https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1ggq051/hezbollah_rockets_hit_un_peacekeeping_base/
This is the second time they bombed UN in two deys
This is the second time they bombed UN in two deys
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Of course they [I assume we're talking about Hamas right now] are "embedded" in UNRWA. If you live in Gaza, every part of your life involves UNRWA. If you're going to pose as a teacher, you'll pose as a teacher for UNRWA because they run all the schools. It doesn't mean that at UNRWA headquarters they're planning out how to send more bombs and propaganda to help Hamas or even that the leadership on the ground there in Gaza supports Hamas.
Well I'm sorry if you're reading comprehension isn't that great.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're the one with reading comprehension issues brother.
You just ignored my entire comment and re-iterated your argument about Hamas and UNRWA which I didn't comment on or dispute.
Here's how I see the conversation,
Now I'll paste my previous comment back with that clarified context visible for you to cross reference...
To be clear, I'm confused because at the 4th line in the greentext you should have said "I said they don't employ HEZBOLLAH " and walked away victorious but you chose to shift to defending the fact that UNRWA employs terrorists and so my question is.... like wtf you doing bro, why'd you even TRY to argue UN as terorist free in the first place. Total motte and bailey debateshit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I never said or implied that nobody working for UNRWA also works for Hamas. You've repeatedly misrepresented me on that so at this point I gotta assume it's intentional, and even I have better things to do than argue with your straw man of me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit bro it's like talking to a wall. The fact that this was apparent to me (and I explicitly stated that) is the exact point of why I'm asking you wtf you're doing defending UNRWA in the first place. Try re-reading our comments, slowly this time. This wasn't meant to be a whole fricking big thing, just a remark on your argumentation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context