I did a research paper this summer on this subreddit and there was a published study that found that 74% of attacks on Reddit came from 1% of source subreddits. I assume that subs like r/Drama are the 1%.
Is it really that enjoyable to circlejerk over straw men of people who oppose your political views? Or do redditors think the shit posted on that sub is what rightoids actually believe?
It's like masturbation for them. They know this is a shit Boomer meme but they can't help but join the conversation about who would win a hypothetical civil war
The argument these people makes are devoid of any historical precedent: “Surely a sparsely populated rural region with handheld weapons would have military mastery of a network of industrialized urban centers with an overwhelming population!!”
This has been the basis of nearly every insurgency.
I’m not sure if that person is shit posting or not.
I would bet a top-shelf bussy and a half that they have smug posted about how the US: “should have known invasions wouldn’t result in victory in Afghanistan and Vietnam, you can’t fight an entrenched population devoid of centralized leadership while occupying their land yadda yardda my wife’s son is still playing my Switch”.
even if this hypothetical civil war were to happen, wouldn't the blue states that are generally way richer than red states be able to hire a shit ton of mercenaries to do the dirty work?
This user is joking or is 13 years old.
Also there's a user posting one word replies( "Yes", "yup") and getting hundreds of upvotes, super red flag.
How valuable do they think money from a country in a civil war would be? Do they have any idea how fucking expensive a military is? Would they pay for it all in bussy?
Where would these mercs come from? What would stop them from just taking over the US? If your military is so anemic that your first thought to fill all of it is to hire mercenaries from outside, you’re going to get got.
There's a reason basically every insurgency in history was based out of the countryside, if there was ever a commie revolution in Burgerstan it'd be based out of bumfuck Tennessee.
That's literally how West Virginia was founded. The disenfranchised poor whites in Virgina took to the mountains, started harboring runaways and deserters, and cast their chips in with the Union. They were the original Y'allqaeda.
Yeah. For some reason Iraq's military was lacking veterans and hilariously undertrained causing shit like this
. Usually, the military can actually kill you.
Despite the pathetic circlejerk that erupts over the union beating a country with 1/4th its population, the South didn't really lose military. It lost primarily because its economy was on its last legs and the southern leadership favored reconciliation and chose voluntarily to end the war in a way that would preserve their nation without waging a 30 year insurgency. The modern south/rural world would never revolt because very few people actually care enough about the division, but the Taliban are proof enough that neither of these factors mean shit in the modern world. The US withdrew from vietnam after losing 50k men, it wouldn't be able to survive an insurgency on the scale of the real civil war if it happened today.
It's true that the csa did mediocre near the end of the war, but it couldnt even afford uniforms from the start and was at that point usually outnumbered >3:1. The main point is that arming a soldier is many times less expensive now than before, guerilla warfare would be the only option today rather than being off the table, and the front-based traditional warfare that gave advantage to the side with the bigger army wouldnt be there
No, the point you were trying to make was stated crystal clear: '...the confederacy didn't really lose military. Which is flat-out wrong. Your point about guerilla warfare was also wrong, as evidenced by the mass and willful surrendering of Confederate soldiers near the end of the war.
The main point i was trying to make is that arming a soldier is many times less expensive now than before, guerilla warfare would be the only option today rather than being off the table, and the front-based traditional warfare that gave advantage to the side with the bigger army wouldnt be there
You clearly have no idea about the costs of equiping and maintaining a modern military. Especially in the, highly hypothetical, scenario of your enermy breaking off with 3/1 of your economy, most of your major ports, tech & population centers.
And lmao @ the thought of rural magacels being able to carry out any sort of 'insurgency'. They'd be dead of diabeetus before they even reached the front. Comparing them to groups of people battle-hardened from generations of constant warfare, like the Taliban and the VietCong, is insulting to the later.
It would literally be hutu vs Tutsi, except less ethnic difference and more guns. But the ethnic difference is a big one, because without uniforms how the hell are you gonna know who to shoot? Aim for the guys with big black glasses and skinny jeans?
It's stupid to speculate anyway after decades of developing and practicing counter radical efforts.
The Oregon bird sanctuary and Waco are way more relevant than the civil war here. Any leader motivating a group to usurp the government will be dealt with swiftly while we all laugh at the 55 gallon drum of lube.
