GovernorGovern/ment
/r/Drama's only elected official by voice vote!
11mo ago#5562553
spent 0 currency on pings
I'm reading two books, Stand Up For America, and Hear Me Out, by George C. Wallace. Although I'm probably a moderate on the chud scale, I find it interesting that these people, who were once so influential over American life, have functionally no voice in history. I make it a point to read books by unpopular people, and to determine what their contribution was as opposed to PhD's looking at history with an axe to grind...
Anyhow, the book's prose leaves something to be desired, neither book is well written as either an autobiography or as a blueprint for America. It could be said that the books were for the campaign faithful, and perhaps only were meant to be read by layman. For the historical value, they're well worth reading. In a sense, Wallace predicts his own assassination attempt in a roundabout way, and also speaks of the radicalization of the black community against the white one. He also predicts that rich people would and have cornered influence from Washington to dismantle their way of life, and that if left unchecked would destroy regular, honest, God-fearing people. And he was right about that.
He did have a coherent voice on policy where you could hear it in the books. He was against the war in Vietnam in terms of putting troops on the ground. He didn't like Vietnam because of the aimless objectives in the war, and his opposition to Vietnam made him very popular, even in places like California. He also predicted that the Civil Rights Act would be used as a pretext in some years to abridge rights of white people and create unaccountable standards for white students and university goers while holding no one else to those standards.
Wallace of course would later go on to recant his views on race after he was shot during his presidential run by Arthur Bremmer, who is still alive. Bremmer had no reason to do it, and in fact was campaigning for Wallace up until a few months before he shot the governor.
Anyhow, the books are no longer in print, so I'm sure at some point this will be lost to time. But it is creepy to see that Wallace and his ilk could see the future, but LBJ, Nixon, Reagan all missed that crystal ball reading. Not that it matters, and not that I'd have it happen any other way. Just makes you think.
He also predicts that rich people would and have cornered influence from Washington to dismantle their way of life, and that if left unchecked would destroy regular, honest, God-fearing people. And he was right about that.
Populists have been saying this since the Articles of Confederation. It's nothing new.
He was against the war in Vietnam in terms of putting troops on the ground. He didn't like Vietnam because of the aimless objectives in the war, and his opposition to Vietnam made him very popular, even in places like California.
The Tet Offensive, the turning point for public opinion against the Vietnam War, was January 1968. Hear Me Out was published in 1968. The end of the Vietnam War was 1973. Stand Up for America was published in 1976.
Wallace might be proposing his genuine views on the war, or he might be following popular opinion.
>Populists have been saying this since the Articles of Confederation. It's nothing new.
Yeah, but it's not wrong. It just means people since the Articles of Confederation were right.
>The Tet Offensive, the turning point for public opinion against the Vietnam War, was January 1968. Hear Me Out was published in 1968. The end of the Vietnam War was 1973. Stand Up for America was published in 1976.
>Wallace might be proposing his genuine views on the war, or he might be following popular opinion.
Yeah I'm not trying to put Wallace on a pedestal here, and I did read the books back to back so I think I'm just mixing them up at this point.
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
longpostbottl/dr
DIDN'T READ LOL! Go essaypost elsewhere.
Governor 11mo ago#5562554
spent 0 currency on pings
You sat down and wrote all this shit. You could have done so many other things with your life. What happened to your life that made you decide writing novels of bullshit here was the best option?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm reading two books, Stand Up For America, and Hear Me Out, by George C. Wallace. Although I'm probably a moderate on the chud scale, I find it interesting that these people, who were once so influential over American life, have functionally no voice in history. I make it a point to read books by unpopular people, and to determine what their contribution was as opposed to PhD's looking at history with an axe to grind...
Anyhow, the book's prose leaves something to be desired, neither book is well written as either an autobiography or as a blueprint for America. It could be said that the books were for the campaign faithful, and perhaps only were meant to be read by layman. For the historical value, they're well worth reading. In a sense, Wallace predicts his own assassination attempt in a roundabout way, and also speaks of the radicalization of the black community against the white one. He also predicts that rich people would and have cornered influence from Washington to dismantle their way of life, and that if left unchecked would destroy regular, honest, God-fearing people. And he was right about that.
He did have a coherent voice on policy where you could hear it in the books. He was against the war in Vietnam in terms of putting troops on the ground. He didn't like Vietnam because of the aimless objectives in the war, and his opposition to Vietnam made him very popular, even in places like California. He also predicted that the Civil Rights Act would be used as a pretext in some years to abridge rights of white people and create unaccountable standards for white students and university goers while holding no one else to those standards.
Wallace of course would later go on to recant his views on race after he was shot during his presidential run by Arthur Bremmer, who is still alive. Bremmer had no reason to do it, and in fact was campaigning for Wallace up until a few months before he shot the governor.
Anyhow, the books are no longer in print, so I'm sure at some point this will be lost to time. But it is creepy to see that Wallace and his ilk could see the future, but LBJ, Nixon, Reagan all missed that crystal ball reading. Not that it matters, and not that I'd have it happen any other way. Just makes you think.
I'll ping !historychads on this one.
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Populists have been saying this since the Articles of Confederation. It's nothing new.
The Tet Offensive, the turning point for public opinion against the Vietnam War, was January 1968. Hear Me Out was published in 1968. The end of the Vietnam War was 1973. Stand Up for America was published in 1976.
Wallace might be proposing his genuine views on the war, or he might be following popular opinion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, but it's not wrong. It just means people since the Articles of Confederation were right.
Yeah I'm not trying to put Wallace on a pedestal here, and I did read the books back to back so I think I'm just mixing them up at this point.
Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You sat down and wrote all this shit. You could have done so many other things with your life. What happened to your life that made you decide writing novels of bullshit here was the best option?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context