If you support free speech, you must support people pinging other users. It's completely legal speech. If you won't defend pinging as free speech because you or someone else finds it disgusting, then no speech that you or anyone else views as disgusting is safe.
if it is in fact on shaky legal ground it's reasonable to not want to be the case that establishes it as illegal.
It's not, The reddit admins are straight up lying to the ignorant (like yourself) to justify their prejudice. Pinging being protected speech has long since been estabilished, as it has undeniable artistic merit. The only time it's been included under any obscenity laws is when someone is being charged with possession of harassment, so the state can slap them with more charges. The courts have been very careful to not charge anyone for pinging, because they'd get their asses fucking annihilated by a higher court due to the firm precedence of pinging being completely legal speech. /r/Drama had nothing to worry about, this guy was just making shit up to fool people into thinking his censoring wasn't entirely personally motivated.
tfw you will never prematurely ejaculate into lawlzs sturdy haunches and have him comfort you afterwards saying that it's fine and he actually takes it as a compliment
A true dilemma, should we take Bentham's utilitarian approach or rather use the gay ethics of Sen to solve this problem?
Imo, we should have a true radical centrist approach: take the decision that brings the most total dissatisfaction. In other words, it's over for unapprovedcels.
44 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-05-04
If you support free speech, you must support people pinging other users. It's completely legal speech. If you won't defend pinging as free speech because you or someone else finds it disgusting, then no speech that you or anyone else views as disgusting is safe.
It's not, The reddit admins are straight up lying to the ignorant (like yourself) to justify their prejudice. Pinging being protected speech has long since been estabilished, as it has undeniable artistic merit. The only time it's been included under any obscenity laws is when someone is being charged with possession of harassment, so the state can slap them with more charges. The courts have been very careful to not charge anyone for pinging, because they'd get their asses fucking annihilated by a higher court due to the firm precedence of pinging being completely legal speech. /r/Drama had nothing to worry about, this guy was just making shit up to fool people into thinking his censoring wasn't entirely personally motivated.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 LucidHuckleberry 2019-05-04
90.6% of mods should be banned.
1 Logan_Pauler 2019-05-04
40% would have already killed themselves.
1 Kidrobot069 2019-05-04
epic
1 Name_Is_Science 2019-05-04
90.6% of the mods control 99% of the gay sex.
Occupy drama street
1 MikeStoklasaBackup 2019-05-04
It's over
1 Wopitikitotengo 2019-05-04
1 rokety_roket 2019-05-04
I think you mean powerful haunches
1 matt123hihat 2019-05-04
I said it’s FINE
1 rsrfy 2019-05-04
why live?
1 yourdeadwife 2019-05-04
imagine not having a rapeable masterlawlz tulpa in 2019. absolute plebian
1 -Steve_French- 2019-05-04
Cope
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-05-04
C
O
P
E
1 throwaway-familyhelp 2019-05-04
🤔🤔
1 SmegMaBallsDick 2019-05-04
You’ll never take u/MasterLawlz alive, you sons of bitches!
1 MasterLawlz 2019-05-04
RUDE!
1 Minimum_T-Giraff 2019-05-04
Even his writing is fat
1 CapitalGigi 2019-05-04
These other dramanauts can’t cope with the fact the ladies are obsessed with you 😘
1 d4ddyd54m4 2019-05-04
Coping with fiction is pretty hard, hence all our capeshit and swordshit posts
1 wwaalleess 2019-05-04
Hey dude can i get your workout? I wanna do the exact opposite of it.
1 bugeyedredditors 2019-05-04
hah fat cunt
1 aWYgdSByZWFkIHUgZ2F5 2019-05-04
I feel sorry for the naked women you use as chairs
1 smedwed 2019-05-04
It's 90.69% Mr LondiPondi.
1 CapitalGigi 2019-05-04
He's a total chad, and I will not stand for this kind of defamation.
1 noxpallida 2019-05-04
Chud*
1 martin59825 2019-05-04
Chester Billingston Hardcock, Sr., the 3rd, MD, PHD,.FLAC
1 guernicaa19 2019-05-04
Chode*
1 silfe 2019-05-04
The state of lawlzcels
1 AnnArchist 2019-05-04
My current life goals include getting ML to lose his Incel card so we can't ban him. Though that might actually be enough for it to happen.
1 pik_09 2019-05-04
Master_lawlz was banned if that makes you happy
1 philoponeria 2019-05-04
He has a nice dog
1 RueysSoulDiegosFight 2019-05-04
Don't be cowards. DO both!!
1 ersatzanarchist 2019-05-04
Was I banned
1 SevenSmallShrimp 2019-05-04
Maybe
1 TheMayorOfHounslow 2019-05-04
A true dilemma, should we take Bentham's utilitarian approach or rather use the gay ethics of Sen to solve this problem?
Imo, we should have a true radical centrist approach: take the decision that brings the most total dissatisfaction. In other words, it's over for unapprovedcels.
1 [deleted] 2019-05-04
[deleted]
1 [deleted] 2019-05-04
[deleted]
1 RoseTyler38 2019-05-04
Test. Am I banned
1 schwafflex 2019-05-04
Nigger
1 Lincolncantwin 2019-05-04
Lawlz is actually the best
1 i-am-less-angry-now 2019-05-04
If I unsubscribe now then just resubscribe after all his retardation do I beat the system?
1 Bijzettafeltje 2019-05-04
H
1 HillaryDidNothnWrong 2019-05-04
No, dude, given how fucking fat we all are, he'd only make up 10%.
1 ImSimpleGuy 2019-05-04
99.69 is a better number