Hillary didnt collude to fuck over bernie he could never win so the established dems naturally fell in behind the non socialist jew who was going to win the nomination, Bernie didnt even expect to win he just wanted to drag hillary to the left which he did.
What’s to cope about a Republican led congress who ran a shotty investigation says they didn’t find direct communication after not interviewing everyone involved. So shocking.
I wasnt aware that many people truely expected direct collusion, i thought it was like the millions of clinton investigations in that you make up a reason for the investigation and then bust daddy on one of his countless illegal activities because he cant help himself.
gee its almost like hes super rich and his lawyers are able to shift anything that may be criminal into civil claims or dismiss them entirely, its not like there are only two billionaires in the history of america to ever actually go to jail because of this.
people can easily get away with criminal acts without conviction if you do it to poor people when you are super rich
This is true. A little later I am strolling down to the range and sighting in my new safari gun, then I'll practice on some poors I said could have an hour's head start. Teehee they only get five
i understand burgerstanis operate at maximum binary thinking but there is a difference between criminal acts you can easily get away with as a rich person like beating the shit out of your wife or money laundering and literally murdering people.
please point to me actual evidence apart from the mountains of allegations, lawsuits lost and won throughout decades because thats all fake news, i need a high def video of trump stabbing a homeless man minimum to accept hes slightly shady.
so you dont have the video of the murder? only these flimsy "decades of evidence from multiple sources" well this just sounds like conspiracy against daddy
Correct, none of that is criminal. I'm not saying he's a saint, but you're a fucking moron if you call someone a criminal without a specific crime in mind. So I'll get really loose this time.
Do you have any remotely plausible circumstantial evidence he has ever in his entire life committed a crime?
Just because there's not the most remote shred of evidence in existence on this earth able to be found in two years of this well funded investigation does not mean that orange man is not bad.
im not a "never trumper" in that i didnt bray on like an autist when he won the primaries, i voted against him, then voted for him in the general, i really dont follow politics religiously like reddit does, i probably get most of my political news from /r/drama lol. ill probably vote against trump in the primaries and for him in the general again next election unless the democrats run Jim Webb.
I know that feel bro, although I got called a commie for the first time recently so I guess that slightly balances out the 50 or so nAhTzEe's I've gotten over the years.
Well... Jews shouldn't have put up #RESIST and nonstop tranny poc rebel media while being so stupid that they think blacks, Mexicans and Muslims can tell the difference between Jews and white people, lol.
Forgotten rule number 1- mayocide includes hebrews.
There's a divide going the dem party between corporate dems and 'progressives'; Harris, Booker, etc are the donor class approved dems who are gonna say whatever it takes to get elected while Tulsi gabbard is more progressive but if you watch the news then you know she's the crazy radical candidate because she doesnt want the US to bomb 7 different countries at once
unironically what's the point of being the preeminent superpower, economic, diplomatic, and militarily if you can't use your status and power to further cement your hegemony.
It's like NASCAR. Nobody wants to admit that the actual racing is boring as shit, and the crashes are really what's fun.
When this thing first started two years ago I rember seeing Colbert interview Matt Taibbi (who is one of the few journalists out there who I still think has some integrity) and he said that he looked into it pretty thoroughly and he didn't think anything was there. This is exactly the outcome that he predicted. They shouldn't have put all their eggs in this basket. I hope they still try to impeach him anyway.
Is Trump dirty? Of course he is but what everyone wanted out of this was some smoking gun about "colluding with the Russians" that just doesn't exist. He didn't have to go begging the Russians for help, they were going to help him whether he wanted them to or not. It's their job to stir the shit but there is not going to be any hard evidence of collusion because collusion was unnecessary. Trump is just bumbling around like Mr. Bean and everyone is laughing at Americans because they look like dupes.
I dunno... He's pretty corrupt, and given the chance to get help corruptly is petty much right up his alley. It would be bad form of the RIS not to try, get an ok, and document it. Which, according to Jr himself (though he was fucking too stupid to see what was going on) the Trump Tower meeting was about.
