WayOutping/pong
Ping "Gock or not" @WayOut for a forensic gock assessment. 100dc per analysis.
i_onIy_downvote_bad_posts 8d ago#7546432
spent 0 currency on pings
s_a_n_t_bwho/whom
Computer User
8d ago#7546449
spent 0 currency on pings
When I started to read as a child I would see mentions like "Soandso was sent to a concentration camp as a teenager" and I thought it was something like a scholarly retreat or countryside sanitarium. Eventually I noticed people tended to die there but I figured people died a lot and anywhere back in the day.
Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy
8d ago#7546350
spent 0 currency on pings
One common response when it's pointed out that you can't always tell is "well we can tell 99% of the time", or some other high percentage pulled out of nowhere. This is a clear overestimate of how often someone can tell, but let's charitably assume that that number is true for a moment and do some maths. If you could tell who was trans or not 99% of the time, that would still lead to nearly two thirds of the people you read as trans actually being cis.
Even if we very charitably assume that the sensitivity and specificity of "we can always tell" in detecting a trans person is both 98% then they are still wrong 50% of the time and accuse a cis person of being trans.
This is because there are vastly more cisgender than transgender people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This already exists and the whites literally pay for its upkeep
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's called Wyoming.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
me behind the fence in the back
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are you fat?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no why do you ask
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh wait nvm you're jacked I remember now
Was gonna make a r*pe joke but you can beat me up
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'd r*pe u bb
This post rests on native land
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
When I started to read as a child I would see mentions like "Soandso was sent to a concentration camp as a teenager" and I thought it was something like a scholarly retreat or countryside sanitarium. Eventually I noticed people tended to die there but I figured people died a lot and anywhere back in the day.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I hate yt coastal tech cute twinks more than I hate BIPOCs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're just us if we really loved making heroin
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!followers !metashit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this wouldn't happen to an !unblockablechads
Putting the in
spookieturkeymerrynew yearJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
A true dramanaut is a dramanaut without borders
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yes! Yes! YES!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This should be made a reality. A containment zone for them where they can do the least harm to the rest of us is the best solution all around.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
@The_Jews in the guard tower
This post rests on native land. Indian land.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
One common response when it's pointed out that you can't always tell is "well we can tell 99% of the time", or some other high percentage pulled out of nowhere. This is a clear overestimate of how often someone can tell, but let's charitably assume that that number is true for a moment and do some maths. If you could tell who was trans or not 99% of the time, that would still lead to nearly two thirds of the people you read as trans actually being cis.
The mathematics is clear, using Bayes theorem.
Even if we very charitably assume that the sensitivity and specificity of "we can always tell" in detecting a trans person is both 98% then they are still wrong 50% of the time and accuse a cis person of being trans.
This is because there are vastly more cisgender than transgender people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context