So Rockefeller was trying to figure out how to make the south rise again (and make 💰, you know). He had this big brain idea of "Maybe stop stepping in bubba's shit?"
the union beating a country with 1/4th its population
Nobody had conquered territory that vast since Tamerlane and certainly not in 5 years. Hence the shock among experts in Europe at the outcome of the war.
the southern leadership favored reconciliation and chose voluntarily to end the war in a way that would preserve their nation without waging a 30 year insurgency
This is actually very insightful. Recognizing that the Americans would have just turned over the task of hunting down and killing... uhhh... honorable southern gentleman to blacks was definitely an important factor in the surrender.
Despite the rather pathetic circlejerk that erupts over the union beating a country with 1/4th its population, the confederacy didn't really lose military. It lost primarily because its economy was on its last legs and the southern leadership favored reconciliation and chose voluntarily to end the war in a way that would preserve their nation without waging a 30 year insurgency.
That’s how war works retard. Why do you think their economy was on its last legs? “Chose voluntarily to end the war” lmao maximum cope
chose voluntarily to end the war in a way that would preserve their nation without waging a 30 year insurgency
lol, that would have actually been the better outcome. An insurgency would have meant that the federal government would have kept the garrisons and never abandoned reconstruction, the terrorists would have been slaughtered by the Army, thus eliminating the KKK, and with that continued federal control over local and state government, no Jim Crow, either.
Not really. While rugged, mountainous rural terrains have traditionally been ideal strongholds for guerrilla movements, most large insurgencies recruited from all over the place.
And, whatever the case, most large insurgencies were not (unlike in this hypothetical) made up largerly of obese meth'd up inbreds with AK's and their auxiliary skinnyfat suburban HS kids.
The Taliban, just like the VietCong a couple of decades ago, were made-up of people battle-hardened from generations of near-constant warfare.
A hypothetical new Southern Rebellion would draw manpower from some of the sickest, fattest most pampared first worlders around. Who's country hasn't experienced a war on its soil since 1812. Comparing the two is legit insulting to the Taliban.
say what you will about antifa being all mentally ill and physically deformed freaks, but they are capable of walking, running etc without the use of mobility scooters, so in rough terrain off-road they will have a clear combat advantage over the magaboomers. part of the war will also come down to whether suicides due to being misgendered outnumber deaths due to obesity + rage induced heart attacks
but they are capable of walking, running etc without the use of mobility scooters, so in rough terrain off-road they will have a clear combat advantage over the magaboomers
this is classic misunderstanding of Trump's voter base.
Sure, a lot of young people would be on the left side in a hypothetical war, but take a look at what you're getting.
The chess club? Sure. Ap students? Maybe.
But 95% of every athletic club is going to be a MAGA kid. The Football team, wrestling team, maybe you'll get basketball if you're in an urban environment but if you're in the suburbs that BB team is MAGA 9/10 times.
The next generation is conservative, it's just a vocal minority that makes people think other wise.
Yeah if you live in California, and even some of the kids your age are vocally conservative you can bet your ass that it's at least triple that in the rest of the country.
every actual poll shows gen z is basically the same as millenials politically, but autistic 4chan/reddit zoomers think they represent the whole generation
It's been my experience that the combat sports are populated by magacels. So the magacels will have the advantage of youth/strength/marksmanship and will be backed up by the mobility scooter obese magacels, many of whom have either direct combat experience or decades of firearms practice.
Guys guys, I know we are unironically scared of the idea of guns, but come on, we are basically rich, we can just hire other people to do our work for us anyway. Its easy, just do a dark web scan and hire a mercenary forehead
the funniest part is that the leftie side wouldn't have soldiers. You've trained these kids that America was never great, violence is bad all the time no matter what, war is wrong, etc and now you think that you're going to turn these kids into A war machine lmao
You've trained these kids that America was never great
That's the saddest part of it. In Stalin's time, communist propaganda taught that being a commie was really the most American thing you could do. Now these kids are left with nothing to identify with except self-hate.
violence is bad all the time no matter what, war is wrong
Cletus's kid would be stringing up his enemies from trees and gutting them like deer. Meanwhile these kids would be like, "I can't believe you'd do that to a deer!"
Good luck winning a civil war if you're not willing to kick hundreds of begging enemies that you've just executed into a mass grave.
The thing (voting rights for felons) I'm most proud of in my life so far is voting for this. To see it passed is amazing and makes me happy in the best way
Lmao imagine your life being so pathetic that being one of over five million to vote yes on a fucking state amendment is the thing you are most proud of in your life
In these hypotheticals why do they always leave out the fact that there are tons of people in the dem states who would side with the red states.
