Follow up to the previous post: https://rdrama.net/h/marsey/post/174770/marsoyhype-its-over-for-artcels-with
Found out on this Github discussion post (quite a but basically a web UI for StableDiffusion wants to emulate what Photoshop's able to do) that the generative fill nonsense can be used on their Firefly site: https://firefly.adobe.com/
This weekend someone told me that you do not really need an Adobe Subscription to use Firefly, and the popular Generative Fill can be used from their website (even without an Adobe account)!
After learning about this, I tested that Firefly Generative Fill with some test images used during the development of ControlNet. The performance of that model is super impressive and the technical architecture is more user-friendly than Stable Diffusion toolsets.
Overall, the behaviors of Adobe Firefly Generative Fill are:
1. if users do not provide any prompts, the inpaint does not fail, and the generating is guided by image contents.
2. if users provide prompts, the generating is guided by both prompts and image contents.
3. Given its results, it is likely that the results with or without prompts are generated by a same model pipeline.
They're right about not needing an Adobe subscription to use it but you still need to have an Adobe account so make a throwaway one or something if you're afraid of the glowies
Just thought it might be interesting if you saw the earlier post but didn't want to install Photoshop from a random Google drive link or something or you're using a Chromebook like me
The generated images might not be super duper great or anything but it's pretty decent if it's just some simple shenanigans I guess, plus it's free (apart from Adobe collecting your user data )
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The only people that use Chromebook are grade-school children
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
VS Code runs smoothly enough natively and I just RDP to a Windows machine if need be
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You should really just buy yourself a real computer for your birthday or something
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
it's a real computerr!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Maybe she isn't a p-do after all...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I bet shota is actually 1000yo boys
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://9to5google.com/2023/04/03/google-employees-chromebook/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See! It's a good device!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It turns on yes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It’s really not as bad as you might think it is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've used one.
You can't bs me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok maybe it was bad a few years ago but like we have dark mode now and material UI and Steam runs on the higher end models
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those are 3 s.
How is "steam finally runs on super high end, $2000 models with 4gb ram and 256gb hdds"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context