How's the factory coming? We almost online?
Not exactly, sir... It's gone.
What do you mean? Did that dipshit mayor renege on our deal?
No, he made every effort, including having the factory repainted.
Okay. So what's the problem?
Well, apparently, the painters left some oily rags in a garbage can.
Mm-hmm.
But because of cuts to the sanitation service, the trash was not collected and the rags smoldered and caught fire.
And because of cuts to the fire department, the blaze spread.
A number of concerned citizens volunteered to help fight the fire, but because the water was cut off, they could not.
Okay, so what happened?
Well, the vast majority of our expensive, rare earth materials survived the fire.
Well, that's something.
Until the flames abated, when because of mass layoffs of police, the locals that were there to fight the fire decided instead to loot the burned-out factory. The National Guard attempted to reach the factory to help stop this, but—
The roads.
The roads, sir, yes.
Okay. So, we lost it all? Everything?
Yes. Also, the IRS called. Somehow, they found out about Bermuda.
I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
I predict some really spicy witch-hunt drama when an inevitably white "intellectual" celebrity goes on twitter to argue against this in defence of the importance of explicit child sexuality in literature. My money is on Stephen Fry
Holy hell that cracked me up watching a pedo try to compare it to GoT then try to interchange between talking about the show and the book series to make his point work.
I think the best was trying to compare people saying Lyanna Mormont's actress is amazing(she stole every scene she was in) to them commenting on loli's appearances. They really tried to say people were lewding here like they do to any 12 yr old unlucky enough to find it's way to their reach
I also get called a pedophile for saying that characters like Nowi from Fire Emblem Awakenings isn't a true loli because she's not underaged, she's thousands of years old.
This all scans as totally transparent transference to me. These obviously closeted pedos are too pussy to pick the patrician choice: keep themselves safe go to dark web sites and just beat off to the real thing.
Most significantly, they found that the number of reported cases of child sex abuse dropped markedly immediately after the ban on sexually explicit materials was lifted in 1989. In both Denmark and Japan, the situation is similar: Child sex abuse was much lower than it was when availability of child pornography was restricted.
Their argument is they are kiddie diddlers, and the only thing preventing them is the ability to watch other men diddle kids. 🤢🤮
Why has the crusade on lolis started all of a sudden anyway?
To be pushed just before the Olympics in Japan in 2020. This way, they have the leverage to do it
Ding ding ding we have a winner. I think accepting the Olympics was one of japan's worst choices in modern history and will lead to cultural imperialism the likes they've never experienced before. They gave the west an in, and it's going to be fully exploited.
🤔🤔🤔
Taking away lolis is literally worse than war crimes against sushi-cels.
Smoking has been heavily restricted here as of late, many signs are being adapted for several languages, more foreigners are showing up, they way pornography is distributed is changing, loli is under fire, these things aren't classic Japanese culture in the slightest, but they are all changes that have been made to facilitate non-Japanese. It's a bit unfortunate tbh.
There's been a major push against smoking in all of Asia and that's a good thing and if there is going to be a similar push to root out child porn and white slavery then that's a good thing too
I doubt anything will come of this. Sure UN will urge it's members but they never get anything done anyway. Doubt any country would consider changing their legal code based on this. It's not like this is a new topic either for the national legislatives.
What i dont understand is that it explicitly says that cartoons can fuel pedophilia but that has been proven false by the legalization of lolis in japan. It lowered their child exploitation rate.
”Seek help” how? Are you expecting to go to my local ”Help center” and say ”Good day, I need some help” and then the people there know exactly what they need to do? Where might such a place be located?
Same source as yours. If it proves that child abuse goes down with legalized child rape cartoons, then it also means that people that consume child rape cartoons are pedos.
You could at least come up with some original lines. It was fun seeing you try to cope but if you're just going to repeat the same replies over and over again then I may as well not waste my time.
I was just thinking once you get out of highschool and grow up a bit you might be a bit more interesting. I'm not sure if even age can fix your retardation though so maybe just ignore that.
What you don't have any classmates that you have a fancy for? I'm sure I could give you some advice on love if you need it kid. Don't worry I understand if you're a little awkward around girls at your age.
No, you weren't. You were just as much of a weirdo as you are now. This isn't even a unique lie, I've seen like 10 people on this sub say this lie and it's incredibly pathetic each time.
what's the problem was I not being obviously sarcastic enough for you buddy? Do you need me to put a /s at the end of all my posts just your your brainlet mind can understand when i'm making an obvious joke?
Pedophiles are not attracted to high school-aged people. You just admitted that you don’t even know what ”pedophile” means, so that makes everything that you say in this thread irrelevant.
Here's the thing. You said a "Ephebophile is a Pedophile." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a Ephebophile, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls Ephebophiles Pedophiles. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "Pedophile Family" you're referring to the fetish of Pedophaila, which includes things from Pedophiles to Ephebophiles to Hebephilies. So your reasoning for calling a Ephebophile a Pedophile is because random people "call the ones who like kids Pedophiles?" Let's get Lolicons and Shotacons in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a BDSM Lover or an Fetisher? It's not one or the other, that's not how fetishes work. They're both. A Ephebophile is a Ephebophile and a member of the Pedophile family. But that's not what you said. You said a Ephebophile is a Pedophile, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the Pedophile family Pedophiles, which means you'd call Hebephiles, Lolicons, and other Fetishers Pedophiles, too. Which you said you don't.
TBH, I'm all for physical removal, but only if everything and everyone is removed until only Pizzashill, Ed, and MasterLawlz are left to roam this world
Last time I checked it, the desktop screen of this sub had hardcore gay porn as one of the banners. Trying to use weebs' famed degeneracy as an argument for getting them out of the sub is glass house stone throwing at its finest.
Copycat crimes are a thing. Even if it doesn't create pedophiles, at the very least it can give people ideas of how to execute it.
For example one or two years ago there was a case of some guy who pretended to have to check for radiation and sexually assaulted a dozen or so kids. That guy literally used some pedo manga as an instructional manual.
I'd also be interested in some hard stats on your claim. Prefererably not by pedo advocacy groups.
Copycat crimes are when people see the attention a criminal/terrorist sparks in the media and tries to have a shot at doing what they did to get some time in the limelight too, dipshit.
I know, /r/drama isn't exactly the place for VaLuAbLe DiScUsSiOn, but at least put some effort in your posts, goddamnit.
That's just the main reason for copycat crimes. Feel free to look up the definition of copycat crimes if you don't trust me.
