You can't have a real argument about shit on Reddit, you'll only be met with some sort of turbo degenerate twisting your words over themselves until it fits whatever their narrative is.
That's why I come here, to watch people make the mistake of even trying
You can't have a real argument about shit on Reddit, you'll only be met with some sort of turbo degenerate twisting your words over themselves until it fits whatever their narrative is.
Yep, this couldnāt be more true. Even if you never intended to argue or you made some tangential point, people on reddit will fall over themselves to make it into anarguement about somethingās youāve never ecen commented on. Idk if this is a reddit thing or a social media thing.
Yes. This, 110%. I'm so glad to see it being called out. I've literally been stunned by the shit people have twisted and tried to use as their "argument". Ima save this comment too. Another reason why I love this sub.
You do realize that getting a bunch of secular stupid young right wing males on reddit to click the upvote button is not the same as winning the argument don't you? Like literally you've just come up with a fancy way of saying "Child support should be entirely voluntary on the part of the man". And you're using the existence of abortion as a justification for it? Holy fuck shit are you an entitled, whiny piece of shit.
Like, again, who the fuck is this legislation targeted towards? 90% of the right is not going to vote for it because they want to "promote" family and ban abortion and voting for something who's argument is based on giving men an "abortion" option (i.e. making child support fully voluntary, in non-retardese). And obviously the left isn't going to vote for something that literally penalizes women for possessing control over their own body, in a petty attempt at artificial, imposed "equality" for the poor poor oppressed deadbeat dads of the world. Step outside of your 90% young white right wing male sphere and you're going to get laughed out of the fucking room. And you're probably going to come out fuming, write a stupid blog about how awful normies (i.e. non-participants the circlejerk of your own single identity group), and blame on Jews or Hillary Clinton. When it really is just because you're a worthless piece of shit. Sorry.
It's funny how in every other instance the right is against artificial equity solutions like this, that try to smooth out inequalities that are the result of inherent natural differences. But when it comes to one that just happens to fuck women over, reddits male circlejerk is all over it and considers it the greatest thing since their last fart.
How about this: if a man gets a woman pregnant, he has to pay child support no matter what. Like if the woman gets an abortion, it's just free money for the next 20 years. I like that solution personally.
Unless a guy is Daddy Warbucks, I don't see what 'oversight' would solve. Average child support is like $400 a month. The woman brings in her receipts for childcare, boom the money is accounted for. So, because childcare is covered, the woman has an extra $400 a month to do whatever you guys are worried will happen to the beta buck's child support. Buy bon bons, make Chads car payment for him, etc., etc.
That's an idiotic assumption, and it dismisses the principle of the argument, that of being forced to pay to facilitate expenditures having nothing to do with care taking of the child.
Like should we establish a whole bureaucracy to micromanage every single mother in the nation? You realize there are a lot of them right?
In general it is expected that parents will take care of their children. It is sort of a natural instinct, hardwired into us by hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Just because you split doesn't mean she's a degenerate aberration as well. I don't see what the problem is unless there is evidence of abuse.
I honestly canāt think of a worse scenario for myself than having kids and only seeing them every other weekend and paying money to the other parent, especially after having been so close to my dad for so long
Like I know worse things can happen in life but I donāt see how that wouldnāt make you horribly depressed. But it happens all the time
Because child support is a racquet. It only makes sense in cases of divorce. Women need to quit feeling so entitled as to assuming that a man who they want as a fuck buddy should have to give them money if they so choose to have a kid. No one's forcing them to have the child so, why force a man with the penalty of possible jail time to give you money for a kid that he most likely won't ever see?
In the deranged mass of cells known as TITCJ's brain, that was the ultimate gotcha. Poor femdude thought she was finally going to own those nasty MRAs and instead got raped with her own words š¢
You want to effectively abolish child support programs because of the fact that women have control over their own body. Makes perfect sense to me. Actually, no, this is going to immediately not be such an awesome and genius idea once you propose it to a group of people not 90% composed of angry young secular right wing males endlessly jerking themselves off. Suddenly you're going to find that people do not accept the clear logic, justice, and reason behind your proposal to abolish child support because abortion. Literally it is a proposal that appeals to no other part of society, than your own identity group. Which for some reason likes to cut away small little spaces on the internet composed 99% of itself and stroke each other off.
