/h/familyman
retard_but_spooky
giga/boosted
Actively detrimental to society (sorry)
1yr ago
(image post)
151 thread views
#148942
Southparkcels BTFO
- 6
- 34
Top Poster of the Day:
misterwigger
Current Registered Users: 27,866
36% Vaxxed
24% Infected
Hey they rDrama user, Peter Griffin here 
welcome to /h/familyman
This hole will focus on content surrounding the Family Guy tv show, included but not limited to
funny family guy clips
family guy compilations
full episodes
familyman memes
new family man marseys
Peter I am not letting you make a new hole again with no rules! We can't just let people post what they want!
Fine, but I'm not going to be an internet jannie
Do not post any sexual content (this goes against the family values on which we used to rely)
Do not post any content that is not directly connected to Family Guy (American dad, South Park)
/h/familyman SETTINGS /h/familyman LOG /h/familyman MODS /h/familyman EXILEES /h/familyman FOLLOWERS /h/familyman BLOCKERS
Live commit: a8bc547
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I hate Jews and poor people
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Southpark was pretty good before it started churning out topic-of-the-week episodes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
so like...the first three seasons? barely?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Was that it? I thought it was until season five, but idk, i’ve never been a knowledgable fan. Some of their topical stuff is funny but the best episodes to me were always the ones where they were just kids goofing around.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context