Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thanks for linking their early life :marseyill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hadn't noooticed until one of you CHUDs pointed it out to me and now I can't unnoootice.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't mind the tech/vc people being ruthless and greedy. That's the game. But I hate the pro-social/visionary/generic tech marketing gloss it all gets. It was the same with the SVB bailout, all the VC people were rugged libertarians who don't need to regulation until it's their uninsured deposit in jeopardy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can hate them even more but the companiea always go to shit when the fart huffing visionaries retire and then the Harvard MBAs take over.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The only people who have referred to the "tech bros" and "VC people" as "libertarian" are redditors. What are the chances that they are 100% r-slurred wrong? Seems like they made it all up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why are the orange site netizens talking about anal in the comment section? :marseysquint:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're signaling to the other slackers that they're available. It's like the A/S/L of the tech world.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because an interest in trade mark law requires one to be very anal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol finance bros have nothing on tech douches when it comes to being ruthless businessmen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.