But they're gone now - you'd have more luck looking for recent discourse about Osama bin Laden. Nor has some some other gender discourse arisen to replace them. Everyone just stopped caring and moved on to race.
ahahahahaha
The early 2010s culture wars were much more vicious than anything you see today, and all of these groups were despised with the energy of a thousand suns.
AHAHAHAHA
I think they irony-ed themselves so hard that they accidentally ended up as Nazis.
Huge oversimplification
Clinton's speech massively accelerated this process - having your extremely uncool enemy go on national television and say "This particular group of mysterious edgy Internet people is so dangerous and threatening, I think I speak for all right-thinking adults when I hope no teens dare to join them" was, in retrospect, not so smart a strategy. And so we got the alt-right.
HUGE oversimplification
For the previous few years, the social justice movement had been the dominant intellectual paradigm in online spaces (and increasingly offline too).
lol
It was the only way left to shock the establishment.
enter: xenogenders
Nobody would confuse them with the maximally-uncool people, the obese white Boomer who shops at Wal-Mart and plasters their car with anti-Obama bumper stickers.
clearly he has never seen those pics of /pol/ zoomers in the wild
I talked before about the profound effect that coining the term "SJW" had on the discourse. Thousands of people who had been vaguely angry at something suddenly had a way to describe the target of their anger. The mocking sense of "woke" was monumental in a different way: it wasn't already coded conservative.
wasn't 'social justice warrior' coined by SJWs on tumblr? 'woke' has made the same shift wherein almost nobody describes themselves as such unless to be ironic/self-deprecating
like our obsessions with religion and gender before it
race was also and possibly just as much of a fixation in the subcultures he's talking about during the #killallmen days
gonna stop words words wordsing because nobody cares but I thought everyone rides this guy's dick for being a supergenius or w/e. this was sloppy and at times inaccurate; would give a solid 4/10
I thought everyone rides this guy's dick for being a supergenius or w/e. this was sloppy and at times inaccurate; would give a solid 4/10
He, his cult, and their offshoots are incredibly pretentious. They are basically a bunch of tech guys that think that being a "programmer" makes you the most intelligent human possible and therefore endows you with the ability to speak with absolute authority on all topics. It's especially funny how many of them shun social sciences given their idol's profession. I'll admit it's been fun watching the offshoots spiral towards radicalization.
I love his writing but I know what you mean. He's never been secret about his blog being just his fallible opinions and ramblings. Him being outed was awful because now rslurs treat him like a god.
Yeah his point lies in that google's trends for specific terms have gone down. Seems weak when he's not taking into account site cultures and the new trains discourse as well the movement of these groups from fringe to mainstream. What would at one point have been called RadFem (like using terms such as mansplaining) has now shifted into just being leftist/liberal/woke.
Plus there isn't drama if you ban every dissenting opinion and restrict the rights of anyone to comment on it.
any study of Internet culture is basically a study of crazy people, and the failure mode is to point and laugh at them without looking for real understanding
But they're gone now - you'd have more luck looking for recent discourse about Osama bin Laden. Nor has some some other gender discourse arisen to replace them. Everyone just stopped caring and moved on to race.
ahahahahaha
The early 2010s culture wars were much more vicious than anything you see today, and all of these groups were despised with the energy of a thousand suns.
AHAHAHAHA
Can you elaborate more on both. I don't mean this rhetorically, I somehow remeber you know a lot about ehistory.
first one: gender is a hotter topic than it's ever been, it's just shifted in focus from feminists vs. MRAs to libfems (i.e. TQ+ and allies) vs. everyone else
second one: the people involved in the 2010s culture wars hated each other (kind of), but there was in general a much lighter tone, some of the most invested people on different were hanging out with each other in shitposting groups (at least on reddit), and it was extremely rare that people's careers ended over it. there were far fewer eggshells to walk on.
He’s a very smart guy, obviously, often on the money, but this one was pretty shit and he does have a habit of failing to connect inconvenient dots once in a while.
clearly he has never seen those pics of /pol/ zoomers in the wild
Because those people disguise as "libertarians" in the wild.
Generally, I'll take your word for it on topics like this. You might as well write a book and sell it on Amazon or something. It will probably net you a pretty profit on the side.
Is this person supposed to be famous, or something?
Because those people disguise as "libertarians" in the wild.
there's a pretty large corpus of pics of people holding up protest signs with /pol/ memes on them and donning plastic LARP shields and shit. they look exactly as you would expect them to.
