- 2
- 11
how things went
— KayJae (@KayJae24) May 16, 2024
i'm really sorry I made a mistake the first time, my man, but can you blame me for not clarifying further? https://t.co/vldCvtLynt pic.twitter.com/DTNfuGpP1u
- 10
- 11
Reject Liberalism. Embrace Fascism. pic.twitter.com/gBFn2MsNB9
— Ubba (@Ubba69420) May 15, 2024
- 5
- 12
Completely unironically, they just want employees who are on time and can figure how to cover their own shifts for time off.
And that's too much for the redditor
- 6
- 12
- 17
- 13
Reddit soys are already out with their predictable film-pseud defence "Duuude, this is going to be spectacularly terrible, I'll love it .
These are the top comments.
Sounds like it has all the ingredients of a cult film, but not a financially successful one
--
Darn these Reviews are all over the place, people who like it are praising it highly, and people who don't are thrashing it.
Sounds like it's gonna be fun love polarizing films
So basically Coppola lost his sanity and made an unmarketable 120 million dollar epic. I'm so hyped!
120 million dollars to create something you truly love that others absolutely hate… That's the dream baby ! Cinema is back !
__
Can't wait. It's either going to be beautiful, or a beautiful disaster. Either way, it sounds worth watching.
__
The reality is even the positive reviews are handling this film with kids gloves. They struggle to articulate what's good about it and are basically going "uhh...this film is ambitious and Coppola(an industry legend) took a lot of risks and we must respect it for that"
Yeah sure
- 11
- 13
Marjorie Taylor Greene ROASTING AOC is the highlight of the night so far 🤣
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 17, 2024
AOC: “She has to apologize”
MTG: “I’m not apologizing. Why don’t you debate me?”
AOC: “That’s self evident”
MTG: “Yeah, you don’t have enough intelligence”
🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/XBFuIxx9QY
Previous exchange:
- 1
- 13
- 4
- 14
This is a very unusual and fascinating thing. I understand that blood relationships can be difficult at times, but what, I ask, is what drives this one particular club to go out of their way to do this? Is it some kind of guilt-motivated signal? Or maybe it's supposed to…reflect their fan demographics?
Idk maybe I'm looking into this too much, but dang, these Brits really got my noggin in good use
- 8
- 14
Charli XCX reveals to Rolling Stone UK she’s listened to ‘Red Scare’ and enjoyed their Lana Del Rey episode:
— Pop Crave (@PopCrave) May 16, 2024
“I wouldn’t say I’m deeply invested in edgelord culture, but have I scanned the texts? Sure.” pic.twitter.com/ta5V7NkJX3
!redscarepod !cute twinks
- whyareyou : giga volcel cope lmao
- 9
- 14
That range is anything above 120 being practically applied. Where you work all day on useful things and have the resilience to keep building up skills and fortunes.
That kind of capability requires the kind of commitment where the foids behavior doesn't just seem absurd but downright negative and regressive.
This is because foids demand as much time for themselves as for important tasks that are changing the world.
No foid in the world is worth the loss of more than an hour of productivity a day at most.
No human is worth more than that no matter what their relation to you.
Those who understand this end up at the top of their industries with families that hate them.
Those who do not understand this end up in middling families that care about one another.
Foids are programmed to function in mediocre environments. They weren't meant to live as equals with successful men.
The differences in IQ charts prove this.
For the majority of successful rich men women would be nothing more than objects to be used and disposed or kept at a distance because women demand hours of productivity off them which they have actual use for.
Only the mediocre man can truly love a woman. Only a mediocre man can give a foid the attention she craves.
This is why stable relationships and happy long term monogamous marriages are the playground of the middle class. The rich cannot tolerate it. The poor cannot successfully achieve it.
That is the nature of gender relations.