At this rate tbh I thing young secular right wing white males are going to become their own species, one day a bussy will evolve that can accept that seed. And then humanity will put you in a spacecraft and shoot you over to the moon, and happily never have to deal with your whiny resentful shit, ever again.
is going to immediately not be such an awesome and genius idea once you propose it to a group of people not 90% composed of angry young secular right wing males endlessly jerking themselves off
IS AN IDEA SUGGESTED BY FEMINISTS YOU HUGE SUBHUMANS
Laurie Shrage, professor of philosophy and womenās and gender studies, questions whether men should be 'penalized for being sexually active', and she puts the subject in the perspective of feminists who had to fight the same idea with different gender portent, namely that consenting to sexual intercourse is not the same as consenting to parenthood. Furthermore, both men and children are punished, according to professor Shrage; children have to live with an absent father who never 'voluntarily' became a parent
I think any education on this sort of thing is a good thing. There, however, is far too much ambiguity in all of this, especially if alcohol is involved. Society I think would benefit from a 10 commandment of consent or an acronym or a consent handshake, a phone app that parties can both click boxes on. I'm just brainstorming.
Absolutely nobody is going use an app for consent. Nothing kills the mood faster than "hey, we need to do some paperwork" and I garuntee any decent lawyer could say she was coerced of she later regrets it.
I garuntee any decent lawyer could say she was coerced if she later regrets it.
Alternately somebody actually could coerce her into clicking the consent app. Which obviously would if it were ever taken seriously. Which prevents it from ever being taken seriously.
Conservatives are generally consistent in being against abandoning your child and against killing your child in utero. Liberals think the killing is fine but abandonment is somehow worse than killing.
This leads to weird conversations where liberals say "we need abortion because what if a womyn is raped" But if you ask them what should happen with child support if a man is raped they're like "we'll it's not the child's fault, the man should be forced to pay child support to his rapist".
Right cause outside of reddit many feminists have been supportive of paper abortion. Only in reddit is seen as a MRA talk point for some bizarre reason
It's quite apparent that the fact that financial abortion isn't a thing is a result of our collective dislike of a welfare state above "the best interests of the child." Because all we're talking about here is the financial support of the child, because men already don't have an inherent obligation to raise it, just financially support it. Both parents can give up financial obligations if they agree to it; if both parents want to put their child up for adoption, they will no longer be on the financial hook. There is already a process of terminating legal parental rights if both parents consent to it.
The only issue that these anti-choice people seem to have is when one parent wants it and the other doesn't, in this instance, when the man wants it and the woman doesn't. Suddenly, this existing financial infrastructure to support children being put up for adoption is no longer sufficient. It's borne out of society's perception that men are to be the breadwinner and to financially support their children. Really both sides could be happy if any extra funds is going to the mother from the state rather than the father himself, like exactly what is happening with couples who adopt, but that's not good enough apparently because so many feminists become hypercapitalistic when they see men becoming advantaged through something.
Losing my kids is a hell of a lot more scary to me than losing a few hundred dollars per month, I donāt know how that can happen to someone and they not be suicidal
For the love of God, Tits isn't a Menslib mod. Tits is basically an MRA compared to Menslib. As weird as this is to believe, there are bigger cucks on the internet than Tits and naturally they are internet moderators as well.
You do realize that getting a bunch of secular stupid young right wing males on reddit to click the upvote button is not the same as winning the argument don't you? Like literally you've just come up with a fancy way of saying "Child support should be entirely voluntary on the part of the man". And you're using the existence of abortion as a justification for it? Holy fuck shit are you an entitled, whiny piece of shit.
Like, again, who the fuck is this legislation targeted towards? 90% of the right is not going to vote for it because they want to "promote" family and ban abortion and voting for something who's argument is based on giving men an "abortion" option (i.e. making child support fully voluntary, in non-retardese). And obviously the left isn't going to vote for something that literally penalizes women for possessing control over their own body, in a petty attempt at artificial, imposed "equality" for the poor poor oppressed deadbeat dads of the world. Step outside of your 90% young white right wing male sphere and you're going to get laughed out of the fucking room. And you're probably going to come out fuming, write a stupid blog about how awful normies (i.e. non-participants the circlejerk of your own single identity group), and blame on Jews or Hillary Clinton. When it really is just because you're a worthless piece of shit. Sorry.