Besides with all good clear as day violations of the FCPA and other statutes if he was a governor he'd be in county blues right now.
I think I said way back in 2016 when this first started, some of the people around Trump might be taken down, but Trump himself would be basically untouched. Prediction seems to be holding up so far.
It was always incredibly obvious, for better or worse, looking at his rhetoric and vocabulary that he clearly isn't a Machiavellian GRU agent being fed policy from a Putinist puppet master.
And releasing 2 different reports that will probably be in almost complete disagreement. The headline comes from what the Republicans on the committee are claiming. Although they do toss in some anonymous (where do we stand on these now? Good if they support the narrative, bad if they don't?) Dem sources who are in agreement
Yes the committee is "bipartisan" but each side releases their own report. It's not unhinged to point out that practically nothing in Congress is truly bipartisan right now
"Trump publicly urged the Russians to find Clinton's missing emails."
Of all the bizarre shit to come out of that election, the fact that lefties glommed onto this as some sort of home run is still the thing I can't wrap my head around.
I eagerly await the ironclad defense of "Look, it's not like Trump knew his campaign manager, associates, and son were all doing illegal shit! He's just so dumb they were all doing illegal things and he didn't realize it!"
Okay there was No Collusion. That means Daddy ran around obstructing justice over No Collusion and obstructing justice over No Collusion is a crime anyways so Uncle Mueller will still be really mad at Daddy. Whoops!
Going after the trade policy would have been harder imo
My company (canadian, oil/gas sector) gets a lot of hardware and equipment from the USA, and I can say that the units we import tend to be hard to source from elsewhere, which means the higher duties / customs from the Trump administration definitely bring money into America (by eating into our profit margins lol). That doesn't even touch on the middle east, since him going back and forth on the Iran trade sanctions threw all our ME clientele into chaos twice last year and left us with almost no work in the region for a whole two weeks last November
Americans criticise his trade policies cause they don't see the effects of them. For the most part (at least in my sector), they've been bringing USA more money and damaging overseas business, so attacking his trade policies would be harder than Russia conspiracies I'd say
Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.
Can't wait until they realise all that is bullshit too.
They will simply pretend this never happened, and never speak of it again. Despite nearly three years of constant shilling and nearly nation destroying rhetoric 24/7 365 days a week.
I think I said way back in 2016 when this first started, some of the people around Trump might be taken down, but Trump himself would be basically untouched, seems to be holding up so far.
It was always incredibly obvious, for better or worse, looking at his rhetoric and vocabulary that he clearly isn't a Machiavellian GRU agent being fed policy from a Putinist puppet master.
145 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-02-12
Hell hath no fury like a suburban soccer mom cucked, I guess.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 newcomer_ts 2019-02-12
Funny thing, when Hillary colluded to fuck over Bernie, there was ample evidence.
Could this be a case of a Russian hacker taking the 5th?
Or, really all of this was made up?
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2019-02-12
Is this the real life?
Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide
No escape from reality
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
Hillary didnt collude to fuck over bernie he could never win so the established dems naturally fell in behind the non socialist jew who was going to win the nomination, Bernie didnt even expect to win he just wanted to drag hillary to the left which he did.
1 newcomer_ts 2019-02-12
So, you're saying Bernie helped elect Trump.
How come nobody asks him that question?
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
Trump ran on protectionism which is traditionally a left wing thing, so obviously this was all a socialist plot.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
more C O P E than seething probably
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2019-02-12
What’s to cope about a Republican led congress who ran a shotty investigation says they didn’t find direct communication after not interviewing everyone involved. So shocking.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
^ C O P E
1 Awayfone 2019-02-12
Getting an early start, i see
1 Intensely_Accurate 2019-02-12
This is what's cope.
