggests that
what she is proposing is not just somewhat larger marginal tax rate for wealthy or merely expanding current welfare system, she is basically proposing replacing existing industrial infrastructure and using the central bank to just print money for it, along with banning nuclear and having universal welfare system for people who don't work, ensuring quality living
there is not one european country whose leadership is proposing this, left or right
just because republicans don't waste an opportunity to call dems communists doesn't mean AOC and her proposals are way beyond being social dwmocrat
1 tathrowaway666 2019-02-08
Don’t forget free housing and medical care so literally all the lazy neets would have to pay for would be food and steam subscriptions
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-02-08
there is just too much going on i can't keep up
1 IllustriousQuail 2019-02-08
Wrong.
1 tathrowaway666 2019-02-08
Even better, that frees up some money for them to spend on sex robots and waifu pillows. Is commie mommy truly the queen of gamergate?
1 ceproastaimata 2019-02-08
Just a year ago, Merkel was claiming that all nuclear power plants in Germany should be closed within 6 years. Merkel also wanted workers of all big companies to get half of all the seats, the owners getting the other half. Social welfare for poor citizens for unlimited time. Government to pay for houses, health insurance and for a 5+ family 1.5k euro for their expenses. No upper limit to the number of refugees from Syria. Green energy subsidized by the gov. Germany to be carbon neutral by 2050. Free Uni. Health insurance for everyone, poors get it free.
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-02-08
none of these things are more radical than what AOC is already proposing
1 ceproastaimata 2019-02-08
The woman who has successfully welcomed hundreds of thousands of refugees and has implemented the kind of social security net that American commies barely dream of and you come here claiming that AOC is more leftward just because she riled up some retards with a list of high-aiming objectives in the hopes of at least achieving half of that.
Yeah right, bitch. If anyone like Merkel would surface in American politics, she'd be straight-up branded either the devil or the female version of Stalin.
1 Intensely_Accurate 2019-02-08
Yes because banning all cars and airplanes is a centrist viewpoint.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-02-08
ACKSHUALLY commie mommy would be considered fascist in EU because EU is that enlightened of a place.
1 i_watch_forsen_LULW 2019-02-08
lmfao nope, maybe in Sweden but rest of EU would consider her insane
1 MehmedIIDidNoWrong 2019-02-08
American hard retard.
Her plan is literally "ban all airplanes and calls" and "rebuild literally every single building in the country in 10 years to be environmentally friendly."
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-08
1 CordialCalamity 2019-02-08
New US congresswomen and DSA succ who is either literally Stalin or the person who is single handedly going to stop climate change. In reality she's just a moderately stupid social democrat.
1 Baconlightning 2019-02-08
That’s an understatement, she’s basically Bernie on roids
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-08
"Dsa succ" Thanks for explaining it for overseas people.
1 Aphil10 2019-02-08
Right, EU social democrats dont write shit like that
1 MyAliasWasTaken 2019-02-08
She’s a socialist who thinks we should just print more money to fund government projects.
1 leparsdon 2019-02-08
She wants to shrink the government, by making it larger.
"Let's replace unemployment offices, with employment offices" "Let's bring all the troops home" "Let's get rid of all environmentally unfriendly modes of transportation and fuel"
This would put millions out of work immediately.
Like, where are all these troops going to work if she wants the government to be a "last resort" employer? You can't force private businesses to hire the people you want, because unlike the government, they don't give veterans preference for these jobs.
So, this would effectively create massive unemployment, but we would still have the money to rebuild every building in America by 2030 because a British thinktank said we could.
Jesus...
1 martini29 2019-02-08
Real talk the environment is more important than any amount of human lives
1 UmmahSultan 2019-02-08
Funny how it's never important enough to build nuclear power plants or hydroelectric plants.
1 martini29 2019-02-08
You're barking up the wrong tree here m8
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-02-08
Millions out of work is like the last thing you should worry about with those policiesm
1 redditthrowaway1294 2019-02-08
She's a young Dem who promises she will give everyone a unicorn and have everyone in America living in a house with a white picket fence for not working while saving the world from climate change. That answers both your questions.
1 CordialCalamity 2019-02-08
/r/politics-cels don't deserve to fellate commie mommy
1 Chapocel 2019-02-08
r/politics doesnt wanna hear that bro... the regulars there are crazy and pieces of shit
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-02-08
She's the left wing version of trump. A person stupid enough to make your average 90 IQ redditor finally feel represented in a government usually filled with at least somewhat capable or realistic thinkers.
1 BenaGD 2019-02-08
Im posting this comment over there
1 pepperouchau 2019-02-08
So brave
1 leparsdon 2019-02-08
This is some nice copypasta right here. I am stealing it. Thank you
1 VapeOnYourNape 2019-02-08
lolol
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-02-08
It's an exclusive-or statement
1 mrv3 2019-02-08
She wants to rebuild every building in America in 10 years.