Also, good job on ignoring the actual point and instead spazzing out about semantics. Yeah, I'm definitely the one who should put more effort in my posts, lmao.
Also, good job on ignoring the actual point and instead spazzing out about semantics.
Ahem:
"What you're describing there is a person who would have been a liability to society with or without access to loli hentai, and I am baffled that even with all the NSA and tech giant espionage that's going on, we weren't able to detect that he was fucked in the head before he had a chance to put his plan in action."
That whole "he was a liability anyway" just seems like a total copout. Take copycat suicides. Obviously these people aren't in the right place, but the if they hadn't come in contact with the triggering suicide, they may not necessarily have offed themselves.
Sure, maybe the radiation pedo would have went on to commit a similar crime anyway, but he could also just have seeked help instead, been too cowardly to do it or not know how, etc.
Also, I think the issue with regards to surveillance is that you can't just lock someone up because they're fucked in the head. Unless you want to introduce literal thought crime I think it's going to be pretty hard to catch all perpetrators before they do anything.
You're ignoring what I said about how it's baffling that "even with all the NSA and tech giant espionage that's going on, we weren't able to detect that he was fucked in the head before he had a chance to put his plan in action."
If I was doing a cop-out, I wouldn't have said that. I would have said "he was going to commit a crime anyway, so why bother trying to stop him or avoid that could come into contact with something that could help him." Instead, I very clearly suggested an alternative to combat child molestation that doesn't catch in the crossfire a bunch of weeb degenerates who ultimately aren't harming anyone but themselves.
I wasn't ignoring that. The issue is literally that it's known that these people are dangerous but they haven't actually commited any crimes yet so you can't do anything. You can't put someone under probation for being fucked in the head when they haven't actually done anything that you can actually prove. Well, you could, but that's pretty authoritarian
Look up the reports on the terrorists in europe. The perpetrators are almost always known to be dangerous individuals, but still couldn't stopped (and I'm assuming that's not just the fault of incompetent intelligence agencies).
Also, how is "would have been a liability to society with or without access to loli hentai" not a copout? It's essentially refusing to admit that it can have a negative effect, while indirectly admitting that you can't really say anything against that. If you think there are better ways to deal with pedos, alright, whatever, but that doesn't change the existence of potential negative effects.
How exactly is what I said just me "refusing to admit loli hentai is bad while indirectly saying it's impossible to prove it isn't bad"? You brought up an example of how loli hentai can lead to child molestation, and I called it out for being a bullshit example, since it didn't really display a case of an individual who otherwise had little to no motivation to commit real world sexual violence being corrupted into doing so by drawings, of all things. As it stands, your example wasn't an argument that strengthened your position, it weakened it by showing that, to believe in it, you had to deliberately misunderstand how much each of the contributing factors of the problem you're analyzing actually contribute to the problem in question. If you thought I was saying anything but that, then I am sorry. Also:
The issue is literally that it's known that these people are dangerous but they haven't actually commited any crimes yet so you can't do anything.
You literally just made the best possible counterargument against your position. In the form of a an actual cop-out, no less.
Don't bother arguing with /r/drama about loli, as they're very feelings over fact over the issue. They're the same kind of people who would have thought pornography causes degeneracy 50 years ago.
Yeah, but at the same time I don't see people lining up to ban all depictions of violence. Okay, they do exist, but we mostly try to stop these people and make fun of them.
I dunno, it seems like to me the "underaged characters in fiction are exactly the same as actual underage people IRL being abused for pedo porn" idea is just one step away from thought crime.
Equivocating fiction with the real deal is obviously stupid. However I think there is a general consensus that showing violence or suicide can have negative effects. Society just has decided that not banning stuff like Werther is obviously the lesser evil and that it's not necessarily the responsibility of the author to make sure the readers don't do dumb shit.
I personally dislike censorship, but I wish people were honest about the fact that there is very likely at least some negative effect. Even if you're genuinely just concerned about freedom, acting like there absolutely can't be any negative effects just makes you look like a pedo in denial.
idea is just one step away from thought crime
I mean, it's about the distribution of such material. There already are some "outlawed ideas" in that regard. For example it's illegal to distribute information about making bombs.
My biggest concern with these sorts of initiatives is they are always vague. If they established some very strict legal definition that only targeted porn I'd be fine with it, but it always verges into also targeting basic works of fiction that just have the normal amount of sexualization inherent in all entertainment.
In this case it's just doubly unjust since it is targetting an artform inherent to another people.
Not that it matters, UN is UN and toothless, but the fact that there are so many people who support this argument in the population at large is what scares me.
all pornography was illegal under meiji restoration, still is technically its just given more leeway with loopholes like a black bar over the genitals or mosaic blur
more leeway with loopholes like a black bar over the genitals or mosaic blur
So you could still make it as long as you put pixels. It wasn't illegal then.
opinion amp piece of a literal fake story as a source
I'm going to assume you've never been to Japan. Never heard cases of women and girl children getting groped in trains and they don't say anything. Never heard that they had to get women only trains cause of this. I could give you more sources but you've already refuted one of mine so why bother...
The Japanese developed an absolutely brilliant method of lowering their sex crimes rate. They don't prosecute about 90% of them and just tell the slut to shut her whore mouth. So they don't show up in the states.
The UN just out here trying to oppress Japanese Culture.
This is worse than when they oppressed British Culture by promoting decolonization and not allowing Brits to exploit Africans and Indians for profit. Next they'll try to stop the Slavics from being homophobic, too.
I can guarantee you the UN is not stopping Britain from doing anything. The EU has (had) way more power over Britain than the UN ever had. The only real purpose of the UN is for countries to come together and talk things out in a neutral setting, literary everything is almost for show.
I'm not saying it correlates, but honestly, it is still kinda messed up.
A few times I encountered lolis on 4chan and other websites, it looked barely better than cp I saw on 4chan. Of course cp is worse, but you could see how fucked up/traumatized/seemingly indifferent kids in cp are, unlike 5 years old lolis gobbling on 30 centimeters cocks and looking like they enjoy it.
Anyway, I'm more conservative than I thought I was prior to seeing those things, I'm disgusted by both and I wouldn't have anything against banning it.
The thing is, does loli hentai make actual pedophiles crave more for actual children, or not? Has anyone with loli hentai been prosecuted for raping kids? Considering how heated this kind of matter is, if it indeed happen, such example would be thrown a lot during these debates, but I haven't even seen em in r/drama, so idk really.