1 ChipotleMayocide 2019-02-12
Ayy lmao
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
I wasnt aware that many people truely expected direct collusion, i thought it was like the millions of clinton investigations in that you make up a reason for the investigation and then bust daddy on one of his countless illegal activities because he cant help himself.
1 elksandturkeys 2019-02-12
This. He deserves this.
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Yikes, sounds simply awful. Could you name a single one for me so I can judge how awful?
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
C O P E
O P E
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Mostly Daddy suing people, and not a single criminal act in all that. What exactly am I meant to be coping with?
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
DDF denialism is strong
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
You’re literally retarded.
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
gee its almost like hes super rich and his lawyers are able to shift anything that may be criminal into civil claims or dismiss them entirely, its not like there are only two billionaires in the history of america to ever actually go to jail because of this.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
Maximum C O P E.
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
COPE indeed.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
Great retort.
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
no u
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
S E E T H I N G
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Thanks for agreeing that Trump has in fact never provably committed a single criminal act.
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
i know this may confuse you
1 usedtobread 2019-02-12
This is true. A little later I am strolling down to the range and sighting in my new safari gun, then I'll practice on some poors I said could have an hour's head start. Teehee they only get five
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
i understand burgerstanis operate at maximum binary thinking but there is a difference between criminal acts you can easily get away with as a rich person like beating the shit out of your wife or money laundering and literally murdering people.
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Fine, could you point me to any actual evidence that there are evil nefarious acts he has gotten away with?
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
So you don't have a single shred of evidence he has done anything criminal in his life, but he's rich so he must have is your argument?
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Correct, none of that is criminal. I'm not saying he's a saint, but you're a fucking moron if you call someone a criminal without a specific crime in mind. So I'll get really loose this time.
Do you have any remotely plausible circumstantial evidence he has ever in his entire life committed a crime?
1 usedtobread 2019-02-12
"has not been convicted" is standard diction, bby
luv u
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
He has never been charged with a crime, so your "standard diction" doesn't apply. Lick me.
1 InboxMeYourButthole 2019-02-12
In the future, if you're asking people where the cope is, try your best not to locate the cope in the same sentence.
1 throwaway-familyhelp 2019-02-12
NOW that what I call COPE Vol. 69
1 Quietus42 2019-02-12
Dude, let them have their fun. It's not like Uncle Mueller isn't coming anyways.
1 wow___justwow 2019-02-12
haha, even ignoring the cope from our SRDine resident mcfluffyfaggot, there's bigtime cope right there in the subtitle of this article:
1 Fungilli 2019-02-12
Just because there was no evidence doesn't mean
wait shit what's the next goalpost
1 Named_NPC1 2019-02-12
Just because there's not the most remote shred of evidence in existence on this earth able to be found in two years of this well funded investigation does not mean that orange man is not bad.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2019-02-12
I guess with Daddy bending down and spreading his ass-cheeks over the border wall, we'll let you guys have this one.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
/>he’s making fun of coping redditors so he must be a daddytard!!
C
O
P
E
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2019-02-12
You put an extra forward slash gramps. Boomers ©0¶3 the fuck out.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
C O P E
1 JumbledFun 2019-02-12
I thought you love daddy tho
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
lol no, but i get accused of it often because i am a conservatard
1 JumbledFun 2019-02-12
Still holding out with Kristol in the last bastion of conservative never trumpets?
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
im not a "never trumper" in that i didnt bray on like an autist when he won the primaries, i voted against him, then voted for him in the general, i really dont follow politics religiously like reddit does, i probably get most of my political news from /r/drama lol. ill probably vote against trump in the primaries and for him in the general again next election unless the democrats run Jim Webb.
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
you must really love poor people, personally i find them repugnant thats usually why i dont vote for them to have more kids and to be even poorer.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
wat
1 throwaway-familyhelp 2019-02-12
Ahh yes. "I'm a conservatard but me no like Trump".
