Vegans are mostly made up of white women (and their orbiters) who have graduated from fucking dogs to bigger mammals. So it's a very personal issue to them.

[removed]

Because women have no personalities or interesting characteristics.

So they take up trendy hobbies like being vegetarians or making candles or some vacant bullshit.

Based.

What if you do both? Make candles and munch on meat for fun.

Only if the meat you're munching is a thick slab of man meat. Tube steak is the best steak.

Whilst filling vacant orifices with the home-made candles and lighting them? Sounds like my kinda party!

Ah incels, you salty bois

smaller bodies require less calories, so it's easier for a majority of women to be able to commit to a vegan diet without feeling hungry all the time

Though at the same time it's harder for women to keep up on their need for iron. Lots of vegan women take anything from iron supplements to actual transfusions.

The other way around per mass, that's why air conditioning is sexist.

I think eating disorders are more prevalent in women on the flipside, maybe the need a system that's kind of extreme?

The only way to sustain such a shitty diet is to have a smaller body (e.g. foids and manlets)

Did Braincels come here after the ban?

You're welcome for reminding you of a new word, "orbiters". Now you can run that into the ground like you do with COPE/SEETHE.

Are you having a mental breakdown or something?

Absolutely seething

Absolutely seething

I don't get it.

Dude, you are orbiting him right now.

Imagine orbiting pizza 🤢🤢🤢

There's some incel copypasta I saw ages ago. Something about the difference between humans and animals being things men did (like construction and science).

MasterLawlz actually being based for once

Wtf I lov- uhhh... tolerate MasterLawlz now

I'm gunna eat you 😛

Yet more proof that masterlawlz is hardislife

for once

You kiddin' me?? 🤨

There was some story about a guy in Australia that killed a bird with his bare hands because it took his food and then he got a fine. How is that fair?

You forgot that angl*s are subhuman

They don't deserve Allah's creatures

I do agree with this, with the addendum that I find it hard to respect people who eat meat but have never killed their meal. I approve of accepting our place in the food chain, but spending your entire life pawning the dirty work off on others... is a lazy, self-serving half acceptance of the good only. A human with no experience with inflicting violence is not a strong and well-rounded human.

It can be, and a lot of how accessible it is to go hunting is going to depend on where you live (huntable land, permitting, etc). It can be done relatively cheaply though. If you're going to try to do it cheaply, I would suggest getting a milsurp rifle, probably a Mosin Nagant. Ideally one that somebody else already paid to put a scope on, though it would probably be a kind of shitty scope. If going the milsurp route, I would strongly suggest also buying a Ruger 10/22 to learn fundamentals on, and make sure to do a lot of reading on managing recoil anticipation. This route wouldn't be cheap, but it would be manageable expense on a modest salary, if you really stayed dilligent in setting aside money.

Learning how to actually hunt is pretty easy. Ask boomer men that you know and like well enough if they hunt. If they do, mention that you're interested but don't know how, and ask them some general questions about getting started. You'll probably have to ask like 5 boomers before you reach one that both hunts and is eager to take a young person out and teach them. Seriously, they eat that shit up.

Yeah, I don't know many outdoorsy people.

Color me surprised

There is absolutely a large hunting scene in the DFW area. You'll have to go out of town, yes, but there are a ton of hunters in your area. I can't speak to the details myself, but I have personally known hunters from your area. Start asking people and doing research, it'll be good for you and help you grow to be a stronger person.

g o o u t s i d e f a t a s s

You might be surprised how many people hunt even if they don't wear camo on a daily basis. Seriously, just ask some kind of older guys that you know. Failing that, you could always go to a Gander Mountain, Cabela's, etc. and ask the gun counter guys if they have any info on starting. You'd probably be surprised at the resources around you.

Imagine needing a firearm to hunt an animal so stupid it runs into cars.

Bow hunter? I respect bow hunting just fine, but honestly, I don't see the grand mystique behind it myself. Plus, it didn't really seem any cheaper when I looked in to it. I have guns for self defense anyways, so using that skill to hunt made sense to me.

Bow hunter? I respect bow hunting just fine, but honestly, I don't see the grand mystique behind it myself. Plus, it didn't really seem any cheaper when I looked in to it. I have guns for self defense anyways, so using that skill to hunt made sense to me.