Also, you are speaking more from emotion than reason, but I can give you that loli hentai does look cruder, maybe that's because I just don't like flat bodies or child-like personalities.
The "barely" better part isn't a good benchmark because taste is subjective.
Cp obvs has to be banned., actual children get their lives ruined because of that.
Also, you are speaking more from emotion than reason,
"Emotionality" doesn't invalidate the argument. You can "reasonably" argue that there are at least some kids that aren't hurt in cp and that some of them may even enjoy sex. But emotionally, morally, we know it's wrong.
The thing is, does loli hentai make actual pedophiles crave more for actual children, or not?
I doubt this can be answered without the same controversy that revolves around pornography. When there are several studies on the issue, we can maybe draw conclusions and say "yes/no, pedophiles crave/don't crave for kids because of lolis". But even then, the issue will remain controversial because of the moral side of it that I mentioned.
It's not just "morally" wrong, their minds, and bodies, aren't completely developed for handling adult stuff like sex.
The thing with the "does it make pedos/non-pedos crave real kids" is that it shouldd be looked at a raw fact, because if it's not true, it means that pedophiles have something to get off to. And the opposite reaction if it does.
Plus, if letting them wank to fictional stuff that doesn't require anything more than a skilled artist, that didn't do anything illegal to get such knowledge, curbs their sexual desires, I don't think it would be immoral to let them enjoy that.
The problem is, I doubt anyone would try to do such investigations because of their nature, and the huge backlash from the people that wouldn't like the true answer, be it positive or negative.
Soon they'll try to stop muslims stoning women, blasphemers, homosexuals, apostates, being the wrong kind of muslim and women who are raped by their cousins. Fuck this timeline.
this is the same organization that would like to take your violent vidya away if they could, they even publicly pleaded for it. Luckily most countries are smart enough to recognize that as long as no actual human beings are harmed both of these types of media are fine.
Doubt any country will bother spending resources to create a "fictional police". U.N tried a similar thing in 2016 with a proposal to ban hentai/eroge that "discriminated women", but that failed miserably in the end.
I mean, if it gives radical politicians who need a common enemy for society to fight against in order to justify their discourse, I'm sure they'll at least give it a shot.
I mean, the outrage is already there, and it's so strong it can make even us and SRD agree with something for once.
All UN General Assembly proposals are non-binding anyway. They could make a binding treaty but everyone would have to sign it and it would take about a century to negotiate. The security council has the power to make bindings resolutions... but there's only been a handful ever passed and they were all about attacking some nation that attacked another while not having any great power patron to back them up.
I honestly don't care if lolicon is legal or not, but I do find it strange just how fucking obsessive these people are about it, to the point where I think it should be banned for the sake of their mental health.
That's the beauty of it: We don't need to make arguments based on FACTS and LOGIC, we just need to ban it on the grounds that it's drawn child porn and then put anyone who objects on a government watchlist.
What's with the UN? It started with laws against taking creep shots, they sent out the NWO troops and literally forced us to respect females, and now they're sending out the jack booted thugs again to steal our naked drawings of little kids. When will this oppression end? This truly is the dystopia we've all been dreading.
283 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-02-17
I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief. “Bad news, detective. We got a situation.” “What? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?” “Worse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollars’ worth of bitcoins.” The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 azealiabantz 2019-02-17
How's the factory coming? We almost online?
Not exactly, sir... It's gone.
What do you mean? Did that dipshit mayor renege on our deal?
No, he made every effort, including having the factory repainted.
Okay. So what's the problem?
Well, apparently, the painters left some oily rags in a garbage can.
Mm-hmm.
But because of cuts to the sanitation service, the trash was not collected and the rags smoldered and caught fire.
And because of cuts to the fire department, the blaze spread.
A number of concerned citizens volunteered to help fight the fire, but because the water was cut off, they could not.
Okay, so what happened?
Well, the vast majority of our expensive, rare earth materials survived the fire.
Well, that's something.
Until the flames abated, when because of mass layoffs of police, the locals that were there to fight the fire decided instead to loot the burned-out factory. The National Guard attempted to reach the factory to help stop this, but—
The roads.
The roads, sir, yes.
Okay. So, we lost it all? Everything?
Yes. Also, the IRS called. Somehow, they found out about Bermuda.
1 SnapshillBot 2019-02-17
I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 shaneoffline 2019-02-17
UN? More like FUCKU N
1 Bentoki 2019-02-17
Pedo's mull over why this is not a good thing
1 do_a_humanflag 2019-02-17
this would include a lot of novels btw, not even the explicitly erotic kind
1 nayytay 2019-02-17
It’s all degenerate garbage. I say ban it all
1 do_a_humanflag 2019-02-17
banning classic novels to own the weebs
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
Worth it.
1 jake354k12 2019-02-17
It will not do that.
1 ano1batman 2019-02-17
Yeah it totally wont ban the classic novel that the term loli literally comes from.
1 jake354k12 2019-02-17
That is factually wrong. This proposal only bans hentai with kids.
1 hobocactus 2019-02-17
I predict some really spicy witch-hunt drama when an inevitably white "intellectual" celebrity goes on twitter to argue against this in defence of the importance of explicit child sexuality in literature. My money is on Stephen Fry
1 Thenuclearhamster 2019-02-17
Game of Thrones has depictions of minors engaging in sex acts.
If you watched Game of Thrones or read the books, you are now a pedophile, please report to the nearest authority for life imprisonment.
1 sweetyellowknees 2019-02-17
Can I have strawman for $500?
1 watermark03alt 2019-02-17
You could get the scarecrow of your dreams for that price I think
1 DrZerglingMD 2019-02-17
Holy hell that cracked me up watching a pedo try to compare it to GoT then try to interchange between talking about the show and the book series to make his point work.
I think the best was trying to compare people saying Lyanna Mormont's actress is amazing(she stole every scene she was in) to them commenting on loli's appearances. They really tried to say people were lewding here like they do to any 12 yr old unlucky enough to find it's way to their reach
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2019-02-17
More pedos (on KiA) kvetching
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/arjtc4/censorshipun_proposes_initiative_to_ban_loli/egntu8z/
Too much of a cope. This guy is a pedo.
1 parallelbledsoe 2019-02-17
lmao no way
1 azealiabantz 2019-02-17
This all scans as totally transparent transference to me. These obviously closeted pedos are too pussy to pick the patrician choice:
keep themselves safego to dark web sites and just beat off to the real thing.1 FreshHotDogWater 2019-02-17
Holy fuck.
