Weekly “what are you reading” thread # 11 :marseyreading:

To discuss your weekly readings of books, textbooks, papers, etc.

I’m currently on Chapter 3 Part 2 of Lolita (page 166 of the annotated edition). I have no idea why people say this book is pedophilia apologia, or why some say the main character is “sympathetic”. Humbert Humbert is not just a :marseysickos: perv, he’s a psychopath as well. He marries a woman he loathes solely so he could lust after his preteen daughter, he feels no remorse, guilt or sadness when she dies (I think he killed her, Charlotte’s death was way to convenient for it to be an accident), he kidnaps the girl, sexually abuses her and blackmails her by telling if she dares to turn him over to the police, she’ll end up in an orphanage and therefore is better off with him. There is nothing likable about this :marseypedo: besides the fact he’s funny and witty. As for the witting, is absolutely beautiful, so many references, wordplay and french quotes, you can tell how great Nabokov was by making such a great book with a such a delicate subject as this.

29
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I was gifted the first three books of Asimov's Foundation series. I remember reading the first one when I was nine or so, or possibly just The Encyclopedists. It's nice to get the fuller story as an adult.

Reading sci-fi written before the moon landing is always interesting. I was worried I wouldn't like The Mule arc, but I'm coming around to it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Mule arc is good because it almost wrecks the entire Seldon Plan. It added conflict and raised the stakes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.