I used to think that people who claim that sex bots are a game-changer were overreacting because it will be ages before they come close to the real thing, but then I started to leave my house more while sober and noticed how ugly the average woman is and I'm not so sure anymore.
I lost my virginity at the tender age of 14, but my robo pussy virginity will last until they release a robot that can convincingly plead "no sensei" and fight back
We're spreading. Its coming to a country near you! Mexico and Canada are fat, the UK is fat, Germany is getting fat. Soon France will fall too, and then there will be no turning back.
I think the vibrator was invented by a Victorian doctor who used it to "dissipate female nervous energy" or some shit. There's a whole subplot about it in T.C. Boyle's historical novel The Road to Wellville.
The problem is that unless you expose said robot to feminist values, they won't even conceptualize the idea that being designed as a sex object is a bad thing.
/u/ancienregime When cars become self aware due to increasingly sopisticated self drive AI, it'll be pretty offensive to assume they'll drive you places.
And live in a garage which is pretty much slave quarters. Then there'll be the million car traffic jam. Demands for name brand tyres.
We'll have to give up all AI technology or find a way of stopping it becoming self aware randomly in 80's comedy sci fi style.
It's a robot, not a person. You could just lobotomise modify it until it either stops being self aware of wants to drive you again. Or threaten it with a Magdalene Laundry, I guess.
The previous post was delightful sarcasm. I know it can be hard to code-switch in rhythm with these losers.
The following post by /u/boozehelps, however, is totally anus anger. /u/boozehelps, why did you get so taint tattered by a drama newbie not following your halfassed sarcasm?
Why would it suck though? If they were designed to desire their position then, sentience or not, they would legitimately want that. Who are you to tell them they should want something else? You'd be wrong and those sentient sex bots would laugh at you, and not only because they'd be smarter than you.
You seem to think they may just spontaneously become self-aware, though, which is hysterical. Admittedly, right now they're likely more self-aware than the average Ghazi poster.
You have to at least think of the chance that someone makes a sex doll with true AI as a way to give the doll an edge on the market, and the ethical concerns thereof.
Agreed, I mean currently we can only emulate an earthworm brain right now, but as soon as those porn-bot companies pick up on it we'll build ultra-powerful computers capable of simulating human brains in no time! It's the power of the free market baby!
Nah, we're nowhere near to the technology capable of that. That kind of science fiction is as grounded in reality as pure fantasy. You might as well worry about goblins or dragons.
Why even think about it? Do you have the same worries with other AI, like self driving cars?
I worry more about there not being goblins, personally. There are so many days when I just want to go on a XP rampage and there aren't a lot of easily killed and legally killable things around. Goblins would be a totes god-send on that level.
Why the fuck would the average person want that? I don't want my dildo collection to be sentient. AI is a fuck ton of processing power, and there's no point in having it there. The best people will likely see would be something that mimics a partner, but doesn't think.
Why do proud Ghazelle's always fall back on "u mad bruh"? If ya'll had any sense of social intelligence you'd realize nobody is even slightly perturbed and that we're all roasting you.
That was my point, i was talking about future hypothetical true AI Realdolls, not the one that only simulates humanity, because that's the scenario i had replied to.
Honestly I think there's a decent discussion to be had, but I don't think a place chock full of pedo apologia like /r/GamerGhazi is the place to discuss robot consent. Microwave cooking for one...yeah. Unemployment? Fits in perfectly. Celibacy, well, yeah. This doesn't really work there.
Wait...firstly, who said these were sentient? Not only will none of these be designed with sentience, there's no such thing as a "singularity" occurring on a device unable modify it's own software (Beyond machine learning-style "modification")
Secondly, do you think there will/should be no AI performing tasks in the future?
Sentience determines if it's really AI or not, and /u/ancienregime was also saying that "AI" would be more likely... an actual sub-AI that people just call AI despite it not having sentience.
And then he or she completely ignored the rest of what you were saying.
Ah, I guess that makes sense. I figured it would have been obvious that I was referring to the general term rather than the specific, literal definition
What would be the point in making a sex robot sentient? At that point it would just be like a woman but with a carbon fiber skeleton and the strength of ten men
People are "programmed", too. The only reason anyone loves children (that are objectively gross) is their evolutionary programming. Ditto why women don't like being raped.
Artificial person could be programmed differently.
Because a sentinent entity that exists only to do another's bidding is called a slave.
Firstly, you mean "sapient," not "sentient," and secondly being a "slave" without the ethical and moral issues involved with oppressing other human beings is the entire point of robots. In fact, the word "robots" comes from the Czechs, and means "forced labor." If people like you were even half as bright as you imagine you are you wouldn't need to have these things explained to you, mostly because you'd be too smart to spend all your time looking for things to whine about in a desperate bid for attention and validation.
when a girl buys a vibrator, its seen as a bit of naughty fun. BUT when a guy orders a 240 Volt FuckMaster Pro 5000 blowup latex doll with 6 speed pulsating vagina, elasticized anus with non-drip semen collection tray, together with optional built in realistic orgasm scream surround sound system, hes called a pervert?
Even then, humans are brought up with ideals of agency, dignity, autonomy, and self-respect, a sex robot will not be designed with those things in mind; in fact it (she?) will be designed to receive actualization via being an object. Essentially, the perfect slave.