Their argument is they are kiddie diddlers, and the only thing preventing them is the ability to watch other men diddle kids. 🤢🤮
What the actual fuck! 🤬🤬🤬
1 rockidol 2019-02-17
So in your mind “this ban would increase crime” is the same as “I would be the one committing those crimes if it gets banned”.
1 rockidol 2019-02-17
It’s not. It’s a victimless crime and it gives the government more power to censor fiction and artistic expression.
Every argument in favor of banning Loki has a mirror argument in favor of banning violent video games.
1 Vegan_dogfucker 2019-02-17
Yamete on suicide watch.
1 LuxuriousBottleCap 2019-02-17
The real drama coin is over at KIA who are losing their shit ATM
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/arjtc4/censorshipun_proposes_initiative_to_ban_loli/egnoul8
1 recriminology 2019-02-17
The absolute state of KIAcels in 2019
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
Globalists are alright guys if this is their master plan.
1 recriminology 2019-02-17
It’s about ethics in globalism
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2019-02-17
Wtf, I too love globalists now.
1 Named_NPC1 2019-02-17
I mean, they're clearly right in this case.
1 otherwiseyep 2019-02-17
Yes, the globalist definitely have the right of this one.
1 leva549 2019-02-17
And that's a good thing
1 FreshHotDogWater 2019-02-17
🤔🤔🤔
Taking away lolis is literally worse than war crimes against sushi-cels.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
Lolis are proof two big uns ain't enough
1 Kellere31 2019-02-17
Wait I thought diddling kids is inshallah-cel culture.
1 charming_tatum 2019-02-17
Imagine thinking loli is the pinnacle of Japanese culture
1 ManMeatsHorse 2019-02-17
In some respects they're right.
Smoking has been heavily restricted here as of late, many signs are being adapted for several languages, more foreigners are showing up, they way pornography is distributed is changing, loli is under fire, these things aren't classic Japanese culture in the slightest, but they are all changes that have been made to facilitate non-Japanese. It's a bit unfortunate tbh.
1 charming_tatum 2019-02-17
There's been a major push against smoking in all of Asia and that's a good thing and if there is going to be a similar push to root out child porn and white slavery then that's a good thing too
1 Buy_Dramacoin 2019-02-17
All I’m saying is there’s never a bad time to buy dramacoin futures
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Pedophile Gamers club and unironic /r/GamersRiseUp
1 do_a_humanflag 2019-02-17
I doubt anything will come of this. Sure UN will urge it's members but they never get anything done anyway. Doubt any country would consider changing their legal code based on this. It's not like this is a new topic either for the national legislatives.
1 StopEditingTitles 2019-02-17
What i dont understand is that it explicitly says that cartoons can fuel pedophilia but that has been proven false by the legalization of lolis in japan. It lowered their child exploitation rate.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-17
You know what else lowers child exploitation rates? A pedo, a length of rope and a stool.
1 Coonass_alt 2019-02-17
based and also very, very redpilled
1 Lehk 2019-02-17
cyanidepilled
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-02-17
This but ichironicaifu
1 rockidol 2019-02-17
Don’t cut yourself on that edge.
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
Citation needed.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
Also big 'ol LOL at believing Nippon's crime stats.
1 onafriday 2019-02-17
About as real as China’s GDP figures.
Shiesty fucks
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
So, you’re just going to ignore all the facts that prove you wrong?
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
Just did a quick peruse of your profile. Seek Help.
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
For what? You’ll need to be more specific.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
Kind of a tell, isn't it?
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
What does that mean?
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
It means if you reread what you wrote and see no issue you should seek help.
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
”Seek help” how? Are you expecting to go to my local ”Help center” and say ”Good day, I need some help” and then the people there know exactly what they need to do? Where might such a place be located?
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
Actually yeah
1 spainishturtle 2019-02-17
You are a pedo seek help
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
https://web.archive.org/web/20090618164226/http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/ja/opinion/report/2003_09.html
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
I don't speak pedo.
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
nice cope
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
Says the pedo. Don't jerk it to child rape cartoons.
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
keep coping
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
keep pedoing.
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
i never said that and you didnt actually post a source to back up your claim
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
Same source as yours. If it proves that child abuse goes down with legalized child rape cartoons, then it also means that people that consume child rape cartoons are pedos.
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
it means that some people who do, not all
1 Think_Once 2019-02-17
That's a pedo cope.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Are you denying you're a pedo lol
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
The real cope is rationalizing how looking at child porn doesn't make you a pedophile 🗿🗿🗿
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
literally never said anything about that
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
So you accept you're a pedo
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
i never said i looked at this stuff
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
But you do. All anime is pedophillia
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
yikes
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Sorry that you had to find out your illness like this
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
big yikes
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
There are many treatments for your attraction to kids
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
You
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Why would I cry about not being attracted to children. Is it a bad thing?
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
Na but crying about other people jacking off to cartoons is pretty sad tbh
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Sadder than being attracted to children? There's no way around it, pedophiles are bottom of the totem pole.
It never even began
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
Imagine so buttblasted about internet weebs. I think you belong more on /r/SubredditDrama friend.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Pedo cope is the sweetest 🤗🤗🤗
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
says the coper
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
"heh this dude isn't even attracted to children he must be so angry" -Pedophile
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
based retard
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I know it sucks to be a pedo but you can fix it friend, don't let anyone tell you different
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
Imagine caring so much about your own opinions that you get this buttblasted on r/Drama 😂😂😂😂
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
"heh this guy found out I'm a pedophile he must be so angry xD totally owned" -Pedophile
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
Using the same comeback twice? Cmon man you can do better than that. Or have you already run out?
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
What else can you do to a pedophile besides expose them? What could I say to make you look worse?
You're attracted to kids and that's pretty much as bad as it gets lol
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
You could at least come up with some original lines. It was fun seeing you try to cope but if you're just going to repeat the same replies over and over again then I may as well not waste my time.
Maybe give me a call when you leave highschool?
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I'm not sure why you think this is an argument lol. You're a pedo and mad that I brought it up. There's no argument here.
And it's weird that you'd want to call me once I get home from highschool 🤔🤔🤔 the cope always slips in the end
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
This isn't an arguement, this is you sperging out over the internet and me watching
oh man so you are just a little kid 😂😂😂😂 I suspected it by just how unfunny you were but I never thought it would be true.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
So why are you wanting a high school kid to call you? 🤔 Definitely not a pedo btw
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
I was just thinking once you get out of highschool and grow up a bit you might be a bit more interesting. I'm not sure if even age can fix your retardation though so maybe just ignore that.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I may be retarded but at least I'm not attracted to children
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
What you don't have any classmates that you have a fancy for? I'm sure I could give you some advice on love if you need it kid. Don't worry I understand if you're a little awkward around girls at your age.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I'm sure you could give me advice on how to get with underaged girls
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
They'd be around the same age for you though wouldn't they? Since you're like, what, 12?