Bow hunter? I respect bow hunting just fine, but honestly, I don't see the grand mystique behind it myself. Plus, it didn't really seem any cheaper when I looked in to it. I have guns for self defense anyways, so using that skill to hunt made sense to me.

I just hit them with my truck

doing things yourself is for poor people.

Do you think that homo sapiens sapiens yet would be a thing without our teamwork with canis familiaris?

Yes. Dogs are just another tool humans employee. Obviously they make certain tasks easier, but they're not revolutionary in any way. Any task a dog can do, a human can do albeit often less efficiently.

Unless you're talking about Gvlden Retriever knots.

Yes. Dogs are just another tool humans employee. Obviously they make certain tasks easier, but they're not revolutionary in any way. Any task a dog can do, a human can do albeit often less efficiently.

Unless you're talking about Gvlden Retriever knots.

Grug can lit fire and throw spear on his own, no dog needed.

This comment communicates a very serious lack of understanding of how much easier a team of canines makes hunting, protection of livestock and general companionship.

Sure, grog could light fire (which is the generally accepted view on how the first dogs separated from wolves, when the ones would approach early humans who could afford to discard waste cooked food), and throw a spear, but having one or more of a team of canines to hunt down food - corner, corral or tree it - made it so much easier.

It made it so much easier, that it is part of the reason for early human's eradication of megafauna, and the transition from a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural one.

That's why we don't eat them. They are more useful as tools.

The elites want us to eat plants and bugs and whatever other shit because they want the resources for themselves. They want us to basically opt out of mankind's accomplishments. It's basically a new version of Forest Law from medieval times.

Greater intelligence and power entail greater responsibility.

Based and supervillainpilled

So many illogical statements in one post...

top of the food chain

Appeal to nature fallacy. Also appealing to might is right. See argument 3 for a philosophy professors explanation on why this is a very weak argument. https://youtu.be/Tv2EQfeXuvE

They're dumb as fuck. Have you ever had a conversation with a fish?

I will quote 2 philosophers here. Jeremy Bentham: “The question is not, Can they reason?, nor Can they talk? but,Can they suffer?" Peter Singer: "If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. No matter what the nature of the being, the principle of equality requires that its suffering be counted equally with the like suffering - in so far as rough comparisons can be made - of any other being. If a being is not capable of suffering, or of experiencing enjoyment or happiness, there is nothing to be taken into account. This is why the limit of sentience is the only defensible boundary of concern for the interests of others. To mark this boundary by some characteristic like intelligence or rationality would be to mark it in an arbitrary way. Why not choose some other characteristic, like skin colour?"

Doesn't even the Catholic church have doctrines stating animals have no souls?

If a soul is something you cant even prove humans have how the fuck are you going to prove animals lack one.

if deers had evolved above us

But they didnt. We did. And we have moral agency. And we shouldnt base our morals off animal behavior. Other animals steal, rape, murder and eat their children. Does this mean it's ok if we do the same? This is also a form of the appeal to nature fallacy. If deers were at the top of the food chain, wouldnt you hope they showed kindness to you?

You want me to feel bad about impoverished people or ones facing oppression

It's not one or the other. You can care about human suffering and animal suffering.

That degree finally paying off

I am a bot. Contact for questions

Do not fear. Based on the OP I knew nothing intelligent would make it's way out of you.

Lawlz posts are probably the most intelligent ones on the sub. Just because you're too mayo to see his point doesn't make him any less right.

If a soul is something you cant even prove humans have how the fuck are you going to prove animals lack one.

Someone's in their first semester of philosophy. Was your first homework assignment the "Prove you exist" stuff?

philosophers

Peter Singer

oh no...

I’ve only read his work on Marx for college. What makes him cringe?

Lmao "might is right" as a fallacy. If I can crack your skull open and take your shit, it doesn't matter how much you philosophized about the wrongness of it when your brain matter is leaking out your skull. "Might is right" is a simple truth recognized in writing as far back as the 416bc Siege of Melos. You can equivocate about it all you want, but it's still a fundamental reality.

Lmao "might is right" as a fallacy. If I can crack your skull open and take your shit, it doesn't matter how much you philosophized about the wrongness of it when your brain matter is leaking out your skull. "Might is right" is a simple truth recognized in writing as far back as the 416bc Siege of Melos. You can equivocate about it all you want, but it's still a fundamental reality.