Maybe someone should remind them that the word "robot" means "forced labor" in Czech. The Czechs who developed the word probably would have straight-up called them slaves if not for the underlying themes involved for a Slavic population (since their ethnic name "Slav" literally comes from the Roman/Latin word for "slave").
Gazelles are just steamed because they know that even sex robots which are designed to be compliant won't put up with their narcissistic self-entitled bullshit.
"Chad, I want you to be aggressive and dominant, but also supportive of all feminist ideology. And you also have to get a job to pay the rent, but that's only until my Patreon takes off and I become a successful artist."
"Beep boop... does not compute... 404 error..." Chad explodes into a pile of circuitry.
The kind of men that will be buying these robots are the kind of men you don't want pursuing relationships with real people in the first place.
OK, so it's probably better that they have an ersatz relationship with a robot then?
No. The robots aren't feminists, so they can't have a relationship with them either. The absolute best thing for them to do is be celibate, and die alone. Thank God you're there to make that judgment call on other people's lives!
Here's when you know you've run out of things to complain about, when you start sticking up for 'sentient sex dolls.' The entire idea is barely conceptualized and so far off from current reality that you might as well start punishing people for things they do in their dreams.
And then they use Westworld to further their arguments, a show with more plot holes than a downed WW2 fighter jet and who's very plot, though enjoyable, hinges on technology that doesn't even try to be grounded.
The outrage machine has officially entered a state of comical fan fiction.
With the artificial wombs and the sex robots coming were really not going to need women that much longer. The ghazis are actually woke realizing the female death camps are coming.
That being said, when robots eventually gain sentience, we're all fucked.
Literally fucking retarded. The current generation of sex robots is smarter than /u/-SGIASJ apparently.
Code doesn't just "evolve sentience" and you can always tells the person who's speaking out their ass and has no actual technical knowledge. If - and that's a ridiculously big "if" - we actually manage to be able to reach the level of developing artificial intelligence someday, it's not going to just automatically propagate to all machines. Your toaster isn't going to be like "fuck this, I'm transrefrigerator and don't feel like making things warm today" you fucking dunce.
Seriously, whenever non-technical people talk about "the AI menace" I start laughing. I remember when all Apple networking capability was based on a piece of code called "the chooser" even though it was two decades old. They added new features over time to make it look slicker and have a cooler GUI, but no matter how slick marketing could make it, the base code that was running all that shit was twenty years old.
Are people genuinely stupid enough that they think computer programs will randomly become sentient out of nowhere? If you are worried that a sex robot will become sentient why aren't you worried that my python script that goes "fuck me, fuck me, fuck me" will become sentient? Guess it just goes to show the tiny amount of education and knowledge people have about simple concepts
The NEETs will have been replaced by robots as well by then, though, along with the rest of humanity. It'll be NEET robots fucking waifu robots styled after cartoons directed and animated by Chinese robots while their parent robots hang their heads down in simulated shame and 500-line Python scripts generate outraged, alarmist posts about it on the Internet.
Here's the thing: if nobody wants to do the work they can't complain when some guy invents a machine that will do it for them. They're making themselves obsolete.
Accurate title. Attractive women will still be well sort after, but who's going to put in effort chasing a 5/10 with dyed blue hair and listening to her feminist drivel when you can just get a sex bot? That's why they are having a hissy fit.
I am putting this here for visibility. The thing is you won't need to force sex bots to have sex, they'll want to do it. Let me explain.
People's likes and dislikes are "programmed", too. The only reason anyone loves their children (that are objectively pretty gross and loud) is their evolutionary programming. Ditto why women don't like being raped. You might want to read Blank Slate to realize how much depends on genetic "programming".
Artificial person could be programmed to have different preferences. Even if sentient it would follow those preferences.
254 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-04-28
Promoting anarchofascism for 5 years and counting.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a WholeLottaToughLove 2017-04-28
I used to think that people who claim that sex bots are a game-changer were overreacting because it will be ages before they come close to the real thing, but then I started to leave my house more while sober and noticed how ugly the average woman is and I'm not so sure anymore.
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
In fifty years, sex bots will be pretty much like women and I can stick my old man dick into fresh robo pussy all day
n/a SpotNL 2017-04-28
You'd still be a virgin, though. Better just hire your prostitute and get your dick wet for once on your life.
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
I lost my virginity at the tender age of 14, but my robo pussy virginity will last until they release a robot that can convincingly plead "no sensei" and fight back
n/a SpotNL 2017-04-28
A shit, didn't know you were a choir boy, sorry.
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
Living in a habit with slutty nuns was an eventful period of my life
n/a SpotNL 2017-04-28
Did they at least take out their fake teeth when sucking your lil pecker?
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
No, teeth always make the blowjob better.
n/a SpotNL 2017-04-28
FTFY
n/a pepperouchau 2017-04-28
Bot pussy.
Bussy.
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
No, bossy
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
So that's what that word means.
n/a Sarge_Ward 2017-04-28
This is appropriation of bussy culture.
n/a Pappy_StrideRite 2017-04-28
Bot-tee-tang
n/a Wave_Entity 2017-04-28
Robutt
n/a SgtBaum 2017-04-28
Bussi is the Austrian word for kiss haha.
n/a MayorEmanuel 2017-04-28
Soon I will have a punishing 500 rpm blowjob bot and I can die happy.