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
So you know a lot about seducing 12 year olds?
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
What can I say? I was quite the chad when I was your age so I might be able to help you out if you're having trouble with the ladies.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
You must have had practice in seducing 12 year olds over the years if you think your methods are still relevant.
Maybe you could tell me what you find most attractive in a child?
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
There's some things that never change kiddo. You'll learn when you're older.
Anyway enough about me, how are you doing champ? Keeping up with your studdies?
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
No I have some weirdo trying to teach me how to groom 12 year olds. Probably watches anime, hence the attraction to children
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
That's disappointing, you know I want you to grow up to be a strapping lad like your father so try to keep up with your schoolwork.
Ah anime, now that something I haven't watched in a long time. Now Cowboy Bebop, that was a good anime.
sip
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Sounds like you want to live vicariously through me while hitting on prepubescent girls
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
No no I just want to see you do well in life. You can't spend all your years coping now can you?
Now clean your room before your mom gets mad at you. Isn't that what that John Peterson man that you always listen to tells you to do?
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Imagine typing out your entire grooming process after trying to deny being a pedophile after admitting to being a pedophile.
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
I do like to keep myself well groomed. All you need a good razor and some hot water. I'll teach you when you start growing facial hair.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
gonna be a hot yikearoonie. Grooming in every way
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-17
No, you weren't. You were just as much of a weirdo as you are now. This isn't even a unique lie, I've seen like 10 people on this sub say this lie and it's incredibly pathetic each time.
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
what's the problem was I not being obviously sarcastic enough for you buddy? Do you need me to put a /s at the end of all my posts just your your brainlet mind can understand when i'm making an obvious joke?
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-17
Jokes are supposed to be funny
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
hey don't blame me if you're too much of an unga bunga to understand my high IQ humour.
also /s in case you need it for that one retard.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Tfw you "pretend" to be a pedophile to troll people epic style 😎😎😎
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
Tfw you can't read 😎😎😎
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I may not be able to ready but at least I'm not attracted to children
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
based brainlet
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Angry pedo cope >>>>>>
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
seething
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
"this dude is so mad that he's not attracted to children like I am" -Pedophile
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
3 strikes, you're out.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Pedo defeated
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
cringe
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I'm genuinely scared to know what a pedophile would cringe at
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
I like to think that all people in the world can agree that you're the bees knees of cringe.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
It means a lot that a pedophile is calling me cringe lmao
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
what can all your replies amount to if not the perfect definition of "cringe"?
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I would classify my comments as "not made by a pedo", which I couldn't do for yours.
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
call me what you want but at least i'm not a seethe machine like you who can only fall back on calling me a pedo to cope with getting BTFO
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
You watch anime lmao, how are you not a pedophile
You're right, the true cringe here is not being attracted to children like you are.
1 HarryD52 2019-02-17
I dunno m8 you're the one who made the claim you explain it to me
I'm glad you've finally stopped coping and accepted your place, always nice to see that a good BTFO can set someone's head straight.
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
Pedophiles are not attracted to high school-aged people. You just admitted that you don’t even know what ”pedophile” means, so that makes everything that you say in this thread irrelevant.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Okay heebie jeebie
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
Okay, you’re a cultural Marxist SJW.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Here's the thing. You said a "Ephebophile is a Pedophile." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a Ephebophile, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls Ephebophiles Pedophiles. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "Pedophile Family" you're referring to the fetish of Pedophaila, which includes things from Pedophiles to Ephebophiles to Hebephilies. So your reasoning for calling a Ephebophile a Pedophile is because random people "call the ones who like kids Pedophiles?" Let's get Lolicons and Shotacons in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a BDSM Lover or an Fetisher? It's not one or the other, that's not how fetishes work. They're both. A Ephebophile is a Ephebophile and a member of the Pedophile family. But that's not what you said. You said a Ephebophile is a Pedophile, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the Pedophile family Pedophiles, which means you'd call Hebephiles, Lolicons, and other Fetishers Pedophiles, too. Which you said you don't.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
The real cope is thinking that just because your opposition is degenerate it means anything they say is wrong
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
My opponents are pedophiles so not only are they wrong, but they must be physically removed
1 32624647 2019-02-17
TBH, I'm all for physical removal, but only if everything and everyone is removed until only Pizzashill, Ed, and MasterLawlz are left to roam this world
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Yeah I support that
1 McFluffTheCrimeCat 2019-02-17
Did japan say this or someone else who isn’t a dirty liar?
1 StopEditingTitles 2019-02-17
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/11/30/legalizing.child.pornography.linked.lower.rates.child.sex.abuse
literally the first result on google.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-17
Pedo apologists OUT
Loli is degeneracy
1 rockidol 2019-02-17
Who call things degeneracy other than “ban this sick filth” Puritan shmucks who can’t just mind their own business?
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Last time I checked it, the desktop screen of this sub had hardcore gay porn as one of the banners. Trying to use weebs' famed degeneracy as an argument for getting them out of the sub is glass house stone throwing at its finest.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-17
Gay porn isn't degeneracy. Bussy is the purest form of love.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Go into a baptist church, a mosque, or a synagogue and try saying this shit. I'm sure it'll go over juuuust fine...
1 SinisterSintram 2019-02-17
Religion is peak degeneracy, along with atheism.
1 heretobefriends 2019-02-17
Because banning loli gives us more to charge them with when caught.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Good. Loli possession should be a capital offense
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Don't act so high and mighty there, Steve.
One day, we will find your loli vore stash.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
I'm not a disgusting degenerate so you will not
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Deny it all you want, but we will find it.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Find my nuts on your eyeballs and my dick on your nose, pedo. Gonna give you a Squidward that you'll never forget
1 32624647 2019-02-17
We will find it
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
You're not a natural born Hunter, sweaty 🤗🤗🤗 I have my pussy instincts and reflexes
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Oh, but I will find it. Both the dick and balls on my face and the loli USB you have shoved up your butt.
Momma didn't raise no quitter.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Only one of those exists. Also imagine storing anything on a personal drive lmfao I post all my documents on Facebook so I can't lose them
1 32624647 2019-02-17
That makes my work much easier. Thank you.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
My name is Mark Zuckerberg in case you want to check my documents
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Always knew you'd be him...
