Banned books discussion thread

its always weird to hear about "banned books" in america. my local barnes & nobles has an entire display for what they call "banned books" but apparently its just books that shitthole towns have taken out of school libraries

found a list of it online. its exactly the kind of books you'd expect to be on the list

>Mein Kampf

>Mussolini autobiography

>History of the Chilean military revolution

>Protocols of the Elders of Zion

>La verdad del juicio de Pinochet

None of these books are banned, I'm not even talking about the US, you can buy them in Chile as well. That list is just a bunch of dictator apologia, Apartheid apologia and antisemtic stuff lol.

>Eugène Terre Blanche

@kaamrev is his biography banned in your rainbow homeland?

!bookworms we should read the pivot of civilization. Its free online on gutenberg press. I'm reading the introduction right now and its quite good though I don't know about the rest of the book yet. Perhaps a mini reading for the book club of just the introduction

Next drag queen story hour is gonna be lit 🔥

>practical LSD manufacure

kino cover art

Camp of the saints.

It's good. Idk if it's technically banned but it's definitely controversial.

It talks about hordes of migrants showing up on boats on the shores of europe (lol)

and then they invade basically in like zombie apocalypse style.

It's legitimately a good and entertaining book.

>What banned/controversial books have you guys read?

Culture of Critique, White Girl Bleed a Lot, Democracy: The god that failed, White identity....Literally 80% of what I read are chud books

>Which would you recommend?

Kevin MacDonald's "Culture of Critique", and his Jewish trilogy with "Those who dwell alone" and "separation and its discontents" make up the strongest case for anti-jew chuddery and Nazi shit. I don't agree with all of his conclusions, but there is a lot to what he says. I could write a full review, but the two points I'd take home are

-Jewish intellectuals in the early 20th century engaged with the humanities in bad faith, their own personal ethnic interests drove a lot of what they wrote. Are you really going to tell me the most insular and particular culture in the west at the time just so happened to fall constantly on the side of egalitarianism and tearing apart the dominant culture?

-The humanities all seem susceptible to nepotistic dogpiling. Boaz for Anthropology, Freud for Psychology, etc all had a charismatic jewish leader who cultivated a cult of personality around him, and seeded university chairs with their disciples, and their disciples literally acted like cult members in how they constantly quoted and referenced their "great leader". Then once they reached sufficient numbers they simply brushed competing viewpoints out of the mainstream with all their institutional power. It took a hundred years for us to escape the influence of Freud, despite what bullshit his theories were.

>Are there any books that should be on this list but aren't?

I can't be fricked reading through the entire list, but I don't think so. Most chud books that aren't academic are pretty shit, and for the far right at least, you can find everything decent reviewed at American Renaissance or in the Occidental Quarterly.

I want fear and trembling banned

"Clown World Chronicles" That's probably just some schizos .pdf document. I wouldn't really call it a book

So it's basically just an entire wall of rightoid schizoposts?

I have to wonder how many of them are banned justifiably and how many are just spicy shitposts someone didn't like, based off the titles some of those ought to get pretty r-slurred

It should include Hunter, the superior version of The Turner Diaries

Snapshots:

https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/the-anarchonomicon-real-banned-book:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)

https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/addendum-the-most-banned-book:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)

From the list:

• The Turner Diaries was crap. It's obvious from the way they're written that the dude was super into the soc part of natsoc which is very cringe.

• Expedient Homemade Firearms was interesting from an intellectual standpoint but the author is very aware that these are not good designs, just the absolute bare minimum.

• I've read several of Evola's books including Ride the Tiger and Revolt Against the Modern World and while he's got a point, it was nothing new to me since I grew up with an involved father.

• The Slaughter of Cities was a slog. Correct, but dense to read.

• Democracy - The God That Failed was good. Hoppe is the only influential libertarian who understands that it's not for everyone.

• Improvised Munitions Handbook TM 31-210 is great fun, made my teenage years better for sure.

• Two Hundred Years Together was definitely worth reading, as is Solzhenitsyn's other famous book The Gulag Archipelago

• No idea why Tarnsman of Gor is on there, it's a bit coomer but it's hardly The Story of O or the Hundred Days of Sodom.

• Germany Must Perish! was a book. Not good, but I wasn't expecting it to be. Antisemites love to quote it because a jew wrote it, but it's just wartime propaganda. Vicious and the author was definitely breathing too heavily when he wrote it sure, but propaganda nevertheless

• Mein Kampf isn't as bad as people claim.

Not on the list but should be:

• Voluptuous Panic was certainly an eye-opener, even for someone used to gay degen behaviour

• If You Give a Gay Their Way wasn't particularly well written, but it's an extremely comprehensive look into the mindset of anti-homos

• Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching is a neat look into extremist beliefs and actions, similar to our beloved uncle Ted's manifesto

• Camp of the Saints was difficult to get through because it's typical fr*nch writing, but it was prescient

• The World Book Encyclopedia 1974

Is “The Culture of Critique” by Dr. Kevin MacDonald on there? Because people are reading it..