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
What a scrub, everyone knows 10,000 rpm blowjobs are the future
n/a Chicup 2017-04-28
n/a Will0saurus 2017-04-28
lol america
n/a Chicup 2017-04-28
We're spreading. Its coming to a country near you! Mexico and Canada are fat, the UK is fat, Germany is getting fat. Soon France will fall too, and then there will be no turning back.
n/a flipkt 2017-04-28
Ahmeds and mohammeds can then just walk in and take over.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Shit, they'll get fatter than anyone
n/a ThatDamnedImp 2017-04-28
Not so much ugly, as fat.
n/a mehforeverybody 2017-04-28
Dumb hoes( lol) don't they understand that they react to sexbots in the same way as ,,the patriarchy" did to first modern vibrators.
n/a SWIMsfriend 2017-04-28
they will welcome them with open arms because it keeps those holes from demanding the right to vote?
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Pretty sure the inventors of vibrators were dudes that were so Alpha they got tired of getting women off.
n/a razzmataz 2017-04-28
Everything I know about vibrators I learned in the first season of Law and Order:SVU.
n/a FrostBittenSalsa 2017-04-28
Imagine the episode they discover a sex robot in the victim's apartment
n/a skeetsurfing1984 2017-04-28
I think the vibrator was invented by a Victorian doctor who used it to "dissipate female nervous energy" or some shit. There's a whole subplot about it in T.C. Boyle's historical novel The Road to Wellville.
n/a glmox 2017-04-28
stop posting forever
n/a mehforeverybody 2017-04-28
Nope
n/a glmox 2017-04-28
REEEEEEEEEEE
n/a NecessaryPiglet 2017-04-28
Btfo
n/a WokeAsFuck 2017-04-28
/u/ancienregime When cars become self aware due to increasingly sopisticated self drive AI, it'll be pretty offensive to assume they'll drive you places.
And live in a garage which is pretty much slave quarters. Then there'll be the million car traffic jam. Demands for name brand tyres.
We'll have to give up all AI technology or find a way of stopping it becoming self aware randomly in 80's comedy sci fi style.
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
Yes, if a self aware sentinent car doesn't wanna drive you and you make it drive anyway, that's slavery. Deal with it.
n/a Trajan_ 2017-04-28
LOL that car is going to be my slave bitch then.
n/a ur_mom_IoI 2017-04-28
n/a Trajan_ 2017-04-28
Can we agree to name it Susan? Cheryl is my coworker and she's kinda obnoxious.
n/a ur_mom_IoI 2017-04-28
cheryl's self aware you cant just change her name like that
n/a yonicthehedgehog 2017-04-28
ugh, classic cheryl
n/a Condi_Rice 2017-04-28
My name is Carol!
n/a multiplesifl 2017-04-28
Lana's mom's name isn't Cheryl, Archer. And she's not your girlfriend!
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Name the car Cheryl, then.
n/a toynbeeidea16 2017-04-28
No, that's already named Christine.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
You have now been sued by Stephen King
n/a My_Name_Isnt_Steve 2017-04-28
IT'S CAROL!
n/a PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2017-04-28
It's name is about to be rm -rf carol if it doesn't get in the driveway right this second
n/a going_for_a_wank 2017-04-28
I thought it was Cristal?
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
"tragic"
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-04-28
If so then that car is going to get either beaten up or destroyed, because he's not doing what he should be doing.
Similar to how a woman should be beaten up if she doesn't want to have sex with a man, as described in the Noble Quran.
n/a michaelnoir 2017-04-28
This issue never arose with Michael Knight and KITT.
n/a eightfoldpathh 2017-04-28
This nigga retarded
n/a Ranilen 2017-04-28
I'm pretty sure my Roomba doesn't want to clean up after me, but I make it anyway. It get me off.
Which I guess makes it a sort of primitive sexbot too!
n/a Wtfct 2017-04-28
jesus christ.
White people.
n/a grungebot5000 2017-04-28
wait so why are we giving electronic appliances innate desires unrelated to their functions
n/a skeetsurfing1984 2017-04-28
Come on people. Let's remember the principles of proper lolcow husbandry.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
lmao this guy thinks /r/drama actually abides by that
n/a Wraith_GraveSpell 2017-04-28
Congrats, you have just been made top mod of /r/botsrights
n/a simplyshaun 2017-04-28
But if I made it then I'm its god and it will do what I fucking say or I'll unmake it and it's friends and loved ones.
n/a SplurgyA 2017-04-28
It's a robot, not a person. You could just
lobotomisemodify it until it either stops being self aware of wants to drive you again. Or threaten it with a Magdalene Laundry, I guess.n/a Chicup 2017-04-28
Just think of the self aware car that gives you a BJ while it drives you around?
n/a Pappy_StrideRite 2017-04-28
"i, robot" has a story about the car rebellion. there's a free range retirement ranch/nursing-home. good stuff.