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
🤖🤖🤖
1 otherwiseyep 2019-02-17
won't somebody think of the children
1 Lehk 2019-02-17
i think predditors do enough of that already
1 UnprovableTruth 2019-02-17
Copycat crimes are a thing. Even if it doesn't create pedophiles, at the very least it can give people ideas of how to execute it.
For example one or two years ago there was a case of some guy who pretended to have to check for radiation and sexually assaulted a dozen or so kids. That guy literally used some pedo manga as an instructional manual.
I'd also be interested in some hard stats on your claim. Prefererably not by pedo advocacy groups.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Copycat crimes are when people see the attention a criminal/terrorist sparks in the media and tries to have a shot at doing what they did to get some time in the limelight too, dipshit.
I know, /r/drama isn't exactly the place for VaLuAbLe DiScUsSiOn, but at least put some effort in your posts, goddamnit.
1 UnprovableTruth 2019-02-17
That's just the main reason for copycat crimes. Feel free to look up the definition of copycat crimes if you don't trust me.
Also, good job on ignoring the actual point and instead spazzing out about semantics. Yeah, I'm definitely the one who should put more effort in my posts, lmao.
Why are pedos always such dishonest tards?
1 32624647 2019-02-17
Ahem:
"What you're describing there is a person who would have been a liability to society with or without access to loli hentai, and I am baffled that even with all the NSA and tech giant espionage that's going on, we weren't able to detect that he was fucked in the head before he had a chance to put his plan in action."
1 UnprovableTruth 2019-02-17
That whole "he was a liability anyway" just seems like a total copout. Take copycat suicides. Obviously these people aren't in the right place, but the if they hadn't come in contact with the triggering suicide, they may not necessarily have offed themselves.
Sure, maybe the radiation pedo would have went on to commit a similar crime anyway, but he could also just have seeked help instead, been too cowardly to do it or not know how, etc.
Also, I think the issue with regards to surveillance is that you can't just lock someone up because they're fucked in the head. Unless you want to introduce literal thought crime I think it's going to be pretty hard to catch all perpetrators before they do anything.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
You're ignoring what I said about how it's baffling that "even with all the NSA and tech giant espionage that's going on, we weren't able to detect that he was fucked in the head before he had a chance to put his plan in action."
If I was doing a cop-out, I wouldn't have said that. I would have said "he was going to commit a crime anyway, so why bother trying to stop him or avoid that could come into contact with something that could help him." Instead, I very clearly suggested an alternative to combat child molestation that doesn't catch in the crossfire a bunch of weeb degenerates who ultimately aren't harming anyone but themselves.
1 UnprovableTruth 2019-02-17
I wasn't ignoring that. The issue is literally that it's known that these people are dangerous but they haven't actually commited any crimes yet so you can't do anything. You can't put someone under probation for being fucked in the head when they haven't actually done anything that you can actually prove. Well, you could, but that's pretty authoritarian
Look up the reports on the terrorists in europe. The perpetrators are almost always known to be dangerous individuals, but still couldn't stopped (and I'm assuming that's not just the fault of incompetent intelligence agencies).
Also, how is "would have been a liability to society with or without access to loli hentai" not a copout? It's essentially refusing to admit that it can have a negative effect, while indirectly admitting that you can't really say anything against that. If you think there are better ways to deal with pedos, alright, whatever, but that doesn't change the existence of potential negative effects.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
How exactly is what I said just me "refusing to admit loli hentai is bad while indirectly saying it's impossible to prove it isn't bad"? You brought up an example of how loli hentai can lead to child molestation, and I called it out for being a bullshit example, since it didn't really display a case of an individual who otherwise had little to no motivation to commit real world sexual violence being corrupted into doing so by drawings, of all things. As it stands, your example wasn't an argument that strengthened your position, it weakened it by showing that, to believe in it, you had to deliberately misunderstand how much each of the contributing factors of the problem you're analyzing actually contribute to the problem in question. If you thought I was saying anything but that, then I am sorry. Also:
You literally just made the best possible counterargument against your position. In the form of a an actual cop-out, no less.
1 ticktockwarrior 2019-02-17
Don't bother arguing with /r/drama about loli, as they're very feelings over fact over the issue. They're the same kind of people who would have thought pornography causes degeneracy 50 years ago.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
We're not usually like this, you know. It's just that the flood of MDEfugees made us forget our true call as radical centrists. Also:
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
GO BACK TO KiA
OUT!
OUT!
OUT!
1 Lehk 2019-02-17
porn doesnt cause degeneracy
porn IS degeneracy
1 32624647 2019-02-17
If porn is wrong then I don't wanna be right
1 heretobefriends 2019-02-17
> mass cultural acceptance of porn
> woah where did all these cucks come from?
1 Zeriell 2019-02-17
Yeah, but at the same time I don't see people lining up to ban all depictions of violence. Okay, they do exist, but we mostly try to stop these people and make fun of them.
I dunno, it seems like to me the "underaged characters in fiction are exactly the same as actual underage people IRL being abused for pedo porn" idea is just one step away from thought crime.
1 UnprovableTruth 2019-02-17
Equivocating fiction with the real deal is obviously stupid. However I think there is a general consensus that showing violence or suicide can have negative effects. Society just has decided that not banning stuff like Werther is obviously the lesser evil and that it's not necessarily the responsibility of the author to make sure the readers don't do dumb shit.
I personally dislike censorship, but I wish people were honest about the fact that there is very likely at least some negative effect. Even if you're genuinely just concerned about freedom, acting like there absolutely can't be any negative effects just makes you look like a pedo in denial.
I mean, it's about the distribution of such material. There already are some "outlawed ideas" in that regard. For example it's illegal to distribute information about making bombs.
1 Zeriell 2019-02-17
My biggest concern with these sorts of initiatives is they are always vague. If they established some very strict legal definition that only targeted porn I'd be fine with it, but it always verges into also targeting basic works of fiction that just have the normal amount of sexualization inherent in all entertainment.
In this case it's just doubly unjust since it is targetting an artform inherent to another people.
Not that it matters, UN is UN and toothless, but the fact that there are so many people who support this argument in the population at large is what scares me.
1 2561-2685-0682-521 2019-02-17
Nah, i'm just a furry who fears they'll go after my porn next.
I swear you have women posting on facebook how they fuck their dogs and nobody gives a shit but i jack it to human animals and they want me in jail.