1 flotus_scrotus 2019-02-08
It’s literally in her Retard Manifesto.
1 mrv3 2019-02-08
Want to fly from New York to London? 7 hours
Train from New York to London? Oh just take the train from New York to San Francisco 4 days, then train to Vladivostok another 2 days, then train to Moscow only 6 days, then Moscow to London just two more days.
2 weeks on a train how awesome.
1 Detective_Fallacy 2019-02-08
Ngl, the thought of all those suits spending the majority of their lives on a train in Siberia makes me wish this comes true.
1 mrv3 2019-02-08
Oh don't worry they'd still fly first just the plebs would have to spend 13 days on a train.
I can't wait for someone to come by and go
"But commie mommie will make the trains go fast"
1 CommaCommy 2019-02-08
Time for space daddy to trade up
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-08
Commie mommy will give us a hyperloop
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-08
Only grandpa Mussolini can make the trains run on time and he did it despite being a living cartoon character.
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-02-08
more like the rest of their lives if you gas what I'm saying
1 dramaac 2019-02-08
How does a train get from San Francisco to Vladivostok in just two days? That looks crazy far. So I guess there's trains that go over the Bering Straight btw? And how do you know so much about train schedules?
1 mrv3 2019-02-08
Currently no trains however China is discussing it. 2 days by speed trail isn't unreasonable especially if you had few stops
1 pepperouchau 2019-02-08
What if we do more trains but have them run on [beautiful clean] coal again?
Centrism wins again 😎
1 leparsdon 2019-02-08
But she's not old! She's not from old money! She's from the Bronx!
1 MG87 2019-02-08
Literally a South Park episode, whose message is "It's more fun to get gang banged by 4 dudes than it is to take a plane somewhere"
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-02-08
Germany got pretty close to that after WWII. You just need to decimate every major city first.
1 mrv3 2019-02-08
And not pay people and have America pay tons of money.
1 betazoom78 2019-02-08
That's a funny way of saying the RAF and Arthur "Send the Huns to the sun" Harris.
1 cuteman 2019-02-08
While dressed like Elizabeth Banks in hunger games. Unironically
1 MajorGiraffe1 2019-02-08
BuzzFeed title for a BuzzFeed politician
1 FullPoet 2019-02-08
BuzzFeed Title For A BuzzFeed Politician.
1 CJGitzfiggle 2019-02-08
what even is r/politics?
1 kesselarc 2019-02-08
I refuse to believe that isn't trolling. There is no way anyone believes they're actually living in one of their capeshit movies.
Even the most retarded of capeshitposters acknowledge it's fantasy with no basis in reality. That's part of the appeal, after all
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2019-02-08
Nah go over to a comic book subreddit most of them think its deep commentary about modern politics.
1 flotus_scrotus 2019-02-08
They’re right though because comic books are written and drawn by the kind of drooling regards who post in r/politics
1 BardTheKappa 2019-02-08
The X-men are literal social justice warrior my dudes it’s not new
1 Imgur_Lurker 2019-02-08
There's a difference between killing Nazi's with a fucking Paperclip for building a GenocideRobot and watching Darkseid get #MeToo'd
1 UmmahSultan 2019-02-08
OK but how does anyone come to the conclusion that these movies depict liberals as the good guys? Tony Stark is basically Ron Paul with an engineering background. Captain America is a boomer veteran. Thor is a monarchist. Black Panther is a racist monarchist. The only major character with a recognizably liberal worldview is Thanos, with his concern over resource depletion caused by overpopulation.
1 heavenlytoaster 2019-02-08
Plus perfect intersectionality.
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-08
The entire point of black panther was that he wasn't racist unlike his parents and killmonger
1 Ranilen 2019-02-08
Still a monarchist.
👨🎤🇺🇲 🦅
1 bearshark713 2019-02-08
Anyone who supports an ethno state protected by an impassable wall with zero immigration seems a teensy bit on the right of the spectrum in my book.
1 ProdigyRunt 2019-02-08
T'Challa changed his mind after browsing /r/politics tho
1 bearshark713 2019-02-08
I thought he just started up an "outreach center" in Compton.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-08
Well yeah their country is tiny they aren't going to let in millions. The point of the movie was that T'Challa learned that being a hermit kingdom when you have the capability of helping improve the world is bad.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-02-08
More like not tying up loose ends after executing dissidents is bad. Every problem in the movie was caused by T'challa's dad being stupid.
