Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.
Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.
Bard spotting on Bluesky 19 November 2024 
- 42
- 9
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,684
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/bardfanns SETTINGS /h/bardfanns LOG /h/bardfanns MODS /h/bardfanns EXILEES /h/bardfanns FOLLOWERS /h/bardfanns BLOCKERS
Current software version: 1e44ba8
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Daniel Malmer (@malmer.com):
Regarding account verification, there used to be this method for verifying email certificates using "notaries" to verify people's identities. I don't know if Blue Sky will hire people to "issue checkmarks," but if not something like that might work.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thawte#...
Daniel Malmer (@malmer.com):
Domain verification works in some cases (.gov, .edu, prominent people) but otherwise you have the same problem: how do you know a domain is really that person? Anyway, digital identity is difficult.
Adam 🚀 (@supernovalabs.co.uk):
You can ping the WHOIS for details about the owner.
Ms. Penny Oaken, SkyWitch (@skywitches.net):
laughing Mine will show you NameCheap's Privacy Shield. I suspect a lot of them will.
My identity verification thru my domain is predicated on the "it would be perverse to believe it's not her" model, as are so many others. An informal Web of Lacking Mistrust
Adam 🚀 (@supernovalabs.co.uk):
This is the way surely. Its how the internet was built. Noone can prove I'm not a dog and that's the way it's always been regardless of "trusted" third parties.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context