You might as well just say you're a libertarian if you're trying to be edgy and different for the sake of it
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-02-12
but im not a pedophile and drugs are degenerate
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-12
I know that feel bro, although I got called a commie for the first time recently so I guess that slightly balances out the 50 or so nAhTzEe's I've gotten over the years.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-12
He's a daddytard who's better at hiding his daddy loving ways than the average member of the DDF.
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-02-12
It’s happening in this thread already lmao.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2019-02-12
Now do Israel
1 Barrack-HusseinObama 2019-02-12
Woah buddy, let’s cool it with the antisemitism
1 unrulyfarmhand 2019-02-12
Wheres ya boulda?
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-02-12
Commy Mommy is going to call for this and that will be the end of her.
1 Neon_needles 2019-02-12
Well... Jews shouldn't have put up #RESIST and nonstop tranny poc rebel media while being so stupid that they think blacks, Mexicans and Muslims can tell the difference between Jews and white people, lol.
Forgotten rule number 1- mayocide includes hebrews.
1 UpvoteIfYouDare 2019-02-12
Get a load of this anti-Semite.
1 youshouldbelieveme 2019-02-12
Wages stagnating? Lack of healthcare? Corruption within the Democratic party?
Umm sweetie, which russian bot told you that? lolol
1 duckraul2 2019-02-12
Aren't most democratic candidates (both in the last midterm and for upcoming pres) pushing healthcare and income inequality pretty hard?
1 Shalabadoo 2019-02-12
I think every single one of them are pushing single payer at this point
1 no_maps_no_plans 2019-02-12
Harris, O'Rourke and Booker are pushing a shitty effort at single player. I doubt they would do any more than try to reinstate Obamacare.
1 MalcolmFFucker 2019-02-12
When are we going to get multiplayer healthcare?
1 hexbong 2019-02-12
Healthcare 76 would be good for dramacoin
1 MalcolmFFucker 2019-02-12
There are many Democrats who want a Medicare free-for-all.
1 no_maps_no_plans 2019-02-12
Delet this
1 Shalabadoo 2019-02-12
Unironically multipayer systems like Germany are the best ones to have
1 youshouldbelieveme 2019-02-12
There's a divide going the dem party between corporate dems and 'progressives'; Harris, Booker, etc are the donor class approved dems who are gonna say whatever it takes to get elected while Tulsi gabbard is more progressive but if you watch the news then you know she's the crazy radical candidate because she doesnt want the US to bomb 7 different countries at once
1 Channing_Tate_Yumm 2019-02-12
That's not the America I want to grow up in.
1 duckraul2 2019-02-12
unironically what's the point of being the preeminent superpower, economic, diplomatic, and militarily if you can't use your status and power to further cement your hegemony.
It's like NASCAR. Nobody wants to admit that the actual racing is boring as shit, and the crashes are really what's fun.
1 TheLordHighExecu 2019-02-12
this but unironically
1 Cho-Dai 2019-02-12
When this thing first started two years ago I rember seeing Colbert interview Matt Taibbi (who is one of the few journalists out there who I still think has some integrity) and he said that he looked into it pretty thoroughly and he didn't think anything was there. This is exactly the outcome that he predicted. They shouldn't have put all their eggs in this basket. I hope they still try to impeach him anyway.
1 cochnbahls 2019-02-12
If they try that instead of being productive, it will guarantee 4 more years.
1 Cho-Dai 2019-02-12
4 more years to try and nab him.
I still think having the sitting president of the united states tried for treason and publicly executed would be the ultimate moonshot for dramacoin.