1 MG87 2019-02-08
You didn't see the movie
1 bearshark713 2019-02-08
I fucking wish, boi
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-02-08
Thanos was a space tankie, he forcefully redistributed resources evenly through indiscriminate annihilation.
1 Firnin 2019-02-08
is thanos a posadist?
1 Agenda_Poster 2019-02-08
Hes an accelerationist
1 wwyzzerdd 2019-02-08
huehuehue.jpg
1 MG87 2019-02-08
Tony Stark isn't a racist fuckwit like Ron Paul Black Panther isn't racist tho
1 UmmahSultan 2019-02-08
Tony Stark didn't even put a parachute in the flying armor he gave to a black guy. Tell me that's not a racial issue. It's not like he didn't think about parachutes, either; Spiderman (white) got a parachute, and he can't even fly.
1 regeya 2019-02-08
No Boomers fought in WW2, genius. Boomers were the result of pent up sexual tension due to WW2.
1 UmmahSultan 2019-02-08
My mistake. Captain America is a member of The Greatest Generation, a group famously known for its wokeness.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-08
Even worse lol, Boomers were the Millenials of their triad, the GI generation were the ones tutting at their drugged out children whining about having to do a tour in Vietnam while they fondly remembered blowing Japs out of the sky.
1 Sarge_Ward 2019-02-08
In comics Captain America is an anti-Nixonian/anti-warhawk vet in the comics. (A lot of comic writers in that era loved to self-insert.) He was very much anti-segregation and is generally anti-war unless its against enemies that can't be fought any other way (like the Third Reich was.)
1 Joeybada33 2019-02-08
Thanos was just fighting the real enemy, climate change. The avengers were the bad guys in the movie.
1 CLX053 2019-02-08
Oh absolutely. I had someone try to argue with me about how deep marvel movies were and how amazing the anti-war message in the newest star wars movie is, all because I dared to imply that being the most popular movie doesn't make you right.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-08
Don't you know that CGI capeshit is peak filmmaking
1 RecallRethuglicans 2019-02-08
The most realistic portrayal of Republicans was Captain Planet villains
1 Sarge_Ward 2019-02-08
This but entirety unironically
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-08
But in my capeshit Superman would be a Democrat! Checkmate cons!
1 CrosbyStillzandSwag 2019-02-08
Ahhh part of the appeal of AOC is to boomers trying being hip with the kidz. Makes sense.
1 leparsdon 2019-02-08
It ain't getting back on track with that bill
1 Channing_Tate_Yumm 2019-02-08
Probably suburban middle-upper class teenagers who don't know how the world works other than "daddy will take care of everything."
1 JCDchameleon 2019-02-08
An offering for snappy
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-02-08
P L E A S E
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-02-08
What's incredibly puzzling to me is that they are sucking AOC right now, while hailing Bezos, the richest guy in the world, the owner of that company that has squashed multiple attempts at unionizing, because he has an anti-Trump hot take right now.
1 CJGitzfiggle 2019-02-08
they aren't the smartest bunch.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-08
They hated Bezos literally only a few weeks ago.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-02-08
Im surprised they didnt throw in a harry potter reference
1 tyuijvhvhcfcjf 2019-02-08
It's called Potterverse Political Theory.
You do not merely reference it, you live it.
You fucking moron. You absolute trumptard muggle.
1 betazoom78 2019-02-08
Yeah remember how progressive Batman was with his progressive prison reforms?
1 GandalftheChromatic 2019-02-08
It's all so tiresome
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-02-08
This is amazing.
1 tHeSiD 2019-02-08
Woo those SPS brigades are top notch!
1 Cringeutopia 2019-02-08
First time hearing her speak. She sounds uh...how to put this very Reddit.
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-02-08
There is a reason you only ever see pictures of her. She sounds like some basic bitch mayo girl, which she basically is.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-08
But muh admixture.
1 Kelloggs801 2019-02-08
RIGHT. I HAD TO MUTE HER VOICE AND READ THE SUBTITLES.
Her voice... was.... JUST.... ehhhh I don't have a problem with what she's saying (basically it's old hat meh whatever) but like the pitch tone and frequency of her voice hit me in a place i'd never been hit before
1 Cringeutopia 2019-02-08
Even the way she began her speech was very reminiscent of "So...umm...Let's unpack this".
1 Kelloggs801 2019-02-08
just fucking grating god dam- that was the first time i've ever heard her. i'm glad i managed to limit it
1 POST_BUSSY 2019-02-08
This implies that commie mami has a big ol' chorizo.
I'm on board with that.