It isn't like they automatically have California's whole population on their side just like the right wouldn't have all of Texas.
But in all states the people better suited for a full out civil war like police and military and former military I would guess more would fight for the right in America but I don't know for sure.
People everywhere would easily go right. Every farmer in CA fucking hates liberals with a passion so the "lol we'll just starve the rural folk who've lived in the boonies their whole lives because we're rich liberals" argument looks even dumber. And what happens every time there's even the tiniest bit of unrest in the country? Liberal cities start rioting and burning themselves down. Whether because a gang member got shot, or the lakers won a championship. No one ever goes out to bumfuck nowhere to riot, they're so fucking lazy they'd rob their neighbors.
Liberals would destroy themselves before cleetus would even have to bother loading his gun. Honestly, the only fighting done would be from liberals trying to escape their burning cities and robbing farmsteads because they'd be starving to death. And reds have studied up castle laws for years now so good fucking luck. Hell, Hickok45 alone would win the "war." It'd be so fucking one-sided it's almost sad to think about.
Imagine thinking any but the lowest dregs of the US military would desert those who feed, clothe and pay them & their families to join some ragtag yokel revolt in the Appalachia lmao
The problem is, all the people you'd expect to be these warriors or whatever are actually obese and stupid. All that militia shit died in the 90's, it's for hobbyists now.
Congrats on being the only fag in your apartment building to own a Glock.
However, Billy Fentanyl has an arsenal of weapons that blue state residents have voted themselves out of owning, and has been religiously maintaining, shooting, hunting with and cumming on them.
He isn't in a LARPer militia, but he does get a hard-on at the first thought of a civil war, and rest assured that in a civil war him and every other member of his sisterwife clan (along with his Marine cousin and Army brother) will band together and make Fentanyville into a veritable soy grinder.
And there are roughly 100 million Billys throughout every rural area in the US. Libtards will get dabbed on.
I don't live in a blue state. The only people who believe this shit don't actually live in Fentanylville. It's telling all these right-wing terrorists attacks come from dysfunctional but fairly well-to-do families. Think redneck chic, aka the dude who drives a lifted pickup to his job as like a real estate agent. Those guys are especially prevelant in places like Texas. Actual Billie Bob's aren't functional enough to actually revolt, which is sad because their lives legitimately suck ass.
176 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-14
I did a research paper this summer on this subreddit and there was a published study that found that 74% of attacks on Reddit came from 1% of source subreddits. I assume that subs like r/Drama are the 1%.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Coonass_alt 2019-03-14
Is it really that enjoyable to circlejerk over straw men of people who oppose your political views? Or do redditors think the shit posted on that sub is what rightoids actually believe?
1 WeenieHutJrSupreme 2019-03-14
It's easy to enjoy being retarded when you lack self-awareness.
1 BenchPressEveryDay 2019-03-14
They're mega coping.
1 seenten 2019-03-14
muhboth sides do it constantly, so yes1 grabthebanners 2019-03-14
It's like masturbation for them. They know this is a shit Boomer meme but they can't help but join the conversation about who would win a hypothetical civil war
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-14
r/drama couldn't either. This thread is full of retards who they they're experts on military matters 😂
1 sokolovey 2019-03-14
This has been the basis of nearly every insurgency.
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-03-14
I’m not sure if that person is shit posting or not.
I would bet a top-shelf bussy and a half that they have smug posted about how the US: “should have known invasions wouldn’t result in victory in Afghanistan and Vietnam, you can’t fight an entrenched population devoid of centralized leadership while occupying their land yadda yardda my wife’s son is still playing my Switch”.
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-03-14
They have to be joking, I mean, come on:
This user is joking or is 13 years old.
Also there's a user posting one word replies( "Yes", "yup") and getting hundreds of upvotes, super red flag.
1 OnePercentOfMonster 2019-03-14
I just did a full Game of Thrones binge in anticipation of the new season soooo yeah, I think I know a thing or two about war and mercenaries
1 2938_throwd 2019-03-14
Man, I don’t even know where to start.
How valuable do they think money from a country in a civil war would be? Do they have any idea how fucking expensive a military is? Would they pay for it all in bussy?
Where would these mercs come from? What would stop them from just taking over the US? If your military is so anemic that your first thought to fill all of it is to hire mercenaries from outside, you’re going to get got.
God damn. Fuck. What an idiot.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-14
There's a reason basically every insurgency in history was based out of the countryside, if there was ever a commie revolution in Burgerstan it'd be based out of bumfuck Tennessee.