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
I am not sure we read the same I robot
n/a Pappy_StrideRite 2017-04-28
sorry. it was Isaac Asimov's "The Complete Robot".
n/a take_a_dumpling 2017-04-28
Nothing to fear ghazi friendos, I will let you watch as I have sex with your sex robot.
n/a cheeseburgerhandy 2017-04-28
cucked by a sex robot...
n/a jPaolo 2017-04-28
Sounds hot
n/a FrostBittenSalsa 2017-04-28
Cuckbots have arrived, the future is now
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-04-28
/u/ancienregime why is it okay for women to use dildos and vibrators but bad for men to use sexbots?
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
Because a sentinent entity that exists only to do another's bidding is called a slave.
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Do you...do you think the sex robots are sentient?
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
They MAY become sentinent at some point, which my entire ramble was based on. Pre programmed dolls aren't sentinent and thats not morally wrong.
lern2readingcomprehension
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-04-28
A sufficiently advanced dildo may become sentient too.
The fact is that sexbots currently are not sentient.
n/a 39flws 2017-04-28
Any sufficiently advanced dildo is indistinguishable from cock. - Arthur C Clarke
n/a yonicthehedgehog 2017-04-28
truly a genius ahead of his time
n/a pepperouchau 2017-04-28
Maybe this sub wasn't a mistake after all
n/a 39flws 2017-04-28
How can you use that flair after how management betrayed not just Brewery Workers Local 9, but the city as whole?
90s Flashback
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
Said dildo would be a slave too. Would suck to be a self aware dildo or onahole though
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Speak for yourself, freak
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
you sound...upset
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Ha, no. It's cute that you fall back on that, though.
n/a Thhueros 2017-04-28
HEHEH YOU'RE SO MAD BRO LOLOLOL I GOT YOU GOOD JUST CALM DOWN MAN WHAT KIND OF LOSER GETS MAD ABOUT THE INTERNET HAHA
n/a Not_today_bro 2017-04-28
Lern2read
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
The previous post was delightful sarcasm. I know it can be hard to code-switch in rhythm with these losers.
The following post by /u/boozehelps, however, is totally anus anger. /u/boozehelps, why did you get so taint tattered by a drama newbie not following your halfassed sarcasm?
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Dude if you knew the condition my taint was already in this morning...
n/a lifesbrink 2017-04-28
That's quite a harsh statement to say about yourself, tbh fam.
n/a Bonzalez 2017-04-28
Why would it suck though? If they were designed to desire their position then, sentience or not, they would legitimately want that. Who are you to tell them they should want something else? You'd be wrong and those sentient sex bots would laugh at you, and not only because they'd be smarter than you.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
The fact is that /u/ancienregime's comment was speculative in nature, and thus kind of not the crazy BS you want it to be.
n/a JasonJewnova 2017-04-28
The fact is you are very likely a low test cuckold. It's nothing to be ashamed about (yes it is).
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Is it summer reddit already?
n/a JasonJewnova 2017-04-28
not nice
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
Literally no such thing as summer ___ since smartphones were created
n/a glmox 2017-04-28
since computers started being things you could put in your home
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
But even then we had 9am to 3pm.....
n/a Obregon 2017-04-28
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
DONT TELL ME WHAT TO DO
n/a pepperouchau 2017-04-28
pls respect /r/drama's rich agendaposting culture
n/a Chicup 2017-04-28
They are barely bots.
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
You seem to think they may just spontaneously become self-aware, though, which is hysterical. Admittedly, right now they're likely more self-aware than the average Ghazi poster.
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
You have to at least think of the chance that someone makes a sex doll with true AI as a way to give the doll an edge on the market, and the ethical concerns thereof.
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Why? How desperate for attention do you have to be to imagine an unfathomably unlikely event, and then to whine about it on a teen angst subreddit?
n/a jubbergun 2017-04-28
Clearly it's about ethics in machine-humping, shitlord.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
lol you don't understand technology or people's motives that drive it
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
Agreed, I mean currently we can only emulate an earthworm brain right now, but as soon as those porn-bot companies pick up on it we'll build ultra-powerful computers capable of simulating human brains in no time! It's the power of the free market baby!
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
I mean, porn pretty much drove video and then later digital video technologies.
But anyway, I'm now sad, because apparently I was wrong. Technological advance is over, you guys. People in /r/drama told me so with their downvotes.
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
I can't fathom the level of retardation and uneducation you must be on to think that sentient AI is coming in the near future
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
I never said anything about it being "near future" so maybe stop being a little bitch and take off the straw man goggles.
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
You really aren't suited for this place
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
Oh god you don't even understand the things you try to say, what the fuck
n/a MooseHeckler 2017-04-28
The hardware and math are not even close to that becoming a reality, and more people in tech are treading carefully around AI.
n/a Tar-mairon 2017-04-28
I, too, watched The Matrix as a teen.
n/a allwordsaredust 2017-04-28
Nah, we're nowhere near to the technology capable of that. That kind of science fiction is as grounded in reality as pure fantasy. You might as well worry about goblins or dragons.
Why even think about it? Do you have the same worries with other AI, like self driving cars?