It's funny how in every other instance the right is against artificial equity solutions like this, that try to smooth out inequalities that are the result of inherent natural differences. But when it comes to one that just happens to fuck women over, reddits male circlejerk is all over it and considers it the greatest thing since their last fart.
How about this: if a man gets a woman pregnant, he has to pay child support no matter what. Like if the woman gets an abortion, it's just free money for the next 20 years. I like that solution personally.
129 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-10-26
It's the same teenager racism hate cult that MDE was all about. It's just another boring /pol/ offshoot for lonely edgelord losers.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2018-10-26
Anytime some retard's argument gets BTFO'd via analogy, they will immediately resort to "how dare you?"
Person 1: Only trans people can should portray trans people in movies
Person 2: Why? Tom Hanks played a retard in Forrest Gump and he's not a retard.
Person 1: Yikes, r u really calling trans people retarded?
1 KokomoOReily 2018-10-26
You can't have a real argument about shit on Reddit, you'll only be met with some sort of turbo degenerate twisting your words over themselves until it fits whatever their narrative is.
That's why I come here, to watch people make the mistake of even trying
1 youcanteatbullets 2018-10-26
Are you saying video gamers who use the turbo boost are degenerate? HOW DARE YOU!
1 LightUmbra 2018-10-26
That's it. I'm rising up.
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-10-26
Scum like you are rising up to hurt the innocent children. You child abusers disgust me
1 e-guy 2018-10-26
What, are you pre-emptively calling me a turbo degenerate just because I'm nitpicking and twisting your words so I can be outraged?
I have never been more offended in my life!
1 KokomoOReily 2018-10-26
Oh so we're just cool with being offended now? Like that's what we're doing? Idk sweaty
1 HailSanta2512 2018-10-26
yeah a kiddy diddlin hyper racist would say that
back to el_drumpf with you š
1 Slimey-Bucket 2018-10-26
Yep, this couldnāt be more true. Even if you never intended to argue or you made some tangential point, people on reddit will fall over themselves to make it into anarguement about somethingās youāve never ecen commented on. Idk if this is a reddit thing or a social media thing.
1 lyridsreign 2018-10-26
It is a social media thing. Libtards on Twitter and MAGAcels on Facebook use pretty much the same stragety
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-10-26
this, but unironically
1 Hayleycakes2009 2018-10-26
Yes. This, 110%. I'm so glad to see it being called out. I've literally been stunned by the shit people have twisted and tried to use as their "argument". Ima save this comment too. Another reason why I love this sub.
1 killinrin 2018-10-26
In the stupidest fucking subs, too.
1 gilmore606 2018-10-26
snappy/sidebar quote right here
1 friidum-boya 2018-10-26
Let's just watch the world burn.
1 22333444455555666666 2018-10-26
analogies: comparing the aspects which are similar between two different things
intellectuals on the internet: UM EXCUSE ME THOSE TWO THINGS ARENT 100% THE SAME
1 WhatsupDoc001 2018-10-26
You people just hate on him because you want to abandon your I N N O C E N T C H I L D. How dare you.
1 notcyberpope 2018-10-26
Who wants to raise shitty ass kids anyway?
1 WhatsupDoc001 2018-10-26
How unsurprising, the sub of alt-right nazis hates INNOCENT CHILDREN too. You people disgust me.
1 notcyberpope 2018-10-26
What do you mean YoU PeOpLe???
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-26
This is every single argument on the internet talking about women taking precautions in risky environments.
1 d4ddyd54m4 2018-10-26
Yes
1 Watermark03 2018-10-26
You do realize that getting a bunch of secular stupid young right wing males on reddit to click the upvote button is not the same as winning the argument don't you? Like literally you've just come up with a fancy way of saying "Child support should be entirely voluntary on the part of the man". And you're using the existence of abortion as a justification for it? Holy fuck shit are you an entitled, whiny piece of shit.
