Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're the one with reading comprehension issues brother.

You just ignored my entire comment and re-iterated your argument about Hamas and UNRWA which I didn't comment on or dispute.

Here's how I see the conversation,

>UN employs terrorists

>No they don't

>Here are some examples

>OK so they do but you can't blame them

Now I'll paste my previous comment back with that clarified context visible for you to cross reference...

You confuse me. I thought you were disputing the specific assertion that Hezb memebers were embedded in UN agencies. You had the chance to clarify that here for the le epic :soyjakanimeglasses: moment but instead you're choosing to play defence for UNRWA which is a moving of the goalposts.

If you concede, which this reply implies you do, that @FourthEggnog's examples btfo your original point then just admit the L. Next time you can save everyone time by just getting to the point; defending UNRWA.

To be clear, I'm confused because at the 4th line in the greentext you should have said "I said they don't employ HEZBOLLAH :soyjakanimeglasses:" and walked away victorious but you chose to shift to defending the fact that UNRWA employs terrorists and so my question is.... like wtf you doing bro, why'd you even TRY to argue UN as terorist free in the first place. Total motte and bailey debateshit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I never said or implied that nobody working for UNRWA also works for Hamas. You've repeatedly misrepresented me on that so at this point I gotta assume it's intentional, and even I have better things to do than argue with your straw man of me. :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I never said or implied that nobody working for UNRWA also works for Hamas

Holy shit bro it's like talking to a wall. The fact that this was apparent to me (and I explicitly stated that) is the exact point of why I'm asking you wtf you're doing defending UNRWA in the first place. Try re-reading our comments, slowly this time. This wasn't meant to be a whole fricking big thing, just a remark on your argumentation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.