1 TrailerParkBride 2019-03-14
That's literally how West Virginia was founded. The disenfranchised poor whites in Virgina took to the mountains, started harboring runaways and deserters, and cast their chips in with the Union. They were the original Y'allqaeda.
1 waitforitalex 2019-03-14
But insurgency is what a losing side does. While the stupid meme implies the red states will win
1 LaptopEnforcer 2019-03-14
Bumfuck Tennessee is pretty great tbh
1 Nebor 2019-03-14
Where the whisky flows like water and the fields are full of bounding, plentiful bussies.
1 wiking85 2019-03-14
Other than Iraq?
1 AlicesHardBoiledEggs 2019-03-14
Yeah. For some reason Iraq's military was lacking veterans and hilariously undertrained causing shit like this . Usually, the military can actually kill you.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-14
Modern Arab militaries are notoriously incompetent.
1 Welcome_to_Brotact 2019-03-14
What is Vietnam, Alex?
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-03-14
Despite the pathetic circlejerk that erupts over the union beating a country with 1/4th its population, the South didn't really lose military. It lost primarily because its economy was on its last legs and the southern leadership favored reconciliation and chose voluntarily to end the war in a way that would preserve their nation without waging a 30 year insurgency. The modern south/rural world would never revolt because very few people actually care enough about the division, but the Taliban are proof enough that neither of these factors mean shit in the modern world. The US withdrew from vietnam after losing 50k men, it wouldn't be able to survive an insurgency on the scale of the real civil war if it happened today.
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
What is General Sherman?
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-03-14
It's true that the csa did mediocre near the end of the war, but it couldnt even afford uniforms from the start and was at that point usually outnumbered >3:1. The main point is that arming a soldier is many times less expensive now than before, guerilla warfare would be the only option today rather than being off the table, and the front-based traditional warfare that gave advantage to the side with the bigger army wouldnt be there
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
No, the point you were trying to make was stated crystal clear: '...the confederacy didn't really lose military. Which is flat-out wrong. Your point about guerilla warfare was also wrong, as evidenced by the mass and willful surrendering of Confederate soldiers near the end of the war.
You clearly have no idea about the costs of equiping and maintaining a modern military. Especially in the, highly hypothetical, scenario of your enermy breaking off with 3/1 of your economy, most of your major ports, tech & population centers.
And lmao @ the thought of rural magacels being able to carry out any sort of 'insurgency'. They'd be dead of diabeetus before they even reached the front. Comparing them to groups of people battle-hardened from generations of constant warfare, like the Taliban and the VietCong, is insulting to the later.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-14
It's true the CSA did punch well above its weight, but that's largely because they had some genuinely great generals.
Sherman was okay, but I'd put based Ulysses at the top for the Union side.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-14
The only general you remember from high school I’m guessing.
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
Guess that hit a nerve. Or is it an old burn?
1 siempreloco31 2019-03-14
Lol controversial tag. Dramatards absolutely S E E T H I N G
1 The_Long_Connor 2019-03-14
Pretty easy when you're going up against Joseph E Johnston for a good portion of the Atlanta campaign.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2019-03-14
🎵 WE DON'T NEED NO WATER LET THE MOTHERFUCKER BURN 🎵
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-03-14
The real mistake these guys make is thinking it would be North vs South when it would actually be urban vs rural.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-14
Another mistake is they think red counties are 100% GOP and blue counties are 100% Democrat.
1 MPHJ-7 2019-03-14
In reality, the 2nd Civil War would be more of a geurilla war than a traditional conflict like the first one.
1 AspenFirBirch 2019-03-14
It would literally be hutu vs Tutsi, except less ethnic difference and more guns. But the ethnic difference is a big one, because without uniforms how the hell are you gonna know who to shoot? Aim for the guys with big black glasses and skinny jeans?
1 jamesangleton 2019-03-14
Far leftist men all look exactly the scrawny same and dress the same too. They would be easy to spot, uniform or no.
1 dogwheiner 2019-03-14
It's stupid to speculate anyway after decades of developing and practicing counter radical efforts.
The Oregon bird sanctuary and Waco are way more relevant than the civil war here. Any leader motivating a group to usurp the government will be dealt with swiftly while we all laugh at the 55 gallon drum of lube.
1 heretobefriends 2019-03-14
"The north didn't really win, it just removed the capacity for the south to wage war."