Like, again, who the fuck is this legislation targeted towards? 90% of the right is not going to vote for it because they want to "promote" family and ban abortion and voting for something who's argument is based on giving men an "abortion" option (i.e. making child support fully voluntary, in non-retardese). And obviously the left isn't going to vote for something that literally penalizes women for possessing control over their own body, in a petty attempt at artificial, imposed "equality" for the poor poor oppressed deadbeat dads of the world. Step outside of your 90% young white right wing male sphere and you're going to get laughed out of the fucking room. And you're probably going to come out fuming, write a stupid blog about how awful normies (i.e. non-participants the circlejerk of your own single identity group), and blame on Jews or Hillary Clinton. When it really is just because you're a worthless piece of shit. Sorry.
It's funny how in every other instance the right is against artificial equity solutions like this, that try to smooth out inequalities that are the result of inherent natural differences. But when it comes to one that just happens to fuck women over, reddits male circlejerk is all over it and considers it the greatest thing since their last fart.
How about this: if a man gets a woman pregnant, he has to pay child support no matter what. Like if the woman gets an abortion, it's just free money for the next 20 years. I like that solution personally.
1 LongPostBot 2018-10-26
Have you owned the libs yet?
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 westofthetracks 2018-10-26
this is a bad argument because forrest gump is a trash movie for college football dads and their mouthbreathing sons
the correct citation is charlie in always sunny
1 Leakylocks 2018-10-26
Why are incels so afraid of child support?
1 SlowFatHusky 2018-10-26
It's really expensive.
1 BigTiddyAnimeWaifu 2018-10-26
thats why these degenerates only go for young girls who can't get pregnant yet
1 uniqueguy263 2018-10-26
Yeah kids need food and water and books and other shit
1 SlowFatHusky 2018-10-26
The kids require that. The mother should pay for her own food, water, and housing though. That's part of being a responsible adult.
1 2DDefenseForce 2018-10-26
Taxation without representation.
1/3 of your income pre tax is going to someone who may prevent you from seeing your kids (assuming you want to).
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-26
And literally can be spent any way the woman pleases.
1 2DDefenseForce 2018-10-26
Zero oversight is a huge issue.
1 Protista_of_Peace 2018-10-26
Unless a guy is Daddy Warbucks, I don't see what 'oversight' would solve. Average child support is like $400 a month. The woman brings in her receipts for childcare, boom the money is accounted for. So, because childcare is covered, the woman has an extra $400 a month to do whatever you guys are worried will happen to the beta buck's child support. Buy bon bons, make Chads car payment for him, etc., etc.
1 uniqueguy263 2018-10-26
Iām that scenario the kidās getting the support he needs, so whatās the problem?
1 DownWithDuplicity 2018-10-26
That's an idiotic assumption, and it dismisses the principle of the argument, that of being forced to pay to facilitate expenditures having nothing to do with care taking of the child.
1 Protista_of_Peace 2018-10-26
That's exactly my point. What will oversight solve when the parent receiving it will easily be able to show the money is going to the children?
1 Watermark03 2018-10-26
Like should we establish a whole bureaucracy to micromanage every single mother in the nation? You realize there are a lot of them right?
In general it is expected that parents will take care of their children. It is sort of a natural instinct, hardwired into us by hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Just because you split doesn't mean she's a degenerate aberration as well. I don't see what the problem is unless there is evidence of abuse.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-26
There are plenty of problems with the system. How it should function as designed is far from the actual results.
1 ILieToCaptchas 2018-10-26
Yes, my feminist friend, use a naive account of biology to justify morality, that will surely end well for your feminist ambitions
1 GreasyPeter 2018-10-26
Some states can take more, especially if you have multiple kids. I've heard up to 51% in California but I'm not sure if that's accurate.
1 2DDefenseForce 2018-10-26
In canada I think it tops out at 40% of your income.
1 MasterLawlz 2018-10-26
I honestly canāt think of a worse scenario for myself than having kids and only seeing them every other weekend and paying money to the other parent, especially after having been so close to my dad for so long
Like I know worse things can happen in life but I donāt see how that wouldnāt make you horribly depressed. But it happens all the time
1 2DDefenseForce 2018-10-26
I drank a lot, and almost got crushed by a recycling compactor after passing out in a recycling dumpster.
Thats how I dealt with it.
