- Snappy : R-slur
- 108
- 101
What are they complaining about now? pic.twitter.com/cOOHcjt7BB
— Hussein E (@therealhebrahim) May 12, 2024
PEI changed its policies on work permits for foreign students back in 2023, so that less of them would be able to receive permanent residence after getting their useless diplomas. Indians are really mad about it because they have a God-given right to live in YOUR country, chud.
This article talks more about the situation:
Foreign workers in Canada's Prince Edward Island will hold a day-long protest on May 13 against changes in the province's immigration policy that would reduce the intake of permanent residents by 25 per cent. A demonstration was held in Charlottetown on Friday over the issue.
A large number of students from Punjab living in the province are likely to be affected by the policy changes, announced by the province in February, as many of them work either on work permits or as international students. The burden on the healthcare and housing sectors were cited as the reason to reduce the intake. The focus would now be on nominating workers in the healthcare, childcare and construction trades.
“This has left the hundreds of foreign workers working in the retail and services sector hopeless as they are unlikely to get their work permit renewed once it expires. Even if they shift to the healthcare, childcare and construction trades now, they won't get any benefit as work permits in these sectors will be extended only to those who have prior experience,” said Manpreet Kaur Longowal, a volunteer of the Montreal Youth Students Organisation (MYSO).
They also have the commies on their side. It might be over for us, chudbros...
- 13
- 21
‼️ Announcement ‼️
— Sabrina Maddeaux (@SabrinaMaddeaux) May 9, 2024
I’m suspending my campaign to become the next federal Conservative candidate & MP for Aurora–Oak Ridges–Richmond Hill.
Sadly, I no longer have faith in the election’s integrity.
Here's why 🧵 pic.twitter.com/sSNS7z7BQX
Summary of her claims:
I managed to find the article in question, LMAO. Not exactly slander if it's true. She did say there were some falsehoods in the email, but wouldn't say exactly what they were.
Ex-whore and groomer-sympathizer becomes conservative spokesperson
Honestly it does sound like someone was trying to interfere with her campaign unfortunately she doesn't disclose who the suspected candidate is. However, a CBC article on the situation outlined a similar scandal from a year before:
The Conservatives have faced at least two other allegations of party brass favouring one candidate over another in a nomination race.
Last year in Oxford, a riding in southwestern Ontario, Arpan Khanna got the nod over the daughter of the outgoing MP.
That prompted accusations that Khanna, who previously ran in Brampton, Ont. and served as the co-chair of Poilievre's leadership campaign, was a parachute candidate who unfairly displaced a local leader and an anti-abortion campaigner.
Bernier seems to think her campaign was purposefully sabotaged by the CPC due to her stance on mass immigration:
https://x.com/MaximeBernier/status/1788593433315004427
Honestly though, her stance on immigration seems pretty moderate and doesn't seem to deviate that much from that of the CPC's campaign:
- 8
- 25
- 33
- 55
The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for ‘hate speech’ violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed.
— Camus (@newstart_2024) May 7, 2024
This new bill is… pic.twitter.com/4ROF332xR9
The Trudeau regime has introduced an Orwellian new law called the Online Harms Bill C-63, which will give police the power to retroactively search the Internet for ‘hate speech' violations and arrest offenders, even if the offence occurred before the law existed.
This new bill is aimed at safeguarding the masses from so-called “hate speech.”
https://Revolver.news reports: The real shocker in this bill is the alarming retroactive aspect. Essentially, whatever you've said in the past can now be weaponized against you by today's draconian standards. Historian Dr. Muriel Blaive has weighed in on this draconian law, labeling it outright “mad.” She points out how it literally spits in the face of all Western legal traditions, especially the one about only being punished if you infringed on a law that was valid at the time of committing a crime.
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/canada-to-imprison-anyone-who-has-ever-posted-hate-speech-online/
- 5
- 13
- 8
- 36
- 49
- 89
https://globalnews.ca/news/10459504/hardeep-nijjar-arrests-rcmp/
The assassins have Sikh last names (I think)
Karanpreet Singh, 28, Kamalpreet Singh, 22, and Karan Brar, 22, have been charged with murder and conspiracy in Nijjar's killing, according to B.C. court records.
The suspects entered Canada on student visas but may have been working at the direction of Indian intelligence when they shot Nijjar, a source familiar with the matter said.
Look at this winner, hired on a contract to kill and then he stayed in Canada , I wonder how many rupees he got
- 6
- 19
- 2
- 14
It's the conservative parties who keep violating free expression though.
E.g., an Ontario ag-gag law that prevented certain types of whistleblowling that had part of it struck down over free expression last month (edit: paywall free article).
Or Saskatchewan suspending free expression to pass their pronoun law.
Or with Internet legislation, the article mentions a Liberal bill, but the Conservatives are supporting another one that would require providing your identity to access websites with adult content and censoring websites that don't comply with it. That could in theory at least be used to censor a lot of Internet sites, even reddit.
Won't somebody think of the children?!
Most sane people agree that children should not have the same "rights" as everyone else, since they're too stupid to make decisions for themselves. Maybe not Canadians, though...
I'm a free speech absolutist, so I don't want anybody getting arrested, or facing any other legal trouble, based solely on speech. Excepting, of course shouting "fire" and causing a panic; or direct, specific, threats such as "I intend to assassinate [public figure] on [X date]." Anything less than that should be free and clear. The only fears that people should have for expressing an opinion, no matter how controversial, should be private and interpersonal.
I don't know...that quickly hits the issue we are having with Drag Queens.
They are fully within their rights to dress up and entertain...but they feel very threatened to do so by groups standing outside venues harassing them (and it isn't targeted at an individual but at a group they happen to opt into). Do they still have their freedom of expression if they are concerned for their physical well being if they show up at the event?
I think that only the person who actually assaulted somebody should get charged. By the time that we get to adulthood, we're expected to keep our tempers. I suspect that most people have a strong temptation to strike somebody on a daily basis, I certainly do, but we just don't do it. Assaulting somebody is a crime, if you went to trial and said "he called me an N-word, so I hit him", that's probably not going to convince a judge; it might convince a few jurors to commit Jury Nullification and hang the jury, but that's another matter.
Sorry, I did a bit of a double take reading this. Is it actually your intention that "most people" go through their lives with a strong temptation to indulge in physical violence on a daily basis? That's...remarkable.
Whenever I see a redditor's take I get an uncontrollable urge to
- 3
- 14
- 3
- 9
- 2
- 12
- 7
- 13
Que faut-il de plus pour vous convaincre que ces trois 🤡 racoleurs sont dans le même Parti unique ?
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) April 29, 2024
RIEN NE CHANGERA avec Poilievre comme premier ministre. pic.twitter.com/amyPZd30f1
Looks like the next five years will be more of the same. I don't really like Bernier as a choice either, he seems to just have controversial takes for the sake of being controversial. He's also Quebecois, and they tend to only care about Quebec to the detriment of the rest of Canada.
- 5
- 18
Once again the feds show how much they hate the free market and what lengths they will go too in preventing anyone from enriching themselves.
Inside a garage in an established Edmonton neighbourhood, animals were being slaughtered and the meat was advertised for sale to consumers, a CBC News investigation has learned.
There is no free market in canada. Of course the CBC tries to smear the hard working immigrant
@SexyFartMan69 love sucking peepee
- 4
- 13
- 2
- 22
- 27
- 78
update: the food bank bandit was fired https://t.co/RFLqvVGJb1 pic.twitter.com/CDdrfrmbqI
— pagliacci the hated 🌝 (@Slatzism) April 22, 2024