Generally, I'll take your word for it on topics like this. You might as well write a book and sell it on Amazon or something. It will probably net you a pretty profit on the side.
I have a broad structure for a 'history of internet culture' text, but it would take ages to write.
Is this person supposed to be famous, or something?
He's the guy who coined 'virtue signaling' and brought in-group/out-group dynamics into internet consciousness with some blogpost about tribes.
Here is the thing about polyamory. Only m*slim alphas and their harem of wives have any individual value as polyamorous humans. As much as this tortures me to say, females are worth more than males in reproduction.
When you have a polyamorous relationship with a single female and multiple males, each male's worth as a human is 1 / # of males in the relationship. Actually, it does not matter how many females there are, only one male is necessary. Every male’s vote should count for 1 / # of males in the relationship. They should also only receive this proportion of welfare benefits for their funko pops or Nintendo switch or whatever.
tl;dr polyamorous males are sub-human.
This criteria obviously does not apply to our objectively superior homofascist overlords.
Because someone trying to defend their unreasonably hated interests is just soooooo fucking funny. I'm only here for this post. Sorry kid, but I don't get off on laughing at other's expense so I'm going to gtfo of this degenerate cesspool asap. People wanna get rid of furries. Well how about places like this instead? The world would be infinitely better without drama. This sub is like the young people version of watching the Hallmark channel.
The problem with socialism being the new internet circlejerk is it's just not entertaining enough. wAtcHing trainS talk about how calling traps gay is a horrible act of hate and bigotry is always going to be more entertaining than watching them whine about the 1%. Most people just can't be bothered to care. Even if it does take over, it will never reign as strong.
38 comments
48 32624647 2021-05-10
Sorry, OP, but I refuse to read walls of texts even if it's aligned with my agenda
14 fernguts 2021-05-10
This one has pictures too, tho.
10 Norci 2021-05-10
Yeah, someone just tell me if I should be smug or triggered at all the graphs.
29 snallygaster 2021-05-10
ahahahahaha
AHAHAHAHA
Huge oversimplification
HUGE oversimplification
lol
enter: xenogenders
clearly he has never seen those pics of /pol/ zoomers in the wild
wasn't 'social justice warrior' coined by SJWs on tumblr? 'woke' has made the same shift wherein almost nobody describes themselves as such unless to be ironic/self-deprecating
race was also and possibly just as much of a fixation in the subcultures he's talking about during the #killallmen days
gonna stop words words wordsing because nobody cares but I thought everyone rides this guy's dick for being a supergenius or w/e. this was sloppy and at times inaccurate; would give a solid 4/10
23 johannesalthusius 2021-05-10
snally where is history of drama part 2
16 DuckSosu 2021-05-10
He, his cult, and their offshoots are incredibly pretentious. They are basically a bunch of tech guys that think that being a "programmer" makes you the most intelligent human possible and therefore endows you with the ability to speak with absolute authority on all topics. It's especially funny how many of them shun social sciences given their idol's profession. I'll admit it's been fun watching the offshoots spiral towards radicalization.
10 CapitalistVenezuelan 2021-05-10
I love his writing but I know what you mean. He's never been secret about his blog being just his fallible opinions and ramblings. Him being outed was awful because now rslurs treat him like a god.
12 quitsocmedia 2021-05-10
Yeah his point lies in that google's trends for specific terms have gone down. Seems weak when he's not taking into account site cultures and the new trains discourse as well the movement of these groups from fringe to mainstream. What would at one point have been called RadFem (like using terms such as mansplaining) has now shifted into just being leftist/liberal/woke.
Plus there isn't drama if you ban every dissenting opinion and restrict the rights of anyone to comment on it.
11 CapitalistVenezuelan 2021-05-10
Are we... Failing people? Dramabros?
10 TheOverSeether 2021-05-10
Snally's still reeling from it.
8 ExtremelyOnlineG 2021-05-10
im with snally
i was expecting big brain time
i am disapoint
5 PetitAlbertinpocket 2021-05-10
ahahahahaha
AHAHAHAHA
Can you elaborate more on both. I don't mean this rhetorically, I somehow remeber you know a lot about ehistory.
6 snallygaster 2021-05-10
first one: gender is a hotter topic than it's ever been, it's just shifted in focus from feminists vs. MRAs to libfems (i.e. TQ+ and allies) vs. everyone else
second one: the people involved in the 2010s culture wars hated each other (kind of), but there was in general a much lighter tone, some of the most invested people on different were hanging out with each other in shitposting groups (at least on reddit), and it was extremely rare that people's careers ended over it. there were far fewer eggshells to walk on.
