Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You usually shouldn't insult your boss publicly

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycrusade: Go make your own religion, sweaty

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's how we got prots and Lutheran's :#marseypuke:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The American Catholic schism is coming.

They've been mindrotted by Evangelists and Baptists.

@KoreanKragKing hope they choose Miami or Las Vegas as their seat of power because it'll be extra funny.

black lives matter more than BIPOCs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I went to the Bishop's page on Wikipedia to read more on him, and found this:

On 31 October 2023, Reformation Day, at the Rome Life Forum of LifeSiteNews (which describes itself as an anti-globalist Christian alliance),[14] Strickland read out a letter that he attributed to a "friend"; the letter included the question: "Would you now allow this one [Francis] who has pushed aside the true Pope [Benedict XVI] and has attempted to sit on a chair that is not his define what the church is to be?"[15] Strickland described the letter as "challenging" and did not dispute this accusation.[15] The letter that Strickland read also described Pope Francis as an "usurper of Peter's chair" and "an expert at producing cowards"; Strickland then made his own comment that Pope Francis backed an "attack on the sacred" by the Vatican.[16]

I like how they put "friend" in quotations, it feels like they are implying he wrote it himself. lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The trads play this stupid game of "I'm not touching you" with their flirtation with sedevacantism and they think people can't see through their bullshit. I think it's the tradcath petty legalistic brainrot that lets them rationalize this crap because they're not technically calling Pope Francis an illegitimate pope. It's going to be fun to watch some of them throw in their lot with the sedevacantists only to find out that the latter also throw Pope Benedict XIV under the modernist bus.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For Catholics, clergy in particular, who sneed at Francis, they have to toe a very narrow line between seething at anything he does and still being loyal to the papacy otherwise they're either betraying their ideals and morals or committing schism and possible heresy by going against the pope.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They have been losing their minds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

petty

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Turns out that publicly reading a letter implying that the pope isn't legitimate might not be the wisest decision for a bishop.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even if it was well deserved, it's still petty.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He refused to resign and allegedly there are some deeper issues with his parish. What do you think Rome should have done instead?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

idk, maybe the pope should not be so b-word made that he feels compelled to excommunicate someone every time his feelings get hurt

he could have used his words or had a conversation or anything. he didn't do any of that.

instead, he decided to act like a child.

that's just my opinion, though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

American trads have been in near schism for a decade, pushing politics from the pulpit, and some of the clergy have turned to QAnon quackery. This is about more than some mean words.

he didn't do any of that.

How do you know?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because if he did this wouldn't have happened and it wouldn't be news. Obviously.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Has it ever crossed your mind that there could have been private conversations and Strickland just refused to get back in line?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I doubt it.

Also the guys right. Restricting latin mass is fricking r-slurred and not something the pope should be doing.

It's fine to say, priests should say mass in the vernacular, but saying YOU CAN'T DO MASS IN LATIN UNLESS I SAY SO is moronic.

This pope thinks that's NOT OKAY, but if you want to suck peepee and dress like a woman, that's totally cool.

Frick this pope.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

>implying

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.