WaPo columnist posts pictures of Harris rally. Qtards freak out over some minor camera artifacts

https://x.com/claireternal/status/1817742534052839763

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17222227498867624.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17222227499546382.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1722222750025279.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17222227500751362.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17222227501202934.webp

61
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17222229776395643.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this a roundabout way of saying she used an AI 'sharpen' filter on a shitty iPhone photo (basically shouting enhance to make a blurry jpeg clear except it sucks)? 1)I thought iPhones took p nice photos & 2)why can't wapo journoids afford a real camera?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!applechads

Have you had photos come out like this before :marseyglancing:

It does use a lot of "algorithms" to smooth out the photo but this looks way more like AI image processing stuff.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes. Digitally zoomed iPhone photos look like this. It probably is technically "AI" because Apple literally uses AI processing on their photos for denoise and has for years. But it's not like stable diffusion or anything like that.

Here's an example:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fw64tbjbklov71.jpg

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, I recognised this as the shitty iPhone camera sharpening immediately.

It often looks like this kind of nightmare oil painting when you zoom in.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It often looks like this kind of nightmare oil painting when you zoom in

Low end Motorolas are probably the worst offender, just look at the grass and trees

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Phones do a lot of awful 'enhancements' on photos now including automatically editing face shape

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My iPhone is like 10 years old. This looks about right, it's not AI, just shitty camera. Does she have an iPhone 7?

ETA: I just looked at the picture without zooming in on the faces, those are definitely AI, but I think that she probably has an older phone and then used AI to "zoom" in.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/13/23637401/samsung-fake-moon-photos-ai-galaxy-s21-s23-ultra

Maybe Samsung is up to their old tricks. Instead of moon details, it adds rally details


Putting the :e: in spookie turkey

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think so and I'm using a new one. maybe this is not straight up AI but the way it was processed does make it look like AI

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Definitely looks like "digital" zoom. Try max zooming onto a faraway license plate on a car with your current phone, and you'll see what I mean; it comes out extremely squiggly and bizarre.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

find me that street-side banner IRL on google streetview and I'll believe you, or else

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

reasons

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They turn the shitty enhance filters on by default nowadays.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah that ruined half my vacation pics until I realized what was happening after I had gotten my new phone :marseyitsover:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Samsung?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Noticed that too, pics look fried and over sharpened

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This isn't an AI filter or AI zoom, just standard phone processing, all pictures look like this.

Average phone these days takes something between 4 and 15 pictures every time you press the shutter and tries to reconstruct 1 image with as much sharpness, dynamic range and minimal noise from them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

newer iOS uses "AI" models to combine them as well and enhance the lighting

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm sure it's AI in some sense but it's a part of standard processing.

Do they actually leverage the NPU anyway or is it more of a "AI trained algorithm that helps us recognize which pixels to reject/how to weight different images" and whatnot

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes I'm pretty sure it does already, particularly for portrait and cinematic mode. but 100% the next edition for all photos according to their marketing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

why can't wapo journoids afford a real camera?

Newspapers fired most of their camera teams a long time ago

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

iToddlers unable to use basic features of their phones :marseymanysuchcases:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.