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-14
Peak cope lol
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-03-14
They did win, but the victory was due to factors that wouldn't be present in a modern war
1 PresidentYang 2019-03-14
Supply lines do not exist
1 dogwheiner 2019-03-14
"The Taliban prove you can fight any army by losing all your land, being forced into hiding, then being murdered anyway."
1 PresidentYang 2019-03-14
“The north won”
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-14
"The North won the Civil War"
1 seenten 2019-03-14
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-14
This is your brain on inbreeding culture
1 AlicesHardBoiledEggs 2019-03-14
So Rockefeller was trying to figure out how to make the south rise again (and make 💰, you know). He had this big brain idea of "Maybe stop stepping in bubba's shit?"
1 Redactor0 2019-03-14
Nobody had conquered territory that vast since Tamerlane and certainly not in 5 years. Hence the shock among experts in Europe at the outcome of the war.
This is actually very insightful. Recognizing that the Americans would have just turned over the task of hunting down and killing... uhhh... honorable southern gentleman to blacks was definitely an important factor in the surrender.
1 TheChtaptiskFithp 2019-03-14
The poor whites would have also been happy to help.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-14
https://i.imgur.com/8HnT78H.jpg
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-03-14
How many posts do you have to sperg on every day to survive
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-14
Nice cope, retard 🤣
1 PresidentYang 2019-03-14
That’s how war works retard. Why do you think their economy was on its last legs? “Chose voluntarily to end the war” lmao maximum cope
1 cruelandusual 2019-03-14
lol, that would have actually been the better outcome. An insurgency would have meant that the federal government would have kept the garrisons and never abandoned reconstruction, the terrorists would have been slaughtered by the Army, thus eliminating the KKK, and with that continued federal control over local and state government, no Jim Crow, either.
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
Not really. While rugged, mountainous rural terrains have traditionally been ideal strongholds for guerrilla movements, most large insurgencies recruited from all over the place.
And, whatever the case, most large insurgencies were not (unlike in this hypothetical) made up largerly of obese meth'd up inbreds with AK's and their auxiliary skinnyfat suburban HS kids.
1 drkitteh 2019-03-14
When the opposition is obese stoners with no weapons or children, I don't think that matters to much.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-14
Wow, retarded.
1 Gen_McMuster 2019-03-14
The Taliban is made up of goat-herders who don't even aim when they shoot and they've been dabbing on modern militaries for 30 years
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
The Taliban, just like the VietCong a couple of decades ago, were made-up of people battle-hardened from generations of near-constant warfare.
A hypothetical new Southern Rebellion would draw manpower from some of the sickest, fattest most pampared first worlders around. Who's country hasn't experienced a war on its soil since 1812. Comparing the two is legit insulting to the Taliban.
1 qostewo 2019-03-14
lol wait did you forget about the war from 1861-1865? That was all on American soil.
1 AHealthySenseofDread 2019-03-14
All of those people are dead loser.
1 qostewo 2019-03-14
Yep that tends to happen. How long did it take for you to do the math?
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-03-14
Fortunate Son intensifies
1 MPHJ-7 2019-03-14
"The trees speak English but with a thick southern accent"
1 Firnin 2019-03-14
conservative areas rising up against a radical city based government and fighting a brutal insurrection? never happened in history
1 heretobefriends 2019-03-14
Lol, they lost.
1 waitforitalex 2019-03-14
But insurgency is what a losing side does. While the stupid meme implies the red states will win
1 letter_of_resignatio 2019-03-14
Vietnam? Taliban? Hezbollah? Current Yemen?
1 martini29 2019-03-14
All countries supported by outside parties and made up of battle hardened badass motherfuckers, not fat methheads
1 letter_of_resignatio 2019-03-14
1 TheChtaptiskFithp 2019-03-14
It always cracks me up when the popular perception is "if ISIS invades the US the rednecks and gangbangers will take them out in no time."
1 CherryKirsche 2019-03-14
Eh not really. The basis of every successful insurgency always has been supported by foreign powers / external forces.
1 letter_of_resignatio 2019-03-14
City's can be sieged, countryside can't.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-03-14
Yes it absolutely can you nob.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-14
1 Alexlincoln2 2019-03-14
What is Biafra?
