"AI bros" found a trick to convert rebellious anti-microsoft g*mers into copyright pseudolaw's strongest soldiers (reactions in the post text)

First, for the background, an AI company called Etched made a platform called Decart, and used it to create a model called Oasis. As you could see in the link, it allows you to play a very limited version of minecraft similar to previously made AI-generated Doom gameplay: no gameplay is actually simulated, but a new frame is made based on previous frames and the player's inputs.

A clickbait minecraft youtuber made a video about this, bring it to the attention of the internet's smartest comment section, and the video itself contains misinformation, such as a section at 6:40 where the youtuber claims that scraping YouTube videos violates copyright law. The video also displays a general lack of knowledge about how this model works, showing that the creator did very little research other than likely seeing someone else post about it and immediately clicking the link, an example of this lack of knowledge is every time the creator thinks AI not having object permanence is a serious glitch when the point of this model is to store the lowest amount of frames possible and still have a playable game.

Obviously, the comments brought the 2-digit iq trend-followers to pretend to be AI ethics experts, but their lack of prior knowledge is extremely obvious:

The above screenshots are examples of users suddenly becoming massive fans of Microsoft and copyright law. Also: "Those AI JERKS!!!!!"

>Dude deadass it's so uncanny like the Mandela catalogue in Ohio fr fr

, he wasn't even involved in this

Either one of the developers of this model, or someone impersonating him (account created Nov 2, 2024) argues with some r-slur, notice the discrepancy in tone.

Actually, giving midwits access to the internet was disastrous, unlike the peace and prosperity introduced by the invention of nuclear weapons

Above are 2 examples of the classic privacy hypocrite: This type of user constantly fear mongers about "datamining", targeted ads, and their data being used to train AI models, but often loves platforms like groomercord, YouTube, or even Facebook, which do much worse than nearly any AI model has done with user's data, and also usually is the type of person to think that you're more likely to be hacked by clicking on a link than from downloading a file (in the minecraft community, examples of this include players who react with utter surprise that they got "ratted" by a mod they downloaded (usually pvp mods because pve players are too smart for this), but are afraid to play on the same server as people who use hacked clients because they think that that, of all things, will actually damage their computer). Also, I noticed that the second one uses a name that's usually used by /pol/tards with happy merchant profile pictures, but has a regular cat profile picture. Do you think that that user is an antisemite?

!g*mers