1 TehAlpacalypse 2019-02-12
I hope Hillary gets to pull the trigger
1 Nyroc_ 2019-02-12
oh man that would make such a good bentanyl cartoon I'm getting erect just thinking about it
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-12
I mean there's a ton of questions on how he suddenly became solvent circa 2010ish... No answer to that is appealing
1 Cho-Dai 2019-02-12
Is Trump dirty? Of course he is but what everyone wanted out of this was some smoking gun about "colluding with the Russians" that just doesn't exist. He didn't have to go begging the Russians for help, they were going to help him whether he wanted them to or not. It's their job to stir the shit but there is not going to be any hard evidence of collusion because collusion was unnecessary. Trump is just bumbling around like Mr. Bean and everyone is laughing at Americans because they look like dupes.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-12
I dunno... He's pretty corrupt, and given the chance to get help corruptly is petty much right up his alley. It would be bad form of the RIS not to try, get an ok, and document it. Which, according to Jr himself (though he was fucking too stupid to see what was going on) the Trump Tower meeting was about.
Besides with all good clear as day violations of the FCPA and other statutes if he was a governor he'd be in county blues right now.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-12
I think I said way back in 2016 when this first started, some of the people around Trump might be taken down, but Trump himself would be basically untouched. Prediction seems to be holding up so far.
It was always incredibly obvious, for better or worse, looking at his rhetoric and vocabulary that he clearly isn't a Machiavellian GRU agent being fed policy from a Putinist puppet master.
1 plscalmdown 2019-02-12
Republicans find republicans innocent.
Wow shocker
1 kahabbi 2019-02-12
Senate judiciary committee is bipartisan....
1 UmmahSultan 2019-02-12
Was the Trump Tower meeting about adoption? If not, why did they lie about it?
1 cochnbahls 2019-02-12
Why are we srsposting sweaty. It is time for people to take the L and find a new slant.
1 Neon_needles 2019-02-12
RRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeee....!!!
1 elksandturkeys 2019-02-12
Retard. ^
1 Alicesnakebae 2019-02-12
This is as believable as baron is trump's son
1 SNCommand 2019-02-12
Everyone knows it's a clone of Reinhard Heydrich, planted by the last remnants of the Reich to seize control over america
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-12
And releasing 2 different reports that will probably be in almost complete disagreement. The headline comes from what the Republicans on the committee are claiming. Although they do toss in some anonymous (where do we stand on these now? Good if they support the narrative, bad if they don't?) Dem sources who are in agreement
1 kahabbi 2019-02-12
The Senate judiciary committee is bipartisan. Where did you become unhinged?
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-12
Yes the committee is "bipartisan" but each side releases their own report. It's not unhinged to point out that practically nothing in Congress is truly bipartisan right now
1 Fungilli 2019-02-12
I'll only believe he's innocent when the people who gain lots of money and power off me thinking he's guilty say he's innocent!
1 MtheDowner 2019-02-12
Of all the bizarre shit to come out of that election, the fact that lefties glommed onto this as some sort of home run is still the thing I can't wrap my head around.
1 captainpriapism 2019-02-12
he admitted to sexual assault!!!!
that one always cracks me up too
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2019-02-12
Remember pink pussy hats and an entire movement of foids based on a TV clip of macho shit talk cause I remember 😹 😹 😹
1 GeauxHouston22 2019-02-12
anything to avoid facing their own failings and shortcomings
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-02-12
In fairness, it kicked off an FBI investigation.
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2019-02-12
Just posted it to r/politics. Now we wait
1 unrulyfarmhand 2019-02-12
I was searching keywords on that sub earlier, complete denial of reality on posts with 0 upvotes but 30 comments.
1 rnjbond 2019-02-12
Meanwhile, daily AOC worship threads have thousands of upvotes
1 seshfan2 2019-02-12
I eagerly await the ironclad defense of "Look, it's not like Trump knew his campaign manager, associates, and son were all doing illegal shit! He's just so dumb they were all doing illegal things and he didn't realize it!"
1 Singulaire 2019-02-12
I honeatly find that very believable, though.
1 allendrio 2019-02-12
Holy shit you are right.
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
None of them did anything illegal though.
1 Agenda_Poster 2019-02-12
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
For anything related to the campaign? Didn’t think so. Cope harder.
1 Agenda_Poster 2019-02-12
Can you quote me as saying it was related?
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
So how are the crimes relevant if they have nothing to do with the campaign? God you’re retarded.