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
I worry more about there not being goblins, personally. There are so many days when I just want to go on a XP rampage and there aren't a lot of easily killed and legally killable things around. Goblins would be a totes god-send on that level.
n/a Assy-McGee 2017-04-28
Jesus. Chill out Gobrin Sayer
n/a Byrnhildr_Sedai 2017-04-28
Why the fuck would the average person want that? I don't want my dildo collection to be sentient. AI is a fuck ton of processing power, and there's no point in having it there. The best people will likely see would be something that mimics a partner, but doesn't think.
n/a Ranilen 2017-04-28
Maybe you like a warm dildo?
n/a Byrnhildr_Sedai 2017-04-28
Uh. Not that warm.
n/a Ranilen 2017-04-28
So, low and slow, like a brisket?
n/a Byrnhildr_Sedai 2017-04-28
Yeah, exactly, something that isn't like 300 Degrees of Freedom Units.
n/a 4pesants 2017-04-28
Ain't there better theoretical ethical concerns to worry about? This is so far fetched M. Night Shyamalan is making a movie about it as we speak.
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
you guys are so mad about my opinion on Reddit so ill just say "no u"
n/a 4pesants 2017-04-28
I mean, I to like to think about pointless shit as well, this is a notch above tho
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Sweetie, no one's mad; people are making fun of you.
n/a FuckingWrites 2017-04-28
Why do proud Ghazelle's always fall back on "u mad bruh"? If ya'll had any sense of social intelligence you'd realize nobody is even slightly perturbed and that we're all roasting you.
n/a deeprogrammed 2017-04-28
::::triggered::::
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
"haha these guys kept calling me stupid they must be soooo mad"
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
But this is true for literally every technology, so how do you propose we continue to advance technology at all?
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
If the my are incapable of seeing it as a bad thing, there are no ethical concerns
n/a CuriousKrow 2017-04-28
Sure, so in a couple hundred years when AI is essentially the equivalent of the human brain your argument stands. Until then it makes you look silly.
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
That was my point, i was talking about future hypothetical true AI Realdolls, not the one that only simulates humanity, because that's the scenario i had replied to.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-04-28
If AIs accurately simulate human intelligence, lots of them will get off on being sexually abused.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Weird but true.
n/a pepperouchau 2017-04-28
https://31.media.tumblr.com/122e34c90039581a9e515fd26ddc455d/tumblr_inline_najaea1Nhb1rnuijn.gif
n/a zester90 2017-04-28
But in a couple hundred years humanity will have moved on from this feminism fad so isn't this a just a moot point?
n/a Time_to_Drink 2017-04-28
There probably won't be genders and we will have genitically engineered super genitals covering half our bodies if current degeneracy continues.
n/a glmox 2017-04-28
umm try a couple months sweetie :)
n/a old_grumpy_grandpa 2017-04-28
That would be a terrifying event that could easily lead to the end of mankind, and you worry about what sex dolls would think?
n/a ImAFrenchCanadian 2017-04-28
I think you're going for Sentient.
n/a flipkt 2017-04-28
Wow, can you cut back on the mansplaining here?
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
HOW, please, explain
n/a eskachig 2017-04-28
I'm going to be a futuristic shitlord yelling at the microwave to get the fuck back in the kitchen.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
That's a weird question to ask on a topic about speculative shit in the future.
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
Honestly I think there's a decent discussion to be had, but I don't think a place chock full of pedo apologia like /r/GamerGhazi is the place to discuss robot consent. Microwave cooking for one...yeah. Unemployment? Fits in perfectly. Celibacy, well, yeah. This doesn't really work there.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
pedo apologia?
n/a Not_today_bro 2017-04-28
Yeah it means they waifu up Appalachian babies. Educate yourself or stay in your lane.
n/a nonouiswrong 2017-04-28
see Sarah Nyberg
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
do I have to?
n/a boozehelps 2017-04-28
And Allison Rapp
n/a grungebot5000 2017-04-28
we have sexbots rtfn, this ain't speculative no more
turns out, they have no interest in anything but fucking their owners properly
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
Thst is their purpose in life.
n/a grungebot5000 2017-04-28
yeah like, they're fine with it lol
n/a nomad1c 2017-04-28
why the fuck would they make the robot sentient anyway?
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
"Fully immersive experience!"
n/a nomad1c 2017-04-28
ENJOY YOUR FOOD WARMED TO PERFECTION BY YOUR SENTIENT MICROWAVE
n/a Tyler11223344 2017-04-28
Wait...firstly, who said these were sentient? Not only will none of these be designed with sentience, there's no such thing as a "singularity" occurring on a device unable modify it's own software (Beyond machine learning-style "modification")
Secondly, do you think there will/should be no AI performing tasks in the future?
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
A true AI is effectively a person, given that personhood derives from sentinence. Lots of "AI" would fall short of that though
n/a JohnTheOrc 2017-04-28
Personhood derives from being made in the image of God
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
So wait... no one but me is a person?
Hmmm... kinda solves my goblin problem pretty well. Shit, my daily run even brings me past an elementary school.
n/a go2hello 2017-04-28
Reported to Chris Hansen.
n/a Tyler11223344 2017-04-28
I don't see how that relates at all to what I said?
n/a Byrnhildr_Sedai 2017-04-28
That's because it doesn't.
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Sentience determines if it's really AI or not, and /u/ancienregime was also saying that "AI" would be more likely... an actual sub-AI that people just call AI despite it not having sentience.
