Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.
Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:
11/17/13 23:19:36 with a score of -2: https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1quif5/til_that_it_is_possible_for_the_jury_in_a/cdgy2ir/?context=8
It is illegal for anyone in a courtroom - be it judge, attorney, defendant, or juror - to argue for jury nullification of a law. Why? Because jury nullification was often argued to all-white juries by white attorneys of white defendants who were accused or murdering a non-white person. It was used to allow murderers to walk.
It is legal to find a defendant guilty or not guilty. It is illegal to argue that the law is unjust and should not be enforced.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At 10/02/24 19:11:58 in Frickthealtright with a score of yall:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
At 10/02/24 10:50:31 in conservativeterrorism with a score of yall:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I am certain you do not wish to argue that several years ago you assaulted me at Tanglewood Forest. Several of your fellow company members have chased me and thwapped me with Amtgard -legal boffer weapons on Company Road while I was making announcements on behalf of Kingdom Officers.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1quif5/til_that_it_is_possible_for_the_jury_in_a/cdgy2ir/?context=8:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context