To discuss your weekly readings of books, textbooks, papers, etc.
I’m currently on Chapter 3 Part 2 of Lolita (page 166 of the annotated edition). I have no idea why people say this book is pedophilia apologia, or why some say the main character is “sympathetic”. Humbert Humbert is not just a perv, he’s a psychopath as well. He marries a woman he loathes solely so he could lust after his preteen daughter, he feels no remorse, guilt or sadness when she dies (I think he killed her, Charlotte’s death was way to convenient for it to be an accident), he kidnaps the girl, sexually abuses her and blackmails her by telling if she dares to turn him over to the police, she’ll end up in an orphanage and therefore is better off with him. There is nothing likable about this besides the fact he’s funny and witty. As for the witting, is absolutely beautiful, so many references, wordplay and french quotes, you can tell how great Nabokov was by making such a great book with a such a delicate subject as this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Paradise lost and Malazan book of the fallen
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thoughts on Paradise Lost?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like it a lot, although that might be me overly romanticizing it given recent developments. Still, an enjoyable read and skillfully done.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I made it through two Malazan books because I like big, epic fantasy, but I had no fricking clue what was happening and shelved it after that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I recommend revisiting it. I made the same progression, and once I made it to the book with the mass crucifixion of >=12000 people I was hooked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context