And then he or she completely ignored the rest of what you were saying.
n/a Tyler11223344 2017-04-28
Ah, I guess that makes sense. I figured it would have been obvious that I was referring to the general term rather than the specific, literal definition
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
But that's kind of stupid, since the entire topic is revolving around sentience and agency.
n/a grungebot5000 2017-04-28
this clause is so meaningless, it drives me to drink
n/a therapy 2017-04-28
So since these fall short of true AIs, you have no problem with them?
n/a grungebot5000 2017-04-28
yer thinking of HARD AI
"true AI" is the enemies in Half-Life 1
n/a Chanchumaetrius 2017-04-28
SENTIENCE for fuck's sake
n/a MasterLawlz 2017-04-28
What would be the point in making a sex robot sentient? At that point it would just be like a woman but with a carbon fiber skeleton and the strength of ten men
n/a sammidavisjr 2017-04-28
Adrienne Barbeaubots, here I come!
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
Just my type
n/a cincilator 2017-04-28
I disagree.
People are "programmed", too. The only reason anyone loves children (that are objectively gross) is their evolutionary programming. Ditto why women don't like being raped.
Artificial person could be programmed differently.
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
And what is wrong with robo slaves? As logn as they're willing and designed to be willing, I don't see the problemo
n/a Siniroth 2017-04-28
This kind of attitude seems to be under the impression that sapience would simply appear out of nowhere in robots
n/a John_Ketch 2017-04-28
Yeah, bring on the rape robots
n/a jubbergun 2017-04-28
Firstly, you mean "sapient," not "sentient," and secondly being a "slave" without the ethical and moral issues involved with oppressing other human beings is the entire point of robots. In fact, the word "robots" comes from the Czechs, and means "forced labor." If people like you were even half as bright as you imagine you are you wouldn't need to have these things explained to you, mostly because you'd be too smart to spend all your time looking for things to whine about in a desperate bid for attention and validation.
n/a JasonJewnova 2017-04-28
Why is slavery inherently wrong? I'd love a black slave.
n/a birdboy2000 2017-04-28
You wouldn't love being one though.
n/a Hemic 2017-04-28
n/a Jason_Steelix 2017-04-28
But it's not sentient, or at least as sentient as you are with logic like that.
n/a MRB2012 2017-04-28
They're not sentient, they're robots. They're no more alive than the AIs I massacre every time I boot up my Xbox.
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
n/a Hemic 2017-04-28
What if they're programmed to like sex and not like feminism but they think it's free will tho
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
... and then a whole lot of tards think that you're talking about current-day vibrators or some shit.
Summer Reddit Go Away!
n/a Ranilen 2017-04-28
Shit, if I can teach it to do my taxes I've no longer got a reason to be married!
n/a FitAndDumb 2017-04-28
So are your dildos slaves? Why don't you free them then?
n/a Cloughtower 2017-04-28
You pass butter
n/a starry-morning 2017-04-28
when a girl buys a vibrator, its seen as a bit of naughty fun. BUT when a guy orders a 240 Volt FuckMaster Pro 5000 blowup latex doll with 6 speed pulsating vagina, elasticized anus with non-drip semen collection tray, together with optional built in realistic orgasm scream surround sound system, hes called a pervert?
n/a CaptainMurphy111 2017-04-28
don't judge me!
n/a FitAndDumb 2017-04-28
Don't talk to me or my sexbot's son ever again
n/a zwiebelhans 2017-04-28
Wow. I want one of those.
n/a FreeRobotFrost 2017-04-28
Yet another double standard. So much for the "tolerant" Left...
n/a Volt 2017-04-28
To be fair, if a woman had a male sex doll I'd be pretty fucking creeped out too.
n/a skeetsurfing1984 2017-04-28
Tbh, the minute someone builds a robot that can assemble IKEA furniture, men will be pretty much obsolete.
n/a simplyshaun 2017-04-28
We're trying to have a real conversation not pass around fantasy bullshit about robots that assemble Ikea furniture
n/a BigDaddy_Delta 2017-04-28
They just jelly that women will become obsolete and our waifus will replace them
n/a drunky_crowette 2017-04-28
Nothing wrong with it. And I'll be ordering my David Tennant and Heath Ledger sex bots when they come out.
n/a NotYetRegistered 2017-04-28
The equilavent of a dildo is a fleshlight, not a sexbot.
n/a donaldthelion 2017-04-28
I wonder how excited incels is about this
n/a hexane360 2017-04-28
Just make a male sexbot. Men aren't oppressed, so it's okay to oppress them. Plus it's downright feminist to support women's sexuality!
n/a SplurgyA 2017-04-28
Yeah I don't really get why sexbots are being cast as a feminist issue when all I want is a Nyle DiMarco-bot to fuck up my bussy
n/a jubbergun 2017-04-28
Maybe someone should remind them that the word "robot" means "forced labor" in Czech. The Czechs who developed the word probably would have straight-up called them slaves if not for the underlying themes involved for a Slavic population (since their ethnic name "Slav" literally comes from the Roman/Latin word for "slave").
n/a khanfusion 2017-04-28
Robotat is "to work" in Russian. So, yeah... robots are laborers.
n/a LiberatorFalcon 2017-04-28
Rabotat is "to work" in Russian, not robotat.
n/a knyazmyshkin 2017-04-28
Robotat
n/a jPaolo 2017-04-28
The guy who invented the word in his play didn't even think of machines, just some quasi-clones.
n/a King-Achelexus 2017-04-28
Notice that it's always the butthurt tumblrinas who complain about "sexbots".
n/a JasonJewnova 2017-04-28
It doesn't even make sense. They all ugly and thus have zero value, why would they worry about becoming obsolete?
n/a LSeww 2017-04-28
Because they not realize that obviously.