1 SeattleFingers 2018-10-26
Cause the only thing worse than a studio apartment with one job is a studio apartment with 2 jobs
1 banananutbranmuffin 2018-10-26
Because child support is a racquet. It only makes sense in cases of divorce. Women need to quit feeling so entitled as to assuming that a man who they want as a fuck buddy should have to give them money if they so choose to have a kid. No one's forcing them to have the child so, why force a man with the penalty of possible jail time to give you money for a kid that he most likely won't ever see?
1 anonymous93 2018-10-26
U wot?
1 ABigBigThug 2018-10-26
I love how tits went from the "pregnant men" canard to complaining that someone else was talking about rare edge cases.
1 Corporal-Hicks 2018-10-26
you can preggers thru the butt?
1 radicalfuckncentrist 2018-10-26
dude
1 wow___justwow 2018-10-26
bussy lmao
1 transgirltradwife 2018-10-26
Hell even amongst trannies it's a rare edge case cuz hormones make you sterile.
1 Dungold 2018-10-26
You don't need to take hormones to be transgender sweetie, don't be a bigot.
1 kyzabro 2018-10-26
Yeah I'm definitely edging in my case.
1 kingofthehill5 2018-10-26
Its 2018 sweety men can get pregnant.
1 ladragoness 2018-10-26
Transmen who get pregnant, duh!
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-26
He meant females. Female men. Trannies. Transmen.
This dude is making meme arguments.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-26
Holy fucking shit you are literally Rosa fucking Parks
How does it feel to be so oppressed
Abolish child support b/c abortion exists
What genius, what universal reason and appeal
1 AlreadyPorchNaked 2018-10-26
Lmao damn you're mad. Did your dad not want you?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-26
Was what I said wrong? Was it not a meme argument? Are you offended that I pointed out that an argument being made was disingenuous and retarded?
1 trilateral1 2018-10-26
Obviously not. After a man agrees to be father, he can't abandon his kid when it's 5 years old.
The proposed surrender of paternal rights and obligations would have similar time limits as regular fetus-murder.
In progressive states where women can flush out their "blob of cells" until week 34, men would have the legal opt-out until week 30.
In other states they would have to decide before week 12.
1 morerokk 2018-10-26
Chapo posters are always such whiny pieces of shit.
1 westofthetracks 2018-10-26
i like this because it's like a perfect gradient of "never heard of being trans" to "totally woke about transpeople"
1 HailSanta2512 2018-10-26
In the deranged mass of cells known as TITCJ's brain, that was the ultimate gotcha. Poor femdude thought she was finally going to own those nasty MRAs and instead got raped with her own words š¢
1 NormanImmanuel 2018-10-26
Gay men already could marry women, I don't know what the fuzz about gay marriage was all about.
1 2DDefenseForce 2018-10-26
Gay men are smart enough not to.
1 Cleverly_Clearly 2018-10-26
White people whose grandfathers could vote are allowed to vote, and black people whose grandfathers could vote are allowed to vote.
1 1999-2017 2018-10-26
Gay men could get married to females before obergefell
1 AlreadyPorchNaked 2018-10-26
TITRC is unironically one of the dumbest people on this website.
Someone rightly pointed out the idiocy of that argument, because it's the exact same argument people who opposed gay marriage used.
"Gay men can already get married if they want to. Now they want special rights to marry a man!"
1 Watermark03 2018-10-26
You want to effectively abolish child support programs because of the fact that women have control over their own body. Makes perfect sense to me. Actually, no, this is going to immediately not be such an awesome and genius idea once you propose it to a group of people not 90% composed of angry young secular right wing males endlessly jerking themselves off. Suddenly you're going to find that people do not accept the clear logic, justice, and reason behind your proposal to abolish child support because abortion. Literally it is a proposal that appeals to no other part of society, than your own identity group. Which for some reason likes to cut away small little spaces on the internet composed 99% of itself and stroke each other off.
At this rate tbh I thing young secular right wing white males are going to become their own species, one day a bussy will evolve that can accept that seed. And then humanity will put you in a spacecraft and shoot you over to the moon, and happily never have to deal with your whiny resentful shit, ever again.
1 AlreadyPorchNaked 2018-10-26
Lol did you have fun putting words in my mouth?