5 PetitAlbertinpocket 2021-05-10
Firstly true on reflection, secondly interesting. Funny I sent that PM right before you replied.
could you also elaborate on this
My (very limited) cultural memory lines up pretty well with his narrative. Where was this race stuff and how was it packaged differently from today?
4 -cochise 2021-05-10
He’s a very smart guy, obviously, often on the money, but this one was pretty shit and he does have a habit of failing to connect inconvenient dots once in a while.
2 fernguts 2021-05-10
What happened to your flair, chief?
2 snallygaster 2021-05-10
dunno :(
3 fernguts 2021-05-10
Jannies are slippin'. Maybe a motivational pay-cut is in order?
2 alien122 2021-05-10
I definitely remember this as much. Because of how self-important it sounded the opposition mocked it pretty much immediately.
1 [deleted] 2021-05-10
[removed]
2 muffler_kek 2021-05-10
Where’s kimmo alm part 2 snally
1 snallygaster 2021-05-10
i don't have the time or motivation to finish it :(
1 AlecOzzyHillPitas 2021-05-10
❤️ Queen shit 👑
1 Pepperglue 2021-05-10
Wait what.
Because those people disguise as "libertarians" in the wild.
Generally, I'll take your word for it on topics like this. You might as well write a book and sell it on Amazon or something. It will probably net you a pretty profit on the side.
Is this person supposed to be famous, or something?
8 snallygaster 2021-05-10
there's a pretty large corpus of pics of people holding up protest signs with /pol/ memes on them and donning plastic LARP shields and shit. they look exactly as you would expect them to.
I have a broad structure for a 'history of internet culture' text, but it would take ages to write.
He's the guy who coined 'virtue signaling' and brought in-group/out-group dynamics into internet consciousness with some blogpost about tribes.
3 Pepperglue 2021-05-10
Ah. I thought you meant on an everyday level kind of encounter
All good books take a long time to write.
Oh for reals? I've always wondered how it came up.
15 PacificSpices 2021-05-10
You can spot the exact moment where the alphabet agencies began to care about this shit
8 f1sh_fan 2021-05-10
It also all seems to coincide with the occupy movement. Can’t have the poors getting too comfy with one another.
13 TheColdTurtle 2021-05-10
Is it exactly 9000 words or is it over 9000?
9 hnnghahhHHH 2021-05-10
Here is the thing about polyamory. Only m*slim alphas and their harem of wives have any individual value as polyamorous humans. As much as this tortures me to say, females are worth more than males in reproduction.
When you have a polyamorous relationship with a single female and multiple males, each male's worth as a human is 1 / # of males in the relationship. Actually, it does not matter how many females there are, only one male is necessary. Every male’s vote should count for 1 / # of males in the relationship. They should also only receive this proportion of welfare benefits for their funko pops or Nintendo switch or whatever.
tl;dr polyamorous males are sub-human.
This criteria obviously does not apply to our objectively superior homofascist overlords.
7 CapitalistVenezuelan 2021-05-10
Slate Star Codex is one of the most talented and prolific writers of our time, and I would totally suck his dick
4 ExtremelyOnlineG 2021-05-10
i didn't know scott was polyamorous
8 AlecOzzyHillPitas 2021-05-10
All Rationalists ™️ identify as poly because Less Wrong was a mistake
3 SnapshillBot 2021-05-10
Because someone trying to defend their unreasonably hated interests is just soooooo fucking funny. I'm only here for this post. Sorry kid, but I don't get off on laughing at other's expense so I'm going to gtfo of this degenerate cesspool asap. People wanna get rid of furries. Well how about places like this instead? The world would be infinitely better without drama. This sub is like the young people version of watching the Hallmark channel.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
3 Brilliant-Deal7937 2021-05-10
Where's the lie?
1 [deleted] 2021-05-10
[removed]
1 [deleted] 2021-05-10
[deleted]
1 Make_Pepe_Dank_Again 2021-05-10
The problem with socialism being the new internet circlejerk is it's just not entertaining enough. wAtcHing trainS talk about how calling traps gay is a horrible act of hate and bigotry is always going to be more entertaining than watching them whine about the 1%. Most people just can't be bothered to care. Even if it does take over, it will never reign as strong.