1 TheChtaptiskFithp 2019-03-14
It can be barrel-bombed :^)
Allah, Souria, Bashar in the distance
1 StingAuer 2019-03-14
Ukraine
1 martini29 2019-03-14
Most insurgencies lose
1 endestir 2019-03-14
say what you will about antifa being all mentally ill and physically deformed freaks, but they are capable of walking, running etc without the use of mobility scooters, so in rough terrain off-road they will have a clear combat advantage over the magaboomers. part of the war will also come down to whether suicides due to being misgendered outnumber deaths due to obesity + rage induced heart attacks
1 masterstick8 2019-03-14
this is classic misunderstanding of Trump's voter base.
Sure, a lot of young people would be on the left side in a hypothetical war, but take a look at what you're getting.
The chess club? Sure. Ap students? Maybe.
But 95% of every athletic club is going to be a MAGA kid. The Football team, wrestling team, maybe you'll get basketball if you're in an urban environment but if you're in the suburbs that BB team is MAGA 9/10 times.
The next generation is conservative, it's just a vocal minority that makes people think other wise.
1 endestir 2019-03-14
nice cope, magas are all old and have diabetes, statistically
1 masterstick8 2019-03-14
not a cope from me, I don't really like Trump.
I'm just telling you, 2020 will be a lot closer than people think because all those CHAD 14-17 year olds can vote now.
1 Humorlessness 2019-03-14
Image believing that young people will actually vote.
Young people literally never vote.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-14
As a zoomer I can tell you that's a fucking lie. Most are center left with a local minority of magatards and commiecels.
1 totally_not_ac3 2019-03-14
I, as a fellow zoomer, I completely disagree with you. Most people in my grade/age group are either right, or center right.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-14
I'd call you out for coping but I live in California so that might be skewing my view of gen z.
1 totally_not_ac3 2019-03-14
Yeah if you live in California, and even some of the kids your age are vocally conservative you can bet your ass that it's at least triple that in the rest of the country.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-14
If gen Z is majority conservative the resulting drama with the millennials will be great.
1 totally_not_ac3 2019-03-14
I'm real excited for 2020 for more than a few reasons. Dramacoin is gonna be great that year, regardless of where the pendulum swings.
1 CherryKirsche 2019-03-14
Zoomers talking about politics lol
1 endestir 2019-03-14
every actual poll shows gen z is basically the same as millenials politically, but autistic 4chan/reddit zoomers think they represent the whole generation
1 TreLoon 2019-03-14
Millennials are the awkward middle child, I just realized this
1 Kill_The_Sacklers 2019-03-14
Lmao
1 siempreloco31 2019-03-14
There's no evidence of this and plenty of the opposite.
1 -Mopsus- 2019-03-14
actual polling data shows that Gen Z is really similar to millennials.
even zoomers who identify as republicans are still even more 'progressive' on some issues than millennial republicans.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-03-14
It's been my experience that the combat sports are populated by magacels. So the magacels will have the advantage of youth/strength/marksmanship and will be backed up by the mobility scooter obese magacels, many of whom have either direct combat experience or decades of firearms practice.
It's over for citymillennialleftistcels
1 plurpnslurp 2019-03-14
Nah dude hip city dwellers are master axe-throwers
1 PresidentYang 2019-03-14
Shooting at bottles 10 feet away and doing judo with your uncle does not constitute strength nor marksmanship
1 chunk_o 2019-03-14
running isn’t great against cletus’s ar15 even if he isn’t exactly the fastest guy.
1 Mexagon 2019-03-14
Hillbillies and rednecks live in the sticks their entire lives. They're practically born with 4 wheel drives.
1 FTFallen 2019-03-14
ngl if I ever live to see yallquaeda curbstomp uniqlo camo wearing hipsters in open combat it will, without a doubt, be the highlight of my life.
1 zweckloss 2019-03-14
Here's a taste. Some pre-stuff. Do you like pre-stuff?
​
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDRT1e8ecsc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2t4MRC36rs
1 hi_0 2019-03-14
Was that a pot of beans???
1 qostewo 2019-03-14
maybe chili?
1 Waylon_Swellings 2019-03-14
https://youtu.be/J2t4MRC36rs?t=440
It's hilarious how every there's actual fighting, antifa always gets their asses kicked.
1 Mrtheliger 2019-03-14
Guys guys, I know we are unironically scared of the idea of guns, but come on, we are basically rich, we can just hire other people to do our work for us anyway. Its easy, just do a dark web scan and hire a mercenary forehead
1 BenchPressEveryDay 2019-03-14
Galaxy-brain tier tactics from the soyim here.
1 TheSubredditPolice 2019-03-14
All I can picture is that scene in office space were they're looking up money laundering in the dictionary. Except with mercenaries and google.