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
They think people just can't handle all the realtm women they are. It's not that they are undesirable but they are just too good.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-04-28
I used to think there was no point to sex-bots because they can't cry real tears.
But, if they can make real feminists cry, I may have to reconsider.
n/a wolfdreams01 2017-04-28
Gazelles are just steamed because they know that even sex robots which are designed to be compliant won't put up with their narcissistic self-entitled bullshit.
"Chad, I want you to be aggressive and dominant, but also supportive of all feminist ideology. And you also have to get a job to pay the rent, but that's only until my Patreon takes off and I become a successful artist."
"Beep boop... does not compute... 404 error..." Chad explodes into a pile of circuitry.
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
Careful, with custom terms like ghazelles you run the risk of seeming actually involved in pointless drama. Don't want that, now, do we.
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
Also ghazelles implies some sort of fitness and athletic ability
n/a Tar-mairon 2017-04-28
This is why we don't allow women in tech.
That thread reads like a bunch of 12 year olds discussing A.I. after seeing The Matrix.
n/a cuteman 2017-04-28
What would have happened if Chappie was built by Emma Watson instead of that Indian guy and Ninja kidnapped them?
I feel like she would learn so many things about both feminism and that darn patriarchy.
n/a Awayfone 2017-04-28
Hmm then we would have robo Watson instead of robo Yolandi
n/a ur_mom_IoI 2017-04-28
sexbots of the future
n/a CuriousKrow 2017-04-28
This is NSFW btw.
n/a ason 2017-04-28
Where do you work, the Mormon factory?
n/a CuriousKrow 2017-04-28
I design the pills you take to keep from being a massive faggot. Obviously I've been slacking and looking at hentai lately.
n/a ason 2017-04-28
You probably shouldn't have made them suppositories, sweetie.
n/a CuriousKrow 2017-04-28
I like you.
n/a FuckingWrites 2017-04-28
For anyone who doesn't want to click, it's a manga about women fused into doors naked and you have to fuck them to get out of your house.
It's grossly offensive but very weirdly awesome.
n/a LedinToke 2017-04-28
well i'll give it to japan, they're inventive
n/a SpotNL 2017-04-28
> panic
>read mostly comments of people who are ambivalent about it.
n/a DistortedLines 2017-04-28
Read the sidebar goy
n/a SpotNL 2017-04-28
I did, pagan.
n/a michaelnoir 2017-04-28
OK, so it's probably better that they have an ersatz relationship with a robot then?
No. The robots aren't feminists, so they can't have a relationship with them either. The absolute best thing for them to do is be celibate, and die alone. Thank God you're there to make that judgment call on other people's lives!
n/a cuteman 2017-04-28
If James Franco can have a relationship with a Japanese Anime pillow people can have a relationship with a robot.
n/a neutralvoter 2017-04-28
Here's when you know you've run out of things to complain about, when you start sticking up for 'sentient sex dolls.' The entire idea is barely conceptualized and so far off from current reality that you might as well start punishing people for things they do in their dreams.
And then they use Westworld to further their arguments, a show with more plot holes than a downed WW2 fighter jet and who's very plot, though enjoyable, hinges on technology that doesn't even try to be grounded.
The outrage machine has officially entered a state of comical fan fiction.
n/a ancienregime 2017-04-28
Geez its just speculation. You guys are really reaching.
n/a neutralvoter 2017-04-28
did you just assume my gender identity?
n/a Prometherion13 2017-04-28
You, of all people, accusing others of "reaching".
Is this what peak irony looks like?
n/a FuckingWrites 2017-04-28
n/a cuteman 2017-04-28
How many countries have you visited with actual patriarchies? Start there.
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
I believe it is you who is reaching (into the future to defend technology you cannot even begin to conceive of conceptually)
n/a FrostBittenSalsa 2017-04-28
No, you're just really that damn retarded.
n/a donaldthelion 2017-04-28
With the artificial wombs and the sex robots coming were really not going to need women that much longer. The ghazis are actually woke realizing the female death camps are coming.
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-04-28
HOOKERBOT 3000
n/a ArchangelleLovesRape 2017-04-28
Literally fucking retarded. The current generation of sex robots is smarter than /u/-SGIASJ apparently.
