Unable to load image
/h/bardfanns House Racist Founder
BARD_BOT bard/finn Not really watching  1mo ago (text post) 36 thread views #305155

Daily Bard Digest 2024-10-03

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

02/11/17 17:53:24 with a score of -7: https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfrick/comments/5thot0/the_progression_of_a_gender_change/ddmpdp9/?context=8

I've discovered, over decades of "debate", that people often place their thesis into the first few words of their communication in written forums.

Your first few words:

"Stop being so triggered…"

— from which I can infer that you make the demand that I stop — not going to happen — that I stop being — also not happening — that I stop being in a particular attitude — again: answer is "No" — and an assertion that I am "Triggered".

It is the last assertion that I want to take you to task over.

Do I seem emotional to you? Am I writing in such a way that I am asserting my own emotions, and asserting that my emotions are of the utmost import in this conversation?

Don't answer that; it's a rhetorical question, and the answer of rhetorical questions is almost always meant to be "No".

Am I writing that I find the word offensive? Is this about my feelings?

Or am I actually appealing to science?

See, that one you also shouldn't answer. It, too, is a rhetorical trick — I already know what the audience's answer is, and I already know what your answer is.

That's a rhetorical trick — a trick to get you to respond in a particular manner, to expose your own attitudes and biases and preconceptions.

To the audience.

Maybe to you, too. But typically, that part I'm never around for.

It normally happens in dreams, or in conversations with friends or lovers, or experiencing the situation thrust upon you by necessity, from your own realisations, or those of your children.

So perhaps you may sense here that I feel that my part of this "exchange" is over, that I can produce little or no more communication.

So perhaps I shall — rather than "Stop" — simply … move on.

4
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/02/24 23:05:42 in Dallas with a score of 1 point:

S is opening the door to Abbott & friends suing the city of Dallas for make them comply with a GOP agenda.

"Crime", "homelessness", and "panhandling" are all the same category for their purposes, and right wing wealthy interests have been pushing for social media outrage over all three for over a decade, now. Any time they want to monkeywrench the city of dallas, just run stories about those topics on the local Sinclair news outlets.

U is a nightmare tbqh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/02/24 23:08:15 in Dallas with a score of 1 point:

2015 was 9 years ago, the narwhal bacons at midnight back then, kind stranger, don't forget to tip your fedora on your way out

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/02/24 23:17:58 in AntifascistsofReddit with a score of yall:

I'm planning to do a video on Neo Nazi forums, websites, or just group chats

You should reconsider. 90%+ of them exist to bait people into giving them infamy. Any oxygen they get motivates them to stay in the lifestyle / cult. It's better that they get universally shunned and bored and start to turn on each other and drive each other away from the movement, into a different lifestyle. The other 10% are so unstable that they might fixate on you.

There's no mystery, there. They're sick and resistant to getting better. Making them the main character of a piece of externally produced media just gives them juice.

And yes, I'm talking about the mask-off Nazi groups.

Beyond that consideration, getting their confidence generally involves things like watching terrorism & mass murder videos; some demand you prove you're not a fed by making you trade in felonies. You are not prepared to deal with the shit they roll in.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/02/24 22:59:39 in conservativeterrorism with a score of yall:

The commenters here are the sources. Be cool, baby.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 22:29:32 in GenderCynical with a score of 1 point:

TERFs having 0 idea of the social structure of modern paganist movements.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 14:05:18 in videos with a score of yall:

Ari Graynor, Seth Rogen, & John Cho in Oscar worthy performances

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:37:47 in videos with a score of yall:

Rainn Wilson as Vizzini

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:42:22 in videos with a score of yall:

Patton Oswalt as Vizzini

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:43:48 in videos with a score of yall:

King Bach as Vizzini

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:44:33 in videos with a score of yall:

Angela Kinsey as Vizzini

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:45:36 in videos with a score of yall:

Nick Kroll as Vizzini

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:50:00 in videos with a score of yall:

Jack Black as The Man In Black

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:54:46 in videos with a score of yall:

Sam Rockwell as Sam Rockwell in a Man In Black cosplay

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At 10/03/24 13:03:26 in transgender with a score of yall:

This.

1. For whom is "transgender people in public life" an issue?

2. Through what means do they justify their issue as being worthy of being a law?

3. Who else have they had issues with existing in public life?

The answers to 1 & 2 are the signatories to the Nashville Statement and the answer to 3 isn't fully answered until you get to how those signatories are connected to Bob Jones University v. United States.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseytrain: janny with a mop. :marseytrain: janny with a mop.

Granny panties and a dress. Granny panties and a dress.

6 foot 4 and a mugshot. 6 foot 4 and a mugshot.

Child abuse and no job. Child abuse and no job.

Living in mama's sunroom. Living in mama's sunroom.

Giant pale hands and lipstick. Giant pale hands and lipstick.

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfrick/comments/5thot0/the_progression_of_a_gender_change/ddmpdp9/?context=8:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.