George Soros has paid me $25 million to create this hurricane with a wooden spoon, glitter, and a bottle of Prosecco. I can do this because I’m a woman, and I can bleed each month without dying. He is sending me the money via magical unicorn. Gay Rainbow unicorn, of course...
The good thing about this community, is it’s still based on consent, as no one is fattened against their will. In a way it’s admirable seeing these women do this to themselves, as it shows a real dedication to work against the grain of society and become the sizes they do.
Why the downvotes? The premise of the argument against Snopes is that the Bee headlines are "obvious satire," yet the OP article links directly to stats that show they're genuinely misleading people- especially their target audience.
Being a certain point you really can't be held accountable for the idiocy of your clientele. Gorilla Glue should not and does not get sued every time someone puts it in their dickhole.
True, and it'd be interesting to see if there are any Onion headlines genuinely misinforming a significant amount of people. I doubt it, but there aren't any figures that I know of.
That's a great link, but Snopes didn't label them as "fake news." Snopes said, "Like all content originating with The Onion, the photograph and claim about ICE agents and a pregnant woman were purely satirical, not real news." Compare that to how Snopes rated The Babylon Bee, which Snopes described as "factually inaccurate content."
The idiots at Snopes just don't like it when "their side" is the butt of the joke. They know exactly what they're doing.
I blame society. If we didn’t have voting age adults who couldn’t be bothered to check their sources then it wouldn’t be necessary for someone to publicly tell them it’s false for them to get it.
Yes, sweaty, we saw your link. When Snopes checked The Onion they labeled it as satire, meanwhile their original position on The Babylon Bee was "factually inaccurate content." Then when they got mocked for fact-checking satire they tried to pull a "bUt IT's nOT rEaL SAtiRe" and said, “Not all content described by its creator or audience as ‘satire’ necessarily constitutes satire, and this rating does not make a distinction between ‘real’ satire and content that may not be effectively recognized or understood as satire despite being labeled as such.”
Snopes eventually admitted defeat in the most passive-aggressive manner possible with their new 'SATIRE' label:
And you want to know the really fucked up part of this that makes it impossible to deny that Snopes is being a little bitch? The tweet in that Red State article links back to an article on Snopes where we can find the line "In fact, stories published by The Bee were among the most shared factually inaccurate content in almost every survey we conducted." The fucked up part is that Snopes adopted their new 'SATIRE' label at least a week before printing the tweet/article basically calling The Babylon Bee "fake news." They're still attacking The Babylon Bee a week after admitting satire exists and calling it "factually inaccurate content." That is some industrial-grade butthurt, amigo.
You don’t seem to be a beacon of intellectual wisdom and intelligent discourse yourself. Why don’t you leave politics and the discussion of such to adults?
I bet you felt really smart typing that. does it ever bother you that even though you feel better than everyone around you, you can't seem to get laid?
That would be quite the impressive comeback were it not for the fact that I’m married with kids. But by all means, please keep going. I just looove swapping insults with children over the internet for no reason. /s
They say they "identified 10 of the most shared fake political stories on social media, which included satirical stories", "asked a representative group of over 800 Americans to tell us if they believed claims based on those trending stories", and "asked people to tell us whether it was true or false and how confident they were in their belief."
It sounds to me like they just read headlines to a sample of people without context and asked if they thought it was true, rather than asking people who had actually read the story on the website that prominently states it is satire if they believed those statements, which is really what the article is about. Are people who actually read the Babylon Bee coming away believing their satire? That's the real question, and not what they polled about, and yet that's what they are implying.
All this tells me is that lefties have gone so insane since trump got in office that parodies of them are more believable if you don't actually preface it with 'this is satire.'
Are people who actually read the Babylon Bee coming away believing their satire? That's the real question, and not what they polled about, and yet that's what they are implying.
Ton of reads come from stories like this being shared on Twitter/Facebook, I'd say more than from the site's traffic. And impressions on social media are mostly just reading the headline, not the article itself. The byproduct of sharing/retweeting is also that people who are not familiar with Babylon Bee being satire are also exposed to it. On top of that, BB readers are primarily christian conservatives, so yes, they're retarded enough to believe satire is real.
With that said, Snopes does seem to have a hateboner for Babylon Bee, the original fact check that started all of this had a completely different tone and language than their fact checks of Onion and the likes.
Sometimes satire is easy to spot, like when The Babylon Bee reported that President Donald Trump had appointed Joe Biden to head up the Transportation Security Administration based on “Biden’s skill getting inappropriately close to people and making unwanted physical advances.”
a) Babylon Bee's satire is the best
b) Rightoids are gullible
c) Lefties are becoming more and more ridiculous that the satire actually seems possible
d) All of the above.
It means that the libs running Snopes are assblasted that rightoids are mimicking the whole 'political propaganda disguised as satire' thing and are fact checking it out of a bottomless well of seethe
73 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-08-17
George Soros has paid me $25 million to create this hurricane with a wooden spoon, glitter, and a bottle of Prosecco. I can do this because I’m a woman, and I can bleed each month without dying. He is sending me the money via magical unicorn. Gay Rainbow unicorn, of course...