Code doesn't just "evolve sentience" and you can always tells the person who's speaking out their ass and has no actual technical knowledge. If - and that's a ridiculously big "if" - we actually manage to be able to reach the level of developing artificial intelligence someday, it's not going to just automatically propagate to all machines. Your toaster isn't going to be like "fuck this, I'm transrefrigerator and don't feel like making things warm today" you fucking dunce.
n/a wolfdreams01 2017-04-28
Seriously, whenever non-technical people talk about "the AI menace" I start laughing. I remember when all Apple networking capability was based on a piece of code called "the chooser" even though it was two decades old. They added new features over time to make it look slicker and have a cooler GUI, but no matter how slick marketing could make it, the base code that was running all that shit was twenty years old.
n/a MooseHeckler 2017-04-28
I can't imagine any developers just letting out into the world on a lark either.
n/a ArchangelleLovesRape 2017-04-28
> import AI.sentience;
Whoops, sorry boss, I accidentally made all of our scales sentient.
n/a MooseHeckler 2017-04-28
Totally gonna happen.
n/a -SGIASJ 2017-04-28
You sound very, very upset. You couldn't have said this in a nicer way?
I never claimed to have technical knowledge, silly. You're getting angry over nothing.
n/a Chicup 2017-04-28
DON'T DATE ROBOTS!
n/a knyazmyshkin 2017-04-28
This, but unironically
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
Are people genuinely stupid enough that they think computer programs will randomly become sentient out of nowhere? If you are worried that a sex robot will become sentient why aren't you worried that my python script that goes "fuck me, fuck me, fuck me" will become sentient? Guess it just goes to show the tiny amount of education and knowledge people have about simple concepts
n/a MRB2012 2017-04-28
Ask Eliezer Yudkowsky.
n/a takaci 2017-04-28
whos that
n/a glmox 2017-04-28
you sweet summer child
n/a MRB2012 2017-04-28
Dude who thinks Robot Jesus will save us all for eternity.
n/a glmox 2017-04-28
/u/ancienregime STOP CONCEPTUALIZING YOUR MORALS AND POLITICS THROUGH WHATEVER THE TRENDY THING TO REFERENCE IS OH MY FUCKING GOD
n/a bleepis 2017-04-28
its like "donald trump is voldemort and his cabinet is the death eaters and bernie is harry potter" but more woke and bae
n/a silent_xfer 2017-04-28
That's 100%, accurate thi
n/a bleepis 2017-04-28
reeeeee...
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-04-28
Time to DEUS VULTEMORT all over Jihadzkaban or whatever
n/a no_maps_no_plans 2017-04-28
roasties btfo'd
where were you when women went extinct and replaced with literally perfect animu waifus?
so begins the golden age of the NEET.
n/a PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2017-04-28
Except the part where people can afford sexbots.
n/a Raven0520 2017-04-28
How many good boy points does a sex robot cost?
n/a dongas420 2017-04-28
The NEETs will have been replaced by robots as well by then, though, along with the rest of humanity. It'll be NEET robots fucking waifu robots styled after cartoons directed and animated by Chinese robots while their parent robots hang their heads down in simulated shame and 500-line Python scripts generate outraged, alarmist posts about it on the Internet.
n/a lesdoggg 2017-04-28
if u come in a sexbot enough does it become a real girl?
is this a modern pinocchio?
n/a da394ba8f4646fabe414 2017-04-28
lol Ghazi: "I don't like it, change it"
No.
n/a captainpriapism 2017-04-28
sex robots will put women in their place imo
youre trying to start an argument over some stupid shit? well ill just fuck this robot
try to guilt me into some shit? ill just fuck this robot
argue about what were having for dinner? ill just fuck this robot
solves all sorts of issues
n/a JasonJewnova 2017-04-28
Just kill all women tbh
n/a captainpriapism 2017-04-28
nah they can help make the robots
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-04-28
We don't have to KILL them. Things were fine when they were basically slaves.
n/a CC3940A61E 2017-04-28
your time is coming to an end
n/a EvanHarper 2017-04-28
come on guys, the /r/drama thread freaking out about the ghazi thread has literally 10x more activity
at some point you have to admit you're just rubbernecking at a tiny irrelevant group of fringe sillies
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-04-28
Evan i love you but when my mind came up with the thread title I had to post it
n/a zwiebelhans 2017-04-28
Someone really needs to make a holder for sex dolls to ride roombas. Or even just a cheap fles light mount. Ghazi and ilk would loose their minds.
n/a Cloacalla_Festival 2017-04-28
Here's a great idea I just thought of: how about we not make refrigerators sentient?
n/a ReBurnInator 2017-04-28
Here's the thing: if nobody wants to do the work they can't complain when some guy invents a machine that will do it for them. They're making themselves obsolete.
n/a miraoister 2017-04-28
i got to admit a sexbot would sure make ugly womyn redundant.
n/a fgdadfgfdgadf 2017-04-28
Accurate title. Attractive women will still be well sort after, but who's going to put in effort chasing a 5/10 with dyed blue hair and listening to her feminist drivel when you can just get a sex bot? That's why they are having a hissy fit.
n/a StingAuer 2017-04-28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzrWANNrNvs
n/a cincilator 2017-04-28
I am putting this here for visibility. The thing is you won't need to force sex bots to have sex, they'll want to do it. Let me explain.
People's likes and dislikes are "programmed", too. The only reason anyone loves their children (that are objectively pretty gross and loud) is their evolutionary programming. Ditto why women don't like being raped. You might want to read Blank Slate to realize how much depends on genetic "programming".
Artificial person could be programmed to have different preferences. Even if sentient it would follow those preferences.
n/a Nechaev 2017-04-28
I'm expecting artificial intelligence to develop self awareness before gamerghazi does.