Poppa Frank just endorsed gay marriage.

https://x.com/MLJHaynes/status/1768334362720809215

@carpathianfriendly this is your fault for breaking your lent vows.


https://files.catbox.moe/y2zrro.png https://i.rdrama.net/images/172082001273549.webp

18
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

legal civil union =/= sanctification of marriage

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's crossed over into stragville let's not kid ourselves.


https://files.catbox.moe/y2zrro.png https://i.rdrama.net/images/172082001273549.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This Pope Francis?

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17105230431418104.webp

What you can really accuse him of is his preference for the pastoral over the theological i.e. the extremes of the "Be Nice" heresy where everything is purely focused on the (inherently worldly) needs and wants of the laity rather than the needs of their souls but he's still the same Jorge Mario Bergoglio that was kicked out of his Jesuit house for being far too conservative for their liking.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!catholics

Do you feel like church leadership has been dropping the ball w/r/t clarity and guidance on these issue or do you think it's secular opportunists muddying the waters.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hasn't Francis always been this “sympathetic too the sinner, but not too the sin” kind of guy?

He's a Pope that is (relatively) progressive on social issues, but as always, remains firm on various Catholic beliefs (i.e. abortion is bad, women can't be priests, homogay (at least acting upon any sort of urges) is sinful, etc). The only real difference is that he isn't all that fire and brimstone about people who would usually be condemned in other circles, but idk I ain't no theologian :tayshrug:

Wasn't this a thing back in December? I know that a few chuds kinda got pissed but ultimately people moved on so :marseynothingburger:

Trump for prison

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd accent the word 'legal' right and as such reduce it to the notion that marriage the civil contract and marriage the personal union are concepts that are drifting further and further apart with time, with the former being a legal contract that can be signed and broken however one wills and the latter being a more personal thing that the church actually concerns itself with.

I don't like it either way of course, but I think it is moreso a consequence of the modern way of thinking than anything else, which naturally bleeds into the church as well

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Quote taken from upcoming book, fully released March 19, with excerpt here

This b-word writing Bible 2 or something?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hope he excommunicates all gingers next.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nooooooo

:marseycry:


https://files.catbox.moe/y2zrro.png https://i.rdrama.net/images/172082001273549.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Legal endorsement although a slippery slope isn't the same as the sacrament of marriage being provided for homosexuals. However, isn't he basically endorsing unrepentant homosexuals that cannot be in communion with the church?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>papa frank no longer refers too Filthy Frank

:#marseyitsover:

@CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM say this as a feminist ally

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol Christianity has become so cucked. They should go back to the basics and restart the Crusades in order to bring the morale back up :derpthinking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's not wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.