DownieBig/Fren
Techno 金闕玉晨天尊 , Corporate Shintoist, Descendent of Thule, Enemy of the Demiurge, Consort of Lilith
Grue 24d ago#6386808
spent 0 currency on pings
Women are maids or maidens, men are players or played
ngl I don't get how it's supposed to be applied. For example, is it immoral to stand in a room because it would be irrational for everyone in the world to stand in the same room?
My favorite explanation is that Kant is talking about prisoners' dilemmas. Sure, it might be individually rational for each prisoner to defect, but both prisoners defecting leads to the worst result. Therefore, the truly rational act is to cooperate. Apply this to lying, stealing, freeloading, etc.
Continuing this, a high-trust society like Norway is a lite Kingdom of Ends.
The vast majority of r-slurs on the internet get it completely wrong just like u dw (like @Geralt_of_Uganda).
C*nt is talking about logical consistency (not about whether some outcome is nice or rational or whatever): can some maxim be universalized or can it not be (because it leads to some contradiction)? If yes, it's morally permissible.
Ex. stealing: if stealing became universal law there would be no concept of personal ownership so there would be no concept of stealing, that's a contradiction so C*nt claims this means stealing is not permissible.
DownieBig/Fren
Techno 金闕玉晨天尊 , Corporate Shintoist, Descendent of Thule, Enemy of the Demiurge, Consort of Lilith
24d ago#6386730
spent 0 currency on pings
When do you think she's going to tell him about the gambling debt
Gatoellos/ellas
¡Quiero a mis amigos!
fartnigga 24d ago#6387350
spent 0 currency on pings
One needs only to see the way she is built to realize that woman is not intended for great mental or great physical labor.
Women are suited to being the nurses and teachers of our earliest childhood precisely because they themselves are childish, silly and short-sighted, in a word big children, their whole lives long: a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the man, who is the actual human being, 'man'.
DownieBig/Fren
Techno 金闕玉晨天尊 , Corporate Shintoist, Descendent of Thule, Enemy of the Demiurge, Consort of Lilith
JimieWhales 24d ago#6387064
spent 0 currency on pings
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They are all prostitutes at the end of the day, and they prove it time and time again. Trying to argue against that is the definition of futility.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And all men are what
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Simp.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ain't nobody simping for you peepee boy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So you are a boy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
essential job makers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Johns
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Their enablers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
🛎️
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Neurodivergent, closeted, or racist?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Inclusive or, fwiw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Women are maids or maidens, men are players or played
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
prostitute frickers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
better than women.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At being r-slurs sure
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
touche
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bears
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Degenerates.
Women were made for fricking.
Men were made to do the fricking.
Everything else is filling in the time in between to ensure you can do the deed without ending up dead or miserable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Cuties
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What about me?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're cute! Just not all men
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Tired of women?
Read what I wrote above. Now picture in your head that I put a /s at the end. Good job sweaty!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
all women are queens
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If she breathes, she's a thot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Darn, the dramawhores hijacked his account
F
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
KaNtS CaTeGoRiCaL ImPeRaTiVe p:
i'm immediately on the mom's side
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And it's horribly misapplied too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ngl I don't get how it's supposed to be applied. For example, is it immoral to stand in a room because it would be irrational for everyone in the world to stand in the same room?
My favorite explanation is that Kant is talking about prisoners' dilemmas. Sure, it might be individually rational for each prisoner to defect, but both prisoners defecting leads to the worst result. Therefore, the truly rational act is to cooperate. Apply this to lying, stealing, freeloading, etc.
Continuing this, a high-trust society like Norway is a lite Kingdom of Ends.
!classics thoughts?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The vast majority of r-slurs on the internet get it completely wrong just like u dw (like @Geralt_of_Uganda).
C*nt is talking about logical consistency (not about whether some outcome is nice or rational or whatever): can some maxim be universalized or can it not be (because it leads to some contradiction)? If yes, it's morally permissible.
Ex. stealing: if stealing became universal law there would be no concept of personal ownership so there would be no concept of stealing, that's a contradiction so C*nt claims this means stealing is not permissible.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Huh that sounds way more nuanced
But still pretty nonsensical for the purposes of determining if something is permissible
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fact C*nt scholars are arguing about this still in current year says alot about how practical it is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Don't care much for categorical imperatives and other such moral absolutes. Sometimes, you have to be practical. Sometimes, your mom's a whore.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Simple as
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
By your logic, it would be immoral to stand in a room because the world would be a worse place if everyone stood in that room at the same time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not mine, it's Kant's
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's a stupid concept even when applied properly. It's basically a shitty version of a priori rules utilitarianism even in its strongest forms.
Yes, I'm aware that Kant is considered a deontologist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All dentologists are scammers. $4500 for a tooth implant? What a joke.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why are people spelling can't with a K and ignoring the apostrophe?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I Kant talk to this mf.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're a WHORE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's an authors name
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is it a neighbor?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
French, so spiritually yes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You fricking kant
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
i've never even heard of it until this screenshot but i instantly hate it and anyone who uses it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Proof?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
(male)*
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is an r-slured use of categorical imperative.
By this logic you shouldn't frick your wife because you wouldn't be okay with the whole world fricking your wife.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You got it backwards
It's ok for him to frick his wife because it's ok for the whole world to frick his wife
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Evolved cuck hands wrote the above.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Does that include their children?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
When do you think she's going to tell him about the gambling debt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
That's what you get for not being a Nietzschean
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We really do have a marsey for everything
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The best. Oral framework for disprovimg a woman is a slap
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This but without gorillian layer irony dramatard speak
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fricking r-slur. Your speech bubble addition makes it look like I'm reacting to my own comment here by imagining myself as a pepe (CUTE)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
ALL women are WHORES
ESPECIALLY mothers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Evola would have just insisted her Lunar nature has unbound her spirit to modernity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Instead of that gay butt Kant imperative he should have gone after the c*nt imperative knowwaddamean
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Huh?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
How bout Decartes, you're a dirty skank and your shamelessness is absolute proof of your stupidity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Kant is everything wrong with modern society. Nothing wrong with securing that bag queen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!KOWALSKI ANALYSIS!
!alligatorfrickhouse keep on 'gatin
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context