I never claimed it to be a fallacy? It's just principle that has many obvious flaws. Sure I dont have to actually give examples. What is a fallacy though is your appeal to tradition.

It's just principle that has many obvious flaws

Except it doesn't. You're just a bug-eating faggot.

So I can beat up a child? I mean might makes right? Men can hit woman just because they stronger? I can torture anything weaker than be just because? Listen to arguement 3 for more on this. https://youtu.be/Tv2EQfeXuvE

So I can beat up a child?

No, because you're skinny bug-eating faggot who would be pushed around by a 2nd grade bully. Now go dilate.

And you would be outsmarted by the average 2nd grade student. I would say KYS but I'm sure you would fail at that aswel.

Check your B12 levels sweaty. All this impotent rage is sure to burn up what little energy reserves you've got left.

Hahaha cheers. Thanks for that.

Men can hit woman just because they stronger?

Yes.

I appreciate the novelty of your account, but you've got to find a way to make your shit funnier if you're going to keep serious long posting on are drama. Maybe insult people ironically as examples with each fallacy you call out.

Shut up, nerdbot.

I always knew lawlz was rarted

[removed]

That’s a MtF but the f is for ferengi

Snapshots:

1. [Veganism] Unironically, why should... - archive.org, archive.today*

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Based and darwin pilled

whenever a foid gives you shit for eating meat remind her she covers her ugliness with products that contain aborted fetuses.

This is what radical darwinism looks like

Like, do you think if deers had evolved above us and had a taste for human flesh, they would have moral reservations about turning us into deli meats?

Fucking soybucks. I bet they're ashamed of their antlers and try to shave them down or something.

Lots of people are vegan for environmental reasons.

Most vegans are vegan to tell other people they are vegan and feel smug and superior for being vegan.

Maybe, but probably not.

[deleted]

be a vegan

tell everyone how great you are because you are saving the planet

using a device and infrastracture powered by coal

😂

I am not a vegan. I am also just not so insecure in my own choices that I have to harass others and develop an unhealthy animosity towards others over their dietary choices. You need to talk to someone chief?

SEETHE

I'll take this as a yes.

Sorry you got so triggered

Imagine being such a dipshit that you interpret all criticism against you as someone being unreasonably triggered.

Now you've downvoted me, how will I ever recover?

[removed]

Standby for a vegan brigade.

Man fuck those animals lol, I see it more like we're so scientifically advanced we can make burgers out of beans and don't need to eat meat. I eat the hell out of some chicken but fr the most part I think it's more Alpha to not eat meat if I don't have to, plus it genuinely makes me feel better

Nothing wrong with eating animals. Just the way they're raised is fucked up.

Need to find a liveleak compilation of animals being torn apart, disemboweled, and eaten alive to dab on anyone who tries to guilt me with meat packing documentaries.

Morally I don't give a shit about fish, I'm a mammal supremacist, so I don't eat those but do eat fish. Also environmental reasons, though really I don't go around preaching that you should become vegetarian because ethical consumerism is a scam.

People who try to epically own vegans are just as annoying as vegans.

I didn't read of this but I would imagine it's the same tired shit I've read 1000 times in murderedbywords posts and Facebook boomer memes. Imagine paraphrasing a Lil Dicky song and thinking you're funny original.

Go fuck yourself.

(vegan) HOES MAD x24 😎😎😎😎🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😎😎🤣😎🤣👏

too many stickies pls lawlz

Imho you can NEVER have too many Lawlz stickies

Dont take rep this shit unless you support cannibalism.😤😤😤

Why are meat eaters so insecure when it comes to vegans?

Wow a masterlawlz post I don't immediately Downvote and ignore

Your entire post is just trying to justify might makes right.

One toke over the line sweet jesus....

B A S E D

A N D

L A W L Z P I L L E D

Tank Good, Meat Good, Plant Food bad, PETA Bad, Vegans Bad, Plants Are only good with meat, we’re at the top of the food chain. Send out the tanks of the vegans get crazy. The Vegan Subreddit is garbage, Animal milk is delicious and isn’t stealing from babies unlike the vegans who are busy trying to find out if everything is vegan or not

[removed]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVQO76I0Sh0

[removed]