https://youtube.com/watch?v=KH_p9rgSefg
We also discover that Trent Horn's son identifies as @Spiderman and might be a poster here.
"Vaush vs Fr. Mike Schmitz" and Transgender Propaganda (REBUTTED) - Trent Horn does some 
in a 
apologetics + 
crossover event
- 12
- 16
Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,712
1. Disrespect towards God and the Church is not allowed here.
2. We honor the dignity of life from the womb to the tomb.
3. Debate about Scripture, tradition, politics, etc. are allowed when they do not directly contradict rule 1 (controversial history is an open topic when people are respectful).
4. Trolling, coomerisms, and poorly attempted humor may receive the mop at the discretion of those in charge.
5. Pray for your family, pray for your community, pray for your nation, and pray for rDrama.net. We need it! Prayer works!
/h/dioceseofrdrama SETTINGS /h/dioceseofrdrama LOG /h/dioceseofrdrama MODS /h/dioceseofrdrama EXILEES /h/dioceseofrdrama FOLLOWERS /h/dioceseofrdrama BLOCKERS
Current software version: c889144
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I had this video recommended more than once, but I can't listen to Vaush even by proxy.
He is the distillation of all the bad contained within Breadtube. Being a libertarian and a weird brand of zoofile are actually his minor character flaws.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I was kinda surprised to see his name come up but if you attack Fr. Mike the Anglosphere Catholics are gonna come after you. Bible in a Year was the most downloaded podcast for several of the last few years including during the pandemic. He's probably the single biggest name in the Church over here aside from
Francis.
TBH if you haven't given it a go I highly recommend it to all !christians and !catholics, ~20 minutes a day for a cover to cover read. There's a reason he's so popular and it's not just the looks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Eh, I thought it was only ok. What I mostly didn't like was how one episode would cover multiple books at once (which granted, I get why they did. Trying to get through all of Numbers straight through ain't easy. Just not how I'd prefer to listen).
I also wanted deeper theological analysis than he went into. Which…again, makes some sense because it's aimed as a broad intro. But the very surface level analysis just didn't make it as worth it for me…and I think the average listener could have handled more analysis too. It seems to underestimate the listener.
The final thing that kinda turned me off was his hand wringing about ‘difficult passages.' Like, sometimes the OT God just wanted a b-word smote. Accept it and move on, whatever. That's probably a me thing again though.
Basically he strikes me as a nice enough dude good at outreach, but not exactly an heir to Bishop Fulton Sheen. I don't dislike him, but I don't totally get the popularity either.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
People make this harder than it has to be. God is sovereign. No difference between him taking your grandma with cancer vs taking some dude who accidentally touched the Ark of the Covenant. It always sucks for us, but it's part of our world.
Modern people are uncomfortable with the idea that God is responsible for bad things too. But that leaves God very weak if all the bad things are just stuff that "happens," and that means God's less "fair" biblical actions become intolerable to us in a way that they never did for our ancestors.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I tend to agree with you tbh, my favourite is Bishop Barron though I love his stuff
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not familiar with him, I'll have the check him out. (I'm actually a dirty Protestant, I just like reading and learning about different takes so I've ended up doing a decent amount of Catholic reading/listening).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Have you listened to catechism in a year?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Ugh, I can't listen to Trent either. This video is a hard Pass.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He does look and sound like a guy selling time shares, doesn't he?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
“It's over,” Null muttered to no one in particular.
The year is 2032. The Kiwi Times has long been declared a terrorist publication and the final printing presses, hidden in the bowels of the Lithuanian earth, deep in a reinforced bunker below Vilnius have been destroyed by a tactical nuclear strike. He was ready for this, though; it had been a matter of when, not if. It always was. He hoped Ramūnas had made it out in time, but found solace in the surety that even if he hadn't, at least a few troons had been near ground zero. He'd chosen the caverns beneath the gender clinic as KT's base of operations for a reason, after all. Stoically he watches the mushroom cloud rising on the horizon, painting the sky an otherworldly green, then turns and unlocks the gate to the stables. The Pony Express rides again.
“We are so back.”
Snapshots:
:ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
LIES!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context