1 Agenda_Poster 2019-02-12
Because he was hired on as a campaign manager with skeletons in his closet? You politics tards have really poor reading comprehension.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
And? Why should Trump or anyone care if it has nothing to do with him or his campaign?
1 Strictlybutters 2019-02-12
Daddy only hires the very best people!! 😤😤😤😤😤
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
I’m confused. Are you suggesting that if you’ve ever committed a “crime”, you can’t be good at your job?
1 Agenda_Poster 2019-02-12
Of course not. But if you hire some fucktard who gets caught? You're probably not the stable genius you claim you are.
1 Sub-bub 2019-02-12
Are you honestly asking why it might be a bad idea to hire a known criminal as your campaign manager?
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Indeed, it is odd that the FBI knew all about his crimes but chose not to prosecute until the witch hunt began.
1 JumbledFun 2019-02-12
Lol they must keep getting indicted for fantasy crimes
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
Any crimes related to the campaign yet?
1 Quietus42 2019-02-12
Are you seriously coping in a thread about liberal cope? Wow.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-02-12
Are you seriously coping while accusing someone else of coping?
1 Quietus42 2019-02-12
Where's the cope, friend?
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-12
Besides all the crimes?
1 Quietus42 2019-02-12
Okay there was No Collusion. That means Daddy ran around obstructing justice over No Collusion and obstructing justice over No Collusion is a crime anyways so Uncle Mueller will still be really mad at Daddy. Whoops!
1 Alicesnakebae 2019-02-12
So when's the next season of house of tards
1 elksandturkeys 2019-02-12
Have to find another pedo first
1 Alicesnakebae 2019-02-12
To kia
1 umar4812 2019-02-12
No
1 MG87 2019-02-12
DINDU NUFFIN
1 MG87 2019-02-12
DINDU NUFFIN
1 ReddneckwithaD 2019-02-12
So after two years we may finally get an end to the screeching of the American left? What will US media outlets have left to write about though
Ah, nevermind, they're gonna milk it a lil bit longer 👍
1 rnjbond 2019-02-12
If only the Dems didn't get stuck on the Russia story, it'll be hard to keep it going until 2020 elections.
Instead, if they went after Trump's stupid trade policy, they could have won over moderates.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2019-02-12
Going after the trade policy would have been harder imo
My company (canadian, oil/gas sector) gets a lot of hardware and equipment from the USA, and I can say that the units we import tend to be hard to source from elsewhere, which means the higher duties / customs from the Trump administration definitely bring money into America (by eating into our profit margins lol). That doesn't even touch on the middle east, since him going back and forth on the Iran trade sanctions threw all our ME clientele into chaos twice last year and left us with almost no work in the region for a whole two weeks last November
Americans criticise his trade policies cause they don't see the effects of them. For the most part (at least in my sector), they've been bringing USA more money and damaging overseas business, so attacking his trade policies would be harder than Russia conspiracies I'd say
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Can't wait until they realise all that is bullshit too.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-12
Sorry Putin was scared of a foid?
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
Putin was entirely absent from anything.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-12
... Wait are you actually stupid?
1 nanonan 2019-02-12
What did Putin do then?
1 bat_mayn 2019-02-12
They will simply pretend this never happened, and never speak of it again. Despite nearly three years of constant shilling and nearly nation destroying rhetoric 24/7 365 days a week.
It will just "disappear", as if it never was.
​
1 Van-Diemen 2019-02-12
I think I said way back in 2016 when this first started, some of the people around Trump might be taken down, but Trump himself would be basically untouched, seems to be holding up so far.
It was always incredibly obvious, for better or worse, looking at his rhetoric and vocabulary that he clearly isn't a Machiavellian GRU agent being fed policy from a Putinist puppet master.
1 confusedblues 2019-02-12
Yeah, I'm sure the Senate really tried on this one.
1 aqouta 2019-02-12
Wake me up when something actually happens