None
None
24
Behind the bastards wants to burn Portland cops alive!
None
None

The US still maintains about 1,000 soldiers in Niger, but their movements have been limited since the coup.

They were under house arrest. See below

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1782056169562853511

And here

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1781999920104210688

They turned it over to the russians

None
36
FBI Agent :gay: fricked trumps valet for info
None
None
178
Is this the dumbest thing liberals did when Trump was in office?

(yes)

None

I recently witnessed a significant "family meeting" type discussion in /r/law after the Fanni Willis debacle. Experienced trial attorneys making politically agnostic observations about potential impacts to the case were being down voted into oblivion for the mere act of being politically agnostic and acknowledging even the possibility that Willis could have acted in a way that could negatively impact the case. The adults in the room circled the wagons. The consensus was that any thread that achieves a minimum critical mass of participants will attract partisan non-experts whose interest in facts and reality is secondary to their interest in every situation conforming to their preconceived notions.

r/law used to have high quality legal discussions like three years ago. Now it's r/politics with a thin veneer of “objectivity”

:#marseyglancing:


This post is one of the bad legal takes on this sub that it purports to call out.

“You can think that the stakes are so high here that the justices should depart from textualism and original public meaning to read the phrase more broadly. You can upvote all the people who say Trump should lose”

Just read Baude's extensive paper. Disqualifying trump likely follows the text original intent and original meaning of the 14th amendment. Pretending disqualifying Trump is “progressive” constitutional interpretation is disingenuous and misleading

:#soysnooseethetyping:


This article combined with the Federalist society argument is not a novel “progressive” constitutional theory.

There is ample historical evidence that the president was considered an officer at the time of drafting and ratification.

:#soyjakfattyping:

Yeah, it's hard to take posts like this seriously.

:#soyjakyelltyping:

We are posting in a midwit thread on God

:#zoomersoytyping:

WORDSWORDSWORDS MY SO WORDSWORDSWORDS

:#soyjaktantrumfastgenocidetyping:

!Neolibs, do you think you know more than the supreme court?

None
39
Milei Meltdown in r/neoliberal
None
42
"There's no more money" says German finance minister to protesting farmers.

If only those farmers were Tesla and other "green" megacorps.

:#marseydeception:

None

https://media.giphy.com/media/QWw4hc5gTnJhY0BUI3/giphy.webp

Dont they know the election couldnt have been stolen and was literally saved in good faith?

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

None
None
None
None

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17157040188983254.webp

None

I'm glad this attempt was foiled, but I think this flavor of mass shooter will become more common as time goes on and as anti-white rhetoric heats up. (And that's a good thing!)

None
43
[Voice-posting :platyaboriginal:] Why did the Voice referendum fail? We crunched the data and found 6 reasons : AustralianPolitics

!strayans

None
None
62
haha yes for The Crown haha

!historychads as true today as it was when it was written

None
None
25
Half of european countries shouldn't even exist

Seriously whats the point of a latvia, portugal or a montenegro

None
None

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/rnc-arizona-gop-challenge-court-decision-allowing-non/

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.