1 kesselarc 2019-02-08
Since I know most of you are too lazy to sift through the /r/politics cesspool, here are the highlights and hottest takes that haven't been posted yet
Unfortunately, majority of the posts in controversial are just talking about her lack of sound economic policy, which is boring and already extensively discussed the in other thread, so let's change the channel to the main circlejerk.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-08
It's amazing that depending on how you sort that thread, it's either full of daddy supporters mocking her GND even though I bet they didn't read it (it's terrible, but they have 0 points except "lmao AOC is stupid), or it's full of people with their tongues deep in her asshole who think she's the second coming of
ChristProphet Muhammad.8k comments are a lot but I doubt there are many that are not completely retarded.
1 Mitch285t 2019-02-08
Holy fuck those ppl comparing her to MLK is nauseating
1 MehmedIIDidNoWrong 2019-02-08
I think the most smooth brained infuriating take ever on reddit are people replying with logical fallacy callouts and nothing else.
"This is fucking dumb"
"Ad hominem. REFUTED!"
It fucking sets me off for some reason.
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-02-08
Oh, I see you’ve made an assertion that was mostly informal and expressing an opinion that I disagree with. I guess I’ll just have to reply with...
SOURCE!?!?!?
1 nice_thoughts 2019-02-08
1 Mother_Jabubu 2019-02-08
Source!?
1 Diddu_Sumfin 2019-02-08
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-02-08
Don't forget...
​
1 ceproastaimata 2019-02-08
This is fucking dumb
1 blazeca86 2019-02-08
Ad hominem. REFUTED!
1 blazeca86 2019-02-08
If you think that is bad, you should have seen what it was like ten years ago when /r/atheism was a default sub
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-08
never forget when reddits retardation seems overwhelming, that the default userbase is succinctly represented by faces of atheism
1 MuffDiversLocal69 2019-02-08
All those college degrees in that sub and not a one fucking math class attended.
1 vjaY619 2019-02-08
Sociology and gender studies are legit degrees you bigot! 😅
1 imajustgo 2019-02-08
Reminder that it's totally the Republicans that are obsessed with commie mommy.
1 BenaGD 2019-02-08
Are libs trying to overshadow that joke of a bill?
1 Metatron58 2019-02-08
This dumb bitch is unironically the best thing to happen for drama. She has and will continue to do and say the absolute stupidest shit imaginable for as long as she is in office. She is the far left's answer to Trump and it's glorious.
You want to see horseshoe theory in action? Well here it is. She's exactly like Trump just from a far left perspective. No subtlety just push an impossible agenda as much as possible every time she opens her mouth with no regard for how the real world works. People deep in the kool-aid on the far left will eat that shit up just like people deep on the far right eat up Trump's rhetoric.
This is now American politics. Do and say the dumbest shit you can because no one has been listening to moderates for years.
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-02-08
deep
1 Wtfct 2019-02-08
She's a populist for the left. I don't see why people like her so much when they accused the right of liking Trump for being the same type.
1 VapeOnYourNape 2019-02-08
policies dont matter, just if you are popular or not
1 triptodisneyland2017 2019-02-08
Go on TD and say she is the left version of trump and you will get downvoted. If you go on politics the same thing happens
1 Metatron58 2019-02-08
nah i'm good thanks.
1 kabutoredde 2019-02-08
If both sides disagree youre doing something right amirite
1 GhostOfNothing_ 2019-02-08
I couldn’t make it through 2 minutes of that video without my ears bleeding. Her voice is absolutely infuriating.
1 Channing_Tate_Yumm 2019-02-08
Rebuild. EVERY. Building. Jesus if that didn't scream to you this is beyond implausible, nothing will for this fentanyl American. I want things to change and even im not this fucking retarded to believe that this is a plan that wasn't made during a weekend of binging everclear and huffing spraypaint.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-08
These idiots still believe Youtube algorithm is rigged. This is what the recommendations look like in an incognito window without logging in. My personal recommendations are full of tech videos and music.
Just because you're a faggot who constantly watches divisive political videos doesn't mean algorithm is rigged, it means right wingers are better at the clickbait youtube grift.
1 windupcrow 2019-02-08
Ah just got home from a work, what a day, finally it's time to put my feet up and watch political videos on the youtube
1 rnjbond 2019-02-08
People who post on /r/politics work?
1 newcomer_ts 2019-02-08
~ Soviet Russia, Civilian Agitator Handbook - 1919
1 oralbesties 2019-02-08
Is this sub becoming circlejerk?
1 notcyberpope 2019-02-08
Commy mommy distribute milkers
1 sussoutthemoon 2019-02-08
/r/politics is full of Hillbots. Hillbots hate her.
1 FrankVillain 2019-02-08
Since Bush it's a war between left and right to whom can elect the biggest moron and I can't get enough of it. Feed me with drama Ameritards. Make her Prezprez.
1 PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2019-02-08
Hyperyikes
1 rnjbond 2019-02-08
Never mind