1 TreLoon 2019-03-14
Yikes. Do it right or don't do it at all
1 Vurtizontal 2019-03-14
This has never ever backfire and is a great plan without any drawbacks/s
1 keeeeshawn 2019-03-14
OUT
1 Vurtizontal 2019-03-14
What, what i say? It's a terrible plan.
1 LightUmbra 2019-03-14
Stop serious posting
1 Vurtizontal 2019-03-14
Dude bussy lmao?
1 LightUmbra 2019-03-14
Good boy
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-14
Life fuel for foederaticels
1 furrthur 2019-03-14
OUT
1 Ted_UtteredBoast 2019-03-14
some good old boys sign up, take the payment, fuck shit up, leave
1 Redactor0 2019-03-14
You can trust me, John "Redactor" Hawkwood. 😎😎😎
1 Amin00265 2019-03-14
Stop putting /s after obvious sarcasm
1 Kellere31 2019-03-14
Fucking rapefugees 😨🤢🤮
1 DeweaponizedAutism 2019-03-14
/soy
1 masterstick8 2019-03-14
the funniest part is that the leftie side wouldn't have soldiers. You've trained these kids that America was never great, violence is bad all the time no matter what, war is wrong, etc and now you think that you're going to turn these kids into A war machine lmao
1 Redactor0 2019-03-14
That's the saddest part of it. In Stalin's time, communist propaganda taught that being a commie was really the most American thing you could do. Now these kids are left with nothing to identify with except self-hate.
1 allendrio 2019-03-14
When your cope level is so high you start sounding like imperialist japan and their horrible take on USA war morale.
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
This entire thread is a cope mine lmao
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2019-03-14
Very nice cope you have there.
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
😂😂😂
1 I_DRINK_TO_FORGET 2019-03-14
Nice cope eomji.
1 whatsupufkkinretards 2019-03-14
Copemojis
1 Nebor 2019-03-14
Cletus's kid would be stringing up his enemies from trees and gutting them like deer. Meanwhile these kids would be like, "I can't believe you'd do that to a deer!"
Good luck winning a civil war if you're not willing to kick hundreds of begging enemies that you've just executed into a mass grave.
1 ry8919 2019-03-14
> Implying one of the laziest, fattest countries would mobilize its populous for a civil war over politics.
1 evannever 2019-03-14
Has this dipshit ever seen a map, or heard the term "The Gulf of Mexico"? Every comment in that thread was dumber than the previous one.
1 preserved_fish 2019-03-14
The big port cities on the Gulf are mostly liberal.
1 100percentdegenerate 2019-03-14
read: african american
1 grabthebanners 2019-03-14
Y'all better bet your ass I'm putting sea mines in the oceans
1 persistent-vision 2019-03-14
Galveston... Mobile maybe?
1 RevCostanzaJaypeg 2019-03-14
Lmao imagine your life being so pathetic that being one of over five million to vote yes on a fucking state amendment is the thing you are most proud of in your life
1 moondoggy101 2019-03-14
In these hypotheticals why do they always leave out the fact that there are tons of people in the dem states who would side with the red states.
It isn't like they automatically have California's whole population on their side just like the right wouldn't have all of Texas.
But in all states the people better suited for a full out civil war like police and military and former military I would guess more would fight for the right in America but I don't know for sure.
1 Mexagon 2019-03-14
People everywhere would easily go right. Every farmer in CA fucking hates liberals with a passion so the "lol we'll just starve the rural folk who've lived in the boonies their whole lives because we're rich liberals" argument looks even dumber. And what happens every time there's even the tiniest bit of unrest in the country? Liberal cities start rioting and burning themselves down. Whether because a gang member got shot, or the lakers won a championship. No one ever goes out to bumfuck nowhere to riot, they're so fucking lazy they'd rob their neighbors.
Liberals would destroy themselves before cleetus would even have to bother loading his gun. Honestly, the only fighting done would be from liberals trying to escape their burning cities and robbing farmsteads because they'd be starving to death. And reds have studied up castle laws for years now so good fucking luck. Hell, Hickok45 alone would win the "war." It'd be so fucking one-sided it's almost sad to think about.
1 allendrio 2019-03-14
holy shit how are you burgers this shit at economics, food imports is not hard for a coastal metropolis, its how they function.
1 Manchu_Fist 2019-03-14
Ports destroyed.
Now what?
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
With what? Incendiary meth bombs?