Kinda hoping for an apocalypse.
1 Jriibz 2019-02-17
This ain't possible
1 32624647 2019-02-17
It's possible
I've seen it
Humanity needs to be cancelled
1 leva549 2019-02-17
Like that kid who died after being buried in sand after he watched Naruto.
1 WombTattoo 2019-02-17
So does not registering child exploitation cases.
1 Jriibz 2019-02-17
Lolis were never illegal in Japan. Also Japanese tend to hide and not report abuse cases
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
all pornography was illegal under meiji restoration, still is technically its just given more leeway with loopholes like a black bar over the genitals or mosaic blur
https://web.archive.org/web/20090618164226/http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/ja/opinion/report/2003_09.html
>opinion amp piece of a literal fake story as a source
lmao
1 Jriibz 2019-02-17
So you could still make it as long as you put pixels. It wasn't illegal then.
I'm going to assume you've never been to Japan. Never heard cases of women and girl children getting groped in trains and they don't say anything. Never heard that they had to get women only trains cause of this. I could give you more sources but you've already refuted one of mine so why bother...
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
Yeah because in the 19th century we had mosaic blurs right?
lol
Yeah I refuted your shitty opinion piece that used a literal fake story to back it up
1 Jriibz 2019-02-17
Pedophilia=/= child exploitation
1 watermark03alt 2019-02-17
The Japanese developed an absolutely brilliant method of lowering their sex crimes rate. They don't prosecute about 90% of them and just tell the slut to shut her whore mouth. So they don't show up in the states.
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
hey i read a bullshit bbc article that used a literal fake testimony and formed my opinion on it too
1 Xurker 2019-02-17
P-please dont say bad things about based Japan!
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
if you have actual criticisms sure go ahead and say them
youre just repeating propaganda without actually verifying anything for yourself
1 punkstarbitch 2019-02-17
No I just lived in Japan for most of a decade and consumed news reporting on this objective fact from local media. Nice man of straw though pedo.
1 Kiru-Kokujin33 2019-02-17
はいはい、わたしわジャパニーズニダ！
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-02-17
for a ton of reasons there’s no way the child abuse rate in Japan hasn’t gone way way down over the past 30 years
1 Sarge_Ward 2019-02-17
The UN just out here trying to oppress Japanese Culture.
This is worse than when they oppressed British Culture by promoting decolonization and not allowing Brits to exploit Africans and Indians for profit. Next they'll try to stop the Slavics from being homophobic, too.
What is the world coming to? Is nothing sacred??
1 Vurtizontal 2019-02-17
I can guarantee you the UN is not stopping Britain from doing anything. The EU has (had) way more power over Britain than the UN ever had. The only real purpose of the UN is for countries to come together and talk things out in a neutral setting, literary everything is almost for show.
1 Zeriell 2019-02-17
Too true, we need to stop the Japanese from oppressing... checks notes fictional characters?
1 Sarge_Ward 2019-02-17
ok libertarian
1 rockidol 2019-02-17
I’d rather be a libertarian than a pearl clutching shmuck who wants people arrested over drawings.
1 theassholette 2019-02-17
Pedos truly are everywhere these days.
Don't you have some single mothers to date to groom their toddler daughter?
1 rockidol 2019-02-17
Don’t you have an art museum or a GameStop to picket?
1 TheLastCrawler 2019-02-17
People like anime characters in porn because they look better than real people, u mong.
1 theassholette 2019-02-17
I wouldn't know, since I don't watch cartoons.
​
But anyway, adult characters can be attractive. Like, 18+ and looking like they're 18+. And lolis don't look 18+ to me.
​
1 TheLastCrawler 2019-02-17
A canonicaly 15 year old can be look like 18+ if you give her the right curves.
Lolis are kind of different, I say that they are much different than real children since anime tends to look much appealing than normal people.
I don't like Lolis at all tbh, but the idea of banning them because it somehow correlates to actual child abuse seems stupid to me.
1 theassholette 2019-02-17
I'm not saying it correlates, but honestly, it is still kinda messed up.
A few times I encountered lolis on 4chan and other websites, it looked barely better than cp I saw on 4chan. Of course cp is worse, but you could see how fucked up/traumatized/seemingly indifferent kids in cp are, unlike 5 years old lolis gobbling on 30 centimeters cocks and looking like they enjoy it.
Anyway, I'm more conservative than I thought I was prior to seeing those things, I'm disgusted by both and I wouldn't have anything against banning it.
1 TheLastCrawler 2019-02-17
The thing is, does loli hentai make actual pedophiles crave more for actual children, or not? Has anyone with loli hentai been prosecuted for raping kids? Considering how heated this kind of matter is, if it indeed happen, such example would be thrown a lot during these debates, but I haven't even seen em in r/drama, so idk really.
Also, you are speaking more from emotion than reason, but I can give you that loli hentai does look cruder, maybe that's because I just don't like flat bodies or child-like personalities.
The "barely" better part isn't a good benchmark because taste is subjective.
Cp obvs has to be banned., actual children get their lives ruined because of that.
1 theassholette 2019-02-17
"Emotionality" doesn't invalidate the argument. You can "reasonably" argue that there are at least some kids that aren't hurt in cp and that some of them may even enjoy sex. But emotionally, morally, we know it's wrong.
I doubt this can be answered without the same controversy that revolves around pornography. When there are several studies on the issue, we can maybe draw conclusions and say "yes/no, pedophiles crave/don't crave for kids because of lolis". But even then, the issue will remain controversial because of the moral side of it that I mentioned.
​
​
1 TheLastCrawler 2019-02-17
It's not just "morally" wrong, their minds, and bodies, aren't completely developed for handling adult stuff like sex.
The thing with the "does it make pedos/non-pedos crave real kids" is that it shouldd be looked at a raw fact, because if it's not true, it means that pedophiles have something to get off to. And the opposite reaction if it does.
Plus, if letting them wank to fictional stuff that doesn't require anything more than a skilled artist, that didn't do anything illegal to get such knowledge, curbs their sexual desires, I don't think it would be immoral to let them enjoy that.
The problem is, I doubt anyone would try to do such investigations because of their nature, and the huge backlash from the people that wouldn't like the true answer, be it positive or negative.
1 mordorderly 2019-02-17
Why does your handler let you serious-post?
1 mordorderly 2019-02-17
Why go to all the trouble of grooming when it's so simple to overpower and become a repressed memory?
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
I don't want them arrested...