Please sperg out some more
1 ConfuseTheJews 2018-10-26
It's words never have any value, but fun to watch the watermark sperg
1 ILieToCaptchas 2018-10-26
IS AN IDEA SUGGESTED BY FEMINISTS YOU HUGE SUBHUMANS
WHAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE ON THIS WEBSITE?
1 Dungold 2018-10-26
I have a right to bodily autonomy, to not use it to work for a child I don't want.
1 nmx179 2018-10-26
Actually, it's control over their baby's body, and their right to unilaterally murder that baby, that is the issue.
1 trj820 2018-10-26
It does, however, give men the right to coat-hanger that child on the off chance that they're trans and pregnant.
1 lifesbrink 2018-10-26
God damn, he is such an idiot.
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-10-26
Watching him lose to retards is nice.
1 DownWithDuplicity 2018-10-26
I didn't see any evidence of retardation in the opposing arguments. I'm pretty sure this is a pot/kettle situation.
1 FineLow 2018-10-26
He's a male feminist what did you expect?
1 lifesbrink 2018-10-26
The usual, rape and assault
1 FineLow 2018-10-26
I am sure that is coming.
1 lifesbrink 2018-10-26
Well the #metoo is, there is no doubt in my mind he has already committed said crimes.
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-10-26
Pregnant men...?
What is happening?
1 wow___justwow 2018-10-26
FACTS and LOGIC
1 rationalhuckleberry 2018-10-26
I donāt like these facts and logic.
Can we go back to 1952?
1 error404brain 2018-10-26
š Maleš pregnancyš is šgood šand šmale šabortionš should šbe šforbidden.š
1 LightUmbra 2018-10-26
Mpregnate me daddy
1 cragfar 2018-10-26
You know a conversation is going to be retarded when it's all about consent.
1 aqouta 2018-10-26
Consentcoin is the next big blockchain project.
1 GreasyPeter 2018-10-26
Absolutely nobody is going use an app for consent. Nothing kills the mood faster than "hey, we need to do some paperwork" and I garuntee any decent lawyer could say she was coerced of she later regrets it.
1 aqouta 2018-10-26
The real question is, will they sign a consent transaction onto the chain and wait 30 minutes for 4 confirmation blocks?
1 LightUmbra 2018-10-26
IIRC contracts like this aren't even legally binding.
1 aqouta 2018-10-26
They'd be proof that it was signed, which would be useful evidence even if mot legally binding.
1 Watermark03 2018-10-26
Alternately somebody actually could coerce her into clicking the consent app. Which obviously would if it were ever taken seriously. Which prevents it from ever being taken seriously.
1 madvillainer 2018-10-26
honestly I was thinking somebody should make an app for consent or something like a pre-sex contract like that chappelle show skit
1 aqouta 2018-10-26
Find. Way to monetize the woke.
1 seshfan2 2018-10-26
Nothing says "Conservative family values" like fighting for the right to abandon your child.
1 atsteak 2018-10-26
Conservatives are generally consistent in being against abandoning your child and against killing your child in utero. Liberals think the killing is fine but abandonment is somehow worse than killing.
This leads to weird conversations where liberals say "we need abortion because what if a womyn is raped" But if you ask them what should happen with child support if a man is raped they're like "we'll it's not the child's fault, the man should be forced to pay child support to his rapist".
1 ILieToCaptchas 2018-10-26
Right cause outside of reddit many feminists have been supportive of paper abortion. Only in reddit is seen as a MRA talk point for some bizarre reason
1 transgirltradwife 2018-10-26
It's quite apparent that the fact that financial abortion isn't a thing is a result of our collective dislike of a welfare state above "the best interests of the child." Because all we're talking about here is the financial support of the child, because men already don't have an inherent obligation to raise it, just financially support it. Both parents can give up financial obligations if they agree to it; if both parents want to put their child up for adoption, they will no longer be on the financial hook. There is already a process of terminating legal parental rights if both parents consent to it.
The only issue that these anti-choice people seem to have is when one parent wants it and the other doesn't, in this instance, when the man wants it and the woman doesn't. Suddenly, this existing financial infrastructure to support children being put up for adoption is no longer sufficient. It's borne out of society's perception that men are to be the breadwinner and to financially support their children. Really both sides could be happy if any extra funds is going to the mother from the state rather than the father himself, like exactly what is happening with couples who adopt, but that's not good enough apparently because so many feminists become hypercapitalistic when they see men becoming advantaged through something.