1 Manchu_Fist 2019-03-14
Most of the military is conservative. At the very least you would have artillery available.
1 Matues49 2019-03-14
Imagine thinking any but the lowest dregs of the US military would desert those who feed, clothe and pay them & their families to join some ragtag yokel revolt in the Appalachia lmao
1 Manchu_Fist 2019-03-14
be. Our good friend Burgerdal?
1 martini29 2019-03-14
People who say this were never in the military.
There ain’t gonna be a new civil war, and if there was it’d look more like north Ireland than anything
1 Manchu_Fist 2019-03-14
Ok I'll correct myself. COMBAT ARMS is mostly conservative.
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2019-03-14
Because there would be more people in Red states helping the Dems.
1 heretobefriends 2019-03-14
Do any other countries routinely talk about how easy it would be to kill each other?
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-14
Bad example everybody from the Welsh to the Manx fantasize about killing the English.
1 heretobefriends 2019-03-14
The whole world, really, but do their fantasies extend into strategic discussions?
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-14
Ig you're right. Burgers were a mistake.
1 ____________13 2019-03-14
No, because we've already spent hundreds of years discovering what happens when the English and Scots try to kill each other.
I think we called it a draw and decided to tag-team the Irish instead.
1 whiskeyhammer1990 2019-03-14
The problem is, all the people you'd expect to be these warriors or whatever are actually obese and stupid. All that militia shit died in the 90's, it's for hobbyists now.
1 wsbking 2019-03-14
cope
1 whiskeyhammer1990 2019-03-14
I'm not disarmed if that's what you were going for.
And anyway, it's a moot question because all of these militia groups are full of feds anyway.
1 wsbking 2019-03-14
Congrats on being the only fag in your apartment building to own a Glock.
However, Billy Fentanyl has an arsenal of weapons that blue state residents have voted themselves out of owning, and has been religiously maintaining, shooting, hunting with and cumming on them.
He isn't in a LARPer militia, but he does get a hard-on at the first thought of a civil war, and rest assured that in a civil war him and every other member of his sisterwife clan (along with his Marine cousin and Army brother) will band together and make Fentanyville into a veritable soy grinder.
And there are roughly 100 million Billys throughout every rural area in the US. Libtards will get dabbed on.
1 whiskeyhammer1990 2019-03-14
I don't live in a blue state. The only people who believe this shit don't actually live in Fentanylville. It's telling all these right-wing terrorists attacks come from dysfunctional but fairly well-to-do families. Think redneck chic, aka the dude who drives a lifted pickup to his job as like a real estate agent. Those guys are especially prevelant in places like Texas. Actual Billie Bob's aren't functional enough to actually revolt, which is sad because their lives legitimately suck ass.
1 TheChtaptiskFithp 2019-03-14
If billy was in a militia he'd probably spend most of the civil war fighting other militias that they disagree with over minor doctrinal disputes.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2019-03-14
We gun protek dis her walmart wit ar lifes!!
1 TUMS_FESTIVAL 2019-03-14
Yes, all that fat does make their arms heavy. Makes it really hard to lift up and aim their guns.
1 Al-Rokers-BBC 2019-03-14
lmao
1 MehmedIIDidNoWrong 2019-03-14
Unironically could use another Shermans March though. Let's boogaloo already.
1 Secateurs 2019-03-14
Unironically the Brits should burn down Washington again, then the French should burn the English and then the Italians should burn the French...
1 100percentdegenerate 2019-03-14
could you not i like my house not burnt to the ground tyvm
1 CherryKirsche 2019-03-14
As a non American, both the linked thread as this one are pretty cringy tbh.
1 wsbking 2019-03-14
> As a non American
Opinion discarded
1 Kellere31 2019-03-14
Imagine living in a country that constantly fantasies about killing itself.
1 allendrio 2019-03-14
Whats with all these serious posting conservacopes acting like the entirety of the cities is a TD parody of a liberal.
1 TheHeroReditDeserves 2019-03-14
These fucking people think that the next civil war is gona be states that voters for trunk vs states that voted for Hilary fucking L O l
1 bfeon 2019-03-14
HAHAHAHAHA
1 TotesMessenger 2019-03-14
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-03-14
The actual truth is that a civil war stalls out after a few hours as the liberals need rural soy and the rurals need imported/manufactured goods.
1 2938_throwd 2019-03-14
You might not like it, but this is what peak combat performance looks like. https://i.imgur.com/oBOLr0E.jpg