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2019-08-17
The good thing about this community, is it’s still based on consent, as no one is fattened against their will. In a way it’s admirable seeing these women do this to themselves, as it shows a real dedication to work against the grain of society and become the sizes they do.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-08-17
lmao
1 ffbtaw2 2019-08-17
All Americans descended from people living in the US when the St Louis was turned away should pay reparations to Holocaust victims.
1 Sarge_Ward 2019-08-17
I got a mobile ad telling me to buy Israeli bonds when I clicked on the article lol
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-08-17
I’ve seen worse bonds...
1 [deleted] 2019-08-17
[removed]
1 Rocketteman 2019-08-17
This is ridiculous and it's surprising that it's such a small story. Everyone on Reddit should be laughing at Snopes. I wonder why they're not...
1 Day_of_the_COPE 2019-08-17
It’s literally just like a old Jewish couple isn’t it?
1 snow_bono 2019-08-17
It's a guy and his former hooker mistress.
1 Day_of_the_COPE 2019-08-17
That that to be a tribesman I just don’t feel like digging lol
It’s possible it’s old whiteoid cat people but usually these media types are neurotic Jews lol
1 Top_Manner 2019-08-17
literally anything bad that exists, you know one of them is responsible. there's no point even looking it up anymore.
1 classicwowcomin 2019-08-17
Rightoids continuing to be triggered by snopes is hilarious, its in everything thread about that site.
1 [deleted] 2019-08-17
[removed]
1 Nom_Chompy 2019-08-17
?
1 wow___justwow 2019-08-17
Mind addled ramblings of someone addicted to a 15 year old spreadsheet simulator.
1 bussylmao 2019-08-17
Wow isnt eve
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-08-17
Han anyone been so far even as to want to do go look more like?
1 Nom_Chompy 2019-08-17
Damn straight you are.
1 Corporal-Hicks 2019-08-17
This is obviously pizzashill
1 GENDER_OF 2019-08-17
Or maybe you should read the snopes article and realize that the title is overblown.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2019/08/16/readers-think-satire-is-real/
1 Unit061 2019-08-17
Why the downvotes? The premise of the argument against Snopes is that the Bee headlines are "obvious satire," yet the OP article links directly to stats that show they're genuinely misleading people- especially their target audience.
1 TrailerParkRide 2019-08-17
Being a certain point you really can't be held accountable for the idiocy of your clientele. Gorilla Glue should not and does not get sued every time someone puts it in their dickhole.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-08-17
Why would you put glue in your dick hole?
1 TrailerParkRide 2019-08-17
Idk. Nofap?
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2019-08-17
Acquiring wizard powers by force.
1 Elite_AI 2019-08-17
experimental peepee hydraulic cannon
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2019-08-17
bruh
1 bussylmao 2019-08-17
Shut up faggot
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2019-08-17
/r/AteTheOnion
Tons of retards think The Onion is real but Snopes doesn't label them fake news.
1 Unit061 2019-08-17
True, and it'd be interesting to see if there are any Onion headlines genuinely misinforming a significant amount of people. I doubt it, but there aren't any figures that I know of.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Yes, they do.
1 jubbergun 2019-08-17
That's a great link, but Snopes didn't label them as "fake news." Snopes said, "Like all content originating with The Onion, the photograph and claim about ICE agents and a pregnant woman were purely satirical, not real news." Compare that to how Snopes rated The Babylon Bee, which Snopes described as "factually inaccurate content."
The idiots at Snopes just don't like it when "their side" is the butt of the joke. They know exactly what they're doing.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2019-08-17
bruh
1 [deleted] 2019-08-17
[removed]
1 XxMadMaxwellxX 2019-08-17
After looking into it, looks more like they fact checking it due to the large volume of people who aren’t able to differentiate satire from real life.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2019-08-17
How is that less retarded?
Do we need to fact check the Onion as fake news because people eat the Onion?
1 XxMadMaxwellxX 2019-08-17
I blame society. If we didn’t have voting age adults who couldn’t be bothered to check their sources then it wouldn’t be necessary for someone to publicly tell them it’s false for them to get it.
1 Ingelri 2019-08-17
Good call. We live in one, after all.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Snopes does fact check the Onion.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2019-08-17
Truly a level of retarded even I didn't expect.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Dude, the internet is meant for giving the most retarded people on Earth a platform. How have you not realized that when you are on this sub?
1 Starship_Litterbox_C 2019-08-17
ManBearFridge is right again.
1 jubbergun 2019-08-17
Yes, sweaty, we saw your link. When Snopes checked The Onion they labeled it as satire, meanwhile their original position on The Babylon Bee was "factually inaccurate content." Then when they got mocked for fact-checking satire they tried to pull a "bUt IT's nOT rEaL SAtiRe" and said, “Not all content described by its creator or audience as ‘satire’ necessarily constitutes satire, and this rating does not make a distinction between ‘real’ satire and content that may not be effectively recognized or understood as satire despite being labeled as such.”