1 LongPostBot 2018-10-26
Good job bobby, here's a star
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 jko831 2018-10-26
this but unironically
1 zergling_Lester 2018-10-26
I always said that transwomen are the only reasonable women as a result of experiencing the world from both viewpoints.
1 NGBRecocoBestGirl 2018-10-26
Counterpoint: any girl gamer group.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-10-26
Gamers tho.
1 ILieToCaptchas 2018-10-26
Huh decent take on drama?
Who would have thought it
1 rickhora 2018-10-26
that guy is really fucking dumb, Jesus....
1 Osterion 2018-10-26
The old "I'm a virgin but the idea of child support is scary" argument. A reddit classic.
1 GreasyPeter 2018-10-26
The old "Ive never been sexually assaulted but the thought of rape keeps me from interacting with strangers" argument. A classic.
1 Osterion 2018-10-26
Show us on the doll where the foid wouldn't touch you
1 GreasyPeter 2018-10-26
Everywhere.
1 GreasyPeter 2018-10-26
Everywhere.
1 MasterLawlz 2018-10-26
Losing my kids is a hell of a lot more scary to me than losing a few hundred dollars per month, I donāt know how that can happen to someone and they not be suicidal
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-10-26
For the love of God, Tits isn't a Menslib mod. Tits is basically an MRA compared to Menslib. As weird as this is to believe, there are bigger cucks on the internet than Tits and naturally they are internet moderators as well.
1 LSU_Coonass 2018-10-26
>there are bigger cucks on the internet than Tits
doubtful
>and naturally they are internet moderators as well.
only way this statement could be true
1 ILieToCaptchas 2018-10-26
Literally the most awful thing I have read this month
1 degorius 2018-10-26
drinking game
take shot every time you see 'innocent'
1 _Leninade_ 2018-10-26
I don't wanna die
1 strathmeyer 2018-10-26
Every child is guilty of somethin'.
1 Phantom_Engineer 2018-10-26
Imagine losing an arguement centered around if child abandonment is a God-given right.
1 DownWithDuplicity 2018-10-26
Is that your first time on that sub? Many arguments made by feminists are lost to MRAs.
1 serial_crusher 2018-10-26
SMH. If you're against legal paternal surrender, you're against a transgender woman's right to choose.
1 Particle_Man_Prime 2018-10-26
Making fun of takeittorcirclejerk is cheating
1 Watermark03 2018-10-26
You do realize that getting a bunch of secular stupid young right wing males on reddit to click the upvote button is not the same as winning the argument don't you? Like literally you've just come up with a fancy way of saying "Child support should be entirely voluntary on the part of the man". And you're using the existence of abortion as a justification for it? Holy fuck shit are you an entitled, whiny piece of shit.
Like, again, who the fuck is this legislation targeted towards? 90% of the right is not going to vote for it because they want to "promote" family and ban abortion and voting for something who's argument is based on giving men an "abortion" option (i.e. making child support fully voluntary, in non-retardese). And obviously the left isn't going to vote for something that literally penalizes women for possessing control over their own body, in a petty attempt at artificial, imposed "equality" for the poor poor oppressed deadbeat dads of the world. Step outside of your 90% young white right wing male sphere and you're going to get laughed out of the fucking room. And you're probably going to come out fuming, write a stupid blog about how awful normies (i.e. non-participants the circlejerk of your own single identity group), and blame on Jews or Hillary Clinton. When it really is just because you're a worthless piece of shit. Sorry.
It's funny how in every other instance the right is against artificial equity solutions like this, that try to smooth out inequalities that are the result of inherent natural differences. But when it comes to one that just happens to fuck women over, reddits male circlejerk is all over it and considers it the greatest thing since their last fart.
How about this: if a man gets a woman pregnant, he has to pay child support no matter what. Like if the woman gets an abortion, it's just free money for the next 20 years. I like that solution personally.
1 LongPostBot 2018-10-26
All them words won't bring your pa back.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 double-happiness 2018-10-26
The "ultramajority" agrees with him, what an authoritarian.
1 voicelesshoodwinker 2018-10-26
"Seeing a TITC post"
š