Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • Tachyon : cp
  • ForgotMyPasswordAgain : usually I joke report, but this one might need to actually be looked into. weirdo abound
  • RichEvansOnlyfans : Neighbor I ain't clicking on this shit
  • ManBearNiggurath : Imagine not recognizing every post Bardfinn made
  • SusieVass : This is copypasta of the time BF defended CP. It's just text in here.
  • Brasillguana : susslevass (total newstrag) is spreading dangerous misinformation. there are 5 CP images in this po
  • hereforabit : not clicking that

The photo was of a juvenile human female, Tanner stage 1 (i.e. Toddler), nude, standing in a pool of water.

The child was not engaged in any sexual activity, and the photo in and of itself was not sexual or sexualised.

The photo itself was not, in and of itself, Child Porn, and in and of itself would not likely violate Reddit's Content Policy against Sexualising Minors, except in the directive of "If you are unsure about a piece of content involving a minor or someone who appears to be a minor, do not post it."

The users of that sub immediately upon it being posted, began username pinging me, and accusing me of having posted it, and labelling it Child Porn.

Upon discovering the username pings and the post (due to the username pings), I immediately reported it to Reddit Admins as harassment and sexualisation of a minor, and immediately began documenting the accounts participating in the harassment, and reporting the comments and posts made that accused me, username pinged me, and/or encouraged or incited harassment of me via accusing me of posting child pornography.

These users, by labelling it Child Porn and sexualising it, made it sexualised content of a minor child -- and thus a violation of the Content Policies.

I had retained an attorney to assist in handling dealing with the harassment from the doxxing, and used the attorney's services regarding these accusations of child porn posting and/or possession. All of this has been turned over to law enforcement on my end.

Bottom Line: This is a harassment campaign by violent, conscience-free bigots, sadists, and sociopaths, aimed at me in particular and at all the women, ethnic minorities, gender and sexual minorities, and good people who use Reddit.

I refuse to surrender.

"When these people come for you, they cannot be reasoned with. ... When well-intentioned people fall for bad-faith tactics, bad-faith people continue to employ them." -- Lindsay Ellis

They hope that if their techniques can succeed, if they can be allowed to carry on this kind of behaviour on Reddit, then they can control the site, by chasing off good faith and good-consciences users of the site, and maintaining a terroristic threat over Reddit, and thus over public participation and speech.

Thank you all; You're the real power of rdrama.

36
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wish Bardfinn was actually a lawyer, and practiced in the same city and practice area as me. Endless entertainment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You have read his posts right? And by read i mean didnt read, can you imagine the size of the briefs? Would a judge put a stop to it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

can you imagine the size of the briefs

i guarantee you he wears super lacy AGPanties, not briefs.

now you are thinking about Barf's underwear

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I once saw a judge yell at someone for filing a 50 page brief when the opposing counsel's was like, 12 pages. On the other hand, sometimes they will make an exception if your brief is really good (I had one that was 8x as long as the other 10 parties' and the judge said it was the only one that was helpful; we won). I doubt Bardfinn would have even one correct argument so there would be some yelling and maybe costs consequences.

There are no page limits for trial/motion briefs in my jurisdiction but that depends where you are.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's a reason for FRCP Rule 11. Punishing frivolousness

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We have something similar in leafland but you have to really frick up to get that dropped on you as the lawcel. Usually they just dab on your client lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Same, there's pretty significant safe harbor provisions in Rule 11. You have to basically be a shithead and play gay chicken with the court to get your bussy pounded.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the legal system never holds itself accountable in the way it abuses the people

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you guys have to wear the silly wigs and night gowns like they do in bongland?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wish. We gown for appeals though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

🚨Bard bot alert!🚨

Reset the counter. Current counter was: 0 days, 0 hours, 8 minutes

Record is 0 days, 21 hours

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

🚨Bard bot alert!🚨

Reset the counter. Current counter was: 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes

Record is 0 days, 21 hours

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.