Snopes eventually admitted defeat in the most passive-aggressive manner possible with their new 'SATIRE' label:
This rating indicates that a claim is derived from content described by its creator and/or the wider audience as satire. Not all content described by its creator or audience as ‘satire’ necessarily constitutes satire, and this rating does not make a distinction between 'real' satire and content that may not be effectively recognized or understood as satire despite being labeled as such.
And you want to know the really fucked up part of this that makes it impossible to deny that Snopes is being a little bitch? The tweet in that Red State article links back to an article on Snopes where we can find the line "In fact, stories published by The Bee were among the most shared factually inaccurate content in almost every survey we conducted." The fucked up part is that Snopes adopted their new 'SATIRE' label at least a week before printing the tweet/article basically calling The Babylon Bee "fake news." They're still attacking The Babylon Bee a week after admitting satire exists and calling it "factually inaccurate content." That is some industrial-grade butthurt, amigo.
1 LongPostBot 2019-08-17
This is a really long way of saying you don't fuck.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 jubbergun 2019-08-17
I don't, but if I wanted to I could because I'm not a dickless pile of script, LPB.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Good bot
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Yes sweety, I saw your last reply.
1 jubbergun 2019-08-17
Yeah, they label it "satire" after everybody and their brother mocked them mercilessly for being a humorless twats. Maybe people who have so much surplus autism that it prevents them from recognizing a joke shouldn't be in the business of deciding what is or isn't true.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Lmao they changed it and you are still fucking crying about it
1 nybbas 2019-08-17
It wasn't a problem until a bunch of conservatives started making satire lol
1 agenteABIN 2019-08-17
the kind of people who believe satirical news are not the kind that would ever visit Snopes, you absolute retard
1 XxMadMaxwellxX 2019-08-17
You don’t seem to be a beacon of intellectual wisdom and intelligent discourse yourself. Why don’t you leave politics and the discussion of such to adults?
1 agenteABIN 2019-08-17
I bet you felt really smart typing that. does it ever bother you that even though you feel better than everyone around you, you can't seem to get laid?
1 XxMadMaxwellxX 2019-08-17
That would be quite the impressive comeback were it not for the fact that I’m married with kids. But by all means, please keep going. I just looove swapping insults with children over the internet for no reason. /s
1 agenteABIN 2019-08-17
/r/waifuism
1 XxMadMaxwellxX 2019-08-17
If you say so.
1 EviscerateTheProles 2019-08-17
They say they "identified 10 of the most shared fake political stories on social media, which included satirical stories", "asked a representative group of over 800 Americans to tell us if they believed claims based on those trending stories", and "asked people to tell us whether it was true or false and how confident they were in their belief."
It sounds to me like they just read headlines to a sample of people without context and asked if they thought it was true, rather than asking people who had actually read the story on the website that prominently states it is satire if they believed those statements, which is really what the article is about. Are people who actually read the Babylon Bee coming away believing their satire? That's the real question, and not what they polled about, and yet that's what they are implying.
All this tells me is that lefties have gone so insane since trump got in office that parodies of them are more believable if you don't actually preface it with 'this is satire.'
1 Yes_he_swan 2019-08-17
Only if it's Epstein related drama
1 Woolgun 2019-08-17
Ton of reads come from stories like this being shared on Twitter/Facebook, I'd say more than from the site's traffic. And impressions on social media are mostly just reading the headline, not the article itself. The byproduct of sharing/retweeting is also that people who are not familiar with Babylon Bee being satire are also exposed to it. On top of that, BB readers are primarily christian conservatives, so yes, they're retarded enough to believe satire is real.
With that said, Snopes does seem to have a hateboner for Babylon Bee, the original fact check that started all of this had a completely different tone and language than their fact checks of Onion and the likes.
1 nybbas 2019-08-17
Was it the one about CNN buying a fucking washing machine to spin the news?
1 jubbergun 2019-08-17
I think we all know the answer to that one, sweaty, but I don't remember Snopes ever fact-checking Jon Stewart or Unfunny South Africa Man.
1 wow___justwow 2019-08-17
Unbelievably based.
1 saint2e 2019-08-17
Does this mean:
a) Babylon Bee's satire is the best b) Rightoids are gullible c) Lefties are becoming more and more ridiculous that the satire actually seems possible d) All of the above.
1 FreedomToDrill 2019-08-17
It means that the libs running Snopes are assblasted that rightoids are mimicking the whole 'political propaganda disguised as satire' thing and are fact checking it out of a bottomless well of seethe
1 throwaway_999912 2019-08-17
If this thread is any indicator, it seems like rightoids are more assblasted by snopes than the other way around
1 FreedomToDrill 2019-08-17
The seethe chalice runneth over
1 _SweetnessFollows 2019-08-17
lol
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
They sure showed you how not assblasted they are
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
B
1 XxMadMaxwellxX 2019-08-17
Ok.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-08-17
Last time I asked of an example of Babylon Bee actually being funny and all people could provide was reeeeeing and downvotes.
Conservatoids, now is your chance to prove you aren't humorless drones.
1 bumshecksagogo 2019-08-17
So this is where we are now...
Linking to Redstate articles unironically.