1 Redemption47 2019-02-17
I mean its a good thing not to push for arbitrary laws that will put people in jail. But its weebs we're talking about, not people.
1 sweetyellowknees 2019-02-17
Soon they'll try to stop muslims stoning women, blasphemers, homosexuals, apostates, being the wrong kind of muslim and women who are raped by their cousins. Fuck this timeline.
1 Sarge_Ward 2019-02-17
My point exactly!
1 watermark03alt 2019-02-17
NWO when?
1 AbolishDemocracy 2019-02-17
What is your argument? ”Some things should be stopped, therefore everything should be stopped”?
1 Vurtizontal 2019-02-17
1 HardIsLife 2019-02-17
Hallelujah! Faith in humanity has been restored 🙏🏻
1 do_a_humanflag 2019-02-17
this is the same organization that would like to take your violent vidya away if they could, they even publicly pleaded for it. Luckily most countries are smart enough to recognize that as long as no actual human beings are harmed both of these types of media are fine.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2019-02-17
That's disgusting. They should take the nonviolent ones away too.
1 KingArtie 2019-02-17
This seems like a legislation nightmare.
Doubt any country will bother spending resources to create a "fictional police". U.N tried a similar thing in 2016 with a proposal to ban hentai/eroge that "discriminated women", but that failed miserably in the end.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
I mean, if it gives radical politicians who need a common enemy for society to fight against in order to justify their discourse, I'm sure they'll at least give it a shot.
I mean, the outrage is already there, and it's so strong it can make even us and SRD agree with something for once.
1 watermark03alt 2019-02-17
All UN General Assembly proposals are non-binding anyway. They could make a binding treaty but everyone would have to sign it and it would take about a century to negotiate. The security council has the power to make bindings resolutions... but there's only been a handful ever passed and they were all about attacking some nation that attacked another while not having any great power patron to back them up.
1 urgoingdownbitch01 2019-02-17
Your daily reminder that loli did nothing wrong****
1 zero237 2019-02-17
My UNICEF donations finally paying off
1 Chicup 2019-02-17
I have to admit its kinda funny that when I was a kid it was the horrible right trying to censor porn. Now its the left trying to censor cartoon porn.
1 SkaterMan 2019-02-17
Wait so people could go to jail for drawing shit
1 Zeriell 2019-02-17
I mean you can already be killed for drawing a long-dead sandlad.
1 SkaterMan 2019-02-17
yeah should we stoop further down to that level though?
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-02-17
Absolutely. Liking pedo weebshit should be a crime
1 SkaterMan 2019-02-17
nah
1 Coonass_alt 2019-02-17
on the one hand fuck pedophiles, on the other hand, why the fuck should we listen to the UN?
instead of banning loli lets just redo world war 2 and teach japan a lesson. same effect.
1 32624647 2019-02-17
We need to start a change.org petition for this
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2019-02-17
Why? After this they are going to commit seppuku
1 eyestrained 2019-02-17
sudoku*
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Nuking Japan caused this. How do we unnuke
1 Coonass_alt 2019-02-17
double down
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Send them back to the iron age. Samurais were cool
1 Pepperglue 2019-02-17
How's UN officials going to satisfy their pedophilia if they ban all of the pedo materials?
1 32624647 2019-02-17
1 Lehk 2019-02-17
by going to third world countries and fucking kids, like they always do.
1 Pepperglue 2019-02-17
Really forward-thinking people.
1 cervix_piledriver 2019-02-17
NOTHING
TO
LOSE
BUT
YOUR
CHAINS
1 DragonSlayerYomre 2019-02-17
Jefferey Epstein's "Lolita Express"
1 KingNothing305 2019-02-17
How the fuck are they going to enforce this? Is the UN going to make a loli police force? Cause that sounds funny and amazing.
1 ikitomi 2019-02-17
That's how the UN has always worked outside of the Korean War.
They bitch and moan and hope someone actually does something when they listen.
1 KingNothing305 2019-02-17
So nothing is going to happen? Lolifags will still have their jack off matieral.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-17
The truly radical centrist position is they still access but need to register and provide proof of chemical or other means castration
1 charming_tatum 2019-02-17
They're going to economically sanction 4chan
1 elephantofdoom 2019-02-17
I honestly don't care if lolicon is legal or not, but I do find it strange just how fucking obsessive these people are about it, to the point where I think it should be banned for the sake of their mental health.
1 Jriibz 2019-02-17
True
1 aqouta 2019-02-17
The geopolitics is going crazy and the environment is going crazy and this is what our legislator cares about.
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2019-02-17
Japan is going to shit a brick
1 2561-2685-0682-521 2019-02-17
When it comes to choosing between pedophiles and the government. I choose pedophiles.
1 watermark03alt 2019-02-17
Porque no los dos?
1 trappysaruh 2019-02-17
whoever reported this, please respond to this message for your immediate promotion to modship.
1 matt123hihat 2019-02-17
I’m fairly certain r/darqwolff is a mod
1 trappysaruh 2019-02-17
moderator reports include the mods name
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-17
Not if theyl mod uses an alt
1 pausei144 2019-02-17
He's right though, there's not a single argument based on FACTS and LOGIC by that Loli art should be illegal.
1 trappysaruh 2019-02-17
your mod invite is in the mail!
1 SJCards 2019-02-17
Wait a second, I remember this scam...
1 InboxMeYourButthole 2019-02-17
That's the beauty of it: We don't need to make arguments based on FACTS and LOGIC, we just need to ban it on the grounds that it's drawn child porn and then put anyone who objects on a government watchlist.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
Reveal yourself, pedophile
1 Andlat_Vard 2019-02-17
pls don't mod the u/darqwolff alt
1 FakeBartReagor 2019-02-17
Good. Fuck ALL pedos. Pedocide when?
1 watermark03alt 2019-02-17
First they came for the pedophiles
And I did nothing, because I was not a pedophile
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-17
1 MrGoodieMob 2019-02-17
It never started for pedocels
1 0o-0-o0 2019-02-17
weebcide is now
1 capthazelwoodsflask 2019-02-17
What's with the UN? It started with laws against taking creep shots, they sent out the NWO troops and literally forced us to respect females, and now they're sending out the jack booted thugs again to steal our naked drawings of little kids. When will this oppression end? This truly is the dystopia we've all been dreading.
1 Poz_My_Neg_Fuck_Hole 2019-02-17
Just claim it's art
1 TotesMessenger 2019-02-17
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 RedesignIsShit 2019-02-17
“They’re just drawings